The hackocracy strikes again

Long-time readers know that I have an odd sort of fascination with the Consumer Product Safety Commission. It’s just one of those unsung agencies that does important work for the public — which Bush has undermined through cronyism and hackery.

When Clinton was president, he appointed Ann Brown to chair the CPSC, which is responsible for reviewing thousands of consumer products to see which, if any, pose a health risk and might need to be recalled. Brown had spent 20 years as a consumer advocate and served as vice president of the Consumer Federation of America, so she was a logical choice, who ended up doing a fine job on behalf of American consumers.

This is how a functional administration works — find capable, competent people to fill government posts, and the public will be well served. Then Bush was elected. First, he tapped Hal Stratton for the post as a reward for his work on Lawyers for Bush during the 2000 campaign. His tenure was something of a joke. Upon Stratton’s resignation, Bush tapped picked another hack to head the Consumer Product Safety Commission: National Association of Manufacturers lobbyist Michael Baroody, who incidentally, has called for weakening the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

And in case this wasn’t funny enough, consider this gem.

A senior lobbyist at the National Association of Manufacturers nominated by President Bush to lead the Consumer Product Safety Commission will receive a $150,000 departing payment from the association when he takes his new government job, which involves enforcing consumer laws against members of the association.

The lobbyist, Michael E. Baroody, wrote recently to the commission’s general counsel that the severance was an “extraordinary payment” under a federal ethics rule, requiring him to remove himself from agency matters involving the association for two years. Under the rule, a payment is “extraordinary” if an employer grants it after learning that the employee is being considered for a government position and it is not part of an established compensation or benefits program.

Mr. Baroody said in the letter that the payment would not prevent him from considering matters involving individual companies that are members of the manufacturers’ association, many of whom are defendants in agency proceedings over defective products or have other business before the commission.

No, of course not. Who could ever think such a thing?

For all the talk about the Bush White House improving its attitude and learning its lessons, these clowns are just incapable of change. The hackery isn’t just obvious; it’s comical. For the president to send Baroody to the Senate for confirmation is Bush’s way of saying, “I’m shameless and I don’t care.”

Kevin Drum notes:

Democrats ought to unanimously vote to reject this doofus without even bothering with a hearing, but I suppose that’s not in the cards. Too bad.

It is too bad, because the nomination itself is a slap in the face. I’d very surprised if Baroody got even one Democratic vote — even Lieberman couldn’t support this guy — if not an outright filibuster.

Of course, given recent history, the president will simply wait for the Senate to take a day off to honor a holiday and then give Baroody a recess appointment.

After all, he’s shameless and he doesn’t care.

i do not understand what the problem is. everytime i have ever left employment with one organization to go work for another, i have always received a $150,000 parting gift. i thought this was a traditional practice, and lord knows how we love tradition.

  • “For all the talk about the Bush White House improving its attitude and learning its lessons, these clowns are just incapable of change.”

    I would counter that we really don’t know if they are incapable (or capable) of change. They have never been put to the test. The GOP Congresses never forced anything upon them or challenged them in any way. The current Dem Congress has made some noise but has not really backed up the noise with actions that result in accountability. If the WH will never be formally taken to task and punished for its actions, it has no incentive to change. And with these stubborn SOBs, they won’t change until someone decides to push the matter to conclusion.

  • Al Capone would have run a more honest administration. If his people screwed up, at least he would have taken the bat to them.

  • bubba is so right. The Dems are talking the talk but aren’t walking the walk. My patience is worn out, and I’m known as a patient person.

  • “And with these stubborn SOBs, they won’t change until someone decides to push the matter to conclusion.” — bubba @ 2

    True, but you’d better be prepared to go nuclear, because they are, and they’re counting on you not having the stomach for it.

    “The hackery isn’t just obvious; it’s comical.” — CB

    A pattern emerged a long time ago and, personally, I think it goes way beyond hackery. If there’s an agency you don’t like but can’t yank out by the roots, inject a systemic poison. Appoint someone to head the CPB, EPA, FEMA, CPSC — you name it — who doesn’t believe in it’s mission. The first 100 times may be coincidence, but the 101st is hard to read as anything but intentional.

  • A senior lobbyist at the National Association of Manufacturers nominated by President Bush to lead the Consumer Product Safety Commission will receive a $150,000 departing payment from the association when he takes his new government job

    Don’t you,
    Forget about me.
    Don’t, don’t, don’t…

    Congress needs to redefine what constitutes a recess. Either that or they need to institute budget cuts that specifically target the salaries of the BushBots. Power of the purse baybee.

  • “True, but you’d better be prepared to go nuclear, because they are, and they’re counting on you not having the stomach for it.”

    Moi? Most definitely. And I think a sizeable majority of the American public is ready for this as well.

  • Go nuclear. Now.

    The Dems are letting these criminals literally get away with murder. I am SICK of hearing about the outrages the Republicans commit EVERY DAMN DAY, and seeing the Democrats doing… what?

    Carving up Iraq’s oil.

    Like the initial invasion force’s dash to protect the Oil Ministry while the museums were all being looted, the supplemental is written in a way that reveals the Democrats’ priorities: Passage of the hydrocarbon law is mentioned first among the list of benchmarks, before legislation requiring elections, reform of de-Baathification laws, and allocation of revenues for reconstruction.

    And as Taibbi aptly suggests, as written, the oil law “is an unusually vicious piece of legislation, an open blueprint for colonial robbery of the Iraqi nation.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/charlie-cray/has-anyone-in-congress-or_b_48557.html

  • Comments are closed.