One of the selling points of the war in Iraq, at least once the “flypaper” theory came into play, was that the war would keep the terrorists busy in one place, preventing them from wreaking havoc around the globe. On a related note, some of these same war supporters argued that the conflict would stem the tide of terrorist attacks in general, because the United States would be on the “offensive.”
Alas, both ideas are debunked by reality. Mother Jones conducted a serious statistical analysis exploring the “Iraq effect.”
Our study yields one resounding finding: The rate of fatal terrorist attacks around the world by jihadist groups, and the number of people killed in those attacks, increased dramatically after the invasion of Iraq. Globally there was a 607 percent rise in the average yearly incidence of attacks (28.3 attacks per year before and 199.8 after) and a 237 percent rise in the fatality rate (from 501 to 1,689 deaths per year). A large part of this rise occurred in Iraq, the scene of almost half the global total of jihadist terrorist attacks. But even excluding Iraq and Afghanistan — the other current jihadist hot spot — there has been a 35 percent rise in the number of attacks, with a 12 percent rise in fatalities.
Contrary to Bush’s assertion, jihadists have not let the Iraq War distract them from targeting the United States and its allies. The rate of attacks on Western interests and citizens has risen by almost 25 percent, while the yearly fatality rate has increased by 4 percent, a figure that would have been higher had planned attacks, such as the London airline plot, not been prevented.
The whole point of the war was to prevent terrorism and make the U.S. safer. It can’t be said enough: Bush’s policies have produced the opposite of their intended effect. The numbers don’t lie — the White House strategy has failed. Badly.
The effects on our national security are profound and discouraging.
The globalization of jihad and martyrdom has disquieting implications for American security in the future. Jihadists are already leaving Iraq to operate elsewhere, a “blowback” trend that will greatly increase when the war eventually winds down. Terrorist groups in Iraq, which have learned to raise millions through kidnapping and oil theft, may be in a position to help fund their jihadist brethren elsewhere. Finally, Iraq has increased the popularity of a hardcore takfiri ideology so intolerant that, unlikely as it seems, it makes Osama bin Laden appear relatively moderate.
Though few American civilians have been killed by jihadist terrorists in the past three years, it is naive to assume that this will continue to be the case. We will be living with the consequences of the Iraq debacle for many years.
Indeed, we will. It’s hard to imagine a more dangerous response to 9/11. In recent years, Bush has launched a war on terror, only to find terrorist attacks getting more frequent and claiming more lives. And by all indications, now that Bush’s policies have led to a terrorist breeding ground in Iraq, it’s going to get worse before it gets better.
If that’s not a definition of “failure,” I don’t know what is.