The Joementum is going in reverse

Two weeks ago, a [tag]Quinnipiac[/tag] [tag]poll[/tag] showed [tag]Ned Lamont[/tag] taking the lead over [tag]Joe Lieberman[/tag] in Connecticut’s Dem Senate [tag]primary[/tag] for the first time. Lamont, at the time, was ahead, 51% to 47%.

His lead’s a little bigger now. OK, more than a little.

Millionaire businessman Ned [tag]Lamont[/tag] has extended his lead against veteran Sen. Joe [tag]Lieberman[/tag] less than a week before Connecticut’s Democratic primary, according to a new poll released Thursday.

Lamont, a political novice, has support from 54 percent of likely Democratic voters in the Quinnipiac University poll, while Lieberman has support from 41 percent of voters.

“Sen. Lieberman’s campaign bus seems to be stuck in reverse. Despite visits from former President Bill Clinton and other big name Democrats, Lieberman has not been able to stem the tide to Lamont,” said Quinnipiac University Poll Director Douglas Schwartz. He added, “Three months ago, Lamont was virtually unheard of, except perhaps on the blogs. As Democrats get to know Lamont better, they like what they see. Lamont has established himself as a credible alternative to Lieberman.”

It’s reached a point in which Lieberman is already crafting a plan in response to losing next Tuesday’s primary.

Hartford Courant columnist Kevin Rennie said step one will apparently be a major staff housecleaning.

Sen. Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) will shake up his campaign staff if he loses Tuesday’s Democratic primary to challenger Ned Lamont. Lieberman supporters have watched with growing dismay since the spring as the three term senator’s campaign has gone from oblivious to defensive. They expect to reap a bitter harvest in 6 days.

Expect Lieberman to can anyone who was associated with 2004 Kerry campaign and replace them with a team of pungent veterans who will take the fight to Lamont.

I’m not entirely sure how the Lieberman campaign could “take the fight” to Lamont more than it already has, but presumably the ugliness we’ve seen can, and probably will, get worse.

Rennie added one other tidbit of note: Republican contender Alan Schlesinger, whose gambling problems have become terribly embarrassing for him and the GOP, is likely to drive additional Republican support in Lieberman’s direction. Rennie concluded:

Renewed Republican muttering about Schlesinger’s doomed campaign to follow as they eye the spot for Lieberman.

It’s hard to imagine Lieberman taking the GOP ballot slot — a campaign spokesperson has already ruled it out — but it was also hard to imagine Lieberman trailing by double digits with a week to go.

Stay tuned.

Expect Lieberman to can anyone who was associated with 2004 Kerry campaign and replace them with a team of pungent veterans who will take the fight to Lamont.

Translation: Lieberman will dump the useless DLC-approved consultants now that his political life is on the line, and get some of Rove’s ratfuckers in to do the job right.

Other interpretation (from Firedoglake): Anybody who wants to work in another Dem campaign in future can’t be part of Lieberman’s independent run as it it self-evidently hurts the rest of the Dem ticket in Connecticut. So any real Democrats currently working for Joe will have to bail after he loses the primary.

  • I hope those heavy hitters who have already proven their support for Lieberman (e.g., Clinton) will now cash in their chips and demand that he do the honorable thing: support the party and the Democratic winner by bowing out.

    Incidentally, I’m having difficulty imagining the “pungent veterans” soon to be put in charge. The definition (Cambridge) of “pungent” is “1 describes a very strong smell or taste, sometimes one that is unpleasantly strong”

  • Ed, I am with you. I sure hope they do cash in their chips. And, depending upon where Lieberman lives, have him serve a 2 year hiatus (atoning for his traitorious comments regarding criticism of the president) and then run for the House against one of the CT Republican reps or even run for governor.

  • I can only hope that more Repukes come out in support Nomomentum after he (likely) loses the primary election next Tuesday. That way Loserman becomes the de facto Republican’t candidate and obviates what ‘s been said about him: he’s not a Democrat. And you can wipe your ass with his “voting with the Democrats 90% of the time”. This is misleading. Every vote this twit has cast has been with an eye towards appearing “bipartisan”, as though that were some kind of virtue in its own right. Bullshit.

  • Ed — we know from news stories the last few days what “veteran” he has back. It’s none other than world-renowned tool Dan Gertsein. He left a few years ago to start a disasterous “consulting” firm in NYC. He also appeared as a FOX News analyst for a while. Here is some background on this clown:

    http://www.dangerstein.com/biography.html

  • I seem to remember Dan Gertsien on The Daily Show as someone they used on their field reports which make everyone (including TDS correspondent) involved look like an ass.

    I could be wrong, but he was one of those PR “experts” who was asked for their advise on how polish elephant turds like Enron.

    Also doesn’t help that Lamont actually went on the Colbert Report on Tuesday and came across as a genunine person while Nomentum didn’t show up yesterday and was mocked on a national stage by Stephen Colbert.

  • If it looks like a Republikanner,
    And it walks like a Republikanner,
    And it talks, balks, lies, cries, and smells to high heaven like a Republikanner…

    It is merely being “bipartisan.”

    So sayeth Joe the Barbarian.

    What to do with Joe Lie, once he’s stripped of his chicken-suit and exposed for the hungry fox that he is? We clearly cannot ship him north; that might constitute an act of war against Canada. East, south, or west would be the equivalent of transporting toxic waste across a state line without a permit. His political career is a moot point, as no one would hire him; in the position of streetsweeper, he’d unilaterally determine which trash stays in the rod and which trash gets picked up. I suppose we might give him to a research lab, and save the lives of a few kittens, maybe even a chimpanzee or two. Or, maybe we could get poor old Joe Lie a job with the circus—he’d fit right in between the bearded lady—and the three-headed chicken.

    But beyond Joe, anyone—and that must be held to mean EVERYONE—that pulls away from the foundational roots of the Democratic Cause to support such an offensive example of “flipflopping turncoatism”—should be given the cold shoulder. If that means telling Bill Clinton that I don’t want to see his face, hear his voice, or read his stuff any more…then, so be it….

  • Hey Jared,

    Don’t call me an anti-semite, but I read “http://www.dangerstein.com/biography.html” as “danger stein” not “dan gerstein.”

    What’s amazing about Gerstein’s self-praising bio is how damning it is–from Leiberman’s speech berating Clinton to supporting the injection of religion into public life. Gerstein and “Holy Joe” are quite an neo-con (uber-zionist) combination.

    Hey CB, that bio is a must read!

  • On Harry Shearer’s “Le Show” this last Sunday, he did a bit about Bill Clinton getting a phone call from Joementum, thanking him for dropping by and trying to get him to drop the “appearance fee”. One wonders how much Clinton did charge for showing up with that whiny little Loser.

  • Talk Left writes that Delay is supporting Joe.
    If I was Lamont, I would just print a list of Joe’s endorsers, that would speak very loudly about where old Joe stands.

  • What impressed me the most about Lamont’s appearance on the Colbert Report was when he said, “If Joe Lieberman won’t stand up to President Bush, I will.” That’s the kind of straight talk that could win an election for just about anyone these days, and I hope more Dem candidates adopt the slogan.

  • It is nice to know that the Democratic party will hold people accountable. If Ned wins it sends a powerful national message: represent us or else.

    I see a lot of comments on Daily Kos complaining about the focus this race is getting, but they are overlooking the fact that it has far greater implications. It illustrating why the Democrats are different and why incumbancy is not a free ride.

  • STTTTTTOOOOOOOOOOOPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP LLLLLLLIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEBBBBBBBEEEEEERRRRRRRRMMMMMMMAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

  • Comments are closed.