House [tag]Speaker[/tag] [tag]Dennis Hastert[/tag], at the request of the president, made a surprise visit to [tag]Baghdad[/tag] over the weekend. Arriving at 4 am, Hastert said he was impressed with the number of lights he saw.
The speaker and his party saw it as a sign of progress, of how much power had been restored in a city known for frequent blackouts, according to Hastert’s spokesman, Ron Bonjean, who accompanied the speaker.
“It was one of our first impressions, so many [tag]lights[/tag] shining brightly,” Bonjean said.
Now, the easy response is that some [tag]electricity[/tag] in Baghdad is hardly indicative of “progress” in Iraq. Indeed, considering that Hastert’s visit coincided with Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki lashing out at American forces in Iraq, it’s probably best if the House Speaker doesn’t dwell too much on light bulbs.
That said, the Center for American Progress noted a Brookings Institution Iraq Index (.pdf), published the day before Hastert landed, that highlighted a different conclusion.
In Apr. 2006, residents in Baghdad received an average of four hours of electricity per day, compared to pre-war levels of 16-24 hours per day.
Maybe Hastert caught Baghdad on a good day?