The Maine problem with abstinence-only

Talking with people in the education field, you hear often that a lot of states aren’t thrilled with federal abstinence-only guidelines and curricula. They don’t work, they’re usually wrong, and they tie the hands of good teachers who want to educate students with reliable, accurate information.

But, at least until 2009, there’s not a whole lot states can do about it. Either they accept Bush’s abstinence-only mandate or they forfeit federal education dollars. Maine, to its enormous credit, has chosen the latter.

Maine has stopped accepting federal funds for an abstinence-based sex-education program, in part because federal guidelines do not allow any of the money to be used to teach so-called “safe sex” practices.

The decision by Gov. John Baldacci’s administration makes Maine only the third state in the country to turn down the federal money. It comes amid a national debate over whether the government should promote only abstinence or provide young people with information about birth control and other aspects of sexual activity.

Maine accepted federal abstinence funds annually from 1998 through last year. But state officials said Monday the state did not apply for $165,000 in funds during the current federal fiscal year and it will not seek $161,000 that is available for the fiscal year starting Oct. 1.

Dr. Dora Anne Mills, the state’s public-health director, said Maine could not legally provide “comprehensive information” on sexual health to young people under the administration’s guidelines, so Maine was left with little choice.

Mills said teen pregnancy rates and teen abortion rates in Maine have dropped substantially, so the state does not need the federal funds anyway. And the fact that the federal government’s guidelines say sex should be limited to marriage makes it hard to educate young people who are gay or lesbian, she said.

“This money is more harmful than it is good,” Mills said. “You can’t talk about comprehensive reproductive information.”

One can only hope other states can follow Maine’s lead on this.

Here in Canada they teach safe sex in the schools. Currently, the teen pregnancy and STD rate here is half of that in the US on a per capita basis.

  • $160,000 is not even close to an amount sufficient to warrant selling out students’ health and undermining the state’s duty to provide the best education possible. Good for Maine for turning it down, and shame on the other 47 states for whoring out their educational programs for such a pittance.

  • AMEN, Liam and James. I happen to live in the DEEP south, where you’ll get called names and they’ll pray for you if they find you had sex before marriage, and yet……not suprisingly…..we have a pretty high rate of teen pregnancy. Imagine that. It’s ridiculous on it’s face that we keep our teens under-educated about sex. Just because they say they’re not having it, does not make it so…..by a large margin. What the conservative right really wants is to go back to the 1950’s model of society. Mom in the kitchen, Dad on the sofa, Dinner at 5, paint a happy face on all of society’s ills, as if there weren’t teen sex, adultery, divorce, homosexuality et al in the 50’s….it was all there, we just didn’t talk about it…..sick….very sick.

  • Abstinence only is working in Ohio. Only 13% of one schools female population got pregnant.

    Experts, parents and students themselves struggle to explain why such pockets of high teen pregancy rates appear. Are teens getting appropriate sex education?

    Clearly, they are getting their education extracuricularly.

    Of course, we wouldn’t want to offend a pharmacists delicate sensibilities by making them honor and fill birth control prescriptions, would we?

  • The MORNING SENTINEL article that’s quoted states that “Maine accepted federal abstinence funds annually from 1998 through last year.” Do you think the writer of the article means “federal sex-education funds”? Or were there really “federal abstinence funds” being doled out by the Clinton Administration?

  • “Mills said teen pregnancy rates and teen abortion rates in Maine have dropped substantially..”

    One might conclude that abstinence only is working. However, I think it could be lower if sex education was more rounded.

  • California has never taken the Federal abstinence only education money. We don’t see keeping our kids ignorant as a laudable thing. California’s, unlike Texas, teen pregnancy rate has gone down dramatically over the years. I wonder if the two are related?

  • Comments are closed.