The mask comes off Georgia’s voter-ID law

When Republicans in Georgia created a new “voter-identification law” earlier this year, they said it wasn’t about race. Their only intention, they said, was to protect the integrity of the voting process and reduce instances of fraud. When they crafted the law to force Georgians without driver’s licenses (disproportionately poor, black and elderly citizens) to pay for a state ID card in order to vote, these same Republicans insisted it had nothing to do with discouraging African Americans from voting.

And today, all of their rhetoric looks pretty ridiculous. (thanks to J.C. for the tip)

The chief sponsor of Georgia’s voter identification law told the Justice Department that if black people in her district “are not paid to vote, they don’t go to the polls,” and that if fewer blacks vote as a result of the new law, it is only because it would end such voting fraud.

The newly released Justice Department memo quoting state Rep. Sue Burmeister (R-Augusta) was prepared by department lawyers as the federal government considered whether to approve the new law. […]

Burmeister said Thursday that the memo’s record of what she said “was more accurate than not,” but added: “That sounds pretty harsh. I don’t remember saying those exact words.”

Well, Justice Department attorneys do remember her using those words, and since she’s willing to concede they’re pretty accurate, they deserve to be judged accordingly.

Needless to say, this isn’t going over well in Georgia. Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), a veteran of the civil rights movement, said, “It’s unbelievable that any elected official would say something like this. It doesn’t have any, any merit. This is an affront to every black voter and would-be black voter not just in my district but in the state of Georgia.”

It also raises questions anew about the priorities of Bush’s Justice Department.

Remember, Burmeister’s legislation — the one she said was necessary because black people only vote when they’re paid — needed approval from the Justice Department before it could become law.

A team of career DoJ lawyers and analysts reviewed the law and recommended rejecting it because it was likely to discriminate against black voters. Having direct accounts from Burmeister, the bill’s chief sponsor, only made the discriminatory motive more obvious. And yet, political appointees of Bush immediately overrode the recommendation and cleared the law.

Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman launched an outreach effort to African Americans a few months ago, characterizing that the Republicans’ race problems as a thing of the past. He was wrong.

It’s not an affront to black voters. It is an affront to all voters and each and every citizen of this country.

  • I’ve been embarrassed to say I live in Georgia because of representation by the likes of Chambliss and Saxby. After this, I’m even more ashamed to call this regressive state my home. It’s time to for me to get active again in the local Dem party and work to turn this place blue again.

  • Why don’t we just legislate a $20 “tax rebate” which can only be collected if one votes. This should help increase the participation of people of all colors. And who can argue with a good tax rebate to get tax revenues back into the hands of the taxpayers. Even poor people pay taxes, sales taxes at least. It may also help spur the economy, getting more people out, spending money.

  • Please, no one is denying anyone the right to vote by requiring I.D. expect illegal Mexicans and felons who should not be voting in the first place.

  • The attempt to block a requirement of indentity to vote is a scam to inflate the vote as has been shown in Ohio and Washington State. The kook cluck klan comment is typical liberal “keep them on the plantation” control tactics as they make their racist smear attacks in the MD race. Actual actions speak louder then the kook talk.

  • The “oh we just want to cut down on voter fraud” arguments would be more compelling if the state-mandated IDs were free and readily available. This was, alas, not the case:

    The program requires voters to obtain one of six forms of photo identification before going to the polls, as opposed to 17 types of identification currently allowed. Those without a driver’s license or other photo identification are required to obtain a special digital identification card, which would cost $20 for five years and could be obtained from motor vehicle offices in only 59 of the state’s 159 counties.
    (Source: Washington Post Criticism of Voting Law Was Overruled, Nov. 17, 2005.)

    If the government is going to implement a burdensome process funded by taxpayer dollars, like special cards available in only one third of the state – shouldn’t there first be some showing of need?

  • Voting is something we should be proud to do as Americans. If a citizen of the USA does not have the want or interest to vote, then there should be no group or organization to cause them or prompt them to register to vote. We should consider voting a very strong priviledge and duty.
    If I had my way, I would not allow anyone to vote unless they showed a strong interest and knowledge of the candidates who are running and a true desire to cast a vote.
    All too often, we hear of groups who make it their business to find people who have not registered, convince them to register and attempt to influence how they will vote in an upcoming election. It is true and happens all the time.
    Let’s vote because we care about what happens to our country and take the time to understand the issues, therefore knowing which candidates are sincere and will carry out promises made during their campaigns. Usually, studying their records, if incumbants, will help voters to decide or learning the backgrounds and track records of those who are running for the first time will provide necessary information to make a judgement. With the age of the internet, there is no excuse for not obtaining information a voter should have before casting that vote.

  • Comments are closed.