The McCain campaign’s small-business myth

Yesterday, leading McCain campaign surrogate Carly Fiorina, a top advisor to the Republican candidate, insisted that Barack Obama’s plan to raise taxes on those who make more than $250,000 a year would hurt small businesses.

“In the Bush tax cuts, if they are repealed, 23 million small businesses will have their taxes raised. Why? Because 23 million small businesses file their income tax as individuals. And so, when Barack Obama blithely says, only the wealthiest are going to be taxed, he is ignoring the fact that 23 million small businesses file as individuals and those small businesses are the only growing sector of the economy right now and small businesses produce 60%, actually it’s more like 70, 70% of the new jobs in this country.”

We’ve been hearing this quite a bit lately. A few weeks ago, after the Obama campaign issued its first general-election ad, emphasizing that Obama had been taught “values straight from the Kansas heartland,” the McCain campaign, in an odd non sequitur, responded, “Barack Obama wants more taxes from 21 million small businesses.”

And the week before that, McCain delivered a speech to the National Small Business Summit, arguing, “Senator Obama’s plans would add to the difficulties of small business in other ways, too. Currently, there are the 21.6 million sole proprietorships filing under the individual income tax. When Senator Obama talks about raising income tax rates on those making over 250,000 dollars — that includes these businesses as well.” Both The Hill and Bloomberg News passed along McCain’s claim as if it were true.

It’s not. In fact, it’s demonstrably false, and like far too many of the McCain campaign’s talking points, has been debunked repeatedly.

But as long as the McCain campaign is going to keep repeating blatant untruths, we might as well go to the trouble of explaining why.

McCain rhetoric, meet reality.

…Obama has proposed rolling back the Bush tax cuts only on “people who are making 250,000 dollars a year or more,” and according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center’s table of 2007 tax returns that reported small-business income, only 481,000 of those returns are in the top two income-tax brackets — which include all filers with taxable incomes of more than $250,000 — not 21.6 million.

To her credit, Jay Newton-Small fleshed this out in even more detail.

Okay, let’s assume there are now 23 million small businesses in the U.S. today (the latest stats I could find were 21.5 million “schedule C” class businesses in 2005). There’s no way that all 23 million of those are netting more than $250,000. In fact, 94.5% of all “flow-through” entities (self-employed folks, which generally tend to be small businesses, though Tiger Woods also falls into this category) had receipts under $100,000 in 2007.

Fiorina was building on a Bush argument from 2004. Bush loved to cite on the stump the plight of the 4.1 million “subchapter S” companies – another catagory of small businesses that have less than 100 shareholders and pay individual income taxes. As my former Bloomberg colleague Ryan Donmoyer — the best tax reporter in town — pointed out, the argument was a bit ridiculous because less than 5% of small businesses who file under sub-chapter S made more than $200,000, Kerry’s threshold in 2004. Putting aside the dubiousness of relying on a stale Bush argument for his tax cuts, even with the sub-chapter S filers added in the total number of small businesses effected by a tax hike on those who net more than $250,000 a year remains a few hundred thousand – nowhere near the 23 million Fiorina claimed.

OK, so McCain, his aides, and his surrogates have been clearly getting this wrong. Either they’re repeating bogus talking points without knowing what they’re talking about, or they’re deliberately lying. Which one is it? Apparently, it’s the latter.

We know this because Time asked Fiorina to explain how she arrived at the 23 million figure. The McCain advisor/surrogate responded:

“My point is this: when Barack Obama says that the Bush tax cuts only helped the wealthy it is factually untrue. It is factually true that 23 million small businesses file as individuals. It is factually true that small businesses create 70% of the jobs in this country. So I honestly won’t even attempt to explain Barack Obama’s economic plan. You ought to ask them that, though.”

So, confronted with reality, the McCain campaign digs in to lie some more. Or, as Newton-Small concluded, “This statement, while factually true, is terribly misleading since only a small percentage of the 23 million small businesses would actually see tax increases and the Obama campaign argues that under his administration small businesses would benefit from his universal healthcare plan, offsetting any tax increases the top tier earners might see. So, when running HP did 23 million = a few hundred thousand? No wonder she got fired.”

For that matter, let’s also not forget that for the McCain campaign, it was part of a day filled with obvious and transparent falsehoods on economic matters.

So much for that honorable campaign McCain had promised us.

It’s a variation of the Chewbacca defense!

  • “I’m only wrong if I acknowledge you’re right, no matter how wrong I am. Therefore I’m right!”

    Wingnut logic at work.

    But bear in mind I’m not a real progressive & don’t know what I’m talking about.

  • Eyes glazed over… can’t get interested… too many details… not interesting…

    This kind of competent in-depth economic analysis is worse than useless in electoral politics, Carpetbagger. Maybe I need more coffee this morning, but I could barely get through this post. Nobody is going to care about this kind of minutia. McCain is hitting Obama with a sound bite bludgeon- and if Obama tries to fight back with this kind of smart, competent mamby-pamby-John-just shoot me now he’s so dull-Kerry crap, he’s going to get killed.

    Forget about these details. Obama needs to say the following-

    John McCain wants to continue driving your children into debt. McCains irresponsible tax policies will continue the borrow and spend Bush policies that are enslaving our children and and grandchildren to the likes of China and Saudi Arabia, Americans understand it’s right to pay our debts and Americans don’t want to be dependent on capital from foreign nations. We need to stop borrowing from China and Saudi Arabia, CHINA and SAUDI ARABIA! McCain will enslave us to CHINA and SAUDI ARABIA!!!

    That pulls at the heart stings. It incites a little fear. It hits simple themes like “independence” and “paying your debts.”

    You see what I’m saying?

  • Why aren’t the Dem aligned blogs destroying her credibility? There’s plenty of fodder there to demonstrate that she doesn’t know what she talking about and can’t be relied on to be a surrogate for McCain on economic matter…

  • This is the biggest canard that the Republican Party repeats over and over again and again and no one from the MSM calls them on it. According to the IRS 62% of all small business owners earn less than $50K, 88% earn less than $100K and only slightly less than 3.4% earn $200K or more. We have to call them on this one every time!

  • I agree with “Haik”
    Didn’t we see a post yesterday about how dumb most of the electorate is?
    It’s a shame but Obama has to speak to their level.

  • Oh please, it’s Carly Fiorina! It’s the person who killed the original HP culture and helped broker the nearly useless and ridiculous Compaq deal. Her CV is well, let’s just say “lucent”.. Of course, you have to think for yourself on this one and god knows I didn’t want to come off as a sexist elitist when chiding Ms. Fiorina’s unique capabilities(?).

  • edr, Haik Bedrosian: The point isn’t so much that the Obama campaign should be doing this, but that the media should not be used as an echo chamber for obvious nonsense. If just a few anchors or reporters would seriously confront this idiocy (which would require informed anchors and reporters, so I won’t hold my breath waiting), the incidence rate would drop. Failing that, we might as well do what we can to point out the these errors.

  • There’s a way to keep to the facts and still energize emotions. “The cutoff line is $250,000. If you make less than that, you pay less. If you make more, you pay more. If you make more than… (there’s a second, larger cutoff not mentioned in this story) you pay a LOT more.”

    Any business making more than $250,000 and still trying to file as an individual has so many more problems, this one pales in comparison. Fiorina’s economics are as shaky as her background. Not hard to refute for a campaign with intelligence and the guts to use it. And there, judging from the last couple weeks, might lie the problem.

  • Carly: It is factually true that 23 million small businesses file as individuals

    It’s also “factually true” that Carly is a habitual liar AND the laughing stock of the tech industry.

    Great VP choice for McCain, though.

  • Relax, folks. Yes, there is detail and policy info in this post, but the message is pretty clear. The soundbite is: “They’re lying and they can’t back up their crazy-ass statements. The rest of the post backs up the fact that they’re lying and can’t back up their crazy-ass statements.

    Now we need some high-profile surrogates to use the word unabashedly and repetitively. They’re lying and they need to be called on their lies. Not “falsehoods” or “misrepresentations” or “troubles with the truth” or any of the mealy-mouthed euphemisms. Call their lies “lies.” Loudly, and often.

  • The most shocking part of this was that JNS did such a thorough fact-checking. Actual reporting from a journalist? Wow.

  • We need to compile a list of Carly’s lies.

    Here are two more from a Fox interview – she says Obama hasn’t proposed “a single tax cut”, and also says McCain is “explicit” about the taxes he will cut (except about how he will pay for it.)

    Both lies – watch it here.

  • Time for a debate or better yet a McAce Town Hall meeting where Obama can explain the War Ace’s tomfoolery. The other component is the press. Why aren’t they pointing this shit out?..

  • #11 – danimal – agree with you on euphemisms – people should start channeling Al Franken and call lies for what they are – lies.

    Even if calling McCain a liar risks having Bob Schieffer’s head explode with outrage…

    (or on second thought that may be a good thing.)

  • Isn’t Carly the one who spied on the board members and officers of HP? Part of McCain’s surveillance culture?

  • who cares if they’re “small businesses” or wage earners. if they make more than $250,000 they should have their taxes raised. won’t hurt the economy one bit if these guys pay a bit more in taxes.

  • @Dale – 16
    Nope, she was fired by the board in February, 2005. The spying thing happened a year later. Now, the fact that when she quit/was fired HP stock rose 7.5% just on the news of her leaving should tell you all you need to know about her qualifications to talk about economics, business and management.

  • Another fact that no one mentions is that even if a small business is making over $250,000, they will only pay the higher rate on the amounts over $250,000. So if the business is making $300,000 they pay only a couple of thousand more as a result of Obama’s tax plan.

  • Hey Carly,
    You want to help a real small, small businessman? Then cut my fucking self employment tax! My family business pays 15% on myself and my wife in SS and Medicare/Medicaid taxes. So, on an income far below $250,000, I am paying more in taxes on this than is the top executive or hedge fund manager is on himself. So, if you really want to help out the small guy, look at the fucking self employment tax! And stop diverting my SS taxes to help reduce the deficits created by giving the rich bastards cuts on their income taxes! MMMMMMGGGGGGG! (Hint, Obama, can you look into this too? I doubt it.)

  • Comments are closed.