The missing White House emails that will never be found

The last we heard from the White House on the subject of its missing emails, one presidential spokesperson was telling the nation, “I wouldn’t rule out that there were a potential 5 million e-mails lost…. We screwed up, and we’re trying to fix it,” while another presidential spokesperson was also telling the nation that White House officials have “absolutely no reason to believe that any emails are missing.”

It’s the kind of clear, helpful explanation we’ve come to expect from the Bush gang.

Yesterday, we learned that untold millions of emails are gone, and they’re never coming back.

After promising last year to search its computers for tens of thousands of e-mails sent by White House officials, the Republican National Committee has informed a House committee that it no longer plans to retrieve the communications by restoring computer backup tapes, the panel’s chairman said yesterday.

The move increases the likelihood that an untold number of RNC e-mails dealing with official White House business during the first term of the Bush administration — including many sent or received by former presidential adviser Karl Rove — will never be recovered, said House Democrats and public records advocates.

The RNC had previously told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that it was attempting to restore e-mails from 2001 to 2003, when the RNC had a policy of purging all e-mails, including those to and from White House officials, after 30 days. But Chairman Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.) disclosed during a hearing yesterday that the RNC has now said it “has no intention of trying to restore the missing White House e-mails.”

“The result is a potentially enormous gap in the historical record,” Waxman said, including the buildup to the Iraq war.

Despite laws mandating otherwise, 80 White House officials routinely used private email accounts for government business, and the RNC deleted all WH emails through 2004. (Karl Rove, for example, sent or received 140,000 e-mails on RNC servers from 2002 to 2007, and more than half involved official “.gov” accounts.)

Worse, this is only half the problem.

While dozens of top Bush aides were circumventing the Presidential Records Act with private emails, the White House was also responsible for creating a “primitive” email system of its own that created a high risk that data would be lost.

Steven McDevitt’s written statements, placed on the public record at a congressional hearing, asserted that a study by White House technical staff in October 2005 turned up an estimated 1,000 days on which e-mail was missing.

Two federal laws require electronic messages to be preserved. […]

In his written statements, McDevitt said he participated in meetings with White House counsel Harriet Miers and members of her staff. The meetings, in December 2005 and early 2006, occurred around the time McDevitt and other technical staffers were trying to determine how much e-mail was missing from the White House.

In a report presented at the hearing, Waxman’s Democratic staff said difficulties arose in recovering e-mails for Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald in the CIA leak probe. Fitzgerald publicly disclosed the fact that the White House had an e-mail problem in early 2006.

There were no archived e-mails from the office of Vice President Dick Cheney from Sept. 30, 2003, to Oct. 6, 2003, just as the Justice Department was launching its investigation into whether anyone at the White House leaked Valerie Plame’s CIA identity, according to documents provided to the House panel. The only e-mails that could be recovered for prosecutors were from the personal e-mail accounts of officials in Cheney’s office, according to the report by Waxman’s staff.

McDevitt’s statements detailed shortcomings that he said have plagued the White House e-mail system for six years. He declared that:

* The White House had no complete inventory of e-mail files.

* Until mid-2005 the e-mail system had serious security flaws, in which “everyone” on the White House computer network had access to e-mail. McDevitt wrote that the “potential impact” of the security flaw was that there was no way to verify that retained data had not been modified.

* There was no automatic system to ensure that e-mails were archived and preserved.

Perhaps most startling of all, the Bush Administration managed to dismantle, apparently on purpose, the Clinton Administration’s email archive system — which worked just fine — without replacing it with anything at all.

So, the emails from the RNC servers are gone, and the emails from the White House servers are gone. Coincidentally, the more important the dates and subject matter (Iraq war, White House criminal investigation), the more likely the emails are gone for good.

If there’s a reasonable defense for the White House’s handling of this, I honestly can’t think of it.

It’s Clinton’s fault. Obviously.

  • If the WH is not going try to recover email by restoring backup tape, it is up to Congress to supeona those tapes and see what’s on them

  • It is not my fault!

    I once thought it a bit over the top to call the Bushies “the Bush crime family.” Now I feel it to be an appropriate if inadequate term for them. My contempt for the Bushies is exceeded only by my contempt for their supporters who enable and support their lawless and immoral behavior.

  • I really don’t understand why the gross violations of the law are not illegal.

    Why should it be OK for the White House staff to violate the law in such a way that no other group, public or private, could get away without paying a penalty.

    The statute of limitations will still be open in 2009.

  • Tyranny with a capital ‘T’ –and the international criminals and Constitution shredders will be scot-free soon.

    Glad that the opposition party was elected to the majority in 2006 to hold the international criminals accountable. And now maybe that very “opposition” party can ascend to the reigns of Tyranny in 2009.

  • We could try and fight tyranny but I think history proves people would rather live under tyranny than risk death fighting it .

  • So if it is the law that electronic communications must be preserved and the law was so clearly and egregiously broken, then someone must face the punishment, hopefully jail time, that comes with it. We needs heads on chopping blocks. So who is it? Who gets to serve time for this destruction of the public’s property? Crimes have been committed and the evidence has just been destroyed. Someone has to pay.

  • The RNC is (for the moment) the culpable party here. They are now saying they aren’t going to look for the missing(?) emails. Martin is correct that the only option Congress has is to subpoena the backup tapes (which I’m sure will come up missing shortly). However the subpeona will be directed at the RNC not the WH. What kind of monumental arrogance does it require to just say we won’t even look for them? The Bush kind I guess. These guys are giving new meaning to the word criminal.

  • I have to say, your headline is misleading Steve. It implies a technical reason that doesn’t exist (or at least hasn’t been reached yet). “will never be found” because they aren’t looking anymore (as if they ever did) is not the same as “cannot be found.”

    Waxman’s response should be, “Fine, give us the tapes, WE’LL restore them.” “Now.”

  • Ooops, we broke the law, but it’s ok now that we’re not breaking it.

    Isn’t this the same answer they gave about FISA?

  • The White House behavior is unconscionable. A) Subpoena whatever is left. B) See what the FBI can do with it. C) Prosecute everyone in the vicinity of the White House actions for destruction of official records and see what targets present themselves. D) If the primary season finishes on March 4, we’ll have nothing to talk about, so perhaps that would be a fine time for some congressional hearings on whether or not the Bush-Cheney-Republican excesses constitute an impeachable offense, or merely fall under the description of “running a criminal enterprise”. (Who knows, maybe we could use RICO to justify seizing the Crawford ranch or something.)

    (Also, isn’t it well past time for Waxman to do something more about all those subpoenas the administration was ignoring last summer, or did I miss another surrender by leading democrats?).

  • The privatization of all government functions is a goal of conservatives. This administration practiced what it preached and has attempted to privatize the White House itself. This privatization effort is accomplished by removing all possible accountability to the public; rewarding and protecting friends and business partners; and punishing rivals and other antagonists.

    Conservatives love Bush because he has transformed public government into private political power. I used to believe (and one still hears) that conservatives stand for smaller, less powerful governments. If this was honsetly true, then they would be leading the charge to impeach Bush for flagrantly violating their core principles. But since they are defending him instead, it reveals what their core principles really are.

  • Perhaps most startling of all, the Bush Administration managed to dismantle, apparently on purpose, the Clinton Administration’s email archive system

    Startling? Oh CB, you’re such a kidder!

  • It’s Clinton’s fault. Obviously
    Shouldn’t this alone be enough to impeach? Oh, right, Pelosi.

    You are both closer to the truth than you thought.

    White House e-mail administrator says he never told Clinton about missing messages
    From CNN Producer Ted Barrett at U.S. District Court

    August 23, 2000
    Web posted at: 6:29 p.m. EDT (2229 GMT)

    WASHINGTON (CNN) — The Clinton administration official who oversees the troubled White House e-mail system testified Wednesday he never told President Clinton about the computer problem that prevented thousands of White House e-mails from being properly stored and archived.

    Mark Lindsay, the assistant to the president for Management and Administration, also told a court he did not threaten White House workers with jail if they went public with the problem that arose at the height of the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

    Lindsay’s comments came in testimony before U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth, who is holding hearings into allegations of obstruction of justice by White House officials concerning the computer problem and the delayed reconstruction of the missing e-mails

    http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/08/23/wh.email/

    Man, I remember the outrage on the left when this story broke!

  • Perhaps most startling of all, the Bush Administration managed to dismantle, apparently on purpose, the Clinton Administration’s email archive system

    Startling? Oh CB, you’re such a kidder!liar!

    There, fixed it for ya. See above post #19.

  • The fear that the tapes could be restored, if given to competent individuals, is probably why Cheney made that “quiet trip” to Dallas. It’s my understanding that a portion of SMU’s “presidential library” will be off-limits, staffed by hand-picked Bushylvanians, and under constant surveillance.

    Dollars to donuts we now know where all those “gotta-hide-’em-forever” records are destined for.

    And, yes—given that NSA has been saving everything since before 9/11—it should be safe to say they they also have copies of everything. But then again, NSA might have one of those—what are they called?—“fires” sometime this year….

  • If there’s a reasonable defense for the White House’s handling of this, I honestly can’t think of it.

    It’s simple: criminals can’t be prosecuted with evidence the prosecution doesn’t have.

  • “Jeff” [20]Man, I remember the outrage on the left when this story broke!

    Thing is, there was plenty of outrage on the left when the whole Monica Lewinsky debacle came to light. First it was directed legitimately at the president for betraying a public trust and being a snake dog. But, after a few years of it, the outrage turned toward Starr and the rabid Republican lynch mob that ground the issue into the dirt over an ill-advised dalliance.

    Compare that to the absent right-wing outrage at the criminal activities of the current administration and you really don’t have an argument. A key difference between conservatives and liberals is that liberals typically do hold their representatives accountable for mistakes, lies, and criminal acts. Conservatives tend to seek out any sort of spin or fabrication that continues to support their wrong-doing leadership. John Dean’s book Conservatives Without Conscience explains the phenomenon quite thoroughly. Check it out.

    Should we have been more outraged about the missing Clinton e-mails? Who knows. But you’re comparing apples to anvils. And YOU don’t seem all that outraged about the missing Bush e-mails. Just sayin’.

    Also, CB never said the Clinton e-mail system was perfect or had never been mis-used. He only reported that the Bush administration did away with the system which, according to the source he cited, worked just fine. Don’t be CB a liar, dog. He’s the real deal.

  • Also, CB never said the Clinton e-mail system was perfect or had never been mis-used. He only reported that the Bush administration did away with the system which, according to the source he cited, worked just fine. Don’t be CB a liar, dog. He’s the real deal.

    Worked just fine!? Clintons own guy testified in open court, under oath that “computer problem that prevented thousands of White House e-mails from being properly stored and archived.” What source claimed that it worked just fine?

    Take the blinders off and try to read before you post nonsense.

  • Oddly enough, the comment about the loss of email by the Clinton WH, where a possible thousands of messages may have been lost, doesn’t include a conclusion.

    There was apparently no actual charge of obstruction of justice. The emails were apparently restored, or explained to the judge’s satisfaction, and it turned out to be a tempest in a teapot.

    That’s why there was no outcry on the left. Only the wingnut right kept up the screeching, because it’s what they do.

    It’s also helpful to note that that was a few thousand messages, lost because of technical problems. Here we have millions, apparently deliberately destroyed.

    False equivalence, Jeff.

  • So where is the honesty and integrity that Bush was supposed to bring back to the White House?

    If the first thing his defenders throw out is “Clinton did it, too!”, then there really hasn’t been an improvement, has there?

  • Poor Jeff.
    He has to follow Reagan’s 11th commandment = Speak not ill of a Repub.
    It is more important than any of the original 10 given to Moses.
    It is more important than the Sermon on the Mount and Do unto to others.
    The result is
    All Dem misdemeanors at to be treat as major Federal felonies or worse.
    All Repub activity is to be dismissed as less than a traffic ticket.
    Jim

  • It’s pretty hard to completely erase files. With the political will, pretty much anything that’s ever been saved on a harddrive can be recovered. Which makes it even better — we can recover the evidence, AND point out they destroyed it.

  • Memekiller,

    No, sorry, it’s rather trivial to completely erase files. Follow the simple steps below:

    1. Centralize where the master copies are kept.

    2. Require regular purges of all non-central repositories.

    3. When it is desired to destroy the files, simply over-write the central repository, preferably with random data, and preferably at least 7 times with different data.

    4. Write over the backup tapes.

    Items 1 and 2 can be implemented for supposedly innocuous reasons (data security).

    Items 3 and 4, however, require malice aforethought, as they would never occur to an honest systems person (although, many years ago, I did meet a DEC repair-person who managed 3 and 4 without, apparently, any ill intent — in fact, without any thought process at all.)

  • I’m sure this is yet another example of a crime that doesn’t rise to the level of impeachment.

    Thank you Nancy Pelosi, you stupid, conniving bitch.

  • I am thinking Rosemary Woods, the transcriber of the Watergate tape, who “inadvertently” erased 18 minutes (I think that was the number) on the tape. This email snafu reminds me of those good old days…not. It is remarkable that we allow these Bush-leaguers to get away with this stuff. I should think normal citizens would be jailed so fast the devil couldn’t find them when they died. Why are we cutting the Bushies so many breaks? Sigh. Can’t wait until next January no matter who wins….

  • Charles,

    I know a firm that hired some people who do this stuff for the FBI, and erasing the files won’t do it, writing over the data won’t do it. It’s how that caught an IS guy downloading porn, and they found every site he ever visited after he did the things you mention there.

    Deleting files doesn’t delete them, but no longer protects them from overwriting. Overwriting doesn’t completely erase magnetic storage, the same way using the same cassette tape to record gives you more and more noise — there are still echoes of the files left behind.

    These guys can salvage files from a harddrive after a house burns down.

  • Memekiller,

    Data is stored on disk surfaces in the form of flux transitions (magnetic pole reversals). Flip enough of those and the NSA ain’t going to recover their original states.

    My information as to what is required comes from the US government security requirements, which comes from what the NSA knows it can do. I also spent many years working for a company involved in this technology. One of the people I worked with did data recovery for the various 3-letter organizations in the federal government.

    When I said, “over-write”, I mean the entire disk. I recommend using linux or other unix derivative. I used “dd” for the purpose, and I guarantee, it won’t be readable when I’m done.

    It has to be done by somebody who knows what they are doing, of course.

  • Charles,

    Sounds like you can. All I can say is in my own experience, everyone I know who tried to delete was surprised to discover that the data could be recovered. If you hard drive crashes, no, but I haven’t seen the guys at the companies like you work for get stumped.

  • Memekiller,

    Trust me, entropy will stump the most determined analyst.

    Of course, for real data security removing the platters and etching them with acid is best. Watch out for the fumes. And it reduces their resale value on EBay.

  • Another great way of “Deleting” History – The Bush “Great” Days – how they handled everything – but how come are we all so surprised 😉

  • Comments are closed.