In the 109th Congress, Republicans on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue had some fairly controversial policy ideas, which congressional Dems opposed vigorously. GOP and media critics started calling Dems the “party of no.”
U.S. News’ Gloria Borger wrote, “Social Security reform? No. Clear some judges? No way, Jose. Find some agreement on national security? Nyet…. Sad to say, the Democrats are becoming the party of no.”
The Senate Republican Conference followed suit: “Democrats continue to be the party of no — no ideas, no solutions and no progress. On the most important issues facing our country today, Harry Reid and Senate Democrats have repeatedly chosen to say ‘no.'”
All of a sudden, with the GOP in the minority, obstructionism doesn’t sound bad anymore. Consider, for example, what Grover Norquist argued this week at the Conservative Political Action Conference.
“Nothing good happens in the next two years out of this Congress. Nothing good.
“If you read in the newspaper that there’s a bill with a nice sounding name, and it sounds in the first sentence like the bill is good, you haven’t read the whole bill. Nothing good happens. They’re not going to cut taxes.
“Look, get married, develop a hobby, learn to belly dance, learn to golf — you know, we got two years free, but we gotta spend some time and effort playing defense here. Because the Democrats are going to be like young men on prom dates — they’re gonna keep asking the same question of us over and over and over again. And our job is to say ‘no, no, no, no’ for two years.
“It doesn’t do us any good to go ‘no, no, yes’ okay? It has to be ‘no’ for two years in a row. It’s going to be tiresome, it’s going to be boring. People are gonna go, ‘oh maybe this bill isn’t as bad as it looks.’ Don’t eat it, don’t swallow it, don’t touch it. Nothing good passes this Congress. Plan for the future and read novels.”
Advice for Dems: this is an opportunity. Start asking Republicans: “Do you agree with Grover Norquist that the next two years should be nothing but gridlock?”