The pastor who accuses the United States of ‘black genocide’

Barack Obama has gone to considerable lengths to distance himself from the inflammatory remarks of his former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, but some remarks are harder to dismiss. When Wright, for example, said the United States government has been complicit in facilitating black genocide, it was hard not to cringe and seek an explanation from the presidential candidate he’s associated with.

Oh, wait, did I say Jeremiah Wright? Actually, this is an argument peddled by the Rev. Rod Parsley, a man John McCain has praised as a “spiritual guide.”

In speeches that have gone largely unnoticed, Parsley (who is white) compares Planned Parenthood, the reproductive care and family planning group, to the Klu Klux Klan and Nazis, and describes the American government as enablers of murder for supporting the organization.

“If I were call for the sterilization or the elimination of an entire segment of society, I’d be labeled a racists or a murderer, or at very best a Nazi,” says Parsley. “That every single year, millions of our tax dollars are funding a national organization built upon that very goal — their target: African Americans. That’s right, the death toll: nearly fifteen hundred African Americans a day. The shocking truth of black genocide.”

He goes on.

“Right now our own government is allowing organizations like Planned Parenthood to legally take the innocent lives of precious baby girls and baby boys and even footing the bill for it all with our tax dollars, turning every single one of us into accessories to murder,” he says.

This comes on the heels of a report from David Corn who noted that the televangelist “called upon Christians to wage a ‘war’ against the ‘false religion’ of Islam with the aim of destroying it.”

Better yet, our old friend John Hagee is back in the news, too.

Greg Mitchell has the story:

In an interview that will appear in this Sunday’s New York Times Magazine, controversial televangelist Rev. John Hagee declares, “It’s true that [John] McCain’s campaign sought my endorsement.”

McCain has attempted to distance himself from some of Hagee’s views, much as Barack Obama is doing in relation to Rev. Jeremiah Wright. But unlike McCain, Obama has not stood on stage with Wright and accepted his accolades this year.

Interviewed by Deborah Solomon, Hagee refused to discuss his statement that Hurricane Katrina was God’s punishment for a gay rights parade in New Orleans, calling it “so far off-base.”

It may seem like a bit of a tangent, but it’s worth noting that the NYT thought to interview Hagee for the Sunday magazine — presumably because of his notoriety as an anti-Catholic, anti-gay, anti-Muslim televangelist — but the New York Times never ran so much as one article about McCain’s controversial association with Hagee. Not one.

Which brings me to the broader point. Obama’s presidential campaign has been undermined, possibly permanently, thanks to the media’s unrelenting fascination with Wright’s controversial sermons. But John McCain has close ties to high-profile evangelical leaders who, among other things, blamed 9/11 on Americans. As a result, McCain has faced no political consequences whatsoever.

I can appreciate the significant differences. Obama has a personal connection to Wright that goes back many years; McCain began sucking up to radical right-wing preachers fairly recently for partisan gain. McCain wasn’t a member of Jerry Falwell’s or Rod Parsley’s congregation, he just sought them out, sang their praises, and refused to denounce any of their scandalous public remarks.

But if major news outlets could at least give McCain’s religious associations some attention — say, one tenth the amount given to Wright — I suspect Americans would be interested to know more about the religious figures McCain chooses to associate with, and the fact that he’s done next to nothing to condemn remarks that most reasonable people would find deeply offensive.

One tenth. That’s all I ask.

How about zero of the amount for all candidates? The “gotcha” stories of pastor contoversies will lead us into a hornet’s nest of constitutional conundrums and hate-speech. Is that what we really want during this campaign?

  • Eh, it doesn’t matter. The logic, specious as it is, is that, since Wright is a black man, his anger towards certian US policies is unjustified because them blacks have it SO MUCH BETTER than they used to. If anything, Wright should be THANKING white America. Whereas with dillholes like Hagee, Parsley, Falwell, Robertson, etc., well they’re white, and SO well-spoken, and SO well-dressed, and SO well-versed in the Bible…and did I mention white? Therefore, they can’t be confused on the issues, they must see things more clearly…they’re white! So when they TELL you something smells fishy. it’s fishy. When Wright tells you something’s fishy…well, that’s just sour grapes.

  • The New York Times is mostly a Republican rag. Frank Rich and Paul Krugman are the only people who make it moderately interesting for me.

    I don’t know when it’s going to dawn on the punditocracy (pharisees?) in this country that we have Very Far Right and More-or-Less-Right as the extreme ends of our political spectrum in this corporate country.

    And, considering how few of us can read, and how many of us are slack-jawed consumers of TeeVee, I guess that’s all we can hope for. At least until the internet generation grows up. I hope.

  • Faux news again today, 5 have stories about Obama and wright!
    I had a person today at lunch state that Obama didn’t answer any of the questions about Wright or disown him. I asked him if he new that Huckabee defended Obama’s speech, He never heard, nor did nayone I ate lunch with ever hear of Hagee!
    I believe people are looking for an excuse to tear down Obama and not look like a racist.
    Also Faux news strategy.

  • Watch this get no airtime in the news, while Obama will get continuously torn down for weeks if not months, it its obvious the mainstream wants to take down Obama and is willing to ignore almost anything else the other cantidates do

  • The appearance is that the Corporate News Media has determined to destroy Obama. My interpretation for the reason is that Obama is the least Corporately owned candidate remaining.

    Fairness nor evenhandedness need be factors in CNM coverage. Indeed, the ABC ‘investigative reporter’ who dug to open the Wright controversy is the same one who has the ‘blue dress’ back in the media.

    After Obama is officially the democratic nominee, I shall be seeking to donate to 527’s who will fight repugnican slime $ for $ and slime for slime. If there is as much advertising in front of the American people linking McCrap to the statements of the religious right preachers as there are linking Obama to interpretations of Wright, I think that Obama wins that slime war.

    Will Catholics be as ‘afraid of the big black preacher’ as they will be offended if they know about Hagee? I think not, but fire needs to be fought with fire!

  • The controversies surrounding Wright, Parsley, Hagee and a pastor Hillary had connections with all prove one thing: religious people say the damnedest things. Since all three remaining candidates have problems with religious people in their lives, maybe we can finally see that maybe this goes beyond politicians are having problems with preachers, but America having problems with religion.

  • Let me emphasize that these reasons are not justifications:

    1. Republicans associating with lunatic pastors is nothing new. It’s a rite of passage for a nominee.

    2. The video on Wright was far sexier than any footage of Hagee.

    3. Continuing media overcompensation for appearing liberal.

    4. More Americans are scared of angry black people than they are of literally apocalyptic white televangelists courted by Republican commanders in chief. [sigh]

    4a. Vis a vis lunatic white pastors, most Americans fall into one of three categories: the followers, the unaware, the folks find them repugnant but ultimately clownish.

    Sad, I know.

  • Don’t think that the NYT giving Hagee space in their Sunday Magazine means they are belatedly recognizing the importance of the story – Deborah Solomon’s page in that publication is a bigger waste of wood pulp than all the vapid fashion spreads and upscale real estate ads put together. You can probably find more accurate information on whatever celebrity she is profiling in the National Inquirer.

  • @12:

    Exactly. She does the Q&A page. The giant picture of Hagee will be ten times the size of the text devoted to him.

  • The media’s unrelenting fascination with Wright’s controversial sermons is simply a way of pointing out that Obama is an African-American; that Wright is an African-American; that Wright is crazy; so maybe Obama’s crazy. (Yes, they do think this way.) It plays to people’s fears about African-Americans without being called racist and brings in the ratings.

  • Ed Stephan, @3

    In addition to those two (Rich and Krugman), Bob Herbert and Gail Collins (the last one is a fairly recent addition to the roster) are liberals well worth reading also. Herbert in particular, since he has a “black perspective”. In some ways, I think it was years of reading Herbert, which made me less surprised at Wright’s intemperate comments. Herbert himself is mild of expression and non-threatening but the issues he raises through the cases he describes make you wonder how it’s possible that all blacks aren’t boiling with anger.

    I never could understand, BTW, why Herbert is never mentioned by the lefties who read Rich and Krugman religiously. Could it be that the issues of the black population are of zero interest except at the voting time and/or when something like the Wright story forces us to pay attention?

    To come back to topic in question, just so y’all don’t think I’m trolling…

    McSame walks on water and his s… don’t stink. That’s why he’ll never be called out on anything. Not on his lies/position changes on every subject, not on his dubious relationships with lobbyists, not on his campaign finances and not on his relationships with religious kooks.

  • I’m sure the “swiftboating” media will be there.

    The Associated Press NORFOLK — Barack Obama’s spiritual mentor will preach next month in Norfolk Virginia. The Reverend Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. is scheduled to address members of the Bank Street Memorial Baptist Church on April 13th. Until retiring this year, Wright was pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago. The Democratic presidential contender has had to defend his long affiliation with Wright because of the cleric’s incendiary remarks from the pulpit.

  • 14. Lynn

    The media’s unrelenting fascination with Wright’s controversial sermons is simply a way of pointing out that Obama is an African-American; that Wright is an African-American; that Wright is crazy; so maybe Obama’s crazy. (Yes, they do think this way.) It plays to people’s fears about African-Americans without being called racist and brings in the ratings.

    Yep there is always one Obamamaniac who has to pull out the race card. The media is there for ratings and Obama and Wright are in the spotlight at this point. It will pass like anything else, but accusations that we are a white supremacist society from people like Lynn, unfortunately will not.

    As far as McCain’s relationship with Hagee’s in comparison to Obama’s relationship with Wright is like comparing a Thunderstorm to a Hurricane. Obama’s 25 year ties with Wright are very tight and binding; which is why he keeps his relationship going.

    At this point who cares. Theses stories have been beaten to death by the MSM, time to find something more important like the recession that leading economists are finally realizing is here.

  • I am posting this in full. It might open eyes.

    Meet The (White) Man Who Inspired Wright’s Controversial Sermon

    Meet the man who inspired Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s now famous tirade about America’s foreign policy inciting the terrorist attacks of September 11.

    His name is Ambassador Edward Peck. And he is a retired, white, career U.S. diplomat who served 32-years in the U.S. Foreign Service and was chief of the U.S. mission to Iraq under Jimmy Carter — hardly the black-rage image with which Wright has been stigmatized.

    In fact, when Wright took the pulpit to give his post-9/11 address — which has since become boiled down to a five second sound bite about “America’s chickens coming home to roost” — he prefaced his remarks as a “faith footnote,” an indication that he was deviating from his sermon.

    “I heard Ambassador Peck on an interview yesterday,” Wright declared. “He was on Fox News. This is a white man and he was upsetting the Fox News commentators to no end. He pointed out, a white man, an ambassador, that what Malcolm X said when he got silenced by Elijah Muhammad was in fact true: America’s chickens are coming home to roost.”

    Wright then went on to list more than a few U.S. foreign policy endeavors that, by the tone of his voice and manner of his expression, he viewed as more or less deplorable. This included, as has been demonstrated in the endless loop of clips from his sermon, bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki and nuking “far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon and we never batted an eye.”

    “Violence begets violence,” Wright said, “hatred begets hatred, and terrorism begets terrorism.”

    And then he concluded by putting the comments on Peck’s shoulders: “A white ambassador said that yall, not a black militant, not a reverend who preaches about racism, an ambassador whose eyes are wide open and is trying to get us to wake up and move away from this dangerous precipice… the ambassador said that the people we have wounded don’t have the military capability we have, but they do have individuals who are willing to die and take thousands with them… let me stop my faith footnote right there.”

    o it seems that while Wright did believe American held some responsibility for 9/11, his views, which have been described as radically outside the political mainstream, were actually influenced by a career foreign policy official.

    Who is Peck? The ambassador, who has offered controversial criticism of Israeli policy in the West Bank but also warned against the Iraq War, was lecturing on a cruise ship and was unavailable for comment. But officials at Peck’s former organization, the Council for the National Interest, a non-profit group that advocates reducing Israel’s influence on U.S. Middle East policy, offered descriptions of the man.

    “Peck is very outspoken,” said Eugene Bird, who now heads CNI. “He is also very good at making phrases that have a resonance with the American people. When he came off of that Fox News, a few days later he said they would never invite me back again.”

    And what, exactly, did Peck say in that Fox News interview that inspired Wright’s words?

    Here are some quotes from an appearance the Ambassador made on the network on October 11, 2001, which may or may not have been the segment Wright was referring to. On the show, Peck said he thought it was illogical to tie Saddam Hussein to the terrorist attacks on 9/11, and that while the then-Iraqi leader had “some very sound and logical reasons not to like [the United States],” he and Osama bin Laden had no other ties.

    From there, Peck went on to ascribe motives for what prompted the 9/11 attacks. “Stopping the economic embargo and bombings of Iraq,” he said, “things to which Osama bin Laden has alluded as the kinds of things he doesn’t like. He doesn’t think it’s appropriate for the United States to be doing, from his perspective, all the terrible things that he sees us as having been doing, the same way Saddam Hussein feels. So from that perspective, they have a commonality of interests. But they also have a deeply divergent view of the role of Islam in government, which would be a problem.”

    Video at the link above.

  • Unfortunately, Parsley’s claims are pretty much true. The founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, was an advocate of eugenics (specifically, negative eugenics), which means that she thought encouraging abortions among the “disadvantaged” would improve society (though, in her time, she worried more about immigrants than African-Americans, as Parsley suggests).

    She has written several works on her views, so you don’t have to take my word for it. The Pivot of Civilization and Woman and the New Race are two of them.

  • RE: Rod Parsley vs Margaret Sanger

    The “Margaret Sanger was a eugenicist, therefore black women should not have access to reproductive choices” argument doesn’t work for me.

    Rod Parsley’s claims are not true. In the 1920s Sanger, in addition to her positive work of advocating for greater reproductive freedom, was also making negative contributions through racist and classist statements. 90 years later, Planned Parenthood continues to advocate and provide for reproductive freedom, but has long ago eschewed the bigoted ideas of Sanger. To compare the current PP to the KKK or Nazis is empty hyperbole coming from desperate anti-choicers.

    Such statements take on troubling race tones when white anti-choicers raise up the spector of racism not in order to work for a solution, but to try and dupe black women into giving up their reproductive rights.

    The racism of some white pro-choice activists of the past does not mean that black women today do not deserve to have as many reproductive choices as white women.

  • The Reverend Wright sound bites being played, especially on Faux News, really are evil. So edited, it’s like a reality show. I pray that Americans are smart enough to research the matter for themselves. And to realize that complexities (recently explained to them very well by Senator Obama) do, in fact, exist.
    I agree with most of what the Reverend says. And yes, what he has to say is sometimes critical. Painful. Harsh. The truth hurts.

    The Reverend isn’t blaming “white people” in his speeches, so everyone needs to stop feeling so defensive… seriously. Chill out. He’s blaming the bad guys like THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION and MEGACORPORATIONS. There’s no white hatred going on, that is not at all the focus if you actually listed to what he says (beyond the sound bites). Yes, he is criticizing the government. How many of us DON’T criticize some part of our government? The war, corruption, the environment, taxes, abortion, etc.? ALL of us, every citizen of this country, regardless of race, gender, socioeconomic status, etc. have the right to criticize our government when we see danger in that government. In fact Thomas Jefferson and other Founding Fathers have said that it was our OBLIGATION to do so.

    Just because most of us are angry at our current government does not mean that we do not love America. We know this. Therefore, just because Rev Wright is angry at the policies of America also does not mean he does not love America. We criticize because we DO love America, and want to see it become even better, “a more perfect union.” One of the most beautiful things about our freedoms as Americans is that we have the right to criticize our government without fear of persecution (ahem). Jefferson was clear about the rights and indeed, responsibilities of the oppressed, to rebel and “raise disturbance” (which Rev Wright surely does!).

    “The oppressed should rebel, and they will continue to rebel and raise disturbance until their civil rights are fully restored to them and all partial distinctions, exclusions and incapacitations are removed.” –Thomas Jefferson: Notes on Religion, 1776. Papers 1:548

    This Bay Buchanan woman on AC-360 says that Reverend Wright is basically a terrible man who shouldn’t be allowed to set foot in any church because he is ”going out there and spreading anger and hate into the church.” But the majority of people in this country (and not just black people!) are ALREADY angry at our government! There’s no denying it. The Bush lower-than-ever approval rating polls are spread all over the front pages of every paper and the screens of every news channel… one could even argue, if one wanted, that this publicity ALSO spreads anger and despair, spreads the truth of the utter lack of confidence that we the people have in our president and his administration.

    Yet the nation (or at least the media), while able to calmly and rationally discuss these presidential polls, seems to suddenly become anxious and highly irrational when the truth of those depressing polls is seen through the lens of an African-American church – this “caught on tape” edited insanity brought to us courtesy of the MSM. Why this huge discrepancy between the two, the polls and the sermons? Is it more threatening, SCARIER when an African American expresses anger and despair? And if so, why is that? That’s something we need to look at.

    It’s no surprise that Americans are really pissed at the Bush administration… he’s made a LOT of bad mistakes. Are African-Americans not allowed to be pissed off too?

    The church attendees don’t need the Reverend to GET them mad, they’re mad already. I believe the function he serves is to give that anger a VOICE, to channel it into positive action, to make his community feel that they are not alone, that they have hope; it gives members of the community a sense of empowerment and agency. And this is an extremely positive force in ANY community. He’s not advocating treason or telling them to take up arms or anything. He’s just giving people a safe outlet, in church, with god, to express their emotions. A psychologist would call that healthy.

  • America must look racism in the face and not blink. This year we have the opportunity to make this election a civil / equal rights victory for all Americans. The Rev Wight issue and Obama’s brilliant speech have started a much-needed national discussion on race relations in this country. With President Obama in the White House we can come together for a common cause and address many of the problems including race relations that currently face this great nation.

    One definition of racism is that it usually denotes race-base violence, prejudice, discrimination, or oppression. Black people are not only victims of injustice in criminal court cases but also victims of an unjust civil court system.

    My life should have been an American success story. I am a 54-year-old divorced black female and the mother of four children. I was born black and poor in rural north Florida to an unwed mother. We were too poor to even have an outhouse – we had to share my grand mother’s out door toilet. As a child I worked in tobacco fields and one year worked as a migrant worker. As a migrant worker I picked peaches, apples, and harvested tomatoes and cabbages.

    “As an underdog born into poverty I managed to achieve my dream of graduating from college and having what should have been a great career with New York State Department of Corrections. My dream and my life were shattered by employment discrimination.” A Case of Racial Discrimination and Retaliation Real or Imagined.”

    Eliot Spitzer is the former governor of New York State. He was forced to resign after he was linked to a high price call girl operation. Eliot Spitzer was the Attorney General of New York State when a member of his staff, Mike Russo, Assistant New York State Attorney General, filed seven perjured declarations in federal court. The perjured declarations were filed to prevent a jury from ruling that the Defendants violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended. By filing the perjured declarations NYS Attorney General’s Office also victimized me.

    Two of my daughters also experienced painful racism. My girls complained of racial incidents on a regular basis while attending University of Virginia and Penn State University. Both daughters were admitted to their respective universities based on outstanding academic records and great SAT scores.

    My daughter Julieannah attended Penn State on a full academic scholarship. She graduated with Honors in 2002 with a double major and a minor in Spanish. In response to the handling on a hate mail incident(s) she wrote a letter to the college newspaper.

    Julie’s October 18, 2000 letter the Daily Collegian
    Letter to the Editor

    Racism quickly becoming important concern at PSU
    I am deeply concerned about the article that appeared in the Collegian yesterday. The article, regarding the most recent incidence of hate mail, quoted Penn State Police Services supervisor Stewart Neff as saying,” Little things are brought to our attention that perhaps at other times might not have been reported.”

    Mr. Neff, if you did in fact say that statement then pay close attention as I attempt to educate you and the Penn State community. By minimizing a problem that is so prevalent on this campus as well as an issue that is apparent in this nation and globally, you are providing an excuse to further ignore a serious problem. Racial incidents, gay bashing and anti-Semitic deeds happen every day.

    The effects that these hateful actions have on individuals are not negated based on your perception of what constitutes a “big thing.” Either it be a student who was told that she can not enter a party at a fraternity house because no blacks are allowed, or a Latino student who was asked by a professor “Why do you people keep having so many kids?” a hateful and non-tolerant environment affects people’s self-esteem, their ability to focus on their studies and ultimately their safety.

    I am encouraging and challenging every person on this campus to realize that racism is a colossal problem at Penn State, to start with yourself and evaluate how you truthfully perceive “differences”, and to speak out on hate crimes. For all of the people who have experienced racism, you are not alone. Participation in dialogue about racism and continuously reporting incidents will help.
    Julieannah
    Junior-Marketing and International Business

  • hey … what bastet said at # 23 ^^ that’s pretty straight up ..and also .. the whole idea that jermiah wright’s context has been hacked up and bastardized .. as ms joanne demonstrates in #18

    jermiah is also a USMC vet .. he’s earned the right to say whatever his heart desires ..imo .. faux news notwithstanding ..

    and i do believe the whole country would benefit knowing where wright drew his remarks from .. and the original contest in which he made them ..

  • what we need to shout near and far is the theme obama created from his “a more perfect union speech ”

    “NOT THIS TIME ” [suckers] …

  • I am constantly surprise that people would think Obama’s character is link to Pastor Wright. They are two individuals.
    If you have a friend who cheats, does that make you a cheater? If you have a friend who is a horrible father, does that say you too are a horrible father? If you…if you…if you. No, it does not. The fact that Obama has not distance himself from Pastor Wright, shows that he’s commited in the friendship to the end – good or bad. It shows great character that one would not abandon one’s friend in their time of needs, but it is then that they need you most.
    It is NOT when your friends win you votes that you cling onto them, it is when they have fallen and you say, “I’m here for you.” That is a true mark of a Christian.

  • It may seem like a bit of a tangent, but it’s worth noting that the NYT thought to interview Hagee for the Sunday magazine — presumably because of his notoriety as an anti-Catholic, anti-gay, anti-Muslim televangelist — but the New York Times never ran so much as one article about McCain’s controversial association with Hagee. Not one. Actually, they ran three articles in a one-week time frame earlier this month regarding McCain and Hagee.

    Second, Parsley said Planned Parenthood is causing the black genocide, with assistance from federal tax dollars. He’s right, by the way.

    Lastly, Greg Mitchell is completely distorting this:

    But unlike McCain, Obama has not stood on stage with Wright and accepted his accolades this year.

    McCain isn’t part of Hagee’s congregation. Obama may not have stood on stage with Wright, but he most assuredly has been listening to Wright preach for the last 20 years being a part of the congregation of Wright’s church. I’m wondering how Mitchell’s piece could be considered “journalism” (along with the link to David Corn’s piece for that matter).

  • Do you ever get the feeling that the people who run this country (the real Bush constituents – the ultra rich) and their voice, the MSM, want this to be a Hillary/McCain election?

    I think it’s time we elected someone that will represent We, the People.

    Now who would that be?

  • Obama didn’t place his hand over his heart for “Old Glory” and the Pledge of Allegiance, he then used his lovely wife as a mouthpiece as evidence of his dearth of pride in his country, and now enter Pastor Wright: Looks like Hillary’s back in the saddle again. Maybe she was “inevitable” after all. Pity the dems as their once-proud political ship sinks without even orchestral accompaniment. Indeed if this is the best that the left can produce in this most integral hour of the past eight years, then I’d say they fully deserve John McCain. Only thing that would move me to vote with the left this time around, would be if Hubert Humphrey or Harry Truman were to be exhumed and placed on the ballot. Tough luck, Dems.

  • News Headline – Mark Penn, chief strategist for Hillary Clinton and Senator John McCain top political advisor Charlie Black are business partners. Penn is the CEO of Burson-Marsteller, which is one of the largest public relations firms in the world. Clarlie Black is the Chairman of BKSH which is a lobbying subsidiary of Burson-Marsteller.

    One of the noted client of Burson-Marsteller is Blackwater. In 2007, Blackwater a private security firm was accused of killing several Iraqi civilians. Blackwater hired BKSH to help them with their image after the Iraqi civilians’ claims. BKSH was also hired by Countrywide Financial to address their image problems after downsizing and the increased numbers of foreclosures. On March 9, 2008, a local television station in Houston reported that the FBI is currently investigating Countrywide.

    The lobbying firm of Burson-Marsteller wins if either Senator Clinton or Senator John McCain are elected as the President of the United States of America. This explains Hillary’s attacks on Obama that states that only she and McCain are qualified to be the next President.

    Americans must not be fooled by a public relations firm and the Clintons. We must continue to support and embrace Senator Barack Obama and his quest to become a President for all Americans. OH YES WE CAN!!!

    Vera Richardson is the author of “A Case of Racial Discrimination and Retaliation or Imagined.”
    http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?r=1&EAN=9780615177014

  • Why have George W. Bush, George Bush Sr., Bill Clinton, and Jimmy Carter plus Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, and Ronald Reagan when they were alive NEVER even been asked to denounce and disown Billy Graham for his anti-Semitic comments?

    The current president has said on innumerable occasions that Graham was a key spiritual adviser for him and THE person who persuaded him to become a born-again Christian 20 years ago. My recollection is that the conversation that persuaded Bush Jr. to change occurred at the Bush home in Maine.

    This whole controvesy about Jeremiah Wright is beyond stupid!!! How many people disagree with their pastor? Probably millions. How many leave the church because they disagree? Probably a tiny percentage.

    When I was a teen, my rabbi — then a national leader in the conservative Jewish community — made racist comments in a sermon, first saying Jews were superior to Catholics because the cross burning of an African-American family occurred in a Catholic neighborhood and then turning around and saying African-Americans should “live with their own kind.” (in my 1970s New York neighborhood, EVERY person on the block was Jewish and the same was true in “Catholic” neighborhoods)

    I recall my father and several others telling the rabbi off to his face, but as far as I know NO ONE left the temple because of this sermon. Most people went to that temple because, well, it was in the NEIGHBORHOOD. How many people choose a church because of its leader as opposed to the number who go there because it is the ONLY convenient place to go to, the ONLY one children can walk to for religious school.

    Shalom

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqPUXjFYh38 This is the link to 9 minutes of one of Rev. Wrights’ sermon currently be used by Fox in an effort to end Obama’s race to the White House. The video is titled Fox Lies The Real Sermon given by Pastor Wright.

    Vera Richardson is the author of “A Case of Racial Discrimination and Retaliation Real or Imagined.”
    http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?r=1&EAN=9780615177014
    http://www.lulu.com/content/1362173

  • Comments are closed.