The Path to a Docudrama Debacle

And I thought yesterday afternoon was eventful on the ABC story. Here’s what we’ve learned over the last eight hours or so.

* Variety, the entertainment industry magazine, reported today that “a bombshell decision” is being considered at ABC: “Sources close to the project say the network, which has been in a media maelstrom over the pic, is mulling the idea of yanking [The Path to 9/11] altogether.”

* Bill Clinton personally weighed in on the controversy, calling on ABC to “tell the truth” in its broadcast. “I think they ought to tell the truth, particularly if they’re going to claim it’s based on the 9/11 commission’s report,” Clinton told reporters in Arkansas. “They shouldn’t have scenes that are directly contradictory to the factual findings of the 9/11 commission. I just want people to tell the truth.”

* For reasons that are not altogether clear, ABC has cancelled its web advertising for the movie.

* A group of American historians, including some of my personal favorites (Schlesinger, Wilentz, Widmer, Perlstein), called on ABC to cancel what they described as a “fraudulent” project.

* Though ABC condemned its critics yesterday for judging a movie that is still being edited, ThinkProgress reported today that as recently as a week ago, ABC told the National Review that the docudrama is “locked and ready to air.”

* Fox News’ Chris Wallace told viewers today, “[W]hen you put somebody on the screen and say that’s Madeleine Albright and she said this in a specific conversation and she never did say it, I think it’s slanderous, I think it’s defamatory and I think that ABC and Disney should be held to account.”

* TP has pulled together an impressive list of conservative critics of the movie, including Bill Bennett, John Podhoretz, and James Taranto. Good for them — ideological consistency is to be applauded.

* Madeleine Albright and Samuel Berger have sent a letter to 9/11 Commission Chairman Tom Kean, personally asking him to help kill this project. “Actors portraying us do contemptible things we never did, and say things we neither said nor believed,” they wrote. “And what’s more, in many instances these portrayals are contradicted by your Commission’s own findings…And so we ask that you use your influence to persuade ABC to withdraw the broadcast altogether.”

I hear completely unsubstantiated rumors that ABC is seriously thinking about pulling the plug on this movie, but as of this second, I haven’t seen anything resembling confirmation of this. If anyone gets word of the network’s plans, feel free to add insights in the comments section.

Even if they dont pull it, it will only be worse for them afterwards, when the real debate starts and it becomes even more abundantly clear what a bunch of partisan schlock this is, and how disgusting it is that they are exploiting this for political purpose less than two months before an election. ABC will totally regret it if they dont yank this garbage and the Republicans might also.

  • I did some phone calling to “the usual suspects” among people I know, and everyone is waiting with bated breath to see what DizzyWorld does. They have gotten one helluva lot of crap. I even hear from two different writers I know that a spec script “auction” that was being held this week had the script pulled from producers whose deal was with Disney, with the writer of the “hot script” letting those producers know he was sorry to do this to them since they go back a ways, but he would not do business with Disney unless this was straightened up. Trust a Hollywood writer to put it on the line (on occasion) – and of course, if that’s true and the story gets around (and if it’s gotten down to my level, it has “gotten around”), it could only up the value of the script in certain quarters.

    Gonna be interesting to see how long it is before Cyrus the Persian Putz is looking for a new agent.

  • Why can’t you be conservative, and honest? Is it because it is impossible to construct any kind of credible case based on reality, or is it because reality simply isn’t a concern, so what is said is constructed entirely based on what “sells”? Or is demonstrating your willingness to fabricate on behalf of the cause how you get into the club?

    I’ve searched, looking for the honest conservative to hold up as an example of how I’m not so partisan that I’m unwilling to give kudos to the other side, and every time, save one, that I can think of, I’ve been let down. The one exception is Gergen, who is therefore despised.

    Bob Dole pushes the Swift Boat Vets. David Brooks drifts back and forth from commentary to hackdome. McCain has sold his soul. Powell…

    In a way, I can see the position the media is in. If one side respects reality, and the other sees dishonesty as the way to earn your stripes, then the only way to be balanced is to cut the difference to pump BS 50% of the time, just to be fair.

  • Could it be a coincidence that Dubya suddenly let the networks know, on pretty short notice, that he wants airtime for a speech to the nation at the very time this show was supposed to be airing? Could it be that the WH is stepping in here to give ABC a bogus reason to cancel the show? How Rovian that would be. But no, I suppose it would be more Rovian to just let the damn thing air with all the lies intact.

    Oh, I can’t wait to hear Fratboy-in-chief’s inspiring-uh…-address to the-uh-um-nation. I’ll have to get out my amerkun flag handkerchief for that one.

    But seriously folks, it’s against family rules to have Bush speaking on our TV. It’s all part of our vomit prevention plan. Plus we wouldn’t want heavy objects thrown at the screen.

  • Looks like Berger and Albright are also letting Kean know that if the defamatory parts are left in, Kean will be a defendant in a libel/slander suit.

  • All I can say is that if they’ve lost Chris Wallace, this project has definitely gotten thrown into the deep end of the piranha pool.

    And it couldn’t have happened to a nicer bunch of slimeballs.

  • Chris Matthews at MyDD has a great post that directly brings up What’s At Stake for Disney with all this: The Mickey Mouse Protection Act (i.e., the copyright extension act) and what could happen to Disney if they don’t pull this show and the Dems win in November (rollback of MMPA in February – hooray!! hooray!!!).

    Read here – comments are good also:

    http://mydd.com/story/2006/9/8/124541/9054

  • All the hoopla surounding this program has put ABC on notice that it is attempting to air something it knows is false that will place the blame on one of the most heinous acts this nation has witnessed on the wrong people. That would constitute malice aforethought and that would sink them in the libel trial.

    This one is backfiring big time on the right wing because all of this exposure is helping to dispell the false impression that Dems were somehow to blame for 9/11 and are weak on terror. I wasn’t even up to speed on how much Clinton had done to counter al Quaeda until this thing flared-up. Thanks to the guys with mouse ears for providing this teachable moment.

  • Looks like Berger and Albright are also letting Kean know that if the defamatory parts are left in, Kean will be a defendant in a libel/slander suit.
    Got a source for that bubba? I haven’t heard that news.

  • Source? No, other than the letter itself. I think it is pretty clear from the terms they use and the notation contained therein that they are letting Kean know he is on the hook for any misrepresentations due to his role in this thing. Give the letter a read–you will see that it is sufficiently putting Kean on notice that they intend to hold him responsible for his participation in this thing if matters are not rectified. Question–must you read or hear about something someplace before you analyze something and draw a conclusion?

  • I’m with memekiller @ 3. Is it possible to be conservative and honest at the same time? One would hope so for the sake of the Republic. If 51% of the nation is made up of grifters who will say anything just to make the sting work, we’re in deep.

    Even the great George Will conceded that John Kerry had a point.

    From This Week Show August 13th.

    George Stephanopoulos: There’s just so much to talk about, but I guess we have to begin with the busted London plot. We heard Senator Feingold. We heard Secretary Chertoff. George Will, what lesson do you take away?

    George Will: That John Kerry had a point. That is ….

    [Interrupted as the panel erupts in laughter.]

    George Stephanopoulos: We have to hear this.

    George Will: This is a first and last, so listen carefully. He was roundly ridiculed in 2004 for saying that this was largely, indeed ‘primarily’ was the word he used in the South Carolina debate – he said the war on terror is primarily an intelligence and law enforcement operation that requires cooperation around the world. Those of us who have watched this carefully, and we all have, know that we have as much to fear from Hamburg, where Mohamed Atta came from, and High Wycombe where these latest terrorists came from in England, as we do from elsewhere. Therefore it seems to me that this is a great testimony to the police dimension of the war on terror – the Pakistani police, the British police, the American police.

    Thanks for this broad, detailed sample of the buzz.

  • George Will: That John Kerry had a point. That is ….

    Doesn’t that mean that hell just frooze over?

  • how stupid of mickey’s minions to claim that it ‘is being edited’ .. the fact that lies are in it just show the rovian twist of trying to spin lies … they might have tentatively thrown out/publicized a few/some of the lies to see how the american idiots would react … The very simpleton fact is still this: one never gets caught at telling the Truth .. so whatup, mickey?

  • I posted this over at Digby’s place also: If all or most of the anti Clinton administration material is edited out, or worse still, if the series is canceled, it will play right into the martyrdom complex of the right wing. Not to mention reinforcing the myth of liberal media bias. One of the brilliant things about sending out hundreds of copies to right wingers prior to broadcast is that despite what Disney might do, it’s out there. It will become a cult classic among the extreme of the right wing. It will be heralded as “the true story of 9/11 that the liberal media and the democrat elite don’t want you to see”. Various wingnut foundations and churches will sell thousands if not millions of copies.

    Don’t get me wrong. I still want Disney to cancel it. It’s just that this is not going to die completely if they do. But at least the damage to the history of that horrible event might be minimized if this Big Lie is canceled.

  • Although I don’t condone ABC’s fabrications, the 9/11 Commission report cannot be considered entirely “factual”. It didn’t even investigate who was behind the terrorist attacks on 9/11 (and simply assumed that Al Qaeda had). It didn’t bother to ask why three steel skyscrapers collapsed due to fire, which has never happened before or since. One of those buildings, WTC 7, a 47-story structure, wasn’t even hit by a plane. It didn’t challenge any of the FAA or Pentagon testimony despite the contradictions with voice recordings (in other words, the testimony was perjurious). It didn’t begin to ask how the terrorists had managed to schedule the attack on 9/11 when secret FAA and Pentagon maneuvers were scheduled on that very day and thus posed a serious risk (in other words, was there a mole in the government, or did Dick Cheney, the man behind the secret maneuvers, allow the terrorists to strike when our defenses were weakest?).

  • Tom, I think you mean Matt Stoller, not Chris Matthews.

    Stoller is dreaming if he thinks copyright extension can be rolled back, regardless of who controls Congress. Disney may be the most powerful company favoring the extensions, but it’s hardly the only one. Because copyright extension hurts the general public a little (that is, not enough to get them riled up, especially since they’re not really aware of the importance of the public domain) while helping large corporations immensely, I seriously doubt we can even stop the next extension, which will come up just as Mickey Mouse once again approaches public-domain age.

  • I think Pres. Lindsay (#4) has nailed it: Bush is bailing out his pals at ABC. They now have a legitimate reason to pull the show gracefully and replace it with his speech.

    It’d be replacing one crock with another but it wouldn’t look like they’ve given in to the leftie pressure. Of course, they could reschedule the show (Monday/Tuesday instead of Sunday/Monday) but I doubt that’ll happen.

  • Question–must you read or hear about something someplace before you analyze something and draw a conclusion?

    Um, bubba? I hadn’t read the letter, and missed the link. It was a serious question. Thanks for pointing it out. I think your statement is a bit of a reading-between-the-lines scenario. They could hold him responsible, too, agreed.

  • The actual irony is that fallenwoman can correctly spell “tell the truth.”

    Of greater importance, however, is the revised study-guide that’s up on Scholastic’s website. Things addressed include “the difference between a documentary and a docudrama

  • Disney should change it’s mascot to Pinocchio, preferably showing his profile and growing nose.

  • Reason #9238 for why
    I hate ChristoIslamoJewish fundamentalists:

    The digital filmmaking program at YWAM’s University of Nations appears to provide Cunningham’s institute with its interns. The school’s Web site encourages potential students, “If you are serious about allowing the Lord to use either your professional background in film and television, or your God-given desire to learn, don’t miss this opportunity. Apply today!”

    Read it again and feel your blood boil:

    “If you are serious about allowing the Lord to use either your professional background in film and television….

    Allowing the Lord?
    Empty. Stupid. Ugly.
    And in this case: AMERICAN.

    Is there anything more arrogant that a human being who presumes to speak in the name of the Lord?

    I can’t think of any creature more deserving of a $*!#&@& to the #@$!

    Can you?

  • Chris Matthews of Fox dissing this? Could it be that Fox can’t stand the thought of ABC trying to muscle in on its demographic of right-wingnuts?

  • I think the Republicans should take a lesson in telling the truth from Michael Moore’s work, Oliver Stones’ work, CBS’s Bush National Guard memo or any of the press that’s been involved with the Plame fiasco. Great track record comrades!

  • @24 . I vote for F’n Goofy as Disney mascot.

    Comment by servant (@26)

    Um… How about “let’s be bi-partisan here”? Goofy with Pinocchio’s nose?

    @19 (spread your legs for money). Let’s see how many lies will Bush/Chenney utter while on oath…

  • ABC is the source that more Americans get thier news from then any other other sourse..That being said to believe that ABC would not know of any backlash or fallout form it’s 9-11 Docudrama is nonesence..Kudos to ABC for bringing the debate about the 9-11 attacks and just who is accountible for them back into the mainstream…The debate about who is or may be negligent or responsible for the 9-11 attacks is a debate that most Right wing Pundits would rather not talk about…What I would not give to see a transcript of the minutes when the ABC Executives planed on and decided to go with thier Docudrama..I’ll bet even K. Rove would like to have a gander of those Transcripts as well..

  • “I think the Republicans should take a lesson in telling the truth from Michael Moore’s work, Oliver Stones’ work, CBS’s Bush National Guard memo or any of the press that’s been involved with the Plame fiasco. Great track record comrades!”

    You guys don’t need lessons in lying for the Fatherland:
    911 Commission grandstanding
    Reasons for going into Iraq
    Al Qaida and Iraq Linkage
    Plame Mess
    Iran
    Katrina Mess
    Enron vs California Elec Price Gouging
    Cheney Shooting a Man in the Face
    Anything Tony Snow Says
    911 Miniseries

    Jahowl Mein William!

  • Correct Dan, great post!

    I’ve learn well from the Conspiracy party. I used to think that Bill Clinton, John (reporting for doodie) Kerry, the almighty UN, and the rest of the Conspiracy party knew that Saddam had WMDs, but now I know Bush lied. I used to think that our elections were fair, until the last two “stolen” elections and the Diebold voting machines. I used to think that Al Qaida blew up the WTC, but I’m now convinced that Bushitler and evil Dick Cheney used controled demolition to kill 3000 of their own people. I used to think that Ray Nagin should have evacuated the folks of NO, but I now know that Bushitler hates black people and purposely let them die. I used to think that Richard Armitage accidently outed Ms. Plame, but I now know that it was all a “Rovian” plot. I used to think that there are Islamofascists in the world that want to kill all nonbelievers, but I now know it’s “this administartion” that wants me dead. I use to think that Bill Clinton was a complete failure combating terrorism and bringing terrorists to justice, but now I know it was Bushitler’s fault for the terrorist attacks on America (or as you state “the Fatherland”) in the 1990s.

    Get the excuses ready for November Dan, because when the Conspiracy party fails to win control of either the Senate or House, you’ll need an even greater excuse than the voting machines.

  • Conspiracy Party?

    You mean like the crap I used to read about in the 90s like the ZOG, Black Helos, UN maps on Kix cereal and Columbia Cocaine cartels in league with Bubbha Clinton? All of that came from Rightwing websites and leaflets and from the mouths of noted Repub supporters like Wayne LaPierre of the NRA.

    What about phantom chaser Kenny Starr? Every Clinton rumor was investigated even if it was unsubstantiated or outlandish.

    I never liked Bill Clinton, but compared to your guy, I can live with a guy who gets BJs in the Oval Office who can govern.

  • You are correct Dan!

    I was ashamed by that garbage back then, but now, when national security is on the line, the Conspiracy party wants us to believe that “this administration” are the terrorists, and not the folks who make videotapes stating that they want US dead (that means you and me). I had no problem with Clinton getting blown in the Oval office (I voted for him twice), but he should have admitted it under oath. (Come to think of it, I would have lied to if I were the president and I was caught with such a skank). I guess it all depends on what your definition of the word “is” is. And by the way, I inhaled alright, I never exhaled!

  • Fallen woman these assholes won’t listen to the truth. They are the reason their party members are dropping like flies.

  • Comments are closed.