‘The President is always right’

Yesterday’s announcement from the administration on extending protections from the Geneva Conventions to U.S. detainees was not quite as elucidating as it could have been.

As Spencer Ackerman noted, the policy still doesn’t protect prisoners in CIA custody, and as Slate’s Eric Umansky explained, “Terror suspects in U.S. custody won’t get full POW status under the Genevas. Instead — per SCOTUS’s order — they’ll be covered by what’s known as [tag]Common Article 3[/tag], which simply says detainees must be treated humanely and can’t face ‘outrages upon personal dignity.'”

With this in mind, there are lingering questions about how the United States will treat suspected terrorists in our custody. If the administration specifically said detainees weren’t covered by any part of the [tag]Geneva Conventions[/tag], and the administration said yesterday that they would be covered, why would the same administration say this “doesn’t indicated a shift in policy“?

On a related note, what about the tack that the policy never contradicted Geneva protections? “The administration has fought tooth and nail for four years to say Common Article 3 does not apply to Al Qaeda,” Martin Lederman, a former Justice Department official, said. “Having lost that fight, I’m afraid they’re now saying, ‘Never mind, we’ve been in compliance with Article 3 all along.’ ”

With these areas of ambiguity, it’d be helpful to know whether the administration was right before, or right now. The answer: Bush is right — always.

As Congress opened hearings yesterday on the treatment of terrorism detainees, the Bush administration’s view was neatly summarized by Steven Bradbury, the Justice Department lawyer serving as lead witness. “The [tag]president[/tag],” Bradbury said, “is [tag]always right[/tag].”

That does explain things, doesn’t it? When Bush wants tribunals for prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, he’s right, and when he doesn’t he’s still right. When Bush says Geneva protections don’t apply, he’s right, and when he says largely the opposite, he’s still right. When [tag]Bush[/tag] says he doesn’t need Congress to revise the Gitmo policy, then says he does, and then hints that maybe he doesn’t again, the president is right in all three instances.

Good to know.

Gad, talk about “Versailles on the Potomac.” They really do believe in the Divine Right of Kings.

  • Presidential Infallibility is a logical concept, if you believe the preznit was appointed by God.

  • Lost in all this is the loophole in Common Article 3. If the Bush Administration doesn’t believe a prisoner in one of its concentration camps has any dignity or is even a person, then how can he be treated with “personal dignity”? Outrage becomes normalcy.

  • It occurred to me after the supreme court ruling on this matter that Bush doesn’t necessarily need any of the liberal judges to retire or die within the next 2.5 years, he just needs Kennedy to retire or die. Does anyone see Kennedy or Scalia retiring before the next presidential election?

  • You’re just figuring this out? That has been the whole point of Dubya’s career and life. He was never held to account for anything in his earlier years, protected by his family’s money and then his father’s position. He said it himself that the best part of being president was never having to explain yourself. He totally resents receiving info he doesn’t like (his staff says so) and thinks anyone who questions him is uppity. He goes thru life blithely assuming that he’s always right because he believes he is entitled to do so. He has never been about service to the country – only ruling it to suit his personal needs.

  • Insane statements like this one that was mentioned on ThinkProgress yesterday are a direct result of the Bush/Cheney/Rove cartel’s anti-rationality stewardship. I hope they’re happy:

    “Conservatives are outraged that a strict new immigration bill in Colorado still allows children of undocumented immigrants to receive public assistance like food and healthcare: “We’re helping create the next generation of terrorists,” said Rep. Debbie Stafford, R-Aurora.”

    What kind of sick and twisted mind would equate giving food to hungry children with creating a new generation of terrorists? Apparently the kind that believes in our “infallible” president. Not a good sign for the future of the republic if the trend isn’t reversed.

  • The president will always be right unless someone holds him to account for being wrong. And right now, it appears that only the American voters can do that.

    It’s interesting that a majority of Americans no longer believe Bush is right or even trustworthy, yet his sycophants can say things like this which are essentially (1) telling America it’s wrong, or (2) further demonstrating how out of touch his supporters are. Let’s hope our fellow citizens don’t get fooled again.

  • That Director of Lessons Learned must have a pretty boring job

    July 12, 2006, Lessons for Today:

    Lesson #1: The President is always right
    Lesson #2: See Lesson #1

  • No matter what Bush and his minions are outwardly projecting about the Hamdan decision, behind the scenes they are freaking out according to what Glenn Greenwald has been saying.

    I’ve been cautiously optimistic after reading “Real dangers face Bush officials post-Hamdan, and they know it” by Greenwald.

    It’s not time to break out the champagne yet, but we are on the way to ending one of the most despicable criminal acts by the Bush administration.

  • Steven Bradbury, the Justice Department lawyer serving as lead witness. “The president,” Bradbury said, “is always right.”

    If no one else, and I certainly discount the spineless Arlen Spector, I think Bradbury PISSED OFF Lindsay Graham with that comment. One can almost hope for some real governance out of some Republican’t Senators.

  • John Dean has written a new book, Conservatives Without Conscience, in which he delves deeply into what’s happened to conservatives, how they operate to the detriment of America, and why.

    In this report by him published by OpEdNews, he outlines the research and conclusions he reached. He’s labeled the so-called Republicans of today authoritarian conservatives. Their main characteristic is always being right, above religious precepts and human law. It’s a long piece but excellent.

    I believe the big question becomes how does one deal with these types? Too bad we can’t send them all to the moon together and let them wreak their havoc on each other…

  • Thanks, marcus alrealius alrightus, that’s one of the greatest links (among many great posts) that I’ve read in a while. Thanks.

  • Comments are closed.