The railroading of Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman

Back in October, a nationally known print journalist told Harpers’ Scott Horton, “I’ve never seen anything quite like this. Everything I’ve been told by the convicted defendants checks out as the gospel truth. And everything I’m told by federal prosecutors who pushed the case turns out either to be an outrageous lie or at least a very serious distortion. And the local journalists who wrote the most about the case all behave like they’re accessories after the fact in a criminal investigation.”

The journalist was describing the Don Siegelman case in Alabama, and doing a pretty good job of it.

There’s been quite a bit of buzz in recent weeks about the report “60 Minutes” had been preparing on the controversy and, after having seen it, I’m delighted CBS has made it available for embedding. Please take a few minutes, even if you’ve heard the Siegelman story before, to take a look.

We haven’t struggled for examples of the Bush White House and the Republican Machine making a mockery of our justice system and the rule of law, but this is one of those examples that just leaves one shaking one’s head. No one wants to believe GOP corruption on this scale is even possible, and yet, it’s not only possible, it actually happened.

Paul Kiel noted:

60 Minutes’ piece is an excellent distillation of the case. There’s Republican lawyer Jill Simpson’s recollection of a conference call where Karl Rove’s friend William Canary recalled talking to his buddy Karl about sicking the Justice Department on Siegelman, saying that his “girls would take care of him,” referring to U.S. attorney Leura Canary (his wife) and another U.S. attorney in the state. And there’s the Justice Department’s renewal of vigor after the first prosecution against Siegelman fell flat on its face.

But there was more, the most significant revelation being that prosecutors had coached their star witness to the point where he had to write his carefully recollected testimony over and over again to make sure he got it right. Such notes, 60 Minutes reports, should have been turned over to Siegelman’s defense attorneys. They were not.

And here’s the gem to end all gems:

I am now hearing from readers all across Northern Alabama—from Decatur to Huntsville and considerably on down—that a mysterious “service interruption” blocked the broadcast of only the Siegelman segment of 60 Minutes this evening. The broadcaster is Channel 19 WHNT, which serves Northern Alabama and Southern Tennessee. This station was noteworthy for its hostility to Siegelman and support for his Republican adversary. The station ran a trailer stating “We apologize that you missed the first segment of 60 Minutes tonight featuring ‘The Prosecution of Don Siegelman.’ It was a techincal problem with CBS out of New York.” I contacted CBS News in New York and was told that “there is no delicate way to put this: the WHNT claim is not true. There were no transmission difficulties. The problems were peculiar to Channel 19, which had the signal and had functioning transmitters.” I was told that the decision to blacken screens across Northern Alabama “could only have been an editorial call.”

The local station is — you guessed it — owned by a family that contributes heavily to the Republican Party.

The mind reels.

Not only should Don Siegelman be immeadiately released from prison but the heads of all of the lying and cheating people who put him there should be sent to prison for a very long time.
To think what has happened to the justice system in the US is terrible. It seems we are a mirror reflection of where? Russia, China, Korea
The one truthful thing Bush said to us ( the public ) is your either with me or against me

  • Oh, it’s going to be just “too good,” once 2009 rolls around, and these cretins start finding themselves swinging in the political wind. WHNT—say hello to some serious problems next time you need to renew that broadcasting license of yours—and it won’t surprise me one bit if you find yourselves “no longer part of the CBS Network” in the near future.

    Something about network affiliates being required to carry network programming and all, don’t you know….

  • out of curiosity I went tho WHNT website. breaking news:
    Breaking News

    Watch “The Prosecution of Don Siegelman” on WHNT.com
    WHNT-TV/NewsChannel 19 experienced technical difficulties last night at the beginning of 60 Minutes, as a special investigative report called “The Prosecution of Don Siegelman” was airing. We re-broadcast the entire piece Sunday on NewsChannel 19 at 10:00. If you missed it, you can watch it on WHNT.com. Click here to go to the CBS Video Player.

  • But it’s a conspiracy theory to think they’d pull security at an Obama rally to send a message.

    People.aren’t too cynical, they aren’t cynical enough.

    They don’t report it, and we don’t believe it because the facts make us look like we wear tin foil hats.

    Looking back, the times I’ve been wrong have been by giving them too much credit.

  • You know all the Republicans under investigation were watching 60 Minutes going, “Yeah! Goddamn DoJ! Told you it’s all political!”

  • That 60 Minutes was mighty depressing. Between the Siegelman political railroading piece and the next segment – on the Oakland Black Muslim Bakery where the investigators totally botched the interrogation of the Chauncy Bailey murder suspect because the supervisor was tight with the totally crooked Bey organization – one can’t help but wonder if there is anything approaching the ideal of neutral, competent, truth-seeking, law-abiding justice left in the system anywhere in the United States these days.

  • This is precisely why the US Attorney firings mattered and why this Republican administration shouldn’t be given the power to warrantlessly wiretap anyone: for these guys abuse of power is one of the perks of having it.

  • In my dreams, the current administration will be held accountable for their actions.

    CBS did a v. good job on this story. The two strikes against it are: 1) it ran opposite the Oscars (so fewer people saw it), and 2) the CBS video feed is choppy.

    Nonetheless, thanks for posting it.

  • I wish “60 Minutes” had at least mentioned the sentencing aspect to the story. First the judge ruled that crimes for which Siegelman was committed could be taken into consideration when sentencing. Then he demanded $180,000 restitution for a crime for which Siegelman was aquitted.

    http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/003554.php

    http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/003609.php

    They also did not mention that the main witness had also claimed he bribed several Republicans including Sen. Sessions, but they were not investigated.

    http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/13190.html

  • Shoot. I usually do a better job editing my remarks. 2nd line “committed” should be “aquitted.”

  • every time I think my capacity for outrage has reached its peak . . . .

    The next 7 days will be interesting. If the chattering class deigns to talk about this, then the story will become real. If not, it will be just one more utter outrage that slips away without making more than a small ripple.

    So far, they’ve managed to ignore all of Horton’s excellent reporting, but this was 60 Minutes. That should matter, right?

    Oh, but wait, Rove is such a good guy, a great dancer, this simply couldn’t be true.

    Nothing to see here.

    Move along.

  • 40 Years ago the Southern Democrats were doing this. Today it’s the Southern Republicans. Does anyone note a connection between the two?

    The term “Southern Justice” covers this an every other crime against civilization committed by these pirates since 1712,

  • And yes, there is a thread through that history since 1712 of people who opposed the pirates. They’re the ones who can be listed as the victims of Southern Justice.

  • Constitutional scholars out there, I have a question:
    Can the president issue pardons if he has been impeached, and is in the process of trial in the Senate? Some little spark in my memory brings this out.
    If true (I can dream, can’t I?), think of the implications.

  • It is an example such as this that brings to mind the specter that under Gonzales our Justice Dept. was morphing into the Ministry of Love! -Kevo

  • There are too many smelly details about the Siegelman prosecution to cram into a full 60 minutes, let alone one segment of the show, but here’s one that adds a “nice” touch: under standard appellate rules, the defendant cannot file an appeal until the transcript of the trial has been certified as complete and accurate.

    Guess what? For some strange reason, the transcript of the Siegelman trial has not yet been certified. Which means he stays in jail, with no chance of having his appeal heard.

    A lot of people in this story belong in jail, but I have yet to see any evidence that Siegelman’s one of them.

  • Scott Horton and Larissa Androvna at AtLargely have both done a great job on this story. Larissa has a link on her page. Apparently CBS has two other indepth segments on the story that it will air, if they generate enough interest. (Sorry, I don’t have her link, but she can be found at RawStory.com)

    Ret @16, I was wondering about that last night, thanks for the info.And I agree 100% with this quote “A lot of people in this story belong in jail, but I have yet to see any evidence that Siegelman’s one of them.”

  • And does Obama really think he has a chance in Red States such as Alabama? Do his supporters really think that? Boy they must be on drugs.

  • Red States..Union of American Socialist Republics..Alabama American (or Confederate) Sociality Republics.

  • The DoJ needs to be brought to Justice. Anyone connected with this prosecution should be fired and the judges held in contempt of justice.
    They put this governor in chains…feet and hands…and held him in solitary confinement.
    We should be so bold with Bush/Cheney and Rove.

  • They’re going to escape to the Bush Compound in Paraguay… almost 100K acres on one of the largest sources of fresh water.

  • Any civilized society that was serious about its most basic rules and systems would by now have hung, drawn, and quartered W, Cheney, Rove, Abramoff, Gonzalez, and at least twenty others of this cabal.

    That painting of the lynch mob chasing the horse thief – the one called “A Charge to Keep” that W keeps on the wall of the oval office? He thinks – or at least says – that its about the unarmed guy whose horse is one step ahead of the armed posse behind him. Under all that bluster, W must find it exhilarating to stay one step ahead of the posse, every damn day. We can only hope he’ll trip and fall down the stairs and choke on a Cheerio on his last day in office, while Cheney somehow finds himself without government-paid health care and a fifth coronary episode at the same moment.

  • This is from Scott Horton’s blogging about issues connecting Roves lies through his attorney:

    In the flurry of pieces running about the pending 60 Minutes exposé on Karl Rove’s involvement in the political prosecution of Alabama Governor Don Siegelman, one passage in the AP story by Ben Evans really stuck out. It was Karl Rove’s response. And it was a flat-out lie. It showed up last night, and I assumed by now, it would be corrected, but it seems that Rove decided to stick with his lie. Rove does not speak directly, but through his attorney, Robert Luskin, who most recently steered Rove through the shoals of Patrick Fitzgerald’s criminal investigation. As you will recall, Karl Rove’s varying versions of the facts in different grand jury proceedings put him in considerable jeopardy.

    Simpson testified to congressional investigators last year that she overheard conversations among Republicans in 2002 indicating that Rove was involved in the Justice Department’s prosecution of Siegelman. She has never before said that Rove pressed her for evidence of marital infidelity in spite of testifying to congressional lawyers last year, submitting a sworn affidavit and speaking extensively with reporters.

    Rove’s attorney, Robert Luskin, denied the allegation.

    “Mr. Rove never made such a request to her or anyone else,” Luskin said in an e-mail to The Associated Press. “Had ‘60 Minutes’ taken the trouble to contact Mr. Rove before circulating this falsehood, he would have told them the same thing.”

    There is a big inaccuracy in this reporting. First Ben Evans writes: “She has never before said that Rove pressed her for evidence of marital infidelity in spite of testifying to congressional lawyers last year, submitting a sworn affidavit and speaking extensively with reporters.” Evans is dead wrong on this. If he had written “It has not previously been reported that she said that Rove…” he would be fine. I interviewed Simpson in July and she recounted this to me; and I believe she recounted it to two other reporters as well, one with another major national publication, but I’ll let them speak for themselves. She requested that I not write it up or report it without her prior okay, and I abided by her request. My understanding is that she also gave this information to congressional investigators when they initially interviewed her. So Evans is incorrect. Or, more to the point, he assumes in his writing more than he could possibly know.

    But second, Robert Luskin states that CBS never spoke to Rove directly about this.

    Now let’s look at the CBS’s teaser on the piece. It addresses this question:

    Rove would not speak to 60 Minutes, but elsewhere has denied being involved in efforts to discredit Siegelman.

    So it suggests that Rove was contacted and refused to speak.

    Well, Luskin’s statement is wrong. And the CBS statement is true only in the way that a butler announces to an unwanted caller that “Madam is not at home” is true: it’s a formulation that covers a different set of facts which those in the news business understand. In fact, Rove was contacted by CBS and did speak with CBS about the allegations. Rove insisted that his comments could not be used in any way without his prior permission.

    I have no idea what Rove said in that discussion, but I do know that the discussion occurred.

    So I’m wondering: did Rove mislead his lawyer about what happened? As we enter the coverage of the Siegelman story with the CBS exposé, much will turn on Rove’s truthfulness. And he has started the process with a predictable pattern: he lies when he thinks he can get away with it, or even better, he has others lie in his stead.”

    Please go to 60 Minutes at CBS.com and email or call them regarding this investigation because they claim that if enough interest is indicated they will continue their investigation as they already have 2 more segments ready to go. Rove should be in Jail.

  • I have listened with some distress to this case on Air America and read several articles. This case is just the latest in an ever growing list of corruption within the USA. As an Englishman living in the UK, a country of whose legal system I am proud, I am horrified at this case. This is government controlling the legal system. Americans need to wake up. They need to ask more questions and they need to back the initiation of a special prosecutor to investigate the criminal way in which this man was imprisoned. The possible downfall of the US will not come from outside but from within. You all seem so scared when you should be looking for the Trojan Horse within your own walls. Your government is flawed, it is corrupt and it seeks to control the masses by instilling a sense of fear. History is repeating itself….beware, democracy may become a thing of the past.

    Larry

  • I was ready to throw the book at the guy.
    He worked in the same slot for three other governors????

    For Pete’s sake.
    After 12 years I’m not sure I want anyone ELSE on that board but Scrushy.

    The first governor that appointed him should have gotten some slap on the wrist for conflict of interest. The fourth guy in line gets the ax?

    Sorry, can’t go there. You gotta get a different fall guy.

    The lottery contribution WAS of direct benefit to a potential re-election. I disagree with the Arizona AG there. If this had been Scrushy’s first appointment, I’d be voting guilty too. How squeaky clean is this guy that THIS is what the GOP could scrape up?

  • 28 FEB Bush press briefing > 4th Estate drops the ball… AGAIN!

    my diary comments on KOS:

    3rd Rate 4th Estate or… Hotlist
    by Ken Tucker [Subscribe] [Edit Diary]
    unpublished draft: will be deleted 45 days after Feb 28, 2008 if left unpublished.

    3rd Rate 4th Estate or How the WH ‘Steno’ Pool CONTINUES to fail the republic.
    Intro
    You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long.

    URL:
    http://
    Label:
    Image

    * Ken Tucker’s diary :: ::
    *

    scene: 28 FEB 1005h Bush Press conference for the WH steno pool.

    players: The usual suspects. NYT, NBC, Faux News, WP etc.

    missed opportunity: ? ‘Political prisoner’ references by Shrub as to why embracing/meeting with Castro/Raul/Cuba is out of the question.

    WHERE was the OBVIOUS follow up question re: Alabama Governor Don Siegelman!?

    Didn’t figure shrub to call on the CBS steno, as much as an idiot we all KNOW he is, I’m sure he received direction before speaking to stay away from them, and, if nothing else, he does take direction well, doesn’t he?

    The HUGE disappointment for me here was that NONE of the other 3rd rate stenos either could ‘connect the dots’, or worse yet, did, and then didn’t have the ‘stones’ to ask the question. After all he IS a political prisoner of Rove and the AL re-Thugs, they DID steal the 2002 election, and, they even censored/blacked out the 60 minutes segment about Siegelman in Alabama. You’d think political prisoners, Rove, the DOJ, AND broadcast censorship would be an ‘issue’ for the media. I am…ashamed.

    We are NOT well served by this 3rd Rate 4th Estate.

  • Everyone hired or promoted in DOJ (hell the whole US Government) since 1/20/01 needs to be Fired! Lock stock and barrel–purge them all. That’s the only way to deal with this political infestation. Heck, the best and brightest who weren’t compromised–left of their own accord or were already forced out. From top, to bottom–time to start over!

  • Unfortunately, examples such as this are well hidden from sight, but even when they are brought out into the open, the politcal spin machines launder the facts and usually end up blaming the victims of high crimes and misdemenors.
    Karl Rove is only one on a very long list of people I would dearly love to see brought up on charges and convicted. Again, unfortunately, that most likely will never happen.
    We, the people of the United States, are far too casual about our liberties and our rights. We hear these stories, do nothing, and therefore, nothing gets done. No politician, Democrat, or Republican, (or Independent, for that matter), and this includes their cronies, can be allowed to act outside of the law.
    But, we go on day by day telling ourselves we can do nothing about it, and again, nothing gets done.
    I will rejoice only in the day that people stop believing the lies and spin and demand better of our government, politicians and media.

  • Comments are closed.