The RNC vs the DNC — ‘The shoe is on the other footage’

As part of its nearly-hysterical push-back against the Democratic National Committee’s “100 years” ad targeting John McCain, the Republican National Committee has decided to focus on where the DNC found its war images for the commercial. It’s not only an odd argument, it’s actually counter-productive for the RNC.

As you’ve no doubt seen by now, the DNC ad features footage of the war in Iraq. Some right-wing activists suggested the DNC may have received the video directly from terrorists, while RNC Chairman Mike Duncan issued a press release accusing the DNC of working with (cue scary music) Michael Moore.

[T]he Republican National Committee has learned that the ad features footage from Michael Moore’s 2004 conspiracy theory, “Fahrenheit 9/11.”

According to ABC News, the ad features “an IED blowing up near US soldiers,” an image ABC confirms that was used in “Fahrenheit 9/11.” It is no coincidence that the same Democrat [sic] advertising firm that produced this ad also was responsible for producing over $6.5 million worth of Democrat [sic] political advertising using themes from “Fahrenheit 9/11” in 2004.

The DNC’s combining its gross mischaracterizations with footage made famous by a movie director who meets with dictators and continually expresses caustic anti-American rhetoric only further reveals the DNC’s utter lack of respect for Senator McCain and his service to our country. Further, “Fahrenheit 9/11’s” director has compared Iraqi terrorists with American Revolutionary heroes. For the DNC to deploy such footage in a political advertisement suggests at best a lack of appreciation, and at worst a disrespect, by the DNC for the sacrifices America’s brave men and women have made and continue to make to protect our freedoms on the front lines in the war against radical Islamic extremism.

Now, as it turns out, the RNC didn’t get its facts straight. As Oliver Willis explained, “Of course, the footage isn’t from terrorists or (even worse in conservative minds) Michael Moore. The footage is from an AP report purchased from Getty Images.”

But if we’re going to explore where the parties get footage for their advertising, maybe the RNC can explain why it has included terrorist training videos in its ads.

Jake Tapper noted yesterday:

I noted this week, out of curiosity more than anything else, that the new Democratic National Committee TV ad against Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., uses stock footage from Getty Images that was also used by Michael Moore in “Fahrenheit 9/11.” Curiously, the Republican National Committee is using this nugget as further evidence as to why the DNC TV ad should be pulled.

However you feel about the DNC TV ad — and Factcheck.org is not too keen on the way the DNC depicts McCain’s “100 years” in Iraq comment — I was not saying that the DNC took the footage from Michael Moore. They both appear to have taken it from stock footage.

If one were so inclined, one could point to the RNC ad from 2006 that used footage of Osama bin Laden taken from Al-Jazeera and use it to question whether the RNC is too closed aligned with Al-Jazeera. That would be silly, but one could do so, right?

“Looks like the shoes on the other footage,” e-mailed Mike Gehrke, self-described “DNC Research Director and Joke Plagiarist.” “We won’t be intimidated by a candidate desperately trying to avoid his own record — or his lawyers.”

Long-time readers may recall the 2006 RNC ad that Tapper mentioned. During the midterm election cycle, the Republican National Committee paid a handsome sum to broadcast video highlighting terrorists’ rhetoric and training footage, as part of an effort to scare voters into voting for GOP candidates.

As Marc Lynch noted at the time:

This is not just a video which suggests that Republicans will be better at fighting terror. It actually very closely resembles real al-Qaeda videos…. The images don’t just resemble those used in al-Qaeda videos: many were actually taken from real al-Qaeda videos…. This video would not look out of place on a jihadi forum, and it wouldn’t surprise me if it actually gets posted on them and admired (although the production values are a bit low for an actual al-Sahab product).

Anyone involved in analyzing or combating al-Qaeda’s media strategies has to be astounded that the Republican National Committee has financed, produced, distributed on the internet, and aired on US television what is for all intents and purposes an al-Qaeda recruitment video. The video, if it works as intended, will frighten the American people and influence American politics… just like al-Qaeda’s own videos. Bin Laden couldn’t be prouder, or more grateful, especially since it didn’t cost him a thing.

The RNC is worried about footage from a Michael Moore movie, after the RNC used footage from al Qaeda?

Whose side are they on?

The problem is, how many people are going to hear the “Michael Moore” version of the story (Fox/Limbaugh/Hannity/ad stupidum audiences) versus the Getty Images truth (you, me, and Willis)?

Hey, people are still saying Obama’s a Muslim who won’t salute the flag. Those wingnut memes are sticky.

  • Further proof that Republicans aren’t even smart enough to get a sing-digit positve number IQ. Where’s the news?

    A bunch of ridiculous, terrified fatboys afraid they’re going to get chased home from work the way they got chased home from school.

  • Obama’s not just a Mooslim, he’s the ANTICHRIST!!!

    According to the Book of Revelations the anti-christ is: The anti-christ will be a man, in his 40s, of MUSLIM descent, who will deceive the nations with persuassive language, and have a MASSIVE Christ-like appeal…. the prophecy says that people will flock to him and he will promise false hope and world peace, and when he is in power, will destroy everything. Is it OBAMA??

    http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/antichrist.asp

  • The more the RNC complains, the more they keep John McCentury’s “100 years” comments on the cable gasbag shows. And as the previous posting noted, more people are concerned about McCentury’s ties to Bush than Obama’s ties to Wright.

  • What KevinMc said.

    Yes, RNC, please keep talking about McCain’s 100 years quote. Please keep getting voters to link the words “100 years” to the name McCain. We appreciate the help in getting our message out.

  • Five years since seeing Fahrenheit 9/11, I can’t recall: just what “conspiracy theory” are they talking about??

  • Racer X said: “According to the Book of Revelations the anti-christ is: The anti-christ will be a man, in his 40s, of MUSLIM descent, who will deceive the nations with persuassive language, and have a MASSIVE Christ-like appeal…. the prophecy says that people will flock to him and he will promise false hope and world peace, and when he is in power, will destroy everything. Is it OBAMA??”

    That would be quite a trick, considering that John wrote the Book of Revelations a long time before the creation of Islam, and he wrote it with the firm expectation that Jesus’ promise that the coming of the Kingdom of God would happen before John died.

  • RNC Chairman Mike Duncan referring to Michael Moore:
    a movie director who meets with dictators and continually expresses caustic anti-American rhetoric….

    So the Goppers are still singing their favorite song: Anti-war or anti-Bush equals anti-American. How much bleach will it take to disinfect the White House once those slime balls are out of there?

  • Hey Lance, John was a prophet, so he knew that Islam would come along 🙂 -Racer X

    And he is still alive. He just faked is death to avoid capture by the Empire. He goes by Old Ben now. Lives out in the desert with sand people, who are easily frightened, but always return in greater numbers.

  • Racer X said: “Hey Lance, John was a prophet, so he knew that Islam would come along.”

    John was an apostle and a really BAD gospel writer. His literary constructs (“the Apostle Jesus Loved” i.e., John himself) and conceits make him just painful to listen to. He wrote the book of revelations because there was a lot of that kind of stuff going around in his old age, and he decided he ought to provide the official word, being the last disciple of Jesus living at the time.

    The fact that the basic promise Jesus gave on the timing of the coming of the Kingdom of God (that is, that it would happen before the last of his disciples died) has already been passed and the fact that Jesus’ time period for the existence of the Kingdom of God (One Thousand Years, sound familar?) has been exceeded by the time we have supposedly been waiting makes me really laugh at the notion that it’s actually coming.

  • Lance and RacerX, you guys are trying to use logic and common sense. Shame on you! We all know that the Bible is MYSTERIOUS, therefore, the more romantic or evil sounding the interpretation, the closer to the truth!

  • I just groan inside whenever the goopers come up with this stuff! Unfortunately they know their audiences better than we do. Somehow they manage to drive the dialog even when the dialog is insane. In fact, the more insane it is, the better for them. Unless the public gets smarter, this is going to continue to win elections. I don’t fear the terrorists. I fear the people who have this voodoo hold on the minds of the American people.

    Excuse me, but I have to go throw up now.

  • Solution to this stupid problem is simple: Let the candidates fight it out like big boys. The DNC, RNC, Swift boaters and all other groups stay out of it and let’s create a fair fight system where the presidency is won based on the candidates merits, policoes, etc. and not this immaturity and distortion. Can the feds establish a system where the only people involved are the candidates and not the groups?????

  • Closest thing to the ANTICHRIST here is Racer! Read you Bible son… it doesn’t mention Muslim, the age of the antichrist or much of what you’ve stated. It’s this type of rhetoric and ignorance that hurts us all, in fact I’d rather have my ignorance than your supposed Biblical “knowledge!!!”

  • Comments are closed.