The ‘Yes, We Can’ video

Quite a few people emailed me yesterday morning to let me know about a new video put together by popular entertainers on behalf of Barack Obama. Initially, I just shrugged my shoulders. I’m not especially interested in celebrity culture, and there’s already been a few too many viral campaign videos — “Obama girl” comes to mind — that didn’t amount to much.

But then, after some cajoling, I took a look. And I have to say, it’s quite good.

It was originally posted here, and this version looks and sounds a bit better.

Mark Kleiman, an Obama supporter, called the video “pretty damned overwhelming,” and compared it to “Lillibullero.” Ezra Klein, who isn’t an Obama supporter, said, “Without positing any electoral impact or too closely analyzing its politics, this music video, transforming Obama’s already lyrical speeches into actual music, sung and played by actual musicians, is beautiful and affecting.”

Agreed. Obama’s best speeches have been compared to poetry, but it never occurred to me they might literally be considered lyrical.

CNN had an item about the song.

With just a few days to go before the critical Super Tuesday primaries, Black Eyed Peas’ frontman will.i.am and director Jesse Dylan, son of legendary musician Bob Dylan, have released a new song featuring a host of celebrities and one very unlikely music video star: Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.

“Yes We Can,” released Friday, is centered around footage of the speech the Illinois senator gave after the New Hampshire primary last month.

The music video includes excerpts from that Obama speech and appearances from celebrities including jazz artist Herbie Hancock, former LA Lakers captain Kareem Abdul Jabbar, singer John Legend, model Amber Valletta, actresses Kate Walsh and Scarlett Johansson, and others.

(In an interview with the Associated Press last month, Johansson had joked that she was engaged to the White House hopeful, telling a reporter: “My heart belongs to Barack.”)

Dylan and will.i.am told ABC News they did not coordinate the creation or release of the video with the Obama campaign, and are unsure Obama knows about the production.

Not to be left out, of course, the Clinton campaign has entertainers of her own.

Hillary Clinton had been campaigning Hollywood style. The candidate has appeared at several events in California flanked by a host of her closest celebrity friends.

On Friday, Ms. Clinton spoke at a fund-raiser at the Orpheum Theater in San Francisco alongside actor Ted Danson and his wife and longtime friend, actress Mary Steenburgen. Today Ms. Clinton spoke at a rally at California State University in Los Angeles with “Gidget” star Sally Field and basketball legend Earvin “Magic” Johnson.

And in still more entertainment/political news, the Grateful Dead is doing a reunion show on Obama’s behalf.

The battle to capture California’s gray-haired ponytail vote may be over: The Grateful Dead — Jerry, RIP — is endorsing Barack Obama.

Not only that, the boys are reuniting for a one-off show Monday at the Warfield Theatre in San Francisco for a GOTV rally…. And the political spin on this, not that the Obama campaign has thought of it yet, is that Obama The Uniter is the only candidate who can reunite members of the Dead for their first show together since 2004. Yes, that’s a stretch, but it’s three days before Super Tuesday and everybody has long run out of decent spin material.

Tickets were sold out instantly, of course.

Good to know.

OK, lets give Obama a Grammy, but that doesn’t mean he should be president. It isn’t what you say that matters, but what you do. It isn’t what performers say about you or sing about it — it is what you do in office. Obama had the chance to show strong leadership against the war in the senate but has doing nothing. Obama has had the chance to show strong leadership on any of a number of issues in the senate but has done nothing. I am not impressed by a video.

  • I watched this video with Mitt Romney’s face talking on a muted television screen in the background. What a contrast.

    If only we could get the power of this video down to 30 or 60 seconds. Obama is right on the issues, but he’s also right for the time.

    Hope and Change are absolutely necessary to mitigating the damage and rebuilding.

    Yes, we can.

  • This is the most powerful piece of political video as I’ve ever seen. It’s almost a shame the video is so long – it would make a tv campaign ad for the ages.

  • lets give Obama a Grammy

    Obama already has a Grammy.

    I’m wondering if Obama will end up releasing a DVD compilation of all his best speeches.

  • Agreed — the most powerful political message I’ve ever seen.

    Check out the commenters at Hot Air and Red State. They’re scared shitless.

  • I shrugged my shoulders at it too, but then started seeing it everywhere. So i broke down and watched it. It’s really good.

    What Obama supporters need to stress heavily is that what can be called fluff may well be what is needed to shake many people from their political stupor, apathy, and cynicism.

    Barack Obama is not going to save this country. But, if he can inspire people to become truly involved, the people can save this country. No politician will save the nation, only its people can do that. I’m not particularly excited about Obama. In fact, he kind of angers me because my cynicism is easier than hope (twisted, i know). What i am excited about is hearing people under 35 really taking an interest. I was at the bar last night and people were animated in talking about politics, and for a change it wasn’t just complaining. That’s where the hope lies.

  • To all the cynics who say inspiration isn’t important, that we merely need someone competent and wonkish in the White House — remember that this message gets new voters to the polls (as we’ve seen in every primary state so far) and if that holds true in November with Obama as the nominee, we’re going to see more people involved and that’ll translate into a lot of down-ticket votes for liberal Democrats as well.

    FDR was a politician who led by inspiration too — famously described as having a “second-rate intellect but a first-rate demeanor,” he had no fixed idea for the New Deal beyond the name when he was elected. But he inspired people to get involved, and he got waves of liberal Democrats elected into office, and together that led to a new mandate for real reform across the board.

    Sounds good to me.

  • Whoa…i went to RedState, as suggested by TR. I couldn’t believe my eyes!

    I didn’t bother to count the number of times i read something along the lines of “i disagree with everything he says, but i’ll vote for him.” What is going on? Is this one of the signs that the End Times are nigh?

  • I saw this last night. I was skeptical at first about the celebrity involvement, but the words and music are so powerful and inspirational that my cynicism washed away and I was truly moved. I like Obama’s positions and resume, but it is the impact that he has on emotions that changes the dynamic politics and government. Skeptics and Hillary supporters can pushed back all they want, but this man is different and now is the time for his leadership.

  • I was watching This Week with Georges Stephanopolis, and all the panelists agreed (for what it’s worth) that the Republicans will be excited if Clinton gets the nod and afraid if Obama gets the nod (the polls continue to show that Clinton would lose to McCain and Obama would beat him).

    This video (especially the man wearing the Obama t-shirt) illustrates that kind of profound effect that Obama is having on people. He’s not a savior, it’s true. But he is a messenger, and anybody who hears the message almost always walks away impressed and excited.

    I HOPE he becomes our next president.

  • On Friday, Ms. Clinton spoke at a fund-raiser at the Orpheum Theater in San Francisco alongside actor Ted Danson and his wife and longtime friend, actress Mary Steenburgen. Today Ms. Clinton spoke at a rally at California State University in Los Angeles with “Gidget” star Sally Field and basketball legend Earvin “Magic” Johnson.

    How inspiring!

    And Mary, assuming you’re a Clinton supporter, I’ve got to say, arguing that one should not vote for Obama because he never “led” against the Iraq War while in the Senate seems a little counterintuitive to me. Obama was one of the few Democrats with the courage to come out against it less than a year after 9/11, when any foreign policy disagreement with the Bush administration was tantamount to treason. At the time, he was planning to run for the US Senate, and the smart money for anyone seeking national office was on toeing the line and beating the drums for war. You know, like the Clintons, Podhoretz, O’Hanlon, John Edwards, etc. were doing. But Obama had the wisdom – and integrity – to come out against it. Go back and read his speech. To the letter, he was correct, and to the letter, Hillary was wrong. Why remind people of that? Or are you following the Rovian strategy of attacking an opponent’s strengths?

  • Wow, how can you not watch this and have years in your eyes.

    Someone get this on the main stream media now.

  • Is it just me, or are the massive stone walls of Fortress Hillary beginning to tremble?

    As for RedState, I don’t think it’s so much fear as it is a realization that someone’s been trying to build bridges.

    Building bridges—ever notice how harsh the ridicule from Fortress Hillary gets, every time that issue comes up? They call it “Conservative Framing.” They call it “typically Republican.” They call it every name under the book, if for no their reason than to try and stop the earth from moving beneath the foundations of their lair.

    But the earth HAS moved—and those massive Hill-istine walls just might be on the verge of tumbling down.

  • Mary, you, like so many other Americans, have drank the Clinton kool-aid of saying Obama has no substance.

    I strongly encourage you to visit barackobama.com and to read his policy positions and do your own research on what he has done. Stop relying on what other people tell you is true when there is so much primary information out there that says otherwise.

    Obama has been the leading voice in ethics legislation, nuclear non-proliferation, death penalty system, abortion, and a voice for the downtrodden and voiceless as a community organizer in the streets of Chicago. And to say that he has not led with the war in Iraq is disingenuous. You and I both know he opposed this war from the beginning with prescient arguments as to why it would be a bad idea. His funding of the war is based on the fact that he is not going to leave troops without equipment in the middle of nowhere when you have the moral obligation to clean up a disaster as best you can. There is no contradiction.

    And for your information, Hillary has voted the same way.

    So don’t just drink the kool-aid. Become an independent voice of reason. Change isn’t going to happen because Hillary says she can beat Republicans. Change happens when millions of voices come together, lead through inspiration, to push against conventional thinking. Hillary thinks she can do it on her own and with her big donor buddies.

    Change doesn’t work that way.

  • I’m just fed up to here with the pragmatic, experienced people who got us into this mess. The ones who now profess to care about Joe Lunchbox when, through their efforts, Joe’s lunchbox is stamped “Made in China.” They’ve shown us their best stuff and it stinks on ice.

  • I agree with jackpine and I’ve seen it this way for a while now.

    I don’t think Obama’s the chosen one or even near saintly. He doesn’t bring all the answers or aligns with me on all the issues. But he crosses bridges and inspires people to care. That’s very important to me because I think those inspired masses can change the country for the better.

    That’s also why I’m not too concerned about Obama ‘running out of time’ as Super Tuesday nears. I don’t think he has to sell himself, or that’s really been his platform. I see him trying to get the American people to buy into their image of our government, to buy into excitement instead of damage control. Very risky since it’s not pragmatic, but, and it still astounds me, it’s been successful so far.

    Funny, I’m reminded of Family Guy at the moment. Specifically the episode where Peter wins a mail sweepstakes and gets to choose a prize: a boat, or whatever is in the mystery box. It sounds bad in this analogy, but I voted for the box already, and I hope most others do the same. And it’s not to disparage Hilary, who might be a better President than Obama (who can really know?), but I feel whatever marginal difference will be more than made up for by a galvanized American people. That said, I hope there isn’t a cynical backlash in the event of a Hilary nomination– it would be terrible for the country/election and she doesn’t deserve to take the heat for that.

    …I think I filled the sub clause quota for the debates.

  • I am perplexed why any Democrat would want Hillary given what Obama offers the party and potentially the country. As many of you know, I lean right on many issues and don’t agree with his platform as a whole… but everytime I see and hear Obama, he seems to generate a feeling of inspiration and hope. I can’t say that for Hillary, that’s for sure.

  • JRS Jr, I dont often agree with you, but you hit the nail on the head. Im a bit of cynic, but that feeling of inspiration and hope…it gets me…

  • I really think that the tide is turning. I have nothing against Clinton supporters and i have never used the phrase “kool aid”. But they seem to be getting more defensive as the days go by…and much more derogatory. (not here, this is such an adult place to talk, amen and hallelujah)

    I hate all the defeatocrat, Repigs, et al. stuff. But when i’ve posted elsewhere saying anything positive about the deeper meaning of the Obama movement, i’ve been called an “asshole” and a slew of other names. This is what i want out of; this is what i want to end. I have conservative friends, and it is possible to talk to them and even reach agreement. But it will never happen so long as we all just keep calling each other names.

    And i am particularly dismayed by the fact that Democrats have begun launching this stuff at each other. (And by no means are Obama supporters too engaged with halo polishing to stoop to that level as well.)

  • Naysayers upthread aside, I think that is hands-down the best political ad/video ever conceived and executed. It might be the glossiest, glitziest, least-policy-related thing ever, but it is amazing.

    After watching that, and learning about Obama’s rally in Boise, can you honestly tell me that something isn’t happening with this candidacy? Forget Bill Clinton versus Bob Dole—Barack Obama could make John McCain look as lively and viable as Bob Dole’s right hand.

  • So, that video is 4 minutes and 30 seconds long (unless edited down)…and Obama raised $32 million in January, from 250,000 new donors (me among them), is that enough cash for a halftime ad tonight?

    That thing NEEDS to be shown during the Superbowl. It is a game-changing, back-breaking play. There is no bigger audience, there is no bigger moment. Talk about “the fierce urgency of now.” Super-Tuesday is in 36 hours, and the environment surrounding the SuperBowl is like none other. Hundreds of millions of people are watching worldwide. People who don’t give a shit about the game watch for the ads. The ads! All everybody talks about the next day are the ads.

    Picture the Superbowl party when this video comes on. Everyone stops to see what this ad is. You can’t blow that video off. If you aren’t moved, or at least tweaked by that, you’re hopeless (literally). There is no downside here. Anybody who reacts negatively never voting for him anyhow, and the sheer number of people who will be left thinking, “Wow. I gotta find out more about this Obama guy” is what pushes him over the top to the nomination.

    The best part? It’s not even an Obama ad. His name is never mentioned or shown. He doesn’t need to spoil the mood by “approving this message.” Hell, John Legend alone could bankroll placing this thing, so the campaign doesn’t need to break the bank running it. What the is dipdive.com anyway? Is this their ad, and Obama is merely a (willing) prop?

    Just you imagine if THAT VIDEO was what everyone was talking about for the 36 hours and what happens going into the day when half the states have primaries?

    This could be the either the greatest moment in advertising ever if it works, or it could be the greatest opportunity ever missed if they don’t try it. I can only hope that the fact this came out yesterday is somehow indicative of this being a Superowl ad that leaked out.

  • When McCain wins the GOP’s nomintation, to me it’s a clear signal that the “adults” are back in charge of the Party. My only hope is the Dems can say the same thing if they pick Obama. Perhaps I am in la-la land, but the general election environment would probably be most “mature” in a Obama/McCain match up.

    Even though a race with Hillary would be much better for the GOP’s candidate, it would get sooo ugly (on both sides) and I just dont have the stomach for it at this crap anymore.

  • Remember how people thought that the Eminem song “Mosh” would effect the ’04 general election? It didn’t and neither will this.

  • Yes, he’s no JFK, Obama is BETTER!
    The man didn’t come from a politically strong family or money … he has charted his own path from the bottom up … that’s why he is truly in touch with American and real issues.
    We love you Obama 2008! Cali for Obama!
    no Koolaide – just the facts!

  • JRS Jr:

    I am perplexed why any Democrat would want Hillary given what Obama offers the party and potentially the country.

    Clinton infatuation syndrome.
    It really goes deep with some folks.
    So deep…
    That someone with integrity like Josh Marshall,
    Can turn a jaundiced eye to Bill Clinton’s dealings in Kazakhstan:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/us/politics/31donor.html?em&ex=1201928400&en=30526cefe8453a3c&ei=5070

    And say flippantly: All ex-presidents do it.
    (All Josh… as all whose names ends in Bush?)

    They simply can’t see the Clintons for what they cost this country in the past…
    And what they will cost this country in the future should Hillary be elected.

    They don’t see the future like some of us do.
    You can say: The past is a preview of the future.
    And that what happened to the Democrat party in 1994 will happen again in 2010.
    Or that Hillary’s health care efforts will go the way they did in 1993: DOA.
    Or that Bill has earned your deepest distrust…
    But you are flapping your typing fingers in the wind.

    These people love their Clintons.
    And they will ride that two-headed monster to the bitter end…
    Even it will destroy the Democratic party again.

    So be it.

  • jurassicpork @ 29…

    I clicked and shuffled through your post.
    In critique, I am just going to cut to the punch line at the bottom of the verbiage:
    (Hint: Learn to put your theme statement in the leading paragraph.)

    Barack Obama will likely be the first black president of the United States. Yet as one African American voter recently put it, “For me, now is not the time to experiment – maybe later, but not now.”

    There was a poster here, who got shamed and migrated over to Kevin Drum’s site.
    His name was Swan… and he was repeatedly known to aver stuff like this:

    America is not ready for a black president.
    http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_01/013027.php#1217110

    Seems like you have the same disease.
    I’d to suggest you look at some polls…
    The ones I have seen show America is indeed ready:
    To elect a black.
    To elect a woman.

    Perhaps it is you and Swan that aren’t ready…
    Suggestion: Look deep inside for the answer to that one.

  • Was that the lead singer from Live? I think that one singer was on Fresh Prince of Bel Air. And Amber Valetta? All the stars of the ’90s. Here’s the thing: That part of Obama’s NH speech is the single best passage I’ve ever heard from a politician in my lifetime. It doesn’t need embellishment by a bunch of celebrities. To me, it just comes off as self-serving. Scarlet Jo standing in a studio intoning wisdom? Worse than The Island. Hopefully Obama will win despite this.

  • Mary in #1 said “It isn’t what you say that matters, but what you do. It isn’t what performers say about you or sing about it — it is what you do in office.”

    This is true, as far as it goes. However, in politics, it is as much what you can persuade other people to do as what you yourself do. Just look at all the godawful crap Bush & Cheney have inspired their people to do (or not do) in terms of invading Iraq, failing to pay attention to looming crises like 9/11 and New Orleans, etc., etc.

    The first step is building a base, and then the second is doing something with it. Look at the video and see what Obama inspired a bunch of musicians to do, without even asking for anything like that. Obama has stated his goals, in fair detail on his website and elsewhere. I happen to like them, though your mileage may differ. He’ll have good people working for him and with him, and if the musicians are anything to go by, he’ll have some highly inspired good people working for him. I think he’s the best bet we’ve seen in quite a while.

  • Maybe I was just grumpy when I looked at the video yesterday, but I got the idea fairly quickly and clicked out long before it was done. If inspiration is what I want, I much prefer the wherethehellismatt video which has nothing to do with politics but everything to do with celebrating life.

  • Harking back to #1, who said,

    It isn’t what you say that matters, but what you do.

    I have to respectfully disagree. What you do is important, but especially as President, what you say is absolutely crucial. The President controls the “bully pulpit” and speaks — whether intended or not — for what used to be called The Free World. The President embodies our noblest hopes or our basest impulses and amplifies them. We have lived a long time — two decades or more — without national hope, without a unified sense of being in this together, and it has corroded our discourse. Maybe a President Obama cannot remake American politics — but perhaps American politics has been undergoing an underground seismic shift that he can immanentize. If Obama wins the White House, there’ll be at least four years to try. Maybe he’ll truly reach across the aisle and discover the semi-mythical, near-extinct moderate Republican. Maybe he’ll sweep enough Democrats into office on his coattails that he wouldn’t need to. Maybe people will finally stand up and shout down the talking heads who preach what they’re told by their corporate masters and who poison the well of civic life.

    Who knows? Maybe the horse will sing…

  • “In the unlikely story that is America. There has never been anything FALSE about HOPE.”

    There are kernals of truth in the American mythology and Obama is tapping into them. We have always been far from perfect, but throughout our history, individuals have arisen and helped lead us forward toward a “more perfect union.” This video amplifies upon that, and it made me want to believe in that mythology again. I’m just not sure if that is a good thing. It is one thing to yearn for political unity. Will all those who are drawn by Obama’s campaign message feel their work is done if they are able to elect him? Because, in truth, their work will have just begun. The change Obama is calling for will require compromise. As I look inward to see what I am willing to compromise, I find myself unable to believe that my opposite numbers on the right will be willing to compromise anything. This is why – although I absolutely love Obama’s rhetorical skills and am drawn to the underlying themes – I remain wary.

  • That thing NEEDS to be shown during the Superbowl.

    TPM is saying that it will appear on local stations during the Superbowl, but not nationally.

    Personally, I’m waiting for The Romney Video of Who Let the Dogs Out…woof woof. Since Romney is the cool white friend I’ve been looking for.

  • ***Geez will you stop already with “the Clintons” as if Hillary has already been president. It’s Hillary, herself, and if you can’t see that then you can’t see her objectively. I’ve been to both O’s and H’s sites and neither are as progressive as I know they can be. So how do we get them to listen to us. So many come out and spout their opinions once every four years and then go back to sleep saying “take care of it for us will ya”. These are not kings and queens being elected here but representatives and in the past it seems they promise anything, get elected, and then stop listening to the people. Neither one of these candidates deserve to be slammed like they are being. Both have served their country well.

    No repub will win the WH this election so for the first time the presidency will be settled by the democratic primary. That being the case we deserve to know as much as we can about their positions and especially who is advising them…who they are listening to. This is hard to accomplish when people keep “glamorizing” their personalities. I don’t like seeing people projecting what they believe onto their chosen candidates without even knowing if the candidates believe the same way.

    Look at how compromising the current dems have been to the republicans: (from Glenn Greenwald at salon.com)

    “…In almost every case, the proposals that are enacted are ones favored by the White House and supported by all GOP lawmakers, and then Democrats split and enough of them join with Republicans to ensure that the GOP gets what it wants. That’s “bipartisanhip” in Washington:
    To support the new Bush-supported FISA law:
    GOP – 48-0
    Dems – 12-36

    To compel redeployment of troops from Iraq:
    GOP – 0-49
    Dems – 24-21

    To confirm Michael Mukasey as Attorney General:
    GOP – 46-0
    Dems – 7-40

    To confirm Leslie Southwick as Circuit Court Judge:
    GOP – 49-0
    Dems – 8-38

    Kyl-Lieberman Resolution on Iran:
    GOP – 46-2
    Dems – 30-20

    To condemn MoveOn.org:
    GOP – 49-0
    Dems – 23-25

    The Protect America Act:
    GOP – 44-0
    Dems – 20-28

    Declaring English to be the Government’s official language:
    GOP – 48-1

    The Military Commissions Act:
    GOP – 53-0
    Dems – 12-34

    To renew the Patriot Act:
    GOP – 54-0
    Dems – 34-10

    Cloture Vote on Sam Alito’s confirmation to the Supreme Court:
    GOP – 54-0
    Dems – 18-25

    Authorization to Use Military Force in Iraq:
    GOP – 48-1
    Dems – 29-22

    If this is uniting the country by compromise then it is failing in it’s mission. These dems have stopped listening to the people and now Bush issues a signing statement to use tax money to build permanent bases in Iraq in spite of congress (who is supposed to hold the purse strings) saying no. So are we now in Iraq permanently? Pelosi and Reid and Clinton and Obama have all failed to stop this. There should be consequences for “bad actors” as Obama calls them or else this is the result…they ignore congress and do what they want.
    You bet I want some particulars out of Obama and Clinton and not just pretty rhetoric and I won’t get it by humming tunes of glory and praise.

  • This vid has gone viral – 365, 000 views in 1 day!

    http://www.viralvideochart.com/youtube/barack_obama__yes_we_can_music_video?id=BHEO_fG3mm4

    We CAN win this thing. We only have 1 MORE DAY.

    Please send the vid to everyone you know.

    If you are worried that Obama is all fluff and great speeches, please see and pass out Obama’s Blueprint for change. It will answer all you naysayers. It is incredibly detailed and intelligent. He’s got hillary matched on the details with the most important thing of all, he can inspire
    http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/ObamaBlueprintForChange.pdf

  • Wouldn’t it be funny if someone did do this with a Bush speech? Maybe with some silly tune. I’d suggest the Looney Tunes but, I have a soft spot for Bugs so it would ruin my lifelong hero.
    But, a serious video with the greatest hits of Bush would be fun.
    Anyway, this is simply a beautiful video.

  • it’s good that he can inspire because his supporters are putting normal people to sleep.

    this guy is a one trick pony.

    i am a grown up. i do not want to be inspired. i do not want to be a part of any stupid movement. i just want good government. clinton = good government. look it up if you are too young to remember. it’s in the history books.

    obama has been in federal government for less than three years and you want to hand him over the huge mess junior has created? ever stop to think you might be setting humpty dumpty up for a great big fall?

    this country has gone too far down the drain to base a vote on a video of speeches set to music or lofty rhetoric about change and inspiration. that is all bullshit. it will not put food on your family. under clinton the economy was very good, much better than now. what will obama do?

    hillary clinton will fight. she will not back down. that is a proven fact. the only thing obama has proven is that he makes a nice speech.

    if the economy crashes six months after he takes office, and we slide into some really hard economic times, will you then look back at this video and wax nostalgic about putting an unexperienced diletante into the most important job in the world again? that is, if you still have a roof over your head, can still turn your power on, and haven’t frozen or starved to death.

    we have real problems here little children. this faker is not the answer.

  • I would hate to have to vote for Clinton in November, so I probably will be voting for Obama on Tuesday. (I greatly preferred Edwards.) But as eloquent as I think Obama is, “Yes We Can” doesn’t particularly inspire me to vote for him.
    Perhaps I am in the minority but I am far more interested in the contents of the “Blueprint” Mary (#44) refers to, not some slickly produced star-studded video celebrating Obama’s feel-good rhetoric. And I am more interested in Obama’s record, and like bjobotts (#42) I think both he and Clinton have been (as have most other leading Democrats) been far less progressive than they should be. Let’s keep in mind that there will be a lot of work to do no matter which one of these Democrats is elected.
    Finally, if anyone has been drinking “Kool Aid” lately, or had an “infatuation syndrome,” it would be a some of Obama’s supporters judging from comments here and elsewhere.

  • Yes, we can.

    We have all waited for a leader who could unite us. He has arrived. Now it is up to us. We need to get behind him and support him.

    If we don’t we will get the age old divisive politics… and that include Hillary.

    Obama’s strong record and lifetime achievements show that he not only talks a great vision, but he acts on it as well.

    Please give of your time, support, and, yes, donations if possible. however, if you do nothing else, talk to others. We need to do our part.

    Yes, we can.

  • i swear to god, if you “have been waiting for leader” you are a braindead, mouthbreathing, moron. sure you didn’t vote for bush?

  • obama supporter: we reject the age old politics of the clintons who were the last democrats to beat the republicans! we reject their politics!

    clinton supporter: obama supporters are dumb asses.

  • obama supporter: we reject the last politics of the last democratic president who balanced the budget, left a surplus, and had the best economy in history! we reject him and his wife! yippee! we want a guy that hasn’t even served three years in the senate! yippee! republicans like him! yippee! i can join a movement and have a leader happy day!

  • please send obama more millions so he can make more cool videos and buy airtime so he can show you how cool and hip he is and you can come to gether and be part of something donate now this movement is so cool!

  • i’m sure there are a half-million people waiting to support hillary. somewhere.

    i’m sure the unparalleled participation in the primaries is just due to the excitement of hillary finally getting her turn. and even if it isn’t participation in the political process isn’t an indicator of civic health or anything.

    besides, who needs inspiration or new ideas? hillary’s got experience, the incantation of which which will really serve her well when running against senator methusaleh on the other side.

  • English Teacher:
    1) Obama didn’t make the video.
    2) Please provide some support for your assertion that Obama is an “unexperienced diletante”.
    3) As an English Teacher, please learn to spell dilettante.
    4) I get that you think Clinton is a better candidate, but could you not call me a dumb ass?

  • I’m almost 48 years old. I’ve been a lifelong Democrat. If Hillary gets the nomination, I’ll leave the party.

    Hillary’s plan to Thatcherize the health care system before it even gets off the ground is worse than the mess we’ve got now. Her plan would delay a wrking system until it collapses from it’s own weight. Obama’s is only slightly better, but it stands a chance.

    Inspiration matters in elections. Bill had it and combined with 12 years of Reagan / Bush it’s what got him elected. Dukakis, Mondale, Kerry – all of these wooden wonks didn’t inspire people enough to get elected.

    We need someone who lacks the “experience” of selling out, over and over again. Of being owned by big business after lawyering for Wal Mart.

    I would have preferred someone whose positions were more closely aligned with Kucinich, but Obama is BY FAR the lesser of two evils. If it came down to Hillary vs Paul, I could probably live with Paul.

  • Hey Teach,
    “obama has been in federal government for less than three years”

    And Bill Clinton lost both the Senate and the House in just two years. How long do you think it would take Hillary to lose them again?

    See what I did there? I used capital letters. Try it–you’ll like it.

  • It has gotten even worse with Swan over there at Drum’s site:

    Yeah, the poor regulars over there must be tearing their hair out. I was finding myself reveling at Swan’s emmigration, but now I’m suspicious (due to the multiple consecutive posts, a Swan trademark) that “english teacher” is simply Swan with a new name. I went to check out a video he did on Youtube last week, by the way, and could hardly believe it. He claims to be a lawyer, but if any law school graduated him then woe betide the poor sod who has to depend on Swan to defend him.

  • Piggybacking on the discussion upthread regarding Obama inspiring change rather than being solely responsible for it himself, it’s worth noting that this is a recognized (albeit new in our corporate culture) form of leadership. It’s called “transformative leadership” and is taught alongside more traditional leadership models in MBA programs around the world. It stands in stark contrast with the top-down style of leadership we generally associate with the White House, but that doesn’t mean that it’s incompatible (I’d argue that the domination-oriented leadership model has failed thoroughly — so this must be better!). /grin/ It doesn’t surprise me one bit that this is the kind of leader Sen. Obama is, given his age and background. Sen. Clinton, on the other hand, came of age when women were breaking through glass ceilings, but only if they acted like men and led like men. (If anything, they had to be hyper-aggressive in leadership style in order to get male subordinates to fall in line.) The hierarchical, Patton-esque model of leadership turns off young people because we’re used to more progressive group dynamics, and older folks have flat-out seen that the approach to leading this nation has got to change for the outcome to be different.

    So anyway, the next time someone goes on about Obama being inspirational fluff, here’s one more way to convince them otherwise.

  • I too was skeptical of the celebrity involvement, but I am a blind woman and i was truly moved by the words of Barack Obama…INSPIRING!!!

  • The video is the most moving video I’ve ever seen. I don’t watch TV, seldom listen to radio and go to movies, and had never before heard Obama speak, though I voted for him. I also didn’t recognize any of the celebrities in the video: I thought they were ordinary people.

    Obama’s words blew me away. He has the ability to speak like FDR and JFK did, and that’s exactly what we need now: A leader who can inspire Americans around a message of hope that’s not based on fear tactics and demonizing others.

    Obama is what we need. He can make people believe again in the dream that is America. And he’s smart and a collaborative enough leader to build a Cabinet of leaders who have the brains, creativity and experience to transform this nation to become even more than it was in its golden days of glory.

    Yes we can!

  • I watched the “Yes We Can” video and all I can say is finally America is on the way of finding a leader who is not only inspirational for the future, but also right for the moment.

    Yes, we can!

  • I sick of hearing that Obama has no experience. None of the canidates have any experience in being President of the United States, Bush had eight years to get experience, and he still doesn’t have it right!! The only Republician who would make a good President is Ron Paul.

  • This is the most inspiring video I’ve ever seen in my life. I literally get chills. Barack Obama is an amazing man and motivational speaker. I can’t wait until this man is in charge of my country. Change is coming, Obama is coming.

  • Comments are closed.