‘There’s no report, there’s no investigation, and there are no sanctions’

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform’s hearing with Valerie Plame Wilson produced plenty of fascinating insights, but my personal favorite was the grilling Dr. James Knodell, Director of the Office of Security in the White House, took from Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.).

First, a little background. There’s a provision known as Executive Order 12958 prohibits “any knowing, willful or negligent action that could reasonably be expected to result in an unauthorized disclosure of classified information.” Whether the leak is intentional or mere “negligence,” E.O. 12958 mandates that the administration take administrative actions against employees who violate these rules, and adjust procedures in order to prevent similar security breaches in the future. (It also mandates that a White House employee who believe he or she might have leaked classified information has an obligation to report it.)

Indeed, E.O. 12958 provides that when a violation or infraction of the administrative rules occurs, each agency must “take appropriate and prompt corrective action.” It’s not optional — under executive branch directives, it’s incumbent upon the White House to conduct an internal investigation of the security breach and take “prompt corrective action.”

That White House officials were involved in just such a leak is no longer open to debate. The question then becomes what kind of mandatory investigation the White House launched.

The answer: none.

Knodell was on hand to answer committee member’s questions. After some Q&A from Cummings, Knodell acknowledged that the Office of Security in the White House, which is directly responsible for responding to these kinds of leaks, conducted no investigation, prepared no report, and took no sanctions against anyone.

“So, it sounds to me like we had a breach on top of a breach,” Cummings told Knodell. “We had one situation where Ms. Valerie Plame Wilson’s identity and covert status was disclosed, and then within the very office in the White House, there’s no report, there’s no investigation, and there are no sanctions.”

Waxman jumped in.

Waxman: I just want to pin this point down. Do you know whether there was an investigation at the White House, after the leaks came out?

Knodell: I don’t have any knowledge of an investigation within my office.

Waxman: Ever?

Knodell: I do not.

Waxman: Because the president said he was investigating this matter. He was going to get to the bottom of it. You’re not aware that any investigation took place.

Knodell: Not within my office, sir.

Waxman: And if there was an investigation, what were you referring to? Mr. Fitzgerald’s investigation?

Knodell: Yes, the outside investigation.

Waxman: OK, that didn’t start until month and months later, and that had the purpose of narrowly looking to see whether there was a criminal law violated. But there was an obligation for the White House to investigate whether classified information was being leaked inappropriately, wasn’t there?

Knodell: (extremely long pause) If that was the case, yes.

I know this may seem like a minor point, but let’s be clear about what we’ve learned here. The White House office responsible for overseeing classified information knew that some administration officials were responsible for leaking classified information, and despite regulations mandating at least some kind of investigation, this office literally did nothing.

They didn’t care. They leaked classified information, exposed a covert CIA official, undermined national security, and then blew off every rule in the books about how to deal with just such an incident. As Hilzoy put it:

The point of investigating a leak of classified information is not just to assign blame; it’s also to figure out how to fix things so that no similar leaks ever happen again. The best possible spin one could put on this, for the White House, is that they were completely unconcerned with covert agents getting outed. The more likely story, of course, is that they knew perfectly well who had leaked the information, and didn’t want it investigated because they knew that the more details found their way onto paper, the worse it would be.

The Bush gang was obligated to keep classified information secret, and they failed to do their duty. They were obligated to report possible leaks, and they failed to do their duty. They were obligated to investigate what happened, and they failed to do their duty.

The mind reels.

if the white house isn’t going to follow the laws that are passed by congress, why in the world would they pay any attention to a simple executive order?

  • …that some administration officials were responsible for leaking classified information…

    So they’ll argue that Cheney or Bush declassified the information. right? Is there anyway to pre-emptively deny that excuse to them?

  • But…But…

    Bush said that nobody wanted to get to the bottom of it more than he did!

  • Perhaps I’m engaging in connecting the dots a bit too rashly, but maybe Jeff Gannon/Guckert was involved in the strategic (ahem) “outing” and when Bush said that he would “get to the [ahem] *bottom* of it” …

  • Man, I’ve been waiting for people to get back around to this! Yippee!

    Every time I’ve heard Victoria Toensing or one of her ilk talking during the Libby trial about how there was no crime, I’ve been crazed by the obvious fact that a leak undeniably happened, and whether or not the Intelligence Identity law was broken, there ARE rules we expect the White House to follow when handling sensitive info which WERE clearly broken. Even if the leak was an accident!

    Thank god for a Democratic majority, and Waxman with subpoena power. It’s nice to get this White House security guy testifying that he did nothing. Ha!

  • Remember the two rules of “great” leadership.
    1. The boss is never wrong (especially this crowd of radicals).
    2. When the boss is wrong, refer to rule #1.

  • The White House didn’t need an investigation. They knew what happened. They didn’t need to figure out how to prevent it in the future, they just gave Cheney the authority to declassify any intelligence or secret he wanted, without review by the classifying agencies. See, they fixed it.

    No fuss, no muss.

  • I’m inclined to agree with Lance. I see no way that even this administration would have just “not cared” about a leak. The only reason they wouldn’t bother to investigate is if they already knew the answer.

  • Knodell: (extremely long pause) If that was the case, yes.

    I suspect that Knodell’s marching papers are being drafted as I type.

    God how I love oversight.

  • The low point, for me, was Rep. Lynn Westmoreland (R-Ga) badgering Plame over her party affiliation. She asked why that was relevant, then finally “admitted” that she was a Democrat. Eeek! This reminded me of the HUAC witch hunts: We don’t care if you were treasonously outed by Bush, Cheney, Rove, Novak and the rest of the crime family; just ‘fess up about your evil political affiliation.

    I’m surprised the knuckle-dragging Westmoreland — who was unable name any more than three of the Ten Commandments he wanted posted in the halls of Congress — didn’t demand to know her religious affiliation and bra size.

  • And no, this isn’t a minor point at all. This is huge. Under normal circumstances (pre-1994 era of government) this would be front-page news, above the fold, and more than enough to generate a whole series of additional investigations (and most certainly if this was a GOP congress investigating the Clinton administration.)

  • I posted this comment in another section but I meant to post it here:

    I feel such grief for our nation, and it just keeps getting worse and worse. This latest revelation is so despicable and so unnecessary that words fail me. This is not a “pass the popcorn” moment, it is a tragedy. The damage done to the very fabric of our government by the Bush administration may never be repaired. The abuse of power is so astonishing, and so far reaching that to mention impeachment is superfluous. The word that comes to my mind is treason. Congress get off your lazy butts and do something about this!

    Comment by GRACIOUS — 3/16/2007 @ 5:08 pm

  • Re: #11: by any chance was the question phrased, “Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Democrat (sic) party?”

  • There’s a provision known as Executive Order 12958 prohibits “any knowing, willful or negligent action that could reasonably be expected to result in an unauthorized disclosure of classified information.”

    Slow down. Let’s look at this in detail and see how it will be spun/defended.

    But there was an obligation for the White House to investigate whether classified information was being leaked inappropriately, wasn’t there?

    Knodell: (extremely long pause) If that was the case, yes.

    Okay, it seems taht Knodell is saying that the WH had an obligation IF classified information was leaked. There seems to be some doubt as to whether Plame’s covert status was ‘classified’. So that will be the Republican’t first line of defense.

    The only other line of defense I can see for the WH not conducting the investigation is that the information (if classified) was AUTHORIZED. If the WH authorized the disclosure, then WH was under no obligation to investigate.

    Of course, if that is the case, then the political vindictiveness of the Admin is exposed.

  • The answer: none.

    NONE???

    NOTHING???

    ShrubCo didn’t do ANYTHING???

    Man. I’m just chagrined. I gotta say, my faith in these guys is a little shaky right now. There must be an explanation for this slip up. Or maybe a couple of explanations. They might even have as many as 7 or 8 explanations for such a mistake.

    It’s sort of a big deal. It may take kind of a combo-explanation or something. “Supersize that explanation if you could and throw in a side of lies.” Ha-Ha. Something like that. Kind of lighten the mood and create a little distraction. Sort of a diversion.

    We just have to be patient. I mean, getting all cynical and everything about our most highly placed politicians and their lacky’s is almost unpatriotic and maybe even…defeatist. Dang.

    Yeah. We don’t want to go there. It’s Friday and all. The weekend’s coming. This stuff will all be sorted out by Monday. Fresh start and all that. That’s the ticket.

  • Re: #13, to follow that point, this is why impeachment is the only acceptable solution to the current situation. If the country is going to survive, if this administration is going to be remembered with shame rather than used in the future as precedent, they need to be impeached before their term expires, and then convicted. It is the only way that the country can assert the rule of law on a rogue executive branch. And this administration with its rampant and shameless lawbreaking, is most definitely that.

    It is hard to see what rises to the level of an impeachable offense if none of the pervasive behavior we have seen in the last six years does not.

  • FOX NEWS:

    HANNITY: Mr. President, has your administration done all the terrible things those who hate America say it’s done?

    BUSH: Now, Sean, I’ve never said that my critics hate America. I’ve said they love the terrorists, but that’s not the same.

    HANNITY: Then, how do you answer these child molesters and Satan worshipers — not all Democrats are, of course — who accuse the White House of being part of the Plame scandal?

    BUSH: I don’t remember a Plame scandal.

    HANNITY: Of course not! And what do you say to bedwetters — not all of the liberal media, of course — who criticise your handling of the war in Iraq?

    BUSH: I don’t remember a war in Iraq, Sean.

    HANNITY: Of course not! How many of us do? It’s those quiche-eating snots at CNN who keep crying “Wolf!” and fooling the American people into thinking that we’re at war!

  • Well…maybe it’s time to start hammering these thugs with their own weapons—to wit:

    As regards the subject of impeachment proceedings for this administration and its flying monkeys, ***the phrase “high crimes and misdemeanors” is a term of art that includes many offenses that are not criminally or civilly actionable but are, nevertheless, grounds for impeachment and removal from office. Many of those grounds survive today only in the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and include such things as dereliction of duty, moral turpitude, and conduct unbecoming which can adversely affect good order and discipline and bring discredit to the person, his office, his organization, and his country.***

    Now, if POTUS is the C-in-C of the Armed Forces, then civilian or not—UCMJ applies to him—and he may well be subject to trial by military tribunal. That takes the GOP roadblocks in the Congress out of the picture altogether. Likewise, the mere notion that impeachment is wholly justified, as per the above excerpt, should start fueling the fires of a national resolve to bring this administration down—this year.

    Oh. I’m sorry. Did you want to know where this little scrap of drivel—this hodge-podge of an idea that the Right will surely denounce—came from?

    Okay.

    “High Crimes and Misdemeanors”—by Ann Coulter.

    It sure is easy to fix a Thankgiving dinner—when the turkey actually cooks the turkey….

    as explained by Ann Coulter in her recent book entitled High Crimes and Misdemeanors,

  • I really like Steve’s point. Bush has repeatedly cited (bragged about) his position as Commander-in-Chief. Why not invoke the UCMJ as an authority to try him in front of a military tribunal (what a delicious thought!). So what if the Constitution may not allow the Prez to be dumped under military law. It would be something like the OJ verdicts — acquitted in one, nailed in the other. Bush might walk, but not with that “crapped-in-my-pants” gait.

    I wonder what powers — militarily — a CNC/President might have in overruling a UCMJ conviction. Congress has the power to remove a president, but something like a “non-binding” military conviction could be legally possible. Because it’s never been attempted doesn’t make it impossible.

  • Watching Knodell testify I felt like I was in the garage with Felt and Woodward.

    The natural thing to do would have been to conduct an investigation, but the fact that one was not done suggests (1) the WH knew all along what happened (2) someone stopped an investigation from occurring (3) whoever the culprit, it was someone indispensable.

    Knodell was obviously uncomfortable admitting there was no investigation at first, but he seemed more comfortable repeating the admission when asked clarifying questions. As if it was a relief to finally get this in the open, and eventually agreed that an investigation should have been conducted, and that it was his responsibility to do so.

    This guy may not know who was responsible for the Plame leak, but he knows who stopped him and his predecessor from investigating it. That’s our “follow the money.”

  • CB, you left out a great quote:

    Rep. Waxman at one point said that he regretted not being able to put up a video of the president promising a full probe but added, “I guess we will leave that to The Daily Show.”

  • Yes beep 52…. He knows who stopped him. It’s unheard of and downright shocking that a CIA operative’s name was leaked by someone in the Administration and there was no investigation. It would be almost automatic so someone had to stop it from happening. Only 2 people in the WH have the power to prevent an investigation of this sort and one of them was loudly staing, “I’m gonna’ get to the bottom this…” Waxman knows this and right now is calculating on just how to go about outing this person. If it begins to look like he might get it done then let’s hope the cornered rat doesn’t play an ace in the hole card and completely distract attention with a 9/11 tactic like nuke and rebuke Iran. Oh, the insanity of the desperate authoritarians

  • Comments are closed.