They got everything wrong, every step of the way

I realize this isn’t at all new information, and I suspect this new report will get lost in the shuffle because it reinforces already-known facts, but Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction Stuart Bowen’s perspective shouldn’t be overlooked.

The U.S. government was unprepared for the extensive nation-building required after it invaded Iraq, and at each juncture where it could have adjusted its efforts, it failed even to understand the problems it faced, according to the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction.

In a stinging, wide-ranging assessment of U.S. reconstruction efforts, Stuart W. Bowen Jr. said that in the days after the invasion, the Defense Department had no strategy for restoring either government institutions or infrastructure. And in the years since, other agencies joined the effort without an overall plan and without a structure in place to organize and execute a task of such magnitude. […]

For the first time, the report lays out a timeline documenting the paucity of planning from the beginning of the war in Iraq, noting what was needed when and describing how the scale of reconstruction grew once the United States was in Iraq. It details how Congress provided vast amounts of money with little idea of how it was being spent. The push to get things done quickly meant turning much of the reconstruction over to contractors with little oversight from the government, as security worsened. And the lack of coordination magnified every shortcoming.

Bowen’s credibility couldn’t be higher; no one in any part of the government has been as effective in exposing fraud, waste, and mismanagement in Iraqi reconstruction, and then punishing those directly responsible. His office “opened 27 new criminal probes in the last quarter [of 2006], bringing the total number of active cases to 78. Twenty-three are awaiting prosecutorial action by the Justice Department, most of them centering on charges of bribery and kickbacks.” Indeed, Bowen is the only guy in the administration who actively targeted Halliburton contracts.

It’s no wonder the White House tried to fire him.

From a NYT article in November:

Investigations led by a Republican lawyer named Stuart W. Bowen Jr. in Iraq have sent American occupation officials to jail on bribery and conspiracy charges, exposed disastrously poor construction work by well-connected companies like Halliburton and Parsons, and discovered that the military did not properly track hundreds of thousands of weapons it shipped to Iraqi security forces.

And tucked away in a huge military authorization bill that President Bush signed two weeks ago is what some of Mr. Bowen’s supporters believe is his reward for repeatedly embarrassing the administration: a pink slip.

The order comes in the form of an obscure provision that terminates his federal oversight agency, the Office of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, on Oct. 1, 2007. The clause was inserted by the Republican side of the House Armed Services Committee over the objections of Democratic counterparts during a closed-door conference, and it has generated surprise and some outrage among lawmakers who say they had no idea it was in the final legislation.

It’s an almost perfect example of how the GOP has approached the war and legislating. Identify the one guy who’s been doing his job perfectly, fire him, but keep it secret because of how utterly shameful the decision truly is. (Fortunately, Congress ended up saving Bowen’s job, which helped lead to today’s report.)

Regular readers may recall that I’ve mentioned this before, but the background on who Bowen is fascinating. The president chose Bowen to lead the office of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction in January 2004. At the time, it seemed like a typical set-up job for the Bush gang: the president needed to respond to criticism about corruption and mismanagement, but instead of asking an independent voice to begin serious oversight, Bush chose Bowen, a loyal friend, senior member of Bush’s gubernatorial campaign team in 1994, a Bush attorney during the Florida recount debacle in 2000, and an associate counsel in Bush’s White House. For Dems hoping for a strong, independent voice to exercise real oversight of Iraqi reconstruction, Bowen’s resume offered little encouragement.

But Bowen surprised everyone — including, presumably, the White House. And now Bowen is making it clear just how incompetent the administration’s reconstruction efforts have been from the outset.

The guy deserves a medal.

Your headline appeared on my computer screen quite a few moments before the rest of the article, and it is telling that I was completely unable to guess what subject you were going to talk about: the US attorney firings, Afghanistan, the Iraq War, the Iraq reconstruction, Katrina, eavesdropping, treatment of detainees, Bush tax policies ……. The possibilities are legion.

  • As others have speculated, maybe they planned “to get everything wrong”. Maybe we’re seeing the result of a planned implosion. A hit on a country that contemplated switching to the Euro. Watch this sometime when you have an extra 45 minutes. It’s GREAT…

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7374585792978336967

    The only thing that keeps me from 100% believing that this was a carefully planned hit is that they also failed to cover their tracks, which one would assume they would have done if they really were criminal geniuses intent on destroying Iraq.

    So they are probaly just idiots.

    I hope.

  • Key Point- “Twenty-three are awaiting prosecutorial action by the Justice Department”…

    So… The Bush Administration lost by having Bowen stay on? Or isn’t it convenient that, no matter how good he is, if the “loyal Bushies” refuse to prosecute, we still get nowhere.. *sigh*

  • The Bush Admin tactic of rewarding incomptence and unquestioned loyality rather than rewarding results in the interest of the American people is dying for a big picture story from the MSM

    I wish some media person would do a big picture story regarding the people the Bush Admin has fired or attempted to fire (Shinseki, Bowen, 8 US attorneys, etc)( all of which were competent people who did not put Republican politics above service to country) versus the people they kept on until they were forced to “resign” Brownie, Kevin Kiley (Walter Reed), David Savafian, Claude Allen, Sec of the Army……

    This all needs to be put in perspective for the American people

  • For Dems hoping for a strong, independent voice to exercise real oversight of Iraqi reconstruction, Bowen’s resume offered little encouragement. But Bowen surprised everyone — including, presumably, the White House. The guy deserves a medal.

    It’s a shame we feel the need to award medals to people in this administration who merely do their jobs with integrity. Shouldn’t that be expected? I know it’s a stupid question, but why don’t conservative voices ever express outrage at the looting and incompetence of the “loyal Bushies” in what was their most important priority, the takeover of Iraq?

  • You know, I was talking with a co-worker who hates Bush almost more than I do, and he brought up a great point that I think kinda relates to this story (and all the other examples of incompetence from BushCo.):

    Despite the fact our country is being ran by the biggest idiot to ever hold the office … despite the cronyism, corruption, and gross incompetence at every level … and despite the most expensive and disastrous war we’ve ever seen …

    America is still standing.

    Goes to show just how strong the U.S. is, doesn’t it?

    Of course, he also said we still have almost two years left, so …

  • Re #2, I forgot to point to the location in that video where Newman discusses the “Eurodollar theory of the war in Iraq”. It’s at the 21:45 mark.

    Very educational.

  • If Bowen’s oversight does anything, it points out where this conflict was “lost.” All Bush’s talk about wanting a pyrrhic victory turns to dust when Bush’s management of the war is examined. Bush himself lost Iraq. If he demanded competence from his subordinates and competently oversaw what was going on over there, as a true Commander in Chief should, this would not have been the disaster it is. But while Iraq burns, W mountain bikes.

  • Assume that the real goal was to plunder the national treasury for as long as possible and thus force a massive transfer of wealth to the super wealthy. It would make sense to have no plan for after the invasion other than to create a state of permanant chaos in Iraq. Indefinate state of chaos and insurgency = indefinate state of occupation = indefinate state of inflated war costs, military budget, war profiteering, etc. = indefinate massive transfer of wealth from the public treasury (us) to the top few percent of ownership (Bush’s base). Not ALL of the people driving this catastrophy can be as stupid as they appear. When all the answers make no sense then maybe one should ask a different question.

  • Or like Iran Contra, part of the money is being siphoned off for covert operations in other places that the Congress and the American people wouldn’t approve of?

  • I have high friends in places. Retired military officers, some from the Pentagon, quite a few who were/are in touch with the Pentagon. They tell me that the Defense Department had very good plans for invading Iraq. They started with 250,000 troops in the invasion force and 150,000 in reserve in Kuwait and Turkey.

    The problems arose when the Bushies trashed the existing plans for the 150,000 troops whose main problem was anticipated to be cleaning up the rose petals strewn in their path by the grateful Free Iraqis.

  • It probably is implicit with the ideas of #8 and #9 that the failure of Bush was operational. He has always seen such events as something to be spun; political showmanship was paramount. He never saw himself as a puppet. His view of everything, including himself, was entirely superficial. Anything he did was probably going to result in one grand mess.
    Chaos yielded profits. His cronies dazzled people with political theater while they picked the pockets of their countrymen. Accountability has never really worried them. There may be some awkward times, puppets will be sacrificed. Bush has merely been a diversion who will be cast aside as they set up the next scam.

  • Comments are closed.