‘They really have no idea where they are’

One of the points emphasized in the “No End in Sight” documentary, which is excellent, is that through carelessness, the Bush administration inadvertently helped provide weapons to the Iraqi insurgency. The most well known example was the debacle at Al Qaqaa, but as we learned in March, the administration’s faulty planning left millions of tons of munitions unsecured, which helped arm insurgents with materials needed to make, among other things, roadside bombs.

As it turns out, the Bush gang’s carelessness not only provided insurgents with munitions; the administration may have inadvertently helped put AK-47s in the hands of insuregents, too.

The Pentagon has lost track of about 190,000 AK-47 assault rifles and pistols given to Iraqi security forces in 2004 and 2005, according to a new government report, raising fears that some of those weapons have fallen into the hands of insurgents fighting U.S. forces in Iraq.

The author of the report from the Government Accountability Office says U.S. military officials do not know what happened to 30 percent of the weapons the United States distributed to Iraqi forces from 2004 through early this year as part of an effort to train and equip the troops. The highest previous estimate of unaccounted-for weapons was 14,000, in a report issued last year by the inspector general for Iraq reconstruction.

Wait, it gets worse.

The United States has spent $19.2 billion trying to develop Iraqi security forces since 2003, the GAO said, including at least $2.8 billion to buy and deliver equipment. But the GAO said weapons distribution was haphazard and rushed and failed to follow established procedures, particularly from 2004 to 2005, when security training was led by Gen. David H. Petraeus, who now commands all U.S. forces in Iraq.

Remember, in most circles, it’s still considered outrageous and irresponsible to question Petraeus’ competence.

What’s more, the problem has reached a point in which U.S. forces don’t know what to do about it.

“They really have no idea where they are,” said Rachel Stohl, a senior analyst at the Center for Defense Information who has studied small-arms trade and received Pentagon briefings on the issue. “It likely means that the United States is unintentionally providing weapons to bad actors.”

One senior Pentagon official acknowledged that some of the weapons probably are being used against U.S. forces. He cited the Iraqi brigade created at Fallujah that quickly dissolved in September 2004 and turned its weapons against the Americans.

Stohl said insurgents frequently use small-arms fire to force military convoys to move in a particular direction — often toward roadside bombs. She noted that the Bush administration frequently complains that Iran and Syria are supplying insurgents but has paid little attention to whether U.S. military errors inadvertently play a role. “We know there is seepage and very little is being done to address the problem,” she said.

Ugh.

Take heart, tender foot. These are the “first glimmers of progress.”

  • Another reason to leave Iraq.

    Another reason to impeach this corrupt and incompetent administration.

  • In August 2005, I didn’t know anything about Petraeus but I was shocked when I read what he had to say about corruption in the Iraq Defense Ministry after a more than billion dollars was stolen.

    From a 8/2/05 Newsday story ,”Investigates Widespread Corruption” by Bassam Mroue:

    “…Lt. Gen. David Petraeus, the American commander in charge of training and equipping the Iraqi military, declined to comment on the corruption claims, saying it was a matter to be resolved by the Iraqi government…”

    At the time, I thought someone ought to be checkPetraeus’s offshore bank accounts because no one could honestly believe that Iraqi corruption was not our problem.

  • Shuffling the chairs on the Titanic, and forcing us to sit in them is what this WH strategy is all about! -Kevo

  • JKap wrote: “Take heart, tender foot. These are the “first glimmers of progress.””

    Yep; according to conservative fantasies, once every single person in the country has a gun, there’ll be no more crime, because all those guns will be a deterrent to violence. Remember all the RW screeching about arming students after the Virginia Tech tragedy? This is all part of their master plan…

  • This reminds me of an NPR article I read last year when this story of lost weapons first came to light. It stated how just a few of the weapons provided are registered by their serial number.

    As someone who had to memorize the serial number for my M-16 (# 6209862), it amazes me that the US military wouldn’t keep track of these weapons.

    If US forces come across weapons that they determined by their serial number to be part of weapons sent to a particular Iraqi unit, you would think this would be a huge bonus for the intelligence guys. You can say “well, we found these AKs which match the serial numbers to weapons sent to this unit, so the insurgents must have either infiltrated that unit, or someone there is on their side”.

    Of course, I was just a dumb grunt, so what do I know?

  • Some days I don’t know whether to laugh or cry – even if we could wrap our heads around the fact that this much weaponry is missing, would we be able to accept the hedge that “maybe” some of these weapons were in the hands of “bad actors?” “Maybe” some were being used against American troops? I guess this is the new “friendly fire;” being shot and/or killed by weapons we provided.

    Perhaps the bigger question is, why would we allow this kind of parsing and hedging to substitute for answers? And where answers are not forthcoming, why wouldn’t we accept the resignations of those responsible for it?

    Oh, right. We don’t hold our own “bad actors” accountable; we give them medals and promotions and find new and scarier things for them to apply their incompetence to. Gosh, what was I thinking?

  • And the proposal is to send another $20 billion to Saudi Arabia, and we are sure that none of that will end up on the other side of the Iraqi border, right?
    Right?
    Anyone?
    Bueller?

  • Let’s see. We didn’t send enough American troops to get bin Laden when we had him cornered, we didn’t send enough troops to Iraq to secure the country once the government was overthrown and didn’t have an occupation strategy. We didn’t secure Iraqi weapons caches, we quit looking for bin Laden, the Taliban is back, al Q back, we lost our own weapons, many which may now be being used against us, and we’re training Sunni’s for short term gains even though they’re likely to turn against us later. Most of our reconstruction projects have failed, we’ve built permanent bases and we refuse to set any timeline or conditions for our withdrawal.

    Gee, it almost seems like someone is intentionally trying not to succeed. Ya think?

  • I wish we still had journalists and that they still had Freedom of Information. I’d love to know how much the Bush-Laden Crime Family, through its Carlyle Group investment front, under Gen. Betray Us, stands to make from those “missing” weapons and their ultimate replacement through yet another rape of the taxpayers.

  • When the administration began braying about Iran’s providing arms to the insurgents the usual voices called for Iran to be bombed. Now that it appears that we have armed the insurgents do we have to bomb ourselves?

  • Dennis -SGMM said: “Now that it appears that we have armed the insurgents do we have to bomb ourselves?”

    On the bright side, no matter how well the offensive goes against ourselves the administration would be able to to say that ‘our side’ is winning:

    The offensive succeeds: “We have decisively defeated the forces of ourselves. Mission accomplished.”

    The offensive fails: “We have beated back the forces of ourselves. Our country remains strong!”

    It would be the perfect war for BushCo…

  • Given that it takes a pre-frontal lobotomy to make it past Major in the Imperial Stormtroopers, and a castration to make it past Colonel, anyone is surprised at the incompetence of the Imperial Legionairres???

  • Patience, patience, there’s enough weapons for everyone. Why has no reporter asked Bush about this issue? Is the incompetence of our “Security” operation responsible for supplying as many weapons to “terrorists” (insurgents) as Iran and Saudi Arabia. Why doesn’t MTP stick that in Lieberman”s bowl since he wants so badly to attack Iran for the same reason, or isn’t incompetence mentioned in his “rapture” philosophy.
    AK47’s no less. Well, Joe, are we out supplying Iran?
    They hear this information and then pretend it never happened. We can’t get rid of these people fast enough

  • One senior Pentagon official acknowledged that some of the weapons probably are being used against U.S. forces.

    Oh no. You think? Are you sure they didn’t smuggle the weapons to Syria with the WMD? Maybe people found big crates of weapons and body armor and tucked it under the living room carpet. WTFF else could have happened to this stuff?

    I will say this again: The GAO is the hardest working agency in the entire farking government. They, not our ankle grabbing Congress are the bloody heroes of this disaster.

    One thing that blows my mind is the amount of body armor that “might” be keeping a bad guy safe and sound. We can’t provide suffient body armor for our own soldiers, we can’t deliver body armor to our allies and the best we can get from pResident George’s Pet Raeus is “Well, things were kinda hectic.”

    From the article:

    During the Bosnian conflict, the United States provided about $100 million in defense equipment to the Bosnian Federation Army, and the GAO found no problems in accounting for those weapons.

    Oops, so much for the Clinton Did It! defense.

  • So to sum up, the Iraqi government is completely dysfunctional and cannot be trusted; religious fundamentalism has completely taken over what was formerly the most secular society in the middle east; neocons hold all the important US posts; a secret but large portion of military operations have been privatised to US contractors like Blackwater, who can do pretty much whatever they want with no fear of being held legally responsible; companies like KBR / Halliburton have raked in billions with no oversight and even less accountability; the Republicans get to skate from lies to bluster and back to lies without anyone seriously questioning them, while the Dems appear to be incapable of doing anything other than just going along with Bush’s insanities; the US neocons were able to impose a flat tax on Iraq (and at a very low tax rate); much of Iraq has been privatised by the same neocons; each Iraqi citizen or family is pretty much entirely dependent on their own individual initiatives in matters of health care, education, transportation, personal safety, fire fighting, retirement funding, roadway maintainance; power generation, water supplies, and all the other important facets of life; religious laws have been inserted into the constitution; and everyone in Iraq who wants to be armed, is.

    In other words, Iraq must be the Republican idea of heaven.

    So why don’t they all move there and leave the rest of us alone?

  • The Pentagon has lost track of about 190,000 AK-47 assault rifles and pistols given to Iraqi security forces […]

    Compared to the rest of the story, a small-potato and possibly irrelevant question, but… Why AK-47? Why Avtomat Kalashnikova and not M-16 or whatever it is that US makes? Our soldiers have been heard complaining that AKs are more reliable in desert conditions, easier to maintain, etc. And we supply the better weapons to Iraqis than to our own?

  • libra,

    It would make it easier to know where the insurgents get their weapons if the Iraqi army was given M-16s. It’d be pretty hard for the WH to claim that Iran was supplying the opposition.

    I think they chose the AK because it was the small arm of the Iraqi army, and so training for former Iraqi soldiers would be at a minimum. Also, the M-16 needs more “high maintenance” (lots of cleaning) in comparison to the AK.

    The sad thing is that Heckler & Koch currently makes a modification for the M-16, the HK416, that is better designed to stand up to the sand and crap of the Middle East. But like body armor and mine-resistant armored vehicles, it takes a back seat to more important programs, like super-expensive fighters, ships, and missile defense systems designed to fight the Soviets 20 years ago.

  • Comments are closed.