This is a ‘sense of national unity’ — just not the kind Snow wants

Today’s White House press briefing was a rather aggressive affair, with reporters trying to pin Press Secretary Tony Snow down on what, if anything, the White House is prepared to do in response to the new report from the Iraq Study Group. There were, of course, plenty of evasive and ambiguous answers, but this was the fun one.

“The one thing they thought was absolutely important was to rebuild a sense of national unity on this, and that was their overwhelming objective.”

Now, as it turns out, it’s not at all clear that the ISG’s overwhelming objective had much of anything to do with rebuilding a sense of national unity. The panel urged Bush to strive for national unity, and the ISG’s members seem to believe their policy recommendations might help in that regard, but it’s not as if the group, by virtue of its work, thought they personally would play a role in bringing Americans together.

But if Snow agrees that rebuilding a sense of national unity is important, he’s in luck. Most Americans continue to agree on what they’d like to see in a policy.

[T]he first post-election poll from the much-respected Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) shows] that 58% of Americans want a withdrawal of all U.S. troops on a set timeline, with 18% desiring this within six months, 25% within a year, 15% within two years.

If the Iraqi government heeded the wishes of most of its own citizens (as shown by polls in that country) and demanded a U.S. pulllout in one year, 77% of Americans — including nearly 3 in 4 Republicans — would back the idea. A poll of the Iraqi public conducted by WorldPublicOpinion in September 2006 found that 71% want U.S.-led forces to commit to withdraw within a year.

Indeed, the closer one looks at the results, the more “unified” Americans appear. The problem for the Bush gang, of course, is that we’re unified around a policy that bears no resemblance to the president’s approach to the war.

Slightly better than 2 out of 3 believe the U.S. should declare that it does not plan to keep bases in Iraq indefinitely.

By an almost 2 to 1 margin (60% to 35%), respondents believe U.S. forces in Iraq are now more of a “provoking” than a “stablizing” force.

And as long as we’re on the subject, PIPA is the same respected outlet that found that Iraqis’ opinions are surprisingly in line with Americans’.

PIPA has released a … poll of Iraqi attitudes toward the U.S. occupation, and the takeaway is very, very clear: they want us to leave. 74% of Shiites and 91% of Sunnis want us to leave within a year (the number is 80% for Shiites in Baghdad). By wide margins, both groups believe U.S. forces are provoking more violence than they’re preventing, and both groups believe that day-to-day security would improve if we left. Support for attacks on U.S. forces now commands majority support among both Shiites and Sunnis. And none of this is because of successful al-Qaeda propaganda: 94% of Iraqis continue to disapprove of al-Qaeda.

Forget “national” unity, Tony Snow, we’re looking at international unity.

You’re right, Mr. Snow, just like the Dems ‘thumping’ the Repubs last month was a vote for “bipartisanship”…

  • In this corner—Snow.

    In that corner—a fifty-pound bag of rock salt.

    Anyone care to guess what happens when your dump fifty pounds of rock salt on a pile of snow?

    “Pound salt, Tony. Pound salt….”

  • “The one thing they thought was absolutely important was to rebuild a sense of national unity on this, and that was their overwhelming objective.”

    Steve, I move we just pound him with the bag of salt.

    A perfect example of another non-statement from the vapid mouthpiece for the brainless prezdint. Gee Tony, do ya think, just maybe, the whole point was to find a way out of Iraq that didn’t reduce the Middle East to a smoking ruin? No? I see. It was so we stop bickering about what to do about Iraq (and obey Clueless Leader). Right.

    I know it is near the holidaze and I should be thinking of goodwill towards all men, but I’d like to shove Snow under a bus, a train a herd of stampeding bulls and then throw the pieces in the river. And given the condition of the Potomac I could probably set that sucker alight to make sure he was reduced to fine ash.

  • rebuild a sense of national unity on this

    1. To rebuild one has to build first.
    2. National unity on this? whatever this is?

  • I’m surprised that 91% of the Sunnis want us out in a year, since they will be attacked by the Shiites (who outnumber them and are running the government).

    I wouldn’t pound Tony Baloney with a bag of salt, that would be a waste of salt.

    Use rocks.

  • “I should be thinking of goodwill towards all men” (TAIO, #3)

    The original Latin expression was “Et in terra pax hominibus bonae voluntatis” which translates into English: “And on earth peace toward men(people) of good will”.

    I don’t think any of our opponents could be referred to as people of good will. So screw ’em; let ‘er rip.

  • I’m still surprised the press corps continues to show up…just to have more bs piled on and listen to that idiot.

  • Racerx – maybe with US forces out, the Saudis could move in and protect their fellow Sunnis.

  • “Racerx – maybe with US forces out, the Saudis could move in and protect their fellow Sunnis.” – petorado

    Oh, they’ve already made that threat.

    Though, being who they are, I think they’ll just be sending Egyptians and money.

  • “And on earth peace toward men(people) of good will”.

    O tidings of comfort and joy! Thanks for the translation Ed Stephan, I’ll begin Operation Snow Blind with a good conscience.

  • I don’t think any of our opponents could be referred to as people of good will. — Ed Stephan, @7

    “people of goodwill” they’re not; more of the “homo homini lupus est” (man’s a wolf to man) persuasion 🙂

  • At this moment, Tony Snow is too silly, even to be a clown! At some future moment he may realize for this Administration there is no there there. -Kevo

  • I assume that everyone who reads and writes here wants peace and are willing to do that which will create peace and that does not mean killing other people from other cultures with other beliefs. So if this is true, look at http://www.invincibleamerica.org, http://www.permanentpeace.org, http://www.uspeacegovernment.org, http://www.victorybeforewar.org, http://www.alltm.org, http://www.mum.edu, http://www.mou.org, http://www.tm.org, http://www.tesp.org. And if you have any doubts, or even if you don’t, do search for “bubbling bliss of yogic flying.” If you really do want peace and an honest government, there is no logical reason–or excuse–for not becoming a member of the US Peace Government, which is one of 108 in the world, all teaching this knowledge. (I use the term excuse because that’s what many if not all Republicans usually try to use.) Laurence forpeace@lisco.com

  • Comments are closed.