This Week in God

First up from this week’s God machine is news that should get Bill O’Reilly and the Fox News gang very excited: a war on Easter. (thanks to reader M.C. for the tip)

The Easter Bunny hopped into St. Paul (Minn.) City Hall, but was quickly bounced out Wednesday.

A sign with some Easter decorations in the lobby was removed out of concern it may have been considered offensive for non-Christians…. The display — a cloth bunny, pastel-colored eggs and a sign with the words “Happy Easter” — were put up by a City Council secretary. They weren’t purchased with city money.

St. Paul’s Human Rights Director Tyrone Terrill went to the office and said he suggested the signs be removed.

St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman joked about it, saying that the effort was well-intentioned but probably unnecessary. “Try not to engage in the practice of religion in City Hall, I mean, that’s appropriate, but there’s, you know, kicking the bunnies out of City Hall is going a little too far,” Coleman said.

Terrill later apologized and said he never wanted to get rid of the Easter Bunny. A few religious right activists still want to raise a fuss.

When the Catholic League heard about the decorations being taken down, it wanted to get a message to Terrill by sending him a full-size Easter Bunny costume.

“This is a mania in this country, and it’s being led by a tiny minority of influential people who think they are doing good but in fact, they remind me of the Taliban,” said Bill Donohue, the Catholic League’s president.

So, Donohue, who wants to mix religion and government more, thinks religious neutrality is like the Taliban. What an odd man.

Next up from the God machine is a story about a veteran of the war on terror, his tragic death, and his vacant slot on a memorial wall.

Nevada National Guard Sgt. Patrick Stewart gave his life for his country when the Chinook helicopter he was in was shot down in Afghanistan in September.

But those wishing to honor Stewart, who should have his name on the memorial wall at the Northern Nevada Veterans Memorial Cemetery in Fernley, would have a difficult time doing so.

The space reserved for Stewart is vacant. Stewart was a follower of the Wiccan religion, which is not recognized by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Stewart’s widow, Roberta, said she would wait until her family’s religion — and its five-pointed star enclosed in a circle, with one point facing skyward — is recognized for use on memorials before having Stewart’s plaque installed.

“It’s completely blank,” Roberta Stewart said, pointing to her husband’s place on the memorial.

As the AP explained, Patrick Stewart and four other National Guard members died in September when their Chinook helicopter was shot down by a rocket-propelled grenade as they returned to their base for refueling. They had finished dropping off troops. He was posthumously awarded the Air Medal, the Bronze Star, the Purple Heart, the Nevada Distinguished Service Medal and the Combat Action Badge.

Stewart insists that the government’s policy is discrimination, and it’s hard to disagree. “I had no idea that they would [refuse] our veterans this right that they go to fight for,” she said. “What religion we are doesn’t matter. It’s like denying who my husband is.”

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and its National Cemetery Administration apparently have 30 approved “emblems of belief,” and the Wiccan star isn’t on the list. (A symbol exists for atheists.)

To their credit, some key officials have come to Stewart’s aid. U.S. Rep. Jim Gibbons (R) supports her application to include the Wiccan star on the Veterans Affairs’ list, as does her husband’s battalion commander, Lt. Col. Robert Harrington, who said the nation’s soldiers are “from every walk of life and every faith. We are all accepted in our community.”

An application seeking recognition of the Wiccan religion, and the use of the pentacle as an emblem of belief on memorials in veterans’ cemeteries, is working its way through the Department of Veterans Affairs.

And in England, by way of Tristero, we find my very favorite archbishop with an important message about modern science.

The archbishop of Canterbury, the leader of the world’s Anglicans, says he is opposed to teaching creationism in schools. “And that’s different … discussing, teaching about what creation means,” Archbishop Rowan Williams said in an interview published Tuesday in The Guardian newspaper.

“For that matter, it’s not even the same as saying that Darwinism is — is the only thing that ought to be taught. My worry is creationism can end up reducing the doctrine of creation rather than enhancing it,” said Williams, the spiritual leader of the Church of England and the worldwide Anglican Communion.

Williams described creationism as “a kind of category mistake, as if the Bible were a theory like other theories.”

Good for him.

“This is a mania in this country, and it’s being led by a tiny minority of influential people who think they are doing good but in fact, they remind me of the Taliban,” said Bill Donohue, the Catholic League’s president.

Ironic Kettle, er, Bill Donohue, meet Pot.

  • Since when is the Easter Bunny religious? Seriously. Where in the whole story of Jesus, Good Friday, etc is there an Easter Bunny? At least Santa Clause comes from St. Nick – though what Santa Clause has to do with the Christmas story from the Bible I have no idea -but at least there is some connection to religion and seasonal religious traditions. But a bunny?

    ARGH! Those people drive me bonkers. Why don’t they fight to secular domination of once religious practices instead of a perceived “slight” of Christianity?

  • Thank God for the theology of the Easter Bunny and Santa
    .
    A rabbit that hides eggs for children to find and the fat old man who gives presents to everyone from a flying sled pulled by reindeer.

    Faith based wishful fantasy which is right up there with Victory in Iraq, Tax Cut Defecit prosperity, Intelligent Design, and Global Warming denial.

    Childlike makebelieve is something the Republicans should fight for.
    It is the foundation of their philosophy.

  • ET- The bunny and the Santa are perfect unifying republican icons.
    Advertising logos to mark a season to consume with the tradition that Christianity is our national religion with national God holidays. The Greed and God factions united under one symbolic roof.

  • A symbol exists for atheists.

    I don’t recall the meeting where we voted on a symbol. Do any of the other atheists out there remember?

  • Donahue’s a certifiable nut case. I don’t know why any rational beings give him the time of day.

    I wish Catholics (and other Christians) knew more about the origin of their own Feast Days. Easter was originally an amalgam of Pagan spring fertility festivals. Bunnies. Eggs. Get it? Fertility! It’s held on the First Sunday and the first full moon after the Vernal Equinox? Does that suggest anything? The Church merely Christianized a pagan fertility celebration. The ordinary (not wealthy or powerful) Greeks used to celebrate Spring by having the adolescent boys and girls in the village get drunk and dance around a huge wooden phallus in the town square, then pair off with one another in the bushes. The pregnancies which resulted usually resulted in June weddings. I wonder if the citizens of St. Paul might consider bringing back that jolly custom.

    Similarly, the Romans used to celebrate Saturnalia – a week of drunken debauchery before the dreaded winter set in (in a bad crop year, several family members might die during the winter). They had such fear of winter they didn’t even name January and February (till later) – it was just an empty period during which Gods-knew-what might happen. That’s why their year ended with the tenth month (“decem” is Latin for 10). Their New Year (and calendar) began in the spring, in March, when the flowers grew and the wars of conquest could start up again. There is no evidence that Jesus was born in December (some that he may have been born in March). The Christian festival of Christmas is merely a Christianization of the old Saturnalia.

    Unfortunately, the fundamentalist yahoots don’t know what they’re talking about, and their ignorance causes hurt to others. Do they care? Have they ever?

  • Follow-up:

    Here’s [clink] to the effort to get Wiccan recognized! I’m personally opposed to all supernatural beliefs (after all, they’re super-natural) including atheism, but if you’re going to give credence to all those others (are the Olympian or ancient Egyptian gods and goddesses included?), what sort of pre-judice leads you to reject Wiccan?

    And here’s [clink!] to the good sense of the archbishop of Canterbury!

  • rege: Somebody decided that, for government purposes, atheists should have a symbol and it should be an atom with the letter “A” in it (no. 16 at http://www.cem.va.gov/hmemb.htm, “Emblems of Belief [sic] Available.”

    Evidently, atheism is a religion according to the government. At http://www.religioustolerance.org/grav_mark.htm:

    “Government policy on religious symbols:

    “In an 2004-AUG article on Wiccans in the military published in Knight Ridder Newspapers, reporter Randy Myers interviewed Mike Nacincik of Veterans Affairs. Nacincik said that the department authorizes 38 emblems, but does not allow one for Wiccans because they don’t meet the emblem requirements. The government policy insists on:

    “• A written request from the recognized head of the religious group,
    “• A list of national officers, and
    “• A membership tally.

    “None of these are possible [for Wiccans], because Wicca, like other Neopagan religions, Native American Spirituality, New Age, Santeria, Vodun, and other decentralized and/or aboriginal religions, has no recognized head, no national officers and no membership lists.”

    I didn’t know that atheists had a recognized head, a list of national officers, or a membership tally. How did this emblem designation come about?

    Ed Stephan: “I’m personally opposed to all supernatural beliefs (after all, they’re super-natural) including atheism”–you don’t know much about atheism, do you?

  • But, more fundamentally, what the f**k is an indication of faith doing on a memorial wall? On a gravestone, sure, but a memorial wall ?!?!?

  • gmanedit,

    I regard atheism as a “super-natural belief” because I can conceive of no natural experiment which would prove it to an objective observer.

  • Ed, from a scientific point of view there are irrelevant concepts, for example the color of an electron. Our understanding of microscopic phenomena via quantum mechanics does not allow us to assign any mean to the statement, “an electron is red.” There is no experiment which could prove to an observer that an electron is not red. Yet, it is perfectly valid within the framework of quantum mechanics to say that an electron is not red, more to the point it has no color. Likewise, I view the statement “god exists” to be equally meaningless within my world view as the statement “an electron is red”. God is an irrelevant concept within a scientific world view. There is no coherent and testable theory of the universe which requires the concept.

  • Come October, the Wiccans should start complaining about “the war against Hallowe’en.” After all, the same right-wing Xtians who demand recognition of Xtian holidays by public schools go ballistic when cut-out figures of witches on broomsticks appear in public school windows. If they can do it, so can we.

  • You know, I’m just disappointed that This Week in Bob has failed to include anything about that Afghani fellow who probably gonna get stoned or chopped or something because he’s converted to Christianity… I can’t say as how I agree with him, but don’tcha think the consequences seem sorta harsh?

    Guys, oppression swings both ways, and keeping an open mind doesn’t mean you are obliged to allow your brains to leak out.

  • Comments are closed.