First up from the [tag]God[/tag] machine this week is a follow-up story about the annual National Day of Prayer “holiday,” on which I had an item on Thursday, and the religious right’s idea about how best to promote the event.
NEXTEL CUP Driver Kenny Wallace is scheduled to drive the National Day of Prayer car #78 sponsored by Furniture Row for the [tag]NASCAR[/tag] NEXTEL CUP race at Talladega Superspeedway.The [tag]National Day of Prayer[/tag] tradition predates the founding of the United States of America when the Continental Congress issued a proclamation setting aside a day of prayer in 1775. In 1952, Congress established an annual day of prayer and, in 1988, that law was amended, designating the National Day of Prayer as the first Thursday in May.
In commemoration of the day, which falls on Thursday, May 4th, the #78 Furniture Row Chevy Monte Carlo CUP car will feature a new red, white and blue paint scheme, created by Sam Bass Design, showcasing the National Day of Prayer logo for Talladega on April 30. Click here for a full-page image of the car.
Yes, we’re dealing with an event that not only mixes church and state, but also, inexplicably, mixes church, state, and racecar driving. Wow.
Next up from the God machine is a very provocative line on [tag]creationism[/tag] from an unexpected source (thanks to reader M.B. for the tip).
Believing that God created the universe in six days is a form of superstitious [tag]paganism[/tag], the [tag]Vatican[/tag] [tag]astronomer[/tag] Guy Consolmagno claimed yesterday.
Brother Consolmagno, who works in a Vatican observatory in Arizona and as curator of the Vatican meteorite collection in Italy, said a “destructive myth” had developed in modern society that religion and science were competing ideologies.
He described creationism, whose supporters want it taught in schools alongside evolution, as a “kind of paganism” because it harked back to the days of “nature gods” who were responsible for natural events.
This follows a similar item from January in which the Vatican newspaper published an article saying “[tag]intelligent design[/tag]” is not science and reported that the Vatican’s chief astronomer, the Rev. George Coyne, said “intelligent design” had no place in school classrooms. A month later, Italian biologist Fiorenzo Facchini scolded intelligent design advocates for “pretending to do science” in the same official Vatican newspaper.
For a church that forced [tag]Galileo[/tag] to recant his beliefs under the threat of torture during the inquisition of the early 17th century, it’s a welcome and progressive attitude on modern biology and biblical literalism, isn’t it?