This Week in God

First up from the God machine this week is a religion story I’ve been following quite closely lately, involving a dispute between All Saints Episcopal Church in Pasadena and the Internal Revenue Service.

If you’re just joining us, a guest pastor at All Saints delivered a sermon shortly before the 2004 presidential election. The Rev. George F. Regas imagined Jesus participating in a political debate with Bush and Kerry and said that “good people of profound faith” could vote for either man. He added, however, that he imagined Jesus telling Bush, “Mr. President, your doctrine of preemptive war is a failed doctrine. Forcibly changing the regime of an enemy that posed no imminent threat has led to disaster.”

The comments prompted the IRS to launch an aggressive investigation. Recently, the agency ordered All Saints to turn over documents — including copies of sermons, emails, newsletters, even financial records — the church produced in 2004. This week, All Saints said no.

A liberal Pasadena church on Thursday declared that it will refuse to comply with an IRS investigation into its tax-exemption status launched after a guest speaker was critical of President Bush in a sermon.

At a news conference attended by 50 cheering supporters gathered before the marble altar at All Saints Episcopal Church, the Rev. Ed Bacon said his 3,500-member congregation did not violate tax regulations barring tax-exempt organizations from endorsing or opposing candidates when a former rector, George F. Regas, criticized the Bush administration two days before the 2004 presidential election.

The Episcopal faith, the 58-year-old rector said, “calls us to speak to the issues of war and poverty, bigotry, torture, and all forms of terrorism … always stopping short of supporting or opposing political parties or candidates for public office.”

Joined by members of other faiths, he added, “We are also not here for ourselves alone but to defend the freedom of pulpits in faith communities throughout our land.”

The church has hired Marcus Owens, a former head of the IRS exemption office, as one of its attorneys, and Owens looks forward to a court challenge. “We believe the only way to challenge the IRS’ actions in this case is through a summons enforcement proceeding in court,” he told IRS officials in a letter, “and therefore the church respectfully declines to respond to the summons. Rev. Bacon will not appear to testify Oct. 11.”

Next up is a bizarre faith-related measure that’s holding up the entire Defense appropriations bill in Congress.

Taxpayers may find it hard to believe that the must-pass $500 billion defense budget could be held hostage to a mischievous amendment empowering evangelical chaplains to speak in the name of Jesus at nonreligious military gatherings. But that is the case in Congress, where hard-right Republicans have held up passage of the defense bill in an attempt to license zealot chaplains to violate policies of religious tolerance at secular ceremonies.

Despite the firm opposition of the Pentagon and ecumenical chaplain groups, House Republicans have been defending this egregious pro-evangelical thumb on the scale in negotiations with the Senate.

We expect the Senate, mindful of the nation’s multidenominational legions fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, to reject the fine-print travesty. At its heart is religious intolerance — not respect of chaplains’ consciences — and a naked attempt to elevate evangelical beliefs to primacy in the ranks. These very abuses caused a scandal at the Air Force Academy two years ago after cadets complained that ranking officers tolerated evangelical chaplains’ proselytizing and discriminating on campus.

Reasonable people seem to realize this isn’t a fight with merit. No less than the Rev. Ted Haggard, president of the National Association of Evangelicals, called the provision “unnecessary and likely counterproductive,” adding, “At this time, our country needs no legislation in this area.”

Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John W. Warner (R-Va.) said this week that he opposes including the amendment in the defense bill and suggested lawmakers consider the issue in hearings when Congress reconvenes in January. If it’ll help make this nonsense go away, I’m all for it.

And, finally, I thought I’d note a disconcerting religion-related poll published this week.

Joel Rosenberg, the New York Times bestselling author whose books have eerily predicted bad things like 9/11, has a new one coming out, and in it he takes on the superbig question: Is the end near? Seems many think so. For Epicenter, a book on the Middle East crisis, Rosenberg had the polling firm McLaughlin & Associates ask 1,000 adults if they agreed that current events were evidence of what the Bible calls the last days. In the poll, provided exclusively to Whispers, a remarkable 42 percent agreed. The breakdown is even more startling: Half of women agree, 75 percent of blacks agree, and 57 percent of those ages 18 to 25 agree.

No, I don’t understand it either.

I wonder if these people realize just what the requirements for the End Times are? There’s the matter of the virgin cow, the red heifer. Until that is resolved all the wars in the Middle East don’t mean squat in Biblical terms.

  • I was very glad to hear that church is giving the IRS a well deserved single-digit salute. It seems to have united all flavours of religions, which is always a good thing. If it goes to court, the ruling will give (hopefully) a bright line decision on what tax-exempt organizations can and cannot do. This administration doesn’t seem to like well-defined rules (unless it makes them up itself but then it won’t tell anyone what those rules are). It might also reveal interesting things like who decided to go after this particular church and why.
    I’ve been trying to predict whether the Tax Man will back down or not and right now I’m leaning slightly towards Cut and Run. From what I’ve heard of the sermon it was less objectionable than a lot of crap fundies were saying and you know Shrubby doesn’t want to annoy them.

    As for the second story, box up whoever’s behind this nonsense, drop them off in Anbar and walk away.

  • I’d love to see a round up of the rules the IRS has for religions. It seems like they come down on a church for some subtle thing while ignoring churches that are all about politics. There must be some technicalities involved.

    It seems like there is a large government effort to suppress ANY criticism of the war.

  • I believe the results of that poll. Americans are anti-rational and superstitious (am I being redundant?). They’ll believe anything, no matter how preposterous; they’re unable to appreciate rational argument.

    As to the IRS going after only liberal churches — those critical of the government — where would this nation be today if the IRS had taxed into oblivion (or quietude) all those churches who spoke out against slavery, or in favor of women’s rights, or against our participation in the Vietnam war, or treating gays fairly? The only religion this country cares about, now that we’re an obscenely rich nation, is that of the Pharisees, not the message of Jesus or any other hippie radicals.

  • I’d believe the IRS was being legitimate in this if there was news they were going after Falwell for his sermons, or that guy in Ohio who’s out promoting Republican Theocracy. Of course, the day that happens will be a very cold one in an important piece of territory.

    As far as red heifers are concerned, there is a group of fundiemoron ranchers in Alabama (surprisesurprise) trying to breed one.

  • Nixon did it and got in trouble. Bush does it, nothing is done. The media did it’s job in Nixon’s day, and now serves corporate and government interests.
    Instead, media covers stories about movie stars getting DUI’s.
    I agree with Tom, the IRS ought to go after all the churches that sent money to the bushie interests.

  • Bill of Rights Amendment I to the Constitution of the United States of America:
    ==
    Congress shall make no law [1] respecting an establishment of religion, or [2] prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or [3] abridging the freedom of speech, or [4] of the press; or [5] the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
    ==
    Now the breakdown on that breakdown, in one-two-three order:

    1: Not Congress’ fault. Flexibility and discretionary clauses in the IRS’ regs re selectivity in the enforcement are likely at the heart of it, methinks. Done deal and down the tubes with that aspect, these days, until corrected by Congress.

    2: Not Congress’ fault. FBI counterterror rules and regs regarding search and seizure on suspected terrorists and sites within US borders pretty well cover that, methinks. Just fill out the forms, secretize all the content as well as the forms’ ever being pulled at all, and hey presto! Instant Terrorist! Bound to stay that way until Congress acts with breathtakingly responsible care. (Does the color blue rise to mind?)

    3: Not Congress’ fault. Just let us thank RoveCo NeoCon Campaigns Inc /et/ /al/ for “Free Speech Zones” sited a Texas mile from the live address site – and little old ladies getting dragged out of the auditorium in chains for the sake of their tee shirts’ artwork too. Um, it ain’t the abridgment so much as the locked gates that bother me. Congress really should act to correct this and thus close the feedback loop as must needs be for sanity to prevail.

    4: Not Congress’ fault. Thank the monomaniacal greed and power-seeking of guys such as Rupert Murdoch to finish /that/ murder hands down. A Comprehensive Truth and Continuity in News Coverage bill is much needed here. Um, it was done with product labelling and advertising, back when more-or-less non-criminal types ran the show.

    Um, got Congress?

    5: I have one notion for you: Patriot One, Patriot Two, Total Information Awareness and General Hayden’s implacable ascent to the topdog terrorspy slot. Also the phone companys’ fullscale sellout of all our calling records for datamining and terrorist manufacture /ad/ /lib./ Um, Congress /still/ as a body has the power, the authority, the very Constitutional *mandate* to right itself and get back to representing WE the PEOPLE once more. The standard-issue criminal-minded response that goes down the mass throat on the lines of “Notmyfaultdin’tduunuthin’sumpin’swrongwit’yuu” just is not anything like “Good Enough” at all.

    Um, can we all still spell “Hoodwink” today?

    Um, how about “Jefferson Memorial Impeachment”?

    Just click and do your part to make an end of the madness. We need to take our country back. While there is still a little of its underpinnings left standing.

    Pray for peace. Give to the Hague War Crimes Prosecutors’ General Fund if ever there is indeed one of those. Help out any good way you can.

    Remember.

  • Hello CB and all,

    Why do religious leaders and followers so often participate in and support blatant evil?

    History is replete with examples of religious leaders and followers advocating, supporting, and participating in blatant evil. Regardless of attempts to shift or deny blame, history clearly records the widespread crimes of Christianity. Whether we’re talking about the abominations of the Inquisition, Crusades, the greed and genocide of colonizers, slavery in the Americas, or the Bush administration’s recent deeds and results, Christianity has always spawned great evil. The deeds of many Muslims and the state of Israel are also prime examples.

    The paradox of adherents who speak of peace and good deeds contrasted with leaders and willing cohorts knowingly using religion for evil keeps the cycle of violence spinning through time. Why does religion seem to represent good while always serving as a constant source of deception, conflict, and the chosen tool of great deceivers? The answer is simple. The combination of faith and religion is a strong delusion purposely designed to affect one’s ability to reason clearly. Regardless of the current pope’s duplicitous talk about reason, faith and religion are the opposite of truth, wisdom, and justice and completely incompatible with logic.

    Religion, like politics and money, creates a spiritual, conceptual, and karmic endless loop. By their very nature, they always create opponents and losers which leads to a never ending cycle of losers striving to become winners again, ad infinitum. This purposeful logic trap always creates myriad sources of conflict and injustice, regardless of often-stated ideals, which are always diluted by ignorance and delusion. The only way to stop the cycle is to convert or kill off all opponents or to end the systems and concepts that drive it.

    Think it through, would the Creator of all knowledge and wisdom insist that you remain ignorant by simply believing what you have been told by obviously duplicitous religious founders and leaders? Would a compassionate Creator want you to participate in a system that guarantees injustice and suffering to your fellow souls? Isn’t it far more likely that religion is a tool of greedy men seeking to profit from the ignorance of followers and the strife it constantly foments? When you mix religion with the equally destructive delusions of money and politics, injustice, chaos, and the profits they generate are guaranteed.

    Read More…

    Peace…

  • Very fitting I think: “God is the inner principle of all movement, the only identity which already fulfils and illuminates the universe. Everything is incorporated in this one principle, because it encloses infinity, it includes everything, and there is nothing that could be outside of it. ” Giordano Bruno

  • Comments are closed.