This Week in God

First up from The God Machine this week is a bizarre religious critique of Democratic presidential hopeful John Edwards, who mentioned his religion at an event honoring those killed in the Virginia Tech slayings. As my friend Cliff Schecter noted, The Politico’s Roger Simon hammered Edwards for his God talk.

Does John Edwards include Jews in his prayers? Or Muslims? Or Hindus? Or any other non-Christians?

He didn’t the other day. The other day, in order to commemorate those killed at Virginia Tech, Edwards led a prayer “in Christ’s name” at Ryman Auditorium, which bills itself as “Nashville’s Premier Performance Hall.”

Edwards has a perfect right to pray publicly or privately any way he wants to. But people who are not Christians often feel left out of prayers like his…. Edwards probably did not know the religions of those killed at Virginia Tech when he gave his prayer, but isn’t that the point? Why not include all religions in your prayers?

If you are running for president, why not demonstrate you want to be the president of all Americans by being inclusive, rather than exclusive?

Yes, we’ve apparently reached a point in which Democratic presidential candidates are being attacked, not for their secularism, but for expressing their religiosity.

As Digby put it, “[A]fter years and years of being told that they must appeal to the vast numbers of Christians who would vote for Democrats if only they weren’t so hostile to their faith, the new rule is that the godless Democrats must not emphasize their own Christian faith or risk being called intolerant. Meanwhile, if they include other religions in their speeches, holiday greetings and prayers, they are said to be waging a war on Christians. Why, if I didn’t know better, I’d think that Democrats just can’t win with these people.”

Next up is an update on a This Week in God story we’ve been following for a long while — the plight of the family of Army Sgt. Patrick Stewart, who died in Afghanistan, and whose Wiccan faith has run into official resistance from Pentagon leaders. This week, the family finally received some good news.

If you’re just joining us, Sgt. Stewart was killed in Afghanistan on Sept. 25, 2005, when his CH-47 Chinook helicopter was shot down by enemy fire. A member of Nevada’s Army National Guard, Stewart was posthumously awarded the Bronze Star and the Purple Heart. Stewart’s widow asked to place a Wiccan symbol, the pentacle, on his memorial plaque. The Bush administration refused — the Veterans Affairs Department has 30 “approved” religious symbols, including one for non-believers, but Wiccans are left out.

Faced with a possible lawsuit they were likely to lose, VA officials finally yielded.

To settle a lawsuit, the Department of Veterans Affairs has agreed to add the Wiccan pentacle to a list of approved religious symbols that it will engrave on veterans’ headstones.

The settlement, which was reached on Friday, was announced on Monday by Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, which represented the plaintiffs in the case. […]

“The Wiccan families we represented were in no way asking for special treatment,” the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United, said at a news conference Monday. “They wanted precisely the same treatment that dozens of other religions already had received from the department, an acknowledgment that their spiritual beliefs were on par with those of everyone else.”

In a press statement, Lynn (my former boss) added, “This settlement has forced the Bush Administration into acknowledging that there are no second class religions in America, including among our nation’s veterans. It is a proud day for religious freedom in the United States.”

It is, indeed.

Can I get a @ or copyright symbol on my tombstone signed God

  • Yes, we’ve apparently reached a point in which Democratic presidential candidates are being attacked, not for their secularism, but for expressing their religiosity.

    Wait a minute, this doesn’t make any sense. I know Mr. Simon from a whole in the ground, but are we to assume he regularly speaks out in favour of people who do express their religion in public? I don’t see anything about his religous views on his Politico web page.

    I could be wrong but it looks to me like you’re conflating people who hammer the Democrats for being a-religious or anti-Christian with anyone who mentions a democrat and religion in the same sentence. It’s an entirely different game. And if memory serves you’ve run a few posts about ReThuglican “Christians” who say prayers that accidentally or intentionally exclude other religions. It sounds to me like Simon is being consistent. But again, I know zip about Simon, care to enlighten me?

  • “…the new rule is that the godless Democrats…” can’t ever do anything right.

    Whatever they do — pray, comfort the afflicted, win purple hearts, document the trashing of our Earth — is somehow hideously sinful, or soon will be after the GOP spin machine and the press lackeys are done with it. Whatever the Bush Crime Family does, however, is faith-based and Divinely Inspired.

    It used to be you could count on the press to document such nuttiness, not be principal participants in it.

    “… in no way asking for special treatment….” As long as our Federal government is going to give official sanction to some religious superstitions and tribal symbols, Wicca deserves the same treatment. As a sociologist I know that the dominant group tends to regard any plea for “equal treatment” as “special treatment” (think gays, blacks, women). In fact, the degree to which a dominant group prates about “special treatment” is an empirical measure of its own decadence and ultimate doom.

  • #3: go back to rolling the sawdust and playing with rattlesnakes there in the double-wide, will you? People like you are lower than lemurs on the evolutionary scale.

  • Religion this – religion that. Blech! All this religion coming from both sides is giving this atheist a headache. Enough already! FREEDOM OF RELIGION ALSO INCLUDES FREEDOM FROM RELIGION.

  • Frankly, I find Edwards’s use of “Christ” disturbing. A national politician SHOULD be more inclusive of all peoples and faiths– ESPECIALLY a Democratic one! I know that a large reason I, as a Jewish citizen, belong to the Democratic party is precisely BECAUSE the white male Christian southern establishment does not control the party. Please, PLEASE don’t let Edwards become our standard bearer!!!

  • The other day, in order to commemorate those killed at Virginia Tech, Edwards led a prayer “in Christ’s name” […]

    Last week, someone was complaining that Jesus had been excluded from the same ceremony; not mentioned,even once. Now,I’man atheist so my understanding of “things religious” is somewhat weak but, isn’t “Jesus” and “Christ” the same person?

  • Is anybody keeping track of the fact that Pat Robertson predicted in his book published in 1990 that the ‘End of the World’ would be tomorrow, Sunday April 28th 2007

    He probably figured that by putting it 17 years in the future, nobody would call him on it, but NPR did a blurb on it, and Pat Robertson was too busy to talk with them. I wonder if he’s trying to come up with excuses, in case it is not the end of the world tomorrow….

  • With all due respect to EVERYONE’s religious or non-religious sensibilities, I feel that Edwards has done nothing wrong or offensive. He offered up a prayer, and he offered it up in the manner that he has come to know God. So he offers it as he has been taught in the name of Christ through whom he has come to know God. Maybe I’m too progressive for Christian rightwingers, too spiritual for secular advocates, and too Christian for non-Christians, but… if someone else offered up a prayer in a manner that reflected their religious background (Jewish, Islamic, etc.), I need to work through any of my personal discomforts and recognize the intention of good (unless actually stated otherwise) towards all and accept it. If he had pronounced damnation for non-Christians or blamed gays and feminists for violent tragedies like VA Tech, I would be all over his ass like a bad diaper rash. But he didn’t. Let us let him pray in the way that is appropriate for him as we should for anyone else of another religious persuasion.

    In terms of non-Judeo/Christian/Islamic religions, if and when I am uncomfortable with those expressions, I have to buck up and politely deal with it. Despite the proclamations of fundamentalists of whatever persuasion, we have a social contract in this country to be civil and tolerate others religions or lack of it. That doesn’t preclude evangelizing or advocating for spiritual or religious perspectives (including atheism and agnosticism), but we all have options for doing it civilly without turning into an American version of Iraq.

  • I’ve got a rather simple word for all Democrats who want my vote:

    Sincerity.
    Pray like you mean it. For most of them, this will mean seldom hearing of it.
    Howard Dean annoyed me no end in 2004 when he started talking faith when he never had before. Be at peace with your non-practicing selves. It makes you mainstream if people would just have the modicum of guts it takes to admit it.

    If you always showed up at church on Xmas and Easter, don’t start showing up Ash Wednesday, okay? It just smells.

  • “Whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If ye shall ask anything in my name, I will do it” (John 14:13,14).

    You guys are unbelievable. Long-standing tradition in Protestant Christian churches is to end prayers with “In Christ’s name we pray” because of the above verse among others. Why not make a good will attempt to understand a culture before criticizing it — google the phrase.

    Shalom. Allah akbar. And God bless you.

  • I couldn’t agree more with #s 10 & 13. And, like TAiO at #2, I can find nothing to lead me to believe the author is one of “these people”.

  • Comments are closed.