This Week in God

First up from The God Machine this week is a disconcerting story about what happens when religious ministries have to compete for access to the federal treasury: they start acting like every other interest group.

St. Vincent College, a small Benedictine college southeast of Pittsburgh, wanted to realign a two-lane state road serving the campus. But the state transportation department did not have the money.

So St. Vincent tried Washington instead. The college hired a professional lobbyist in 2004 and, later that year, two paragraphs were tucked into federal appropriation bills with the help of Representative John P. Murtha, Democrat of Pennsylvania, awarding $4 million solely for that project. College officials said the work would improve the safety and appearance of the road into the campus, which President Bush visited two days ago to give the college’s commencement address.

Religious organizations have long competed for federal contracts to provide social services, and they have tried to influence Congress on matters of moral and social policy — indeed, most major denominations have a presence in Washington to monitor such legislation. But an analysis of federal records shows that some religious organizations are also hiring professional lobbyists to pursue the narrowly tailored individual appropriations known as earmarks.

The New York Times did some research on the number of earmarks for religious organizations and found some interesting results: “From 1989 to January 2007, Congress approved almost 900 earmarks for religious groups, totaling more than $318 million, with more than half of them granted in the Congressional session that included the 2004 presidential election.” (The NYT created an interactive database for the earmarks.)

My friends at AU noted that we’ve strayed pretty far from our constitutional roots on this one: “Nearly 200 years ago, when Congress passed a law granting federal land to a Baptist church in Mississippi, President James Madison vetoed the measure.” Madison told Congress at the time, “[R]eserving a parcel of land of the United States for the use of said Baptist Church comprises a principle and precedent for the appropriation of funds of the United States for the use and support of religious societies, contrary to the article of the Constitution which declares that ‘Congress shall make no law respecting a religious establishment.'”

Now churches are hiring lobbyists to get a slice of the funding pie. This isn’t progress.

Also from The God Machine this week, Congress may be good enough to write some checks for churches, but apparently Congress is no longer worth converting.

It seems the Capitol is now manifestly beyond salvation. The Center for Christian Statesmanship, launched in 1995 to convert members of Congress and their aides to evangelical Christianity, has shuttered its operations in Washington.

The group had been a ministry on Capitol Hill of a 10,000-member megachurch, Coral Ridge Presbyterian, of Fort Lauderdale.

CQ suggests “the group brought in fewer converts than hungry staffers. Its best-attended Hill function had been its monthly ‘Politics and Principle’ luncheons, which supplemented evangelical appeals with complimentary sandwiches.”

I’ve been hearing for quite a while that Congress is beyond salvation. I guess now it’s official?

And finally this week, by way of reader M.W., it appears that Jerry Falwell’s funeral will have one unwelcome guest.

Westboro Baptist Church says it intends to state a protest at the funeral of Rev. Jerry Falwell.

Falwell died died Tuesday at age 73. The funeral will be Tuesday at the Thomas Road Baptist Church, the church he founded, in Lynchburg, Virginia.

On its Web site, Westboro says it will “preach” outside the funeral “of the corpulent false prophet Jerry Falwell, who spent his entire life prophesying lies and false doctrines like ‘God loves everyone.'”

Apparently, for the Phelps clan, Falwell wasn’t hateful enough. Wow.

The Center for Christian Statesmanship, launched in 1995 to convert members of Congress and their aides to evangelical Christianity, has shuttered its operations in Washington.

You know, I thought the air seemed fresher round these parts. Now I know why.

Westboro Baptist Church says it intends to state a protest at the funeral of Rev. Jerry Falwell.

If I survive the irony overdose this will make my week. Who needs lions? The Christianists do an fine job of tearing each other to shreds. Now, Phelps and his genetically redundant gaggle of shitheads are nasty but the Failwell Flock has the numbers and will be on their home turf. Oh…I’ll put my money on the Failures.

  • I think it’s high time churches pay taxes. In addition to more recent efforts like the lobbying recounted above, clergymen have an array of personal tax deductions — such as clothing — that the rest of us don’t, and that have nothing to do with their occupation.

    Personally, I have no use for organized religion. Organized religion generally excludes God.

    Several years ago, Jimmy Carter created the Atlanta Project. He noticed that local charities — mainly churches — were providing services so independently that the help was more hit-and-miss than focused. The Atlanta Project was an attempt to get the churches on the same page and, therefore, create a combined effort that was much more effective.

    The Carter Center provided some organizational help and promotion, but it was left to the churches to cooperate and do their job. They never did, and the thing just evaporated.

  • There’s an aspect to St Vincent’s situation not mentioned here. The college has been hosting the Pittsburgh Steelers training camp every summer for as long as I can remember. If you know anything about ‘Steeler Nation’, this annual event is every bit the circus you might imagine. Hundreds, if not thousands of fans attend regularly, so there are legitimate road safety considerations, even if traffic is light the rest of the year. As it’s a state road, there’s not much St Vincent’s or the Steelers can do on their own to rework it. And the state, strapped for cash, has higher road priorities. This case is probably a bad example to use.

  • St. Vincent’s is not simply (or even primarily) a religious ministry. It is a college with a vested interest in public land use. I really can’t hold it against them for appeal to the federal government when it comes to transportation policy. No one blinks twice when Harvard lobbies the local or federal government to pass policies that serve their interests, so I find it hard to see why anyone would want to call St. V’s to task for the same thing. Not that I disagree with the thrust of your post, but using St. Vincent’s is a bad example.

  • I think it’s high time churches pay taxes.

    Any entity incorporated as a non-profit organization does not pay taxes. That includes churches. If you want to single out religion for being a taxable non-profit, then they could simply reincorporate as “think tanks.” Unless your issue is over the tax status of non-profits in general (schools, universities, think tanks, arts organizations, etc.), there’s no reason to single out churches unless it’s because you have an anti-religious ax to grind.

    In addition to more recent efforts like the lobbying recounted above, clergymen have an array of personal tax deductions — such as clothing — that the rest of us don’t,

    I’m pretty sure if you had to wear a certain uniform or specific clothing as a condition of your job, that would be deductible as a work/business expense.

  • “Any entity incorporated as a non-profit organization does not pay taxes. That includes churches.”

    You ever seen the coffers at a catholic church? Trust me, there’s no way they could claim to be non-profit…

  • Phelps protesting the Falwell funeral……………..this should be interesting.

    when “Christians” collide….. who will turn the other cheek the most

  • Coral Ridge also closed its “Center for Reclaiming America” earlier this month. Although they deny it, both closings are probably due to the prolonged absence of D. James Kennedy, Coral Ridge’s grand poobah. Kennedy has been a familiar face on the televangelist TV schedule, but he suffered a serious heart attack this past December at age 76. Here’s a link to a good article about Kennedy and Coral Ridge:

    http://www.miamiherald.com/569/story/99553.html

    Kennedy will be missed from the political scene a lot like we are going to miss Jerry Falwell. I am confident that they will be close to each other in the place that God has prepared for them.

    It probably was never possible to save the souls of most Congressmen – especially Republicons. But the supposed effort of Kennedy to do so was a clever and probably successful fundraising gimmick.

  • Speaking only as the former treasurer of my church (mainstream, 500 members) we barely take in enough to cover our ministry. There’s no way we could afford taxes. There are no luxuries. Our members give a percentage of our offerings to various charities, plus donate our time to help those in need. Example: our church was responsible for starting a homeless shelter in our town. No, we’re not perfect, but we are trying to make a difference.

    Re Phelps’ gang protesting at Falwell’s funeral: irony indeed.

    Bob Geiger has a great political cartoon on his website re Falwell, check it out (the first one): http://bobgeiger.blogspot.com/

  • You know, I’ve long suspected that Phelps and his crew were subsidized by guys like Falwell, Roberston and Dobson just so they’d look good by comparison. Really, how do Phelps and his posse support themselves?

  • You ever seen the coffers at a catholic church? Trust me, there’s no way they could claim to be non-profit…

    I’m not sure whether you’re trying to be glib and amusing (if so, haha!) or whether you don’t understand what a non-profit organization is. Harvard’s a non-profit. So is the United Way. So’s Andover. So’s the Heritage Foundation. They’re neither starving for money, nor is their position as an untaxed non-profit ever in question.

  • Really, how do Phelps and his posse support themselves?

    Good question. You know those prostitutes (male & female) that keep causing trouble for our ReThuglican pals?

    I jest of course. If wikipedia is to be trusted I suspect at least some of the brood still run the law firm he started.

  • The HuffPo has an article about Jimmy Carter’s take on Bush policies, mostly foreign, but he quotesa statistic that just astonished me: “Carter also offered a harsh assessment for the White House’s Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, which helped religious charities receive $2.15 billion in federal grants in fiscal year 2005 alone.”

    Over $2 billion put into the coffers of Bush’s right wing christian friends. If that’s not bribery to keep the religious right in their pocket, I don’t know what is.

  • “…there’s no reason to single out churches unless it’s because you have an anti-religious ax to grind.” — Constantine

    Good point, and I admit to it. I believe strongly in separation of state from religion. So far, we have freedom of religion and freedom *from* religion. I think the separation is equally valuable to both entities.

    Unfortunately, there has been a relentless campaign on the part of numerous churches and Christian denominations to eliminate that separation. It’s occurred on a grand scale via well-funded right-wing Christian organizations, but it also occurs at local levels with individual churches and almost exclusively in concert with the Republican party.

    Prayer in schools is a particularly familiar campaign. The issue, of course, is prayer organized and performed by government employees. Individual prayer and prayer in private, voluntary groups is already permitted, but that’s never enough. The real issue is not whether a parent’s child who wants to pray can in fact pray in school. It’s whether children of *other* parents must be made a part of prayer organized by someone or some group other than his/her family. In other words, it’s about controlling others’ choices.

    There seems to be no pressure to require churches to teach math, which can also be done at home.

    Taxing churches exclusively and across the board is, of course, a flippant statement on my part. But I would like to see some kind of accountability for political activities in churches that go beyond reasonable. For example, churches that publish and distribute handouts endorsing political candidates — which happens — should pay a fee to do so. Same for churches that give political parties mailing lists of their members.

    It’s just no secret that the religious right has become deeply involved in political action. And right or left, I don’t think it’s a good idea. Is it a church or a political instrument?

    Regarding deductions, I won’t press that because I don’t have the facts at hand. My local newspaper did a week-long series on them, and they included items such as suits, but much else. If I can find it, I will post it. I sometimes wear suits in my own occupation, but even self-employed, I can’t deduct them.

    Still, you make thoughtful points, and I try to acknowledge it when I’m wrong.

  • Comments are closed.