This Week in God

The God Machine this week is focused on just one story, an odd controversy about a fundamentalist anti-science textbook that’s been showing up in the mailboxes of credible people nationwide.

In the United States, opposition to the teaching of evolution in public schools has largely been fueled by the religious right, particularly Protestant fundamentalism. Now another voice is entering the debate, in dramatic fashion.

It is the voice of Adnan Oktar of Turkey, who, under the name Harun Yahya, has produced numerous books, videos and DVDs on science and faith, in particular what he calls the “deceit” inherent in the theory of evolution. One of his books, “Atlas of Creation,” is turning up, unsolicited, in mailboxes of scientists around the country and members of Congress, and at science museums in places like Queens and Bemidji, Minn.

At 11 x 17 inches and 12 pounds, with a bright red cover and almost 800 glossy pages, most of them lavishly illustrated, “Atlas of Creation” is probably the largest and most beautiful creationist challenge yet to Darwin’s theory, which Mr. Yahya calls a feeble and perverted ideology contradicted by the Koran.

Not surprisingly, the book is ridiculous, at least as far as the science goes, but the distribution of the text is what’s raising eyebrows. Kenneth Miller, a biologist at Brown University, said he and his colleagues in the life sciences had all received copies. He started calling colleagues at a variety of major universities across the country, and literally every one of them had received the same thing.

“I think he must have sent it to every full professor in the medical school,” said Kathryn L. Calame, a microbiologist at the Columbia University medical school who received a copy. “The genetics department, the biochem department, micro — everybody I talked to had it.”

An expensive, glossy, 800-page book isn’t cheap to produce or print, but it also costs quite a bit to send them to scientists, doctors, and journalists from coast to coast. Shipping was handled by a company called SDS Worldwide, which has an office in Illinois. When one of the scientists contacted the company about this, he spoke to someone there who told him SDS had received a cargo-container-size shipment of books, “with everything prepaid and labeled. It just went all over the country.”

Taner Edis, a physicist at Truman State University in Missouri who studies issues of science and religion, said the financing of this massive endeavor is “a big question that no one knows the answer to.”

The focus of the mystery is on the Middle East.

…Mr. Yahya’s books and other publications have won him attention in Islamic areas. “This is a guy with some influence,” Dr. Edis said, “unfortunately for mainstream science.”

Dr. Miller agreed. He said he regularly received e-mail messages from people questioning evolution, with an increasing number coming from Turkey, Lebanon and other areas in the Middle East, most citing Mr. Yahya’s work.

That’s troubling, he said, because Mr. Yahya’s ideas “cast evolution as part of the corrupting influence of the West on Islamic culture, and that promotes a profound anti-science attitude that is certainly not going to help the Islamic world catch up to the West.” […]

[I]t’s also possible “that Harun Yahya and his people have decided that there are plenty of Muslim people in the United States who need to hear this message.”

Perhaps we should expect the fight over religion in science classes to get more complicated in the near future, with Christian and Muslim fundamentalists teaming up to undermine modern biology.

Perhaps we should expect the fight over religion in science classes to get more complicated in the near future, with Christian and Muslim fundamentalists teaming up to undermine modern biology.

My thoughts exactly.
But beyond you and I:

Read Arthur Clarke’s “The Hammer of God”.
Inside you will find a syncretic blend: Chrislam.

I think Clarke got this bastardization right.
It will happen as science continues to erode at the edges of both faiths.

  • For those who’ve been following the story CB was written about before, the local paper has a bit of an update on Tom Monaghan and his fundamentalist “Catholic” town project. I couldn’t make it through more than the first couple of paragraph–the “ugh” factor overwhelmed me.

    Ave Maria open for occupancy

  • I can’t remember who said “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.” Was it Jesus Christ? Or was it or the Prophet Mohammed?

    Politics makes strange bedfellows.

  • OT- I’ve got a Daily Kos diary up here today re: Barack Obama’s controversial words about defending against genocide, and a liberal military policy beyond the War on Terror.

  • Perhaps we should expect the fight over religion in science classes to get more complicated in the near future, with Christian and Muslim fundamentalists teaming up to undermine modern biology.

    It’s a match made in Heaven. I think some convergences to watch are Chrislam (thanks ROTFLMLiberalAO #1) and the growing militancy of black muslims in this country. I’m not saying we should be intolerant of Islam, but its challenge to our way of life is just beginning. Confusing times are ahead.

  • Perhaps we should expect the fight over religion in science classes to get more complicated in the near future, with Christian and Muslim fundamentalists teaming up to undermine modern biology.

    Nah. The TalEvan will be bent out of shape because the TalIban, has enough money to produce and ship nice, big, beautiful books,* while they have to make do with sneaking a few photocopies here and there on the company copy machine.

    They’re probably grumbling about “terrist money,” being used to spread radical Islam and darkly suggesting that the secular humanist scientists will lap it up if something isn’t done.

    I’m hoping for a death-cage match.

    Tom Monaghan and his fundamentalist “Catholic” town project.

    I know, it is sick making, but just think: When the inevitable sex scandal breaks it is going to make diaper-wearing ReThuglicans look like two kids playing doctor!

    tAiO

    *I confess that the book addict in me would love to have one.

  • As to the mysterious sponsorship of such a costly project to mail out multiple copies of a 12 lb. 800 page work, I guess the people behind such a project want the addressees to think God works in mysterious ways! -Kevo

  • I’m with taio, I’d love to have a copy of that book. I have a beautiful Koran someone sent me and an old timey Bible with all the great illustrations and a book of lovely Mandalas and yet I continue to accept our Lord and Saviour Chuck Darwin.

  • Meanwhile, have any of the recipients of this book been given medical tests? I realize the administration would like us to forget the anthrax scare, but it seems like such a mysterious distribution would be an excellent way of spreading a bio-weapon to our universities and top medical facilities.

  • Well, who in the Islamic World would fund such a thing? Hmmmm… couldn’t be elements within Saudi Arabia would it? Nah, they’d never fund a bunch of religious fanatics to spread their brand of fundi blockheaded ness thru various means including terror.

    Again, I’ve never had any fundie of any stripe (outside of Mennonites and Amish) answer this age old question. If they hate the ideas of the “modern” world so much then why do they insist on using the fruits of said ideas? Be sort of like buying Harry Potter books cause you hate Harry so much.

  • That’s right . Focus on evolution. That way the Christians don’t have to be bogged down with trivials like “Thou Shalt Not Kill”, Or “Love Thy Neighbor As Thyself”.

  • Maybe the hidden message is to indicate to these various scientists that they are on yet another list; a list of candidates suitable for purging as we approach religious Utopia. Wow! Combined with the fundie’s lists and Dumb George’s we could be on the verge of a perfect world.

  • seems people write on sites where they know they can gain approval: views not challenged.
    And so you’re all commenting as if you’ve read the book’s evidence, yet none has been quoted!

    Actually biological science is not in any way modern, or is it in the lead so far as human knowledge goes.
    Evolutionary theory goes back to vedic times about 3,00 years b.c and they can simultaneously believe in creationist theory: that is the point here.

    Modern evolutionary theory tends to propagate theories of random mutation, for which there is zero evidence, and the word random is highly suspect , but then biological theorists philosophise weakly. They simply are not provided with a round education. They use words and stumble with them. Most good biology, is study of anatomy or systems. That’s as far as it goes. When it comes to evoloutionary theory as having to win in contest with creationist theory, you are out of your depth, and simply repeating a creed you were informed is politically correct.

    In fact, evidence exists for Lamarkism, yet this is not taught in schools, because it is not politically correct, and can co-exist more happily with creationist theory. Need I remind you, who without doubt, being modern scholars, have not read Darwin in the original, that Darwin was a god-fearing man who believed in creation, and gave credit to Lamark, though later on. Now, just think of cells mutating with carcinogens in a petri dish. Is that ‘randon’ mutation, or environmentally-induced. So, cells change in situ with their environment. What can we deduce from that? Selection then favours a course of evolution. Yes, but that is adaptation, not creation.

    The development of a zygote into human gives evidence of an evolutionary line. That was known in vedic texts, and beforehand, I have little doubt. So Creatures evolved, but that doesn’t mean teleological evolution is ruled out, as the ancients understood. But these days, so poor in education and so politicised are we, we cannot even discuss it. I hear a raucous kind of laughter, and jibes. From individuals who are stunted and are stunting the growth of our children. Children stunted by adults, adults who pretend to be interested in enquiry and truth, but are interested in appearing right, or on the right side. Who neatly divide their poetic life and their rational life into their favourite music and theories of life based on anatomy based on a creed of Random.

    Religious scholars, Muslims amongst them , many highly trained scientists, because they receive their religious training as part of their upbringing, and specialise in science at university. They are far more adept at logical and philosophical discourse, than what goes on here. Stick to your narrow biological theories, as you insist. But as you all know, whilst you worship biology or Nature, Matter does not produce matter.

    Bolly.

  • From my post: Islam’s Galileo moment.
    Move over, Ken sHam! Adnan Oktar, also known by his pen-name Harun Yahya, said the evils of the world were a direct result of Darwinism. Whew! Not another shamthropologist!…Poor Yahya – he’s been persecuted, tortured, imprisoned. But nothing has dimmed his vision of an Islamic dominion! From his webpage, composed and posted by himself about himself: […]
    Oktar is a real piece of work, an Islamic fanatic that is only one slight degree less delusional – because he doesn’t believe in the YoungEarthCreationism.He’s just willing to get into bed with the YECs – because the YECs have excellent mailing lists…

  • Bolly,
    I know you’ve been disappointed that nobody has responded to your Lysenkoist yammering, but lest you take it as a coup that you managed to dumbfound all the rational people here, let me suggest that nobody considered your ravings worthy of rebuttal. In the future, your disparagement of the people with whom you’re sharing a blog might be less dismissive if you refrain from denigrating said fellow-bloggers, and you might be taken more seriously if you proofread your posts (how hard can it be to spell Lamarck correctly?).

    As for the substance of your sneering discourse—what little there is of it—you’re free to embrace laughably anachronistic theories all you like, but don’t expect serious rebuttal. You may as well be arguing the merits of divination by chicken entrails. I hope you aren’t too disappointed at the lack of raucous laughter, but at least here’s a bit of a jibe that you seem to expect. I think this’ll have to suffice.

  • Comments are closed.