This Week in God

The God Machine produced so many great religion-related news items this week, it’s hard to know where to start. Let’s kick things off with a fascinating item about how, and whether, a public university can accommodate the religious practices of observant students.

When Majed Afana needs to pray while attending classes at the University of Michigan in Dearborn, the 19-year-old Muslim usually will duck into the campus library’s bathroom, strip off his shoes and awkwardly strain to wash his feet in the sink.

Water often pools at his feet, he says, making it slippery to balance on one foot.

Some of the sinks have started to pull away from the wall, in part from years of use by others like him — who, according to their faith, must clean their feet before praying five times a day.

So when the school recently approved installing two foot baths in a pair of new unisex bathrooms to accommodate the needs of male and female Muslim students, the local Islamic community started planning ways to raise the estimated $25,000 cost.

But the university told them not to bother — it would pay for the foot baths.

A reported 11% of the school’s 8,600 students are Muslim, leading university officials to believe this is a worthwhile infrastructure improvement. The school is using funds from its general fund, financed by students, not taxpayers.

Is this an example of a reasonable accommodation or state-sponsored favoritism for one religious group? Even civil libertarians seem to disagree — the ACLU of Michigan considers the footbaths a matter of “practical cleanliness and safety,” while my friends at Americans United for Separation of Church and State considers the renovations legally problematic.

Said AU’s Barry Lynn, “You start permanently changing your architecture for one religious group, you have to do it for all. After all, what’s the difference between a foot bath used as part of a ritual and a fountain that can be used for a baptism?”

Other items from this week’s God Machine:

* In Texas, public school students will now recite an edited state pledge of allegiance, which has always been secular throughout the history of Texas. Not anymore. Republicans in the Legislature added the phrase “one state under God” to the pledge, which is part of a required morning ritual in Texas public schools along with the pledge to the U.S. flag and a moment of silence.

The Houston Chronicle added, “By law, students who object to saying the pledge or making the reference to God can bring a written note from home excusing them from participating.” No, that wouldn’t be awkward for non-believers at all.

* E&P reported this week, “International Bible Society-Send the Light is planning on spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to distribute Bibles with 11 newspapers during 2007 and 2008. New Testaments would be packaged in pouches on the outside of newspapers, much like soap or other sample products.” The Fort Worth Star-Telegram announced in May it would deliver more than 200,000 New Testaments the last Sunday of the year, but after complaints from readers, offered subscribers an opt-out.

* I tend to avoid criticizing people’s religious practices, but this is just crazy: “Officers responding to a report of an exorcism on a young girl found her grandfather choking her and used stun guns to subdue the man, who later died, authorities said Sunday. The 3-year-old girl and her mother, who was also in the room during the struggle between 49-year-old Ronald Marquez and officers, were hospitalized, police said…. The relative who called police said an exorcism had also been attempted Thursday. ‘The purpose was to release demons from this very young child,’ said Sgt. Joel Tranter.”

* Remember the flap over the “Christian Embassy” video late last year? Filmed in the Pentagon, the video shows uniformed officers explaining how they use their official roles in the military to bring government leaders “into an intentional relationship with Jesus Christ.” Yesterday, the Pentagon announced the results of a probe into the incident.

The WaPo reported, “The Defense Department’s inspector general has found that four generals and three other military officers improperly participated in a fundraising video for an evangelical Christian group, inappropriately offering support for the religious organization while appearing to operate within the scope of their official government duties, according to a 47-page investigative report.”

* And finally, The Hill reported this week, “Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean, who once criticized the GOP as a ‘white Christian party’ and also said ‘my religion doesn’t inform my public policy,’ is building a sophisticated infrastructure to woo so-called values voters…. His effort began early in 2005 when he met Leah Daughtry, an ordained Pentecostal minister who served as Democratic National Committee (DNC) chief of staff under former chairman Terry McAuliffe. They discussed the importance of faith voters, and Daughtry persuaded Dean to commission a poll of religious voters. The meeting impressed Dean enough to keep Daughtry in her job and to embark on an ambitious program to win faith-driven votes.”

  • Either cater to all religions, denominations, sects, cults and heresies…
    or, you know, just keep things secular.
    Yeah, such a difficult thing to figure out!
    It’s like, y’know, countin’ ta ten with only 8 fingers!

  • Though Muslim students would do the lion share of foot washing, other non-Muslim students would also have access to the unisex facilities. As such, I do not see a church/state issue here. I say make more feet cleaning facilities available so all Americans can have good clean feet. -Kevo

  • The “Christian Embassy” gives a whole new meaning to the song, “Onward Christian Soldiers.” -Kevo

  • Do you get the feeling that the United States is looking more and more like the post-WWII Soviet Union, with party officials overseeing all governmental activities, even the technical ones? It’s not enough to be a professional in the military, so serve your country and move up through the ranks. You’ve also got to kowtow to the political hacks who are appointed to regulate you, in this case a bunch of nutjob Christians for whom the word “mission” has little if anything to do with traditional military activity. Of course, as they practice it, it has nothing to do with Christianity either – it’s simply enforcing the party line, loyalty and all that.

  • In all seriousness, my first instinct in answer to Barry Lynn is that people are not baptized five times a day, every single day.

    It is simply practical. I spent a decade in a clinical lab at an academic research facility. I worked with a LOT of practicing Muslims. I have seen expensive repairs necessitated by such use, including a sink that came off the wall and sprayed water all over the bathroom and caused a physical plant emergency at 0300 one morning. I have also seen people get hurt doing the foot-washing in the sink, and I have seen water all over bathroom floors and slipped in it a time or two myself.

    The practical aspect should trump in this instance. Besides all that, it’s just time Common Sense won a round.

  • About providing foot baths for Muslims. I see no reason why a public university should accommodate anyone’s religious beliefs whatsoever. In fact, I think the University of Michigan should post signs near the sinks informing the superstitious that these sinks are for hand-washing only, that foot-washing physically damages the sinks and might lead to personal injury. This country has gone berserk accommodating nutjobs. Its public universities should set standards for rational behavior, not fret every time some kook wants special treatment because of his/her peculiar beliefs.

  • The problem with Barry Lynn’s comparison between religious footwashing and baptism is that Muslims traditionally pray 5 times a day and wash their feet in preparation, and baptisms are not required by Christianity 5 times a day — they’re usually done in occasional church worship services. I think the footbaths are a reasonable and inexpensive accommodation for Muslim students, especially if it prevents the sinks from being torn from the walls and everyone can use them if wanted!

    I’d like to see things kept secular, too, but reasonable accommodations for religion are required under federal law and many state laws.

  • Tim Fahey said:

    You can own your very own image of Jesus/stained concrete!

    You can if you want to see bidder #27’s US $1,075.75 and raise him/her a sawbuck or two. It’s a crappy image and it looks like the stain from the bottom of a bucket of driveway sealer that it is. We’re swirling down, down, down.

  • ANNEY said:

    “I’d like to see things kept secular, too, but reasonable accommodations for religion are required under federal law and many state laws.”

    Then how about changing the laws so that all are equal
    and the government is -actually- secular?

    Oh, noes!
    That’d give fools like me (atheists) the run of the place
    to preach our beliefs! (Which don’t exist, because we have a -lack- of beliefs… but who are we kiddin’, that fact’ll never be adequatly explained).

    But.. yeah…
    As long as religious people are being favored,
    let them be equally favored, I guess.

  • I recall that there was a chapel room in the student union at my college where people could go and pray in peace and quiet. That was at a state university and no one seemed to mind. If you can have a chapel at a state funded university, then you can have a foot bath. You couldn’t make the case that one is OK but you shouldn’t have the other.

    Personally, I would prefer neither. I happen to think the world would be a much better place without religion and it pains me to see any institute of higher learning promoting such nonsense. But I suppose that if people must have their superstitions, we can’t have them breaking their fool necks in the observance of them.

  • I’m fine with the idea of installing foot baths. I just don’t want to be on campus when some redneck takes a piss in one.

    When I was a student, I noticed that my college didn’t have classes scheduled on Sunday, and I managed to survive this ridiculous inefficiency even though it was an accommodation to those loony Christians, with that odd ‘sabbath’ and day-of-worship thing.

  • I don’t have a problem with the footbaths.

    It’s a straight business decision: it’s safer and in the long run will cost the university less.

    Besides, there’s nothing preventing a Christian from washing his taloned cheetos in those baths….

  • The solution for the Muslims is to have their own centralized, on-campus facility. Don’t universities provide facilities for Christian prayer groups now?

    Also: Jewish kosher laws are archaic–given modern refrigeration and health standards; foot washing seems equally archaic–it makes sense if you been walking around amongst a herd of domesticated animals. I guess being archaic is the hallmark of an organized religion.

    One more thing: biggerbox is right about what the rednecks would do.

  • What better image of religious idiocy than some fool dancing around on one foot the bathroom trying to practice his religion. Very Vonnegutian. This practice was required in a place and a time when people wore sandals or no shoes in a sandy environment. Religion makes sheeples of us all.

    I have to admit I would be tempted to pee atheistically in the foot bath.

    BTW, destroying sinks is vandalism.

  • [..] the school recently approved installing two foot baths in a pair of new unisex bathrooms to accommodate the needs of male and female Muslim students […]

    Unisex bathrooms? For Muslims observant enough to insist on washing their feet 5 times a day before prayer? Hellooo??? How much of a female leg, not belonging to them by marriage, would all those males see and be distracted from prayer as the result?

    As for the difference between a foot bath and a baptismal font…In addtition to the one mentioned by Blue Girl, @7 and anney, @9 (nobody gets christened 5times a day)… As far as I know, the water in the footbath is not gonna be magicked into “holy water”. I don’t see installing footbaths as a big problem; abigger problem would be if all the Muslims started to wash their feet in the baptismal font of the university chapel (which, I’m sure, the U does have).

    All the same… ’tis a pity that no religion requires bidets (except, perhaps, at mDC Madam Palfrey’s “house of worship”).

    Re the addition to the Texas’ pledge. I’m opposed to this sort of enforced “public patriotism”, with or without God in it. Too reminiscent of the Stalinist era assemblies in my school (in Poland).

  • Cleanliness next to godliness? To be fair, there should also be bidets, for secular-humanist girls who like to tidy up apres le sex.

  • I have no problem with unisex bathrooms having footbaths for the use of Muslim students especially since tax payers aren’t paying for them. I do object to Ed Stephan’s refering to those of differant religions as “nutjobs”.

  • As regards the footbaths, this is one case where I have to disagree with Barry Lynn. There are many times where “following the law” will lead you to an idiot decision. The English common law recognized this by creating “Equity” courts to make sure that the law was not used to come to an idiotic decision.

    11% of the students are going to use the washbowls to do this, regardless of anything the school does, with the result the plumbing is screwed up. Not to mention that I for one would not care to wash my hands and such in a bowl someone had stuck their feet in. I mention that as a pure public health issue.

    On public health grounds, the school is right and (for the first time I am aware of) Reverend Lynn suffers from Cranial-Rectal Adhesion Syndrome.

  • The foot-baths are okay with me. We already make such concessions not to religion, but to reality, when we don’t schedule classes, or ask most govt workers to work, on the Christian sabbath or on holidays like Christmas.

    The reality here is that the lack of such facilities makes it difficult for Muslims to attend classes.

    (Besides, the foot-washin’ Baptists can also use them. šŸ™‚ )

  • Libra, re the unisex facilities: as far as bare feet amongst mixed company is concerned, I don’t think Muslims’ attitudes towards feet and sexuality are like Western ones.

    I often see Muslim women wrapped up in their veils and long coats, but wearing open-toed sandals. Apparently there’s no foot-fetishism in Islam.

  • Yup, the so called Christian right will howl.
    Is there anything in the Koran that expressely forbids using wet cloths to clense the feet?
    Probably not, so why do people who want to clense their feet not do it the same way the rest of us clense our hands, in public bathrooms? Or the same way parents clense their babys bottoms in public bathrooms?

    I can’t wait for the snakes and speeking in tongues in the bathrooms.

  • Keep in mind that UofM Dearborn is in Dearborn. If you aren’t from the Detroit area, then you might not know that Dearborn boasts the highest concentration of Muslims of Middle Eastern descent anywhere outside of the Middle East. There are streets in Dearborn where you won’t see English on the shop/restaurant signs. Let me tell ya, the food is out of this world. So the UofM is not caving to some minority here…the folks who bathe their feet make up a large slice of the student population.

    On the other hand, i’m with the comment suggesting a “chapel” like setting on campus where Muslims may go to wash their feet and pray. I think that it would be the best balance.

    Remember that our Constitution does not talk so much about keeping religion out of our lives but about not elevating any religion above the rest.

    And the ACLU can go to hell with its protests over footbaths. Their lawyers should be in front of the Supreme Court every day. They want to raise a fuss over footbaths, but much like the Democratic party have done nothing to end the civil liberty infractions of the War on Drugs or all the crap that has come down the pipe (and onto our heads) since Bush took office.

  • Elephantrider should read a bit more carefully. From this report, it appears that the ACLU agrees with the installation of the footbaths. I do, as well. However, My opinion would be that a separate center be built, because we know how much certain “christians” will piss in the baths to honor their god.

  • Comments are closed.