This Week in God

First up from the God machine this week is a religion/politics story we’ve been following for weeks with great interest: exit polling and faith-related questions.

In all of the major primaries and caucuses, the National Election Pool, including representatives of several major news outlets, conducts exit polls of voters. The problem this year, though, is that the NEP asks questions about religion of Republicans, but not Democrats.

If you want to know what percentage of voters in the Republican caucuses and primaries described themselves as born-again or evangelical Christians — and whom they voted for — exit polls will tell you. If you want to know what percentage of voters in the Democratic caucuses and primaries consider themselves born-again or evangelical Christians, well, sorry. No one knows. No one knows because the exit polls did not ask. […]

[I]t has not gone unnoticed that in five states, voters in Republican contests were asked their religious affiliation, and in four states they were asked how frequently they attended religious services. Voters in Democratic contests were asked those questions in only three states.

In four states, voters for Republican candidates were asked how much it mattered that a candidate shared their religious beliefs. Nowhere was that question put to voters for Democratic candidates.

And most notably, in every state voters in Republican caucuses and primaries were asked if they were born-again or evangelical Christians. Voters in Democratic caucuses and primaries were never asked.

My friends at Faith in Public Life, an interfaith group interested in broadening the religious agenda beyond issues favored by conservative Christians, have been doing all of the heavy lifting on this, and it’s beginning to generate attention. The group has been hounding NEP officials, arguing that exit polls have ignored “the bipartisan courtship of evangelical voters” and “perpetuated the misperception that all evangelical Christians are Republicans.”

This week, Howard Dean and the DNC picked up on the cause. “This bias in polling questions,” Dean said in a letter to the National Election Pool consortium, “has in turn shaped news coverage, making it appear that one party has a monopoly on religion in this race.”

Super Tuesday is just a few days away, and the bias apparently won’t improve.

What about Tuesday? The pool’s media coordinator, Jack Stokes, would not go beyond saying: “We choose the questions based on our internal editorial discussions. To protect the integrity of the process, we routinely do not talk publicly about what questions are on our surveys.”

On Election Day in November, exit polls will ask all voters the same questions. It will become apparent, for example, whether evangelicals experiencing Republican fatigue signaled that by voting Democratic or simply, as some polling for The New York Times suggests is more likely, by staying home.

In the meantime, the nine unhappy evangelical leaders fear a kind of vicious circle. Is “an outdated script” about religion and Republicans, in Mr. Dean’s phrase, unduly influencing the exit poll questions, the answers that are in turn influencing reporting and analysis by reporters, newscasters and pundits, which in turn influence future poll questions. Is campaign coverage and discussion being diverted from new developments among both evangelicals and Democrats?

Also from the God Machine this week, if you were planning to attend a church function tomorrow to watch the Super Bowl, forget it. The NFL isn’t going for this idea at all.

For years, as many as 200 members of Immanuel Bible Church and their friends have gathered in the church’s fellowship hall to watch the Super Bowl on its six-foot screen. The party featured hard hitting on the TV, plenty of food — and prayer.

But this year, Immanuel’s Super Bowl party is no more. After a crackdown by the National Football League on big-screen Super Bowl gatherings by churches, the Springfield church has sacked its event. Instead, church members will host parties in their homes.

Immanuel is among a number of churches in the Washington area and elsewhere that have been forced to use a new playbook to satisfy the NFL, which said that airing games at churches on large-screen TV sets violates the NFL copyright.

Ministers are not happy.

“There is a part of me that says, ‘Gee, doesn’t the NFL have enough money already?'” said Steve Holley, Immanuel’s executive pastor. He pointed out that bars are still allowed to air the game on big-screens TV sets. “It just doesn’t make sense.”

If you’ve ever seen a game, the text will sound familiar: “This telecast is copyrighted by the NFL for the private use of our audience. Any other use of this telecast or any pictures, descriptions, or accounts of the game without the NFL’s consent is prohibited.”

There is no faith-based exemption.

Money is officially the religion of the US.

  • What is this thing you call “foot ball”?????

    Myself, I loooooove Stuporific Sunday. All the morons are tanked up and vegged out in front of the tube, so there’s no lines to go to the movies at the mall, shopping, etc. You can drive on freeways the way God intended, while considering how right Mencken was when he said “nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people.” The NFL wouldn’t be the NFL without it.

  • Howard Dean and the DNC picked up on the cause. “This bias in polling questions,” Dean said in a letter to the National Election Pool consortium, “has in turn shaped news coverage, making it appear that one party has a monopoly on religion in this race.”

    That’s only part of it. If you listen to the entire MSM spin, you might think Republicans vote based solely on which leg of the Conservative Movement tripod they pee on – religion, fiscal issues, or defense. Democrats, by contrast, are only interested in race, gender, and sexual preference.

  • Didn’t the pre-game copyright notice once say something like “Any commercial use of this telecast…”?

    Super Bowl parties are held all over the country. How many of my friends can I have over before I am in violation of the NFL copyright? Does it matter if we watch the game at my place of business rather than in my home? What if the pastor invites his friends and opens the doors to his “place of business.”

    Unless someone is charging admission to see the game, I think the NFL is offside here. Way offside.

    Jen, football is the real religion in some parts of the country, this being one of them. Football is about fanaticism, but money is just about greed.

  • Both items draw negatives from me.

    Ask religious questions of Democrats? Why? Ours is a secular nation which tolerates religions but which formally bans any religious test in politics and government. We don’t ask voters about their mental illnesses. Why ask them about religion?

    A church using its six-foot screen for anything seems bizarre to me. Which brand would Jesus buy or sell? But the NFL deciding that church members aren’t part of the approved (i.e., paying) members of “our audience” seems just as weird. Charlatan preachers pandering to the wannabe apes in their congregations by gawking at obscenely overpaid spoiled apes in a stadium …a plague on them all.

    Harrumph!

  • I’m glad that the NFL is standing firm on the constitutional separation of church and football.

  • I for one would very much like to know the polling data on the Pastafarians that vote Democratic. It seems there might be a goodly number.

  • #2 TC

    The absence of lines is great. One year, got third row seats for Richard III at the Guthrie in Mpls on the day of the show.

  • Okie,

    Never quite got into football, even though in high school in Georgia I was required to take a pe course in football tactics. Come baseball season my comments will plunge as I focus away from navel gazing and toward the infield. Among my friends, I’m odd for enjoying any sport.

  • LOL Schwag, as the Okie from Muskogee said, in some parts of the country, football is religion. As an OU alumn, I agree with him 110%.

    I remember last year the NFL did this, banning churches from hosting SuperBowl events, it was wrong then, it’s wrong now.

    And I never understood the framing or meme that Republicans were more religious than Dems. Honestly, when some 92%-95% of the population says they believe in God, and only 1/3rd of the populous is Republican, the numbers never meshed.

  • What’s really fun to do is answer the someone’s question of “Are you watching the Super Bowl?” with “the Super Bowl, oh, who’s playing?” This can be dangerous if you respond to a committed fan this way. The quiet Sunday in the city is a delight worth enjoying however.

  • It’s not just biased polling… it’s incompetent polling. Polling samples and polling samples need to be consistent in order to make correct statistical inferences. Due to the biased questioning, it will be at best difficult, and at worst impossible to make accurate comparisons of Democrats and Republicans (although I’m sure they’ll try), because they won’t be able to hold necessary variables constant.

  • The NFL issue is pretty ridiculous. Now, instead of people going to the church to watch the game for free, they’ll go home and watch it for free (effectively). Hmm, any difference, especially when bars can do it?

    Copyright holders in our country always bamboozle me.

  • “The problem this year, though, is that the NEP asks questions about religion of Republicans, but not Democrats.”

    Well, duh! Democrats love only abortions and gay marriage.

    How can they possibly be religious??

    sarcasm/off

    “…which said that airing games at churches on large-screen TV sets violates the NFL copyright.”

    So how is that different than watching it on a large-screen TV down at the local sports bar?

    I may not agree with what the head of a congregation says every Sunday, but if they want to have a get together for the biggest football game of the year, without charging cover, I really don’t have a problem with that.

  • “This telecast is copyrighted by the NFL for the private use of our audience. Any other use of this telecast or any pictures, descriptions, or accounts of the game without the NFL’s consent is prohibited.”

    That is really absurd, descriptions or accounts of the game. Can I tell my friends about an interception, legally ??

    Bars, if they transmit the game from the airways, that’s fine, but if they have cable or dish, they have to pay commercial fee for all sporting events. I am guessing this is the same thought behind the churches.

    Id it just me or does anyone else think tax-exempt dollars should not be purchasing a “six-foot screen” to watch the Super Bowl, even if that isn’t it’s original purpose ??

  • Great post(s) and comments – especially for the several dozen evangelical Christian friends of mine. They really enjoy reading the ‘week in God’ posts and the equally brilliant comments. (with a few minor exceptions)

    Last week I was at an event on global warming sponsored by Christian organization. The speaker, a representative who champions alternative energy, struggled to keep the crowd from booing at his suggestion of bio-fuels. They knew the science and the drawbacks better than he did – and were not going to let him persuade him that food-based biofuels were either a stop-gap measure, or equal to wind and solar. I was startled, having expected that he’d receive some reverential treatment or hero worship. You know – the kind and obedient Church crowd…

    About 5% of the audience was gay, along with a sizable contingent of Muslims and Jews. The evangelicals didn’t bat an eye, welcoming everyone with enthusiasm.

    Me – not religious, although there is a certain draw to aspects of Buddhism, which is like saying that you’re drawn to Jesus because you like his opposition to the Roman Empire and stand in favor of the downtrodden. It makes me wonder if a great deal of the ‘awe and wonder’ gets knocked out of faith when religion adds all the conditions, hoops, and weight of bureaucracy.

    All I’ve got to add is anyone assuming that they can pigeonhole evangelical Christians fits well within Menken’s demographic.

    Note to pollsters: Don’t assume that I’m not talking about you….

  • There’s no reason, ever, to ask different questions (aside from changing the candidates) for different parties.

    To do so means the answers are meaningless and you’re not actually polling.

    Honestly, I don’t see how the NFL can actually hold ‘copyright’ over gatherings and large televisions. It doesn’t even make sense.

  • We don’t ask voters about their mental illnesses. Why ask them about religion?

    Ed, you’re being redundant again.

  • Super Bowl parties are held all over the country. How many of my friends can I have over before I am in violation of the NFL copyright? Does it matter if we watch the game at my place of business rather than in my home? What if the pastor invites his friends and opens the doors to his “place of business.”

    I believe it’s the size of the screen 50″ or less. Also the NFL has a vested interest in the money from the commercials during the game.

  • Comments are closed.