Thompson remembers the Schiavo controversy, snubs far-right base

In mid-September, while campaigning in Florida, Fred Thompson was asked for his thoughts on the Terri Schiavo case from 2005. Thompson pleaded ignorance. “That’s going back in history,” he said. “I don’t remember the details of it.”

It seemed a little odd. 2005 wasn’t all that long ago. In fact, Thompson helped prep John Roberts for his Supreme Court confirmation hearings in 2005, and they presumably went over the Schiavo controversy. For that matter, a few months later, “Law & Order” did an episode, featuring Thompson, based on the case.

As it turns out, Thompson does remember the controversy, and addressed it yesterday in some detail.

In his public life, former Senator Fred D. Thompson has long refrained from speaking about the death of his daughter from an accidental drug overdose in 2002, an episode that friends and colleagues say played into his decision not to seek re-election to the Senate in 2002.

But on Monday, when questioned at a news conference about his reaction to the Terri Schiavo case, Mr. Thompson opened up about the death, suggesting the Schiavo matter had particular resonance for him because of how his daughter, Elizabeth Panici, known as Betsy, had died.

“Obviously, I knew about the Schiavo case,” he said. “I had to face a situation like that in my own personal life with my own daughter.” … “Making this into a political football is something that I don’t welcome, and this will probably be the last time I ever address it,” he said. “It should be decided by the families — the federal government and the state government too, except for the court system, ought to stay out of those matters as far as I am concerned.”

Obviously, this approach may put Thompson in the American mainstream, at least on this issue, but this is certainly not what the Republican Party’s far-right base wanted to hear.

Dick Polman explained that Christian conservatives will likely see this as a major insult.

Thompson’s stance is definitely not in tune with the Christian conservative agenda. Their attitude – as evidenced by the Terri Schiavo case, the 24/7 cable TV melodrama of 2005 – is that the federal government should intervene in the private lives of families, and ensure, in accordance with their views of morality, that the doomed patient remains attached to the feeding tube. […]

It’s probably bad enough, from their perspective, that Thompson is known to be an infrequent churchgoer, that he once lobbied for an abortion rights group, and that he bestirred few hearts at the weekend Values Voter Summit. And now, from Thompson at his news conference, comes this blasphemy.

Indeed, I imagine the Dobson crowd will hear Thompson talking about government staying out of family matters and question the candidate’s commitment to most of the far-right agenda, practically all of which is predicated on the notion of the government getting entirely involved in family matters.

As for Thompson’s other problem — his apparent dislike for actually running as a presidential candidate — the actor/lobbyist/politician said yesterday that he won’t change.

Defending his campaign work schedule, Republican presidential hopeful Fred Thompson said Monday his strategy is working and “I’m going to do it the way I want to do it.”

Well, he can try. It probably won’t work, though.

Fundies want to meddle in life, sex, death and those varying matters of personal choice. It’s their hobby. Of course that meddling stops when it is their problem and then they plead for privacy.

It’s not often that I agree with Freddie, but he’s right.

  • So—UnAware Fred is now aware that he is unaware—but he wants everyone to be unaware of his unawareness by exhibiting awareness to that which he was officially unaware of? This guy reminds me of a frog in a junior-high science class. Someone tweaks this muscle, and that one over yonder starts jerking around.

    UnAware Fred needs better trainers. Maybe he can get someone from Ringling Brothers…..

  • Could we stitch together the best parts of candidates and throw the junk away? Between the Republicans, there might be enough to assemble an entire new candidate: Huckabee’s concern for the poor, Thompson’s respect for privacy, Ron Paul’s nerve, Romney’s hair and Giuliani’s balls.

    That might make 2008 a more interesting contest.

  • Some people have to have an experience like that in order to understand how intrusive it is – or could be – to have the government inserting itself into what are very difficult situations. Decisions about whether to carry a fetus to term are also difficult for many, and Thompson, having wrestled with his own daughter’s situation, should be able to make the leap from what he experienced to what too many women experience, but I don’t think that’s likely.

  • How the hell do you square “I don’t remember the details of it” with “Obviously, I knew about the Schiavo case” ??? Oh wait, I get it…

    He’s doing his best Ronal Reagan impression. Get in a jam? You can’t remember!

    Obviously Frederick of Hollywood lives in a Google-free bubble of “Fred Head” sycophants.

  • You know what they say about how even a stopped clock is right twice a day…

    Lord knows I’M not voting for the man, but it’s nice to see someone on the other side of the fence agree that those sorts of matters are up to the family and not the government.

  • On one hand, given Thompson’s wrenching personal experience, I’m tempted to give him a pass for his earlier mishandling of the question. I agree with the wisdom he found, and I’m sorry that he had to go through that with a loved one. This is the most human thing he’s done in his campaign.

    BUT, you know that if the tables were turned, the Right would be screaming about how he LIED when he said he didn’t remember much about the controversy.

    I’m curious how they’ll contort themselves to give him a pass both on his apostasy and (temporary, in this case) dishonesty.

  • 3. On October 23rd, 2007 at 1:17 pm, Grumpy said:
    Could we stitch together the best parts of candidates and throw the junk away? Between the Republicans, there might be enough to assemble an entire new candidate: Huckabee’s concern for the poor, Thompson’s respect for privacy, Ron Paul’s nerve, Romney’s hair and Giuliani’s balls.

    That might make 2008 a more interesting contest.
    ****************************************************************************************
    You’re just saying that because Halloween is next week. Building a Foxchurian Candidate Fraken-thingie would be a crime against humanity !

  • With Thompson pretty much taking himself out of the running by not bowing sufficiently to the right, this leaves Mitt one step closer to the nomination, and to his eventual mauling by Hillary in the general.

  • Irony. A family member, Michael Schiavo, asked a judge, George Greer, to allow him to stop feeding his wife because he was fearful that the rest of her family members–parents and siblings–would accuse him of impropriety if he did it without the court’s permission. WHO asked the courts to get involved in the first place? The family, i.e. Michael Schiavo. What were the parents supposed to do at that point, just go along and say, “that’s fine, whatever you want, after all, you married her five years ago and we have every reason to believe you have her best interests at heart?” Whatever! They were willing to take care of her, in whatever condition she was in. The irony, tragedy of this case, is the way it continues to be misreported and misrepresented. The facts tell a different story–even about the court’s involvement. Too bad the politicians don’t even know the facts or they don’t have to take sides, but just stick to the facts.

  • Comments are closed.