‘Thompson was a mole for the White House’

Fred Thompson’s political resume is a little on the thin side. He was a senator who developed a reputation for avoiding hard work; he was a high-priced corporate lobbyist, though that probably won’t help much on the campaign trail; he was an assistant U.S. Attorney almost 40 years ago; and in 1973, he was minority counsel to the Senate Watergate Committee.

That last one is apparently a point of some pride for the actor/lobbyist/lawyer. On his exploratory website, Thompson boasts that he “gained national attention” as the “hard-charging counsel” who took the “lead” in revealing the audio-taping system in Nixon’s Oval Office.

It all sounds quite impressive — just so long as you overlook the fact that Thompson was actually relentlessly partisan and anxious to protect Nixon during the Watergate investigation.

The day before Senate Watergate Committee minority counsel Fred Thompson made the inquiry that launched him into the national spotlight — asking an aide to President Nixon whether there was a White House taping system — he telephoned Nixon’s lawyer.

Thompson tipped off the White House that the committee knew about the taping system and would be making the information public. In his all-but-forgotten Watergate memoir, “At That Point in Time,” Thompson said he acted with “no authority” in divulging the committee’s knowledge of the tapes, which provided the evidence that led to Nixon’s resignation. It was one of many Thompson leaks to the Nixon team, according to a former investigator for Democrats on the committee, Scott Armstrong , who remains upset at Thompson’s actions.

“Thompson was a mole for the White House,” Armstrong said in an interview. “Fred was working hammer and tong to defeat the investigation of finding out what happened to authorize Watergate and find out what the role of the president was.”

Thompson may want to update that bio page on his exploratory website. He seems to have left out a few details.

First, Thompson claims to have taken the “lead” in revealing the audio-taping system in Nixon’s Oval Office. That’s false.

[W]hile Thompson’s question to presidential aide Alexander Butterfield during a Watergate hearing unveiled the existence of the taping system to the outside world, it wasn’t Thompson who discovered that Nixon was taping conversations. Nor was Thompson the first to question Butterfield about the possibility.

On July 13, 1973, Armstrong, the Democratic staffer, asked Butterfield a series of questions during a private session that led up to the revelation. He then turned the questioning over to a Republican staffer, Don Sanders, who asked Butterfield the question that led to the mention of the taping system.

To the astonishment of everyone in the room, Butterfield admitted the taping system existed.

Second, Thompson claims he pushed for release of Nixon’s tapes because he was a “hard-charging counsel.” That’s false.

Thompson, in his 1975 memoir, wrote that he believed “there would be nothing incriminating” about Nixon on the tapes, a theory he said “proved totally wrong.” […]

Even as he quizzed Butterfield during the hearing, Thompson said later, he believed the tapes would exonerate Nixon, so he saw no problem in pressing for their release.

And third, Thompson was so recklessly partisan, he improperly leaked everything he could to his allies in the Nixon White House.

When Thompson learned of Butterfield’s admission, he leaked the revelation to Nixon’s counsel, J. Fred Buzhardt .

“Even though I had no authority to act for the committee, I decided to call Fred Buzhardt at home” to tell him that the committee had learned about the taping system, Thompson wrote. “I wanted to be sure that the White House was fully aware of what was to be disclosed so that it could take appropriate action.”

Armstrong said he and other Democratic staffers had long been convinced that Thompson was leaking information about the investigation to the White House. The committee, for example, had obtained a memo written by Buzhardt that Democratic staffers believed was based on information leaked by Thompson.

Armstrong said he thought the leaks would lead to Thompson’s firing. “Any prosecutor would be upset if another member of the prosecution team was orchestrating a defense for Nixon,” said Armstrong.

And Thompson now believes his performance during this ordeal helps prove his qualifications to be president.

If you like George W. Bush, you’ll love Fred Thompson.

If you like George W. Bush, you’ll love Fred Thompson.

Yep, kind of like — if you like English Leather, you’ll love Aqua Velva… Or, alternatively, if you like the Third Reich, you’ll love the Fourth Reich.

C’mon ‘Bagger, the guy smells like a million bucks! Admit it.

  • And Thompson now believes his performance during this ordeal helps prove his qualifications to be president.

    It will certainly help prove his qualifications to be the GOP nominee for president. Am I the only one that thinks he is going to be the GOP nominee?

  • Edo – (Re#2)
    I also believe that he will be the GOP candidate.
    I also predict a full-on love affair for Gucci Fred by the press, a’la 2000’s Gore’s a liar, let’s have a beer with Bush BS.

    By the way, it was so hot & humid here yesterday that after working outside for a while I was sweating like a Republican under oath.

  • I too believe that Thompson will be the eventual GOP nominee. He has the same qualifications as G.W. Bush: he’s lazy and full of himself, he wants to be the President without the work of governing. His time as a lobbyist means that he’s already bought and therefore attractive to business, his faux folksiness will make the base adore him. His acting as a mole during the Watergate investigation will be spun as support for a beleaguered President (Wink wink! Nudge nudge!). The question is not whether Thompson will be the nominee but who will be his Cheney?

    The only other question is; How will the Democrats manage to lose to him?

  • Alien lands at the 2008 GOP Convention. He asks the delegates: “Take me to your Leaker.”

  • Let’s start a poll — how many people think Cheney will remain in his office as the president of the Corporate Branch (bigdick@halliburton.gov)? Why not? Who’s going to make him leave?

  • This would qualify him as AG, however. Like the present AG, he knows that the White House often needs a little lead-time to begin destroying evidence…

    And Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Tuesday sent a letter to White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card asking for an explanation of the so called “12 hour gap.” That refers to the length of time it took then-White House counsel Alberto Gonzales to inform White House staffers that the federal investigation was about to begin — and that all documents pertaining to the leak of Valerie Plame’s name should be retained.

    The night he learned about the impending investigation, Gonzales told only Chief of Staff Andrew Card. Gonzales says he waited until morning to let other White House officials know, since most of them had gone home.

    Democrats are suggesting that Gonzales’ 12-hour delay in informing Bush administration officials was calculated to give them time to destroy documents.

    Of course, we know now Nixon’s WH didn’t take Thompson’s hint and start shredding….

  • The question is not whether Thompson will be the nominee but who will be his Cheney?

    Perhaps he could appoint Cheney to head up a search committee….

  • Gee sounds so different than what I’ve read about Thompson’s role in Watergate.

    From the accounts I barely remember, they made out like Thompson was looking out for America.

    Next I’ll hear that he single handedly destroyed the Death Star and raised the flag on Iwo Jima.

  • Was a mole for the Whitehouse?

    He still is a mole for the White House. Or is he just a shill for them? Whatever.

    I agree with Edo, the wingnuts want Thompson bad. He’s the only “true conservative” who has that “real tough guy” smell of bullshit honesty about him, and they really want Reagan back, so another big, tall, folksy actor is just the ticket. I’ll bet Freddie the Faker practices his Reagan impression on a daily basis.

    I hope to God the public will see through Thompson’s BS, and that the press will remind people what Thompson actually did during Watergate, but neither is a sure thing by any stretch of the imagination.

  • It all sounds quite impressive — just so long as you overlook the fact that Thompson was actually relentlessly partisan and anxious to protect Nixon during the Watergate investigation.

    Ha. So this is his little red truck- that’s going to become a new euphemism for skeleton in the closet.

  • He’s the “Sammy the Bull” Gravano to Nixon’s John Gotti- a soldier for a guy who defrauded the American people.

  • OMG! I just had a horrifying thought! Could the answer to Dennis’s question about who would be Thompson’s VP…be Cheney?

    CAN Cheney run again as VP??? The thought chills the bones even on this hot day. But, is it…possible? Constitution-wise?

  • Dennis, comment # 4-
    “The only other question is; How will the Democrats manage to lose to him?”

    Nominate Hillary.

  • But, is it…possible? Constitution-wise?

    Sure is. The 22nd Amendment only limits how many terms a person can serve as President. It does count as a term if the VP formally served as President for two years or more.

    When Thompson is elected Cheney will stay in office as VP because anyone who tries to throw him out will be shot in the face. And then made to apologize.

  • Edo and others, I also think Fred is the GOP golden boy this time around.

    Al B Tross, I also completely agree with you.

  • The question is not whether Thompson will be the nominee but who will be his Cheney?

    The only other question is; How will the Democrats manage to lose to him?

    Phoebes, #14, and Al B Tross, #15, beat me to it. I fear both of those potential outcomes.

  • Freddie boy will win if the Dems nominate Hillary. End of Story.

    And of course after the 2008 we’ll be faced with countless articles, interviews, and a book by and for Hillary, blaming us all for her failures to get elected.

    Get a grip and change the fucking program. Hillary’s old news and she ain’t change. The more the Dems coalesce around her, the more I look for defeat to be snatched from the jaws of victory for the Dems.

  • Thompson is a proven liar and a phony. He is two-faced and appeals to those with no memory or those too stubborn to believe anything detrimental to the GOP propaganda. People who can’t see through this guy have no business voting.
    He is an attack dog feeding off the uneducated and makes me sick every time he opens his repugnant mouth…such a vehement liar.

  • Here’s my entry into the Fred Thompson campaign song sweepstakes:

    (Sung to the tune of “Davy Crockett, King of the Wild Frontier”)

    Bored representing ol’ Tennessee,
    Greenest state in the land of the free.
    Moved up to K Street in Washington DC
    To lobby for the rich and powerful, you see

    Freddy, Freddy Thompson – Acting King of the Wild Frontier

    Muddied every creek as a GOP whore,
    Said war is peace and peace is war.
    And while he was handling this bushy chore,
    Compared himself with legends on Fox News 4.

    Like Daniel Boo . . . uh . . . I mean . . ., Davy Crockett – Whatever! . . . from Tennessee.

    He went off to Congress and served a spell
    A lawyer for the lawless writing laws so well.
    They took over Washington, and I heard tell,
    Stuffed our rights up the crack in the Liberty Bell.

    Freddy, Freddy Thompson, seein’ his duty clear.

    Didn’t come home, when his term was done,
    Thar’s money to be made with the friends he’d won.
    Dust the red pickup truck, time to use it some
    Fixin’ up his act for a Presidential run.
    .

    Freddy, Freddy Thompson, Acting King of the Wild Frontier.

  • You’ve just gotta love the mullet on Fred!

    By the way is there anyone who truly believes this lackluster campaigner who hasn’t defined any policy positions yet, or even formally declared his candidacy, can truly win the GOP nomination?

  • I hope Fred lives to rue the day he wrote this: “Even though I had no authority to act for the committee, I decided to call Fred Buzhardt (Nixon’s lawyer) at home” to tell him that the committee had learned about the taping system, Thompson wrote. “I wanted to be sure that the White House was fully aware of what was to be disclosed so that it could take appropriate action.”

    Appropriate action? Like erasing the infamous 18 minutes? Thompson as Nixon coverup enabler—now that’s a meme I can get behind.

  • Comments are closed.