Thursday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* The House isn’t buying the Bush gang’s latest executive privilege claim: “In a 7-3 ruling today, a House Judiciary subcommittee ruled that that the White House’s assertion of executive privilege to block the release of ‘documents sought in subpoenas issued to White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten and the Republican National Committee was not legally valid.’ During the 20-minute hearing, Judiciary Committee John Conyers (D-MI) said that ‘the White House participated in false statements to Congress.'”

* Mitt Romney went after Barack Obama today on the ridiculous sex-ed for kindergarteners story. Besides the obvious flaw of being wrong, Romney has another problem: “It turns out, Romney himself once indicated support for the same sort of sex-ed approach — ‘age-appropriate’ — that Obama backs.”

* What is it with Alaska Republicans and corruption scandals lately? In the latest story, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R) reportedly sold received some property in a sweetheart deal to from a major campaign contributor who just happens to be tied to a federal criminal investigation on corruption in Alaska.

* Speaking of Alaska, Rep. Don Young (R) had a bit of a breakdown yesterday when Rep. Scott Garrett (R-N.J.) tried to limit Young’s ability to send even more porkbarrel spending back home. “You want my money, my money,” Young stridently declared before warning conservatives that, “Those who bite me will be bitten back.” Young went on to bash New Jersey as a state, and suggest that Garrett, a fellow Republican, should be voted out of office.

* Hans von Spakovsky, almost single-handedly disenfranchised thousands of voters, and then went on to give misleading testimony about his activities under oath to the Senate. Yesterday, he revised his remarks to avoid an even bigger scandal.

* In 2005, after a rash of scandals, Senate Democrats attempted to reconvene Harry Truman’s WWII committee on war profiteering. The Republican majority immediately shot down the idea. Fortunately, Republicans aren’t in the majority anymore: “Under the 2007 version of his effort, spearheaded by Sens. Claire McCaskill of Missouri and Jim Webb of Virginia, the proposed commission would investigate the mismanagement of private contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan, which has resulted in $9 billion in taxpayer dollars unaccounted for.”

* You probably heard about the pipe explosion in NYC yesterday that killed someone. Digby, in a terrific post, explains how and why this fits into the “scourge of E. coli conservatism”: ” The problem is that it is actually very bad news and not just because of the death but because it is a sign of the rapidly decaying infrastructure that has been ignored during the conservative era in favor of free-market religion and the wonder-working powers of tax cuts…. This is the legacy of the past 25 years of neglect.”

* I can’t help but marvel at the journalistic ethics that allow an NBC on-air correspondent to be paid $30,000 for a private speech, in which he attacked a prominent presidential candidate. In this case, the correspondent is Jim Miklaszewski and the candidate is John Edwards. CBS fired Gen. Batiste for appearing in a VoteVets ad, but NBC seems to have no trouble with Miklaszewski. First, what liberal media? Second, don’t these guys question the professional standards of bloggers?

* Leandro Aragoncillo, the former Marine at the center of the first case of espionage at the White House in modern history, was sentenced to 10 years in prison yesterday. As Josh Marshall recently noted, “To the best of my knowledge this is the only known case of espionage taking place within the White House. And it happened in Cheney’s operation.”

* As if the sex scandal weren’t enough, Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) found himself the target of a new ethics complaint, filed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. Apparently, there are some kind of rules against lawmakers soliciting prostitutes.

* Bob Novak think Dems benefited from the all-night debate because it helped focus attention on the war in the way the party intended.

* By the way, the dumbest line from the debate? Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.): “We’re taking a lot of casualties in Iraq because that’s where they are killing our soldiers. That’s the reason we’re taking on casualties in Iraq, because that’s where our soldiers are.”

* Atrios makes a compelling case that the Washington Post’s Shailagh Murray is, in fact, the devil.

* Last week, Tony Snow suggested members of Iraq’s Parliament should be able to take August off because it’s hot in Baghdad in the summer. Yesterday, he backed off his comment and acknowledged he “used a dumb line.”

* In related news, ABC’s Diane Sawyer apologized, on the air, for suggesting Dems were filibustering the Defense appropriations bill: “You wrote me. You were right. I was wrong. I apologize.” Good for her.

* And finally, how many neocons does it take to screw in a light bulb? Andrew Sullivan offers one possible answer, “That’s an interesting question, one that I’m sure future historians will investigate in detail. Look, let me address this issue up front: I don’t know who’s been installing light bulbs or who hasn’t. That’s none of my business. There’s a lot of different views, there’s a range of views, and a lot of concerns, and we are working to accommodate those concerns. We know at this point that we still have some work to do and we are working very hard to address these issues. We’re not making estimates. At this point what you’ve had are some fairly — you had some dramatic testimony and comments — by the way, you can expect people to be ventilating these differing points of views in coming days. Our view is you have to have a resolution that offers a solution. And you’re going to have people — there is sometimes, you’ll be surprised to hear, a disparity between comments made in public for domestic audiences around the world, and comments made in private, as well. In short, we don’t want to comment on an ongoing investigation.”

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

CB, the Murkowski story should be “Bought” not sold.

Farwell, Murkowski dynasty, we hardly knew ye.

  • WHAT? mitt romney flip-flopped on sex ed!

    i’m shocked. SHOCKED, i tell you!

  • I believe you gave Senator Thune to the wrong party, CB. we really dont want him.

  • I tremble before Thume’s piercing acumen. I look forward to his explanation of why rain is wet.

  • Three cheers for Sens. McCaskill and Webb!

    Also: What’s the deal with lawmakers from Alaska? Do they have a big constituency that demands frequent crazy outbursts?

  • What is it with Alaska Republicans and corruption scandals lately? In the latest story, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R) reportedly sold some property in a sweetheart deal to major campaign contributor who just happens to be tied to a federal criminal investigation on corruption in Alaska.

    . . .

    As if the sex scandal weren’t enough, Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) found himself the target of a new ethics complaint, filed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. Apparently, there are some kind of rules against lawmakers soliciting prostitutes.

    Always, dignity.

  • …how many neocons does it take to screw in a light bulb?

    None. Light bulbs are no longer screwed in since September, 11, 2001.

  • Apparently, there are some kind of rules against lawmakers soliciting prostitutes.

    Nah, that only applies to Democratic legislators. The same goes for stalking teens and sending them filthy e-mails.

    Plus, Vitter was set up by Democrats disguised as prostitutes, Clinton did it too, it’s really none of our business what he does and he’s got a note from God excusing him from Earthly repercussions.

    I bet at least one fRighty makes one of those arguments.

  • On a related subject: how many conservative economists does it take to screw in a light bulb?

    According to them, none. If light bulbs were privatized and given property rights, they would screw themselves in.

  • It is impossible for a neocon to screw in a lightbulb. First, the lightbulb has been outsourced to a renegade name-brand clothing counterfeiter in Russia who was recently found face-down in a Moscow back alley with his stomach pumped full of Polonium-laced vodka . Next, the ladder was manufactured in China by a backdoor subsidiary of a major American agricultural conglomerate, and contains toxic petfood in the high impact plastic mixture used to make the ladder, thus cannot be brought into the United States. Finally, the lightbulb socket was found to be evidence in the criminal investigations pending against certain White House officials, and has been deemed “protected under Executive Priveledge” by some recovering alcoholic rumored to be President of the United States.

    UPDATE: There is no need for the neocon to screw in a lightbulb. This is based on the availability of electricity in Baghdad, multiplied by the cubed root of factual evidence broadcast on a daily basis by Hugh Hewitt, and further factored by the bra-size of Bill O’Rielly, the sexual ambitions of some he-skank named Ann Coulter, and Sean Hannity’s secret desires to star as “the Doctor” in in an upcoming remake of the Rocky Horror Picture Show….

  • CB, the Murkowski story should be “Bought” not sold.

    Oops. Fixed.

    A nitpicky comment: John Thune is R-SD, not D-SD.

    Oops. Fixed. Again.

  • To quote Greenwald in A tragic Legacy, ‘replacing an alcohol-fueled life of unbridled hedonism with fervent evangelical certainty can be seen as a lateral, rather than a vertical, move.’

    Bush is not a recovering alcoholic; he just switched to another method of not dealing with reality.

  • * And finally, how many neocons does it take to screw in a light bulb?

    None. They’re too busy screwing us and they prefer to do it in the dark.

  • Bob Novak think Dems benefited from the all-night debate because it helped focus attention on the war in the way the party intended.

    Sometimes hacky or disingenuous people do a little head-fake, put on a little fig leaf of integrity to make sure they don’t start to be ignored. The comedy is that so many people fall for them putting on just the littles bit of disguise possible- months of hackishness, followed by one little line, followed again by months of hackishness during far too much of which too many of us are giving them a chance again, lulled by the little bit of disguise.

  • Rep. Don Young (R) had a bit of a breakdown yesterday when Rep. Scott Garrett (R-N.J.) tried to limit Young’s ability to send even more porkbarrel spending back home.

    Pork is where you find it, I suppose. The $34 Million for the Alaska Native Education Equity program is meant to fix the achievement gap between Native and non-Native students. Grants (or, if you will, payoffs) are awarded to such power lobbies as the Association of Interior Native Educators and the Lower Kuskokwim School District.

    Maybe it’s Young’s fault for having such a porky reputation. And maybe Garrett was just being thorough by trying to axe any program that benefits a single state (not many Alaska Natives in New Jersey, I gather). But not every federal expenditure is a Bridge to Nowhere. (I could even argue that the Bridges to Nowhere, aren’t.)

  • In the “open vein” thread.

    NYTimes has, finally, got itself a permanent replacement for Tierney. I have enjoyed the “visiting” op-ed columnists (if some of them more than others) but always figured that was a temporary measure and wondered who the permanent pick would be. Or, rather, of what colour/stripe, since the visitors had been from both sides of the fence. Well, today my question was answered: it’s a stalwart Repub, named Gail Collins.

    She opened up with a salvo lauding the intrepid and principled (no flip-flopper, he)… John McCain. According to her, his campaign is imploding precisely because he’s so principled. She managed to give Bush a pat on the back too, all in one stroke:

    “There’s actually nothing we hate more than a leader who insists on doing something we don’t like and tells us it’s a matter of principle. We’ve got one of those now, and look how well things are turning out.”

    Took her a couple of extra paragraphs to aim a few potshots at Hillary. Not much of logical transit from one subject to the next, but it rounded off the piece nicely.

    Sigh… Like Babbling Brooks, Friedman Unit and the Dowdy witch weren’t enough? I need a barf bag…

  • Libra’s NYT quote @ 19:

    “There’s actually nothing we hate more than a leader who insists on doing something we don’t like and tells us it’s a matter of principle. We’ve got one of those now, and look how well things are turning out.”

    That mishmash was in the NYT?
    Seriously?
    Wow.

    Hitler just told me that the Jews are the real problem.
    Hitler is a leader.
    He claims we must oppose Jews as a matter of principle.
    I should obey.
    Because… Hitler is a leader.

    Wow.
    And you say the NYT published that mashmish?
    Seriously?

    Aren’t there any intelligent republicans left in this world?

    Wow.

  • Are the MSM outlets covering the Secret Sex Scandal yet? Did anyone clue them in yet that it happened? Are they still keeping it a big Secret when it happens with Republicans?

    What’s next from this country?

  • “During the 20-minute hearing, Judiciary Committee John Conyers (D-MI) said that ‘the White House participated in false statements to Congress.’”

    This is the advantage of going through all the steps, slow and steady. There’s relatively little traction for Republicans here, and Bush just committed a whole new legal ofense. Under the right circumstances (some other supreme court, unfortunately), it could be as good as a signed confession.

    On the Bush-Putin photo: I don’t know if Bush is drunk, but Putin sure seems like he has looked into Bush’s eyes and soul, and found reason to be concerned.

  • Short version: No Republican, she.

    What’s in a name? Republican is as a Republican does.

    Are the MSM outlets covering the Secret Sex Scandal yet?

    “More people get their news from CBS news than from any other source”-

    unless you’re looking for news about the David Vitter prostitution scandal, in which case you would never hear about it if the only place that you go to for news is CBS news.

  • My local newspaper (the Newark Star-Ledger) is a fan-zine for Harry Potter. I can’t recall how many times over the past few months there has been at least something on the front page referring to a story about Harry Potter inside. And I don’t even pay attention to that paper much.

    Over the past ten days or so it seems like there has been a story about Harry Potter every day.

    The headlines more generally have started to read like tabloid ones: a missing young woman isn’t a missing woman, she’s a princess. And no, not literally a princess. That’s editorializing, not being what a newspaper is supposed to be in this day and age at all, unless it’s a rag.

    Once I wrote a letter to these people complaining about the front page (front page (while good sometimes) has become routinely un-informative, like the WaPo’s website frontpage), and they just sent me a dismissive one-sentence e-mail back. Some public editor.

  • Comments are closed.