Thursday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* The story surrounding Sen. Larry Craig (R-Idaho) sure is tough to keep up with: “Republican senators expressed relief Thursday that embattled Sen. Larry Craig has signaled he is highly likely to surrender his seat within a few weeks rather than fight to complete his term…. Craig spokesman Dan Whiting told the Associated Press on Thursday that the senator was focused on trying to clear his name and to help Idaho prepare for a replacement. ‘The most likely scenario, by far, is that by October there will be a new senator from Idaho,’ Whiting said.”

* While it now looks like Craig has one foot out the door, we also learned today that the Senate GOP caucus is not quite as united in their disgust for Craig as we’d been led to believe: “Republican senators held what one participant called a ‘passionate’ and ‘spirited’ closed-door discussion Wednesday afternoon about how their leaders responded to the sex scandal involving their colleague Sen. Larry Craig of Idaho, CNN has learned. At least three senators complained their leaders ‘rushed to judgment’ while others defended the leaders for quickly pulling their support from the disgraced senator, according to one Republican senator in the room and two GOP aides familiar with the meeting.”

* Today’s most provocative story, by far, is an exclusive report in Salon from Sidney Blumenthal, who cites two former CIA officers who say the president not only knew Iraq didn’t have weapons of mass destructions, but also squelched top-secret intelligence, and a briefing by George Tenet, months before invading Iraq.

* Roll Call reports that the White House has begun quietly circulating a short list of potential replacements for Alberto Gonzales among key senators. The list reportedly includes former Solicitor General Ted Olson; former Attorney General Bill Barr; former Deputy Attorney General George Terwilliger; D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Laurence Silberman; former Deputy Attorney General Larry Thompson; and Michael Mukasey, a former judge on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. (You’ll notice, of course, that Michael Chertoff is not on the list.)

* Major court ruling today: “In a big win for the rule of law, Federal District Judge Marrero issued a 103 page decision today holding National Security Letters unconstitutional despite their being blessed by the reauthorization of the Patriot Act.”

* Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) “is working to pass a bill on Thursday that will put limitations on communications between the White House and the Justice Department regarding pending law enforcement business. The bill’s author intends to prevent the politicization of Justice Department criminal and civil prosecutions.” Have I mentioned lately how much I like Sheldon Whitehouse?

* Al Gore is writing a follow-up to “An Inconvenient Truth”: “Gore is working on a new environmental book, ‘The Path to Survival,’ that will be released as a paperback original on April 22, 2008, Earth Day. According to publisher Rodale Books, Gore will continue where he left off in ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ and offer ‘a visionary blueprint for the changes we should make as a world community.'”

* When putting together web videos, national Democrats, especially the national campaign committees, usually keep the gloves on. In the DSCC’s new one, “Moral High Ground,” the gloves are off. I’m pleasantly surprised the party is willing to be this aggressive.

* Speaker Pelosi’s office has released a rebuttal to most of the White House’s talking points on Iraq. Nice job, guys.

* I really, really hate to agree with Limbaugh, but I actually think he’s largely right about this: “I’m not crazy about presidential candidates announcing their candidacy on these late-night shows, Leno or Letterman… The one thing about it that bothers me — and I’m not rooted in fuddy-duddiness here, although it may sound like it to some of you but — is I think the office of the presidency has a certain stature, and I don’t like to see it linked or tied to pop culture.” I don’t mind candidates appearing on the late-night shows, but announcing their presidential campaign? I think candidates should aim a little higher.

* For the one millionth time, tax cuts do not pay for themselves. Anyone who argues that they do does not deserve to be taken seriously.

* During last night’s debate, Duncan Hunter said of prisoners at Guantanamo: “They’ve got health care that’s better than most HMOs. And they got something else that no Democrat politician in America has: They live in a place called Guantanamo, where not one person has ever been murdered.” I have no idea what this means.

* Bush claimed today that the Iraqi Parliament is more efficient than the U.S. Congress. Rahm Emanuel hit back quickly with a great response.

* Keep an eye on this legislation: “The United States Congress has a chance to take a big step toward reassuring Americans that the votes they cast on Election Day will not be lost or stolen. The House is considering a bill sponsored by Rush Holt, Democrat of New Jersey, that could come to a vote as soon as today that would make electronic voting both more reliable and less prone to fraud. The bill lacks one important thing: a ban on touch-screen voting machines. But even in its current form, it goes a long way toward fixing a voting system that has been clearly broken for many years. The House should pass it, and the Senate should pass its own bill without delay.”

* And finally, First Lady Laura Bush couldn’t make the trip to Australia with the president because of a pinched nerve. Last night, at a dinner hosted by Prime Minister John Howard and his wife, the president arrived with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice at his side. “She can be my date,” the president said. Have I mentioned lately that I find their relationship a little creepy?

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

“National Security Letters found unconstitutional despite their being blessed by the reauthorization of the Patriot Act.”

“A bill that will put limitations on communications between the White House and the Justice Department regarding pending law enforcement business.”

“A bill to make electronic voting both more reliable and less prone to fraud.”

Did the wind just shift directions?

  • Have I mentioned lately that I find their relationship a little creepy?

    What, just because Rice once referred to Bush as “my husband”?

  • “They’ve got health care that’s better than most HMOs.”

    Well, for one thing, it means we need better HMOs. But that’s probably not what Hunter meant to suggest.

  • Did I read that Ted Stevens (R-Person of Interest, Alaska) was the most vocal proponent of ‘not rushing to judgement’ in Craig’s men’s room drama? I have a new strategy for our elected Dems: Every time a repup opens their mouth, cut to the quick and just laugh them off the floor.

  • I don’t mind candidates appearing on the late-night shows, but announcing their presidential campaign? I think candidates should aim a little higher.

    One thing I like about America is the liberty aspect- there’s a lot of play in the joints of our institutions. I think a different candidate, like a genuine populist, could have made this a good move. But in general I think it’s inappropriate.

  • Regarding Senator Whitehouse’s bill to “put limitations on communications between the White House and the Justice Department regarding pending law enforcement business,” my first instinct is that it’s a great idea, but I sure hope thery put enough thought into it. I’d hate to imagine some future president being unable to control some future J. Edgar Hoover.

  • Maybe Duncan Hunter plans to write a dreamy, soulful novel called “A Place Called Quantanamo”.

    I can just see the fawns nibbling the tender grass on the well-manicured lawns as happy, heavily shackled prisoners shuffle to their cages.

    Queue the violins….

  • From Sidney Blumenthal in Salon :

    On Sept. 18, 2002, CIA director George Tenet briefed President Bush in the Oval Office on top-secret intelligence that Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction, according to two former senior CIA officers. Bush dismissed as worthless this information from the Iraqi foreign minister, a member of Saddam’s inner circle, although it turned out to be accurate in every detail.

    No one in Congress was aware of the secret intelligence that Saddam had no WMD as the House of Representatives and the Senate voted, a week after the submission of the NIE, on the Authorization for Use of Military Force in Iraq.

    Surely that validates grounds for revoking AUMF?

  • 12.
    On September 6th, 2007 at 7:15 pm, Samten said:
    …grounds for revoking AUMF?

    No, grounds for impeachment, but that only happens in a Constitutional Republic.

  • Queue the violins….

    I think the violin-cello would be more apt.

    Open thread:

    Remember that Andy Rooney, “They’re all Rodriguez to me,” flap? I was thinking, maybe he was trying to slight Alex Rodriguez, a New York Yankee who is a real asshole, and really full of himself and obnoxious. Seems like something Rooney would do, if no one else was putting this giy in his place, rather than do a piece that was explicitly aimed at a particular player for his unbecoming conduct, which Rooney would probably consider an excessive use of the power of his “pen.” Ask anybody who knows New York sports, they will know who Rodriguez is.

  • Larry Craig in 6 short acts:

    “I admit it. I’m gay.”

    “No I’m not.”

    “OK, I’m guilty.”

    “No, I’m innocent.”

    “I resign.”

    “No, wait…”

    Such indecisiveness is definitely the hallmark of not a feminine but a strong, masculine mind. Ambivalence is a trait, also, that’s highly prized of senior elected lawmakers, no?

    Anyway, question: Do any of you bloggers ever feel like taking someone or a whole group of people to the fucking woodshed for no apparent reason other than having A BAD FUCKING DAY?

    Well, I had such a day (my rightwing boss seems to think that it’s my fault an ex-cop’s dick was found in his wife’s snatch and that she ran out on him. It’s all the token lib’ral’s fault, doncha know?) and this post about Bush’s deadenders is temporary relief against something that threatens to drag on for the duration until the time I quit, which, hopefully, will be very soon.

  • I’m sure we’re going to hearing more about this one over the next couple of days.

    Court bans Christian cross on private land in public park

    SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – The U.S. government cannot trade a parcel of land to private hands to allow a Christian cross to remain in the middle of a vast federal preserve, a U.S. appeals court ruled on Thursday.

    At issue is the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which bars the government from favoring any one religion, as it applies to a lone white metal Latin cross in the Mojave National Preserve in southern California between Los Angeles and Las Vegas.

    Didn’t these religious fanatacs learn anything after the Judge Moore/Alabama fiasco? Any bets on how long it will be before they try to appeal to the SCOTUS this time?

  • They described what Tenet said to Bush about the lack of WMD, and how Bush responded, and noted that Tenet never shared Sabri’s intelligence with then Secretary of State Colin Powell. According to the former officers, the intelligence was also never shared with the senior military planning the invasion, which required U.S. soldiers to receive medical shots against the ill effects of WMD and to wear protective uniforms in the desert.

    He he…

    Not only did on Emperor send them into Iraq on false pretenses…
    He made them get unnecessary shots too keep up the illusion…

    He he.
    Ha ha.
    Ho ho.

    I guess that’s why we call ’em grunts…

    He he.
    Ha ha.
    Ho ho.

  • Larry Craig’s daughter is also in trouble with the law.

    A warrant for her arrest was issued this year. From the report:

    “…after she failed to appear in an Idaho court on a pair of misdemeanor criminal charges. In April, a District Court judge signed an arrest warrant for Shae Howell, 36, after she did not show up for a hearing at the Ada County Courthouse in Boise. That warrant orders law enforcement personnel to arrest Howell for contempt (for which bond was set at $500). Howell was due in court to answer charges arising from a domestic dispute in June 2006. According to a criminal complaint, Howell unlawfully entered the residence of David Howell and destroyed photographs of his (the pair appear to have been married, but the current status of that union is unclear). The complaint was filed last November by the Boise City Attorney’s Office.”

    It was also reported by Fox News.

  • According to the former officers, the intelligence was also never shared with the senior military planning the invasion, which required U.S. soldiers to receive medical shots against the ill effects of WMD and to wear protective uniforms in the desert.

    Gee, as I remember – our militiary were complaining about their protective clothing not fitting and being completely iInadequate.

    Why did Bush ask Richard Clarke to lie and say that 9/11 was caused by Saddam?

    Why did Bush just ignore his August 6th briefing – need a justifcation to invade Iraq?

    Why were there maps dividing up Iraq in Cheney’s enegry task force meeting?

    And if Bush knew there were NO WMD – that Bill Clinton knew it too.

    Why did Clinton say those 16 words were just a mistake – when Dana Milbank told us that purpose of those auminum tubes had nothing to do with nuclear development. Than taking heat from Ari Flesher and being marginalized by WP.

    When nothing pan-out from ANY of Colin Powell’s UN presentation and Hans Blix made the statement that all the sites on Powell’s “evidence” turned out be “rubbish” – than Bush started a smear campaign against Blix – the same as he did to Joe Wilson and his wife.

    If Bush KNEW there were no WMD and that Saddam was nothing more than a sitting duck – his oilfields were simply for the taking.

    And as I keep telling – If Bush knew there were NO WMD – than Clinton knew that there were NO WMD too.

    Why did Clinton pardon Marc Rich – and then say the it was a mistake – that he should have let “them” pardon Marc Rich – And “them” must be the Big OIl loving Bushies.

    We were lied into this war – not by one president but by two – Bush and Clinton.

    All Iran has to do – is make deals with Russia – and I’m pretty sure Russia will give Iran the bomb. Bombing Iran would be stupidest mistake Bush will make.

    This war is about oil and it is getting nastier then most American realize it is.

  • Re: electronic voting- if the paper “record” of the electronic vote is not also considered to be the ballot itself, then all of the dangers this bill seeks to cure are still present. If an electronic machine can make it seem like a voter voted one way and record the vote otherwise, it can just as easily print a piece of paper that says the vote was cast one way while recording it otherwise.

    A paper “record” is not good enough. The paper record and the ballot must be one and the same.

  • Maybe Hunter means that he thinks it would be be great if the whole country was like Guantanamo, and that’s how he’ll provide safety and healthcare if he’s elected president.

    Well, he probably didn’t mean to say that, even if he thinks it…

  • Is Guantanamo the only large US base not to have had a murder on it? I find that pretty hard to swallow.

    We do know there’s been many suicides and attempted suicides there, though.

  • There is MUCH confusion and misinformation circulating about HR811. The bill is supposed to be voted on in the House of Representatives this week.

    If HR811 passes, on Election Day you will not know what is happening inside that electronic voting machine. Election results will be generated from secretly programmed electronic bytes from the very machines that top security experts have already determined to be fatally flawed. Many computer scientists, statisticians, and data security and cryptography experts have all spoken out against what Mr. Holt is supporting and provided all their work to the Holt people. The experts were elbowed out of the bill writing process by those who are either ignorant or have an antidemocratic agenda.

    The problem is that many well-meaning groups including Move On, Common Cause, True Majority, and People For the American Way support it and are instructing their members to urge their Congressmen to support it.

    It is a travesty that the House may be required to vote on HR811 before even having a chance to READ what it says.

    I wanted to offer some links that explain the problems with HR811. The first two are two short videos and the third is a pdf.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjFHNfKWkCs

    http://markcrispinmiller.blogspot.com/2007/05/holt-bill-is-poison-pill_22.html

    http://www.votersunite.org/info/hr811Report.pdf

    HR811 was never necessary no matter what the final revisions turn out to be. All that’s needed is paper ballots that are hand-counted in public view.

    The bill’s sponsor, Congressman Holt, admits that he bent to the pressure and interests of the software industry over the interests of the American people and democratic elections (see detailed information below about the meeting in which he discussed all of this).

    Thank you for taking time to educate yourself and contact your House Representative (http://www.house.gov/writerep/) to ask him/her to vote NO on HR811.

    A BRIEF HISTORY OF HR811 CONTENTS:

    2003 version of HR811: No voting system shall at any time contain or use undisclosed software.

    2006 version of HR811: Source code, object code, executable representation, and ballot programming files shall be made available for inspection promptly upon request to any person.

    2007 version of HR811: An accredited laboratory that inspects voting machines shall hold the technology in escrow (in secret). The laboratory (a private company) can disclose technology and information to another person if and only if that person or entity is a government agency responsible for voting, a party to litigation over an election or an academic studying elections.

    MR. HOLT’S MEETING:

    In a Townhall Meeting in his New Jersey home district in July, Congressman Rush Holt made some disturbing statements to concerned citizens which leave no doubt that HR811 has become a bill that protects the interests of software corporations over the rights of citizens. (actual video of this meeting is posted at http://mysite.verizon.net/resq4lzq/cvi/id287.html – it’s called VIDEO HR 811: The Microsoft Bill—Congressman Rush Holt’s Town Meeting, Summer 2007)

    Before this meeting, Rush Holt’s counsel, Michelle Mulder, responsible for writing HR811 for her boss, had an astonishing email exchange with voting integrity activists. One of the activists on the email exchange was NYU Professor and NY Times bestselling author Mark Crispin Miller. Miller wrote about this email exchange in an expose, stating: Holt bill was revised by Microsoft, Diebold and ES&S.

    During the Townhall Meeting, a concerned citizen, reading from Miller’s expose, stated that the wording in the bill has been changed and asked the Congressman why the wording in the bill had been changed so significantly when the bill originally said that the vote should be transparent and it should be accessible to everyone.

    When the concerned citizen began quoting what Mulder said to Miller, Congressman Holt cut him off abruptly. What Holt didn’t want him to finish reading was the last part of the exchange between Miller and Mulder:

    Miller to Mulder: Unless this point in the legislation has been changed, the bill (as marked up in committee) now stipulates that the e-voting software be available only to qualified individuals, who must sign strict non-disclosure agreements.

    Mulder to Miller: That’s not what the bill said when introduced. Therefore, you can take up your concerns with Microsoft and others in the proprietary software industry. During committee proceedings (the software industry) lobbied very heavily against the language that was in the bill as introduced and none of you lobbied in favor of the language that was in the bill as introduced, and thus, the software industry won. It’s very simply really.

    Since when is there a rule that whoever lobbies hardest gets to determine the content of U.S. legislation? (The people did in fact lobby. In Dec 2006, wethepatriots.org submitted to every HR811 cosponsor a letter in opposition to HR811 with suggested amendments and asking for full disclosure of all information relating to voting systems. The letter was signed by 800 American citizens and organizations. How many industry lobbyists does it take to outweigh 800 ordinary Americans?)

    Congressman Holt retorted after having cut off the concerned citizen who was addressing him: It would be nice to have open software. Many jurisdictions around the country don’t use that – they use computers that have an operating system based on Microsoft. The legislation says, Any software that is used to count the votes must be available for inspection. Now that probably would not include the operating system. But that’s OK.

    HR811 only allows selected people to inspect the software code, and only if they take an oath of secrecy. And they can’t even inspect all of the code – they cannot inspect the Microsoft operating system. No, Mr. Holt, that’s NOT OK!

    Congressman Holt continued: What counts the votes would be open for inspection. Furthermore, the real protection for any of us against – you say it’s managed by a corporation; Microsoft or something… – the real protection against that is the audit. Every election will be audited. If the electronic count is different from the hand count on the paper ballot, the electronic count is finished, you don’t use it, it doesn’t mean anything, it’s irrelevant. It is the voter verified paper ballot that counts. I don’t care what Microsoft does with their electronics in there.

    Mr. Holt’s simple remedy to electronic discrepancies is an audit that many experts already have said is inadequate. Up to 10% of the electronically-generated paper records allowed by HR811 are damaged, unreadable and unusable for audits. We need to count the votes, not audit the elections!

    At the end of the meeting, Mr. Holt told concerned citizens: Unfortunately, the committee that made this change heard from Microsoft….they heard from Microsoft.

    The committee HEARD FROM MICROSOFT. When a U.S. Congressman can agree that the software industry WON over ordinary Americans, we have a critical problem.

    At the end of the meeting, Congressman Holt argued to his constituents: I think if we want to fight over proprietary software, you would not see verifiable elections for the next six years.

    This is absurd! First, we already have verifiable elections: hand-counted, paper ballot elections. We do not need this bill! We just need the will to have real, verifiable elections for the whole nation! Second, any battle over proprietary software has no place in our fight to save American democratic elections because nobody has the right to profit from our elections. The only rights that Congress should concern itself with are our right to vote and our right to have our vote fairly, openly, honestly, securely and accurately counted.

    When Congressman Holt – the election reform leader in Congress – advocates for audits that experts say are inadequate, advocates for questionable paper trails linked to secretly programmed machines, and then says, “I don’t care what Microsoft does with their electronics in there,” it looks like our elections are a game of Russian roulette.

  • *** I really, really hate to agree with Limbaugh***

    Think not, Mr. Benen, that you agree with Limbaugh; rather, that Limbaugh has no choice but to agree with you.

  • Isn’t it pretty much an open and shut case – isn’t it.

    At least three senators complained their leaders ‘rushed to judgment’ while others defended the leaders for quickly pulling their support from the disgraced senator, according to one Republican senator in the room and two GOP aides familiar with the meeting.”

    Someone needs to tell us who the anti-Christian three GOP repugs are?

    Which senators think Larry isn’t disgraced in eyes of God?

    When your dwindling constituency consist largely of the radical Christian right – a powerful lobby that says that Larry has sinned – therefore he MUST be banished. What three non-believers think it’s okay whatever the horrible sin Mr. Craig too part in and should still be allowed to stay?

    Bushie and the brilliant Rove marginalized the Repugs – purged and Christianized the lot of them into devote Bushism. Repugs should be ever so thankful to Mr. Rove. He was so brilliant, wasn’t he?

  • Comments are closed.