Thursday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Yet another al Qaeda #3 goes down: “Abu Laith al-Libi, a top al-Qaida commander in Afghanistan who was blamed for bombing a base while Vice President Cheney was visiting last year, has been killed in Pakistan, according to a militant Web site. Al-Libi was a key link between the Taliban and al-Qaida and was one of the Americans’ 12 most-wanted men with a bounty of $200,000 on his head. ‘He was martyred with a group of his brothers in the land of Muslim Pakistan,’ said the Web site, which frequently carries announcements from militant groups. ‘Though we are sad for his loss, he left a legacy that will inflame the enemy nation and religion.'”

* I can’t believe ABC’s Jake Tapper is defending his shoddy work today. Suck it up, Jake, admit your mistake, correct it, and try to do better next time. Mistakes are understandable, but defending them isn’t.

* It looks like the right will have one less thing to complain about: “Congressional leaders are taking extra measures to make sure the economic stimulus bill has clear language to prevent illegal immigrants from receiving tax rebate checks.”

* As expected, the surveillance bill in the Senate is going to come down to one main provision: “According to a source on the Hill, discussions have been progressing. Yesterday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) made an offer on how to proceed, to which Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) made a counteroffer. Most of the details of those discussions are unknown. But, as might be expected, the Dodd/Feingold amendment, which would strip retroactive immunity for the telecoms that collaborated with the administration’s warrantless wiretapping program, is at the center of the dispute. According to the source, McConnell’s counteroffer included votes on seven of the proposed amendments … but, crucially, Dodd/Feingold was not one of them.”

* Apparently, no one at Fox News has read, or even heard of, the National Intelligence Estimate on Iran. It’s a shame, because it makes the network’s reporting on a nuclear apocalypse sound pretty silly.

* Count on 130,000 U.S. troops being in Iraq by the time Bush leaves office: “Senior U.S. military commanders here say they want to freeze troop reductions starting this summer for at least a month, making it more likely that the next administration will inherit as many troops in Iraq as there were before President Bush announced a ‘surge’ of forces a year ago.”

* On a related note, this is tragic beyond words: “Suicides among active-duty soldiers in 2007 reached their highest level since the Army began keeping such records in 1980, according to a draft internal study obtained by The Washington Post. Last year, 121 soldiers took their own lives, nearly 20 percent more than in 2006. At the same time, the number of attempted suicides or self-inflicted injuries in the Army has jumped sixfold since the Iraq war began. Last year, about 2,100 soldiers injured themselves or attempted suicide, compared with about 350 in 2002, according to the U.S. Army Medical Command Suicide Prevention Action Plan.”

* More discouraging economic news: “The number of U.S. workers filing new claims for state unemployment benefits rose by 69,000 last week to 375,000, the Labor Department said. It was the biggest jump since September 2005 after Hurricane Katrina hit the U.S. Gulf Coast. However, the department cautioned that the data may have been skewed because of the Martin Luther King Jr. Day holiday, and analysts agreed, even though many thought the underlying trend in jobless claims might be moving higher.” (thanks to SW for the tip)

* Cooperation is a two-way street: “Senate Democrats plan to delay a floor vote on President Bush’s nominee for the No. 2 post at the Justice Department until the department responds to several Judiciary Committee oversight letters. Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin , D-Ill., said Thursday that the nomination of Mark Filip for deputy attorney general will be ‘held on the floor’ until the panel receives responses, adding that Democrats have notified the department of the demand.”

* Backsliding? “It used to be that surge enthusiasts would at least hint at the unachieved strategic objective of the surge. As Bush himself put it, the surge was meant to provide the Iraqi government “the breathing space it needs to make progress” on sectarian reconciliation. But reconciliation hasn’t happened, and, in important respects, sectarianism has deepened over the past year. So surgeniks are now simply declaring victory by the sheer fact of reduced violence itself, unmoored to any strategic goal. But even accepting that lowered standard, there are growing signs of backsliding in Iraq — even before the surge brigades depart in July.”

* Obama has a lot of young voters to thank.

* How on earth does Michael Savage stay on the air?

* And finally, rumor has it that Keith Olbermann will have one of his “special comments” tonight. Be sure to tune in. The topic: Bush’s warrantless surveillance.

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

Fox news read?? I thought they just made up all their stories.

  • re tapper: we no longer live in a society where one can admit a mistake, even offer an apology anymore, because that’ll only come back to haunt us as enemies attack us a flip flopper. you can only go straight ahead.

  • Other than being a dick, what does McConnell gain by refusing to negotiate on the Dodd/Feingold amendment? Don’t we already know that Dodd will filibuster, and wouldn’t he likely have the same votes with him as last time?

  • I know Al Qaeda has had a lot of #3’s killed or captured, but doesn’t it seem like there are an awful lot of Al-libi’s as well. Does the name mean “the Lybian”?

  • Lessee. We used to kill an A-Q #2 every month. Now we’re killing #3’s.

    So we’re getting worse at killing key members of The Base.

    Or the government realized people were laughing at the seemingly endless supply of #2s in AQ.

  • I can’t believe ABC’s Jake Tapper is defending his shoddy work today. Suck it up, Jake, admit your mistake, correct it, and try to do better next time. Mistakes are understandable, but defending them isn’t.

    Someone is surprised that a guy who could pass the IQ test low enough to get hired at Disney TV would prove to be a Mickey Mouse moron??

  • The mad-hatter reasoning is simple, TAiO—the administration can now come up with the mantra, “We’re killing tomorrow’s AQ #2s—today.” Sure, it sounds like an old, worn-out Ford commercial or something, but it’s getting hard to invent credible lies these days in the Land of Bubble….

  • “How on earth does Michael Savage stay on the air?” – Everyone should follow the link. Then compare that to Clinton’s supposedly playing the race card during the week preceding the South Carolina primary, which the media hammered away at relentlessly, until Hillary’s candidacy was all but shattered.

    There is simply no way to describe such media hypocrisy in the English language. And it’s impossible to predict when they are going to attack like a pack of frenzied, rabid dogs, and when they’re going to yawn and go “ho hum.”. Remember the “Dean scream?” They threw Dean to the wolves, over nothing. And they destroyed Hillary’s chances last week.

    Yet Bush continues to get away with the crimes of the century. They simply don’t care what he’s done. They never have.

    They were part of the insanity of the Clinton lynching/impeachment.

    How do you make sense of all this?

  • You all to have to remember that 2’s come before 3’s. Soon we’ll be after 4’s since 3’s come before 4’s. Remember 1’s don’t count, aren’t important which is why we let 1’s get away at Tora Bora. If we had gotten 1’s there would have been no 2’s which we had to get because they come before 3’s. Got it? Really, it makes perfectilistical sense …

    Well, to at least one I know it does.

  • Certainly, saying that I’m wrong, or taking issue with my stories or blog postings, does not constitute objectionable writing.–Tapper

    That simply isn’t true. In my experience, it has been the snark that’s left, and factual problems with your work that gets cut. (click this link for the story). For example, I posted:

    *****

    Funny, how quickly the right wing gets you to dance when they say you’re going so easy on the Obama, a week after he gets slimed as having coming from a radical Islamic terrorist producing Madrassa. You even make sure to get his middle name out there to feed the “Obama” sounds like “Osama” storyline, which fits neatly into the Obama as Muslim meme (even though he’s Christian). Now you’re going to whine about the soft treatment he’s receiving?

    Yet, you won’t let me post the following press release from the sergeant-at-arms, that exposes the Pelosi plane story as the Moonie fabrication it is:

    For Immediate Release

    February 8, 2007

    As the Sergeant at Arms, I have the responsibility to ensure the security of the members of the House of Representatives, to include the Speaker of the House. The Speaker requires additional precautions due to her responsibilities as the leader of the House and her Constitutional position as second in the line of succession to the presidency.

    In a post 9/11 threat environment, it is reasonable and prudent to provide military aircraft to the Speaker for official travel between Washington and her district. The practice began with Speaker Hastert and I have recommended that it continue with Speaker Pelosi. The fact that Speaker Pelosi lives in California compelled me to request an aircraft that is capable of making non-stop flights for security purposes, unless such an aircraft is unavailable. This will ensure communications capabilities and also enhance security. I made the recommendation to use military aircraft based upon the need to provide necessary levels of security for ranking national leaders, such as the Speaker. I regret that an issue that is exclusively considered and decided in a security context has evolved into a political issue.

    *******
    And this is what was posted:
    *******

    Funny, how quickly the right wing gets you to dance when they say you’re going so easy on the Obama, a week after he gets slimed as having coming from a radical Islamic terrorist producing Madrassa. You even make sure to get his middle name out there to feed the “Obama” sounds like “Osama” storyline, which fits neatly into the Obama as Muslim name (even though he’s Christian). Now you’re going to whine about the soft treatment he’s receiving?

    *******

    Now, I don’t know if it was you or ABC.com, but why was the press release removed?

  • “Suicides among active-duty soldiers in 2007 reached their highest level since the Army began keeping such records in 1980…

    “Senior U.S. military commanders here say they want to freeze troop reductions starting this summer…

    The administration and the generals have seen, for five years now, that we’ve needed more ground troops. They’ve done nothing to alleviate the situation. If Bush had asked for ten more divisions in 2005 the Republican Congress would have voted him twelve. May the next idiot who says that the Republicans are stronger on Defense choke to death on his own lie.

  • When Baghdad fell in 2003, the US had about 143,000 troops in Iraq. After almost 6 years of one success after another, we’re going to have 130,000. At that rate, we should be out of Iraq sometime around July of 2066. If you have grandchildren, their grandchildren could serve.

  • NYT today:

    Upon landing on the first stop of a three-country philanthropic tour, the two men were whisked off to share a sumptuous midnight banquet with Kazakhstan’s president, Nursultan A. Nazarbayev, whose 19-year stranglehold on the country has all but quashed political dissent.

    Who are the two men?

    Bill Clinton and a Canadian mining financier named Frank Giustra.

    Who is Nursultan A. Nazarbayev?
    In three words: A prick dictator.
    (Research it yourself.)

    What is the upshot of the meeting?

    Here is what Nazarbayev got: Enthusiastic support his bid to head an international organization that monitors elections and supports democracy.

    Here is what Frank Giustra got: A deal for uranium that turned an unknown shell company into one of the world’s largest uranium producers in a transaction ultimately worth tens of millions of dollars!

    Here is what Bill Clinton got: Clinton’s charitable foundation received $31.3 million donation from Mr. Giustra (that had remained a secret until he acknowledged it last month). The gift, combined with Mr. Giustra’s more recent and public pledge to give the William J. Clinton Foundation an additional $100 million, secured Mr. Giustra a place in Mr. Clinton’s inner circle, an exclusive club of wealthy entrepreneurs in which friendship with the former president has its privileges.

    So tell me… what do you like about these Clintons again?
    Jesus lefties: Where has your sense of outrage and fairness gone?
    And the left-blogosphere choose to concentrate its lens today on small-minded rantings of a prick named Jake Tapper?

    FOLLOW THE BIG MONEY!

  • “Only in Washington can you get falsely attacked for being like Reagan one week and labeled the most liberal the next,” Burton says. “The tendency of Washington to apply a misleading label to every person and idea is just one of the many things we need to change about how things operate inside the Beltway.”

    Who was it here who said Obama should say this? They need to give you a job, man!

    http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/01/obama-pushback.html

  • ROTFLMLiberalAO

    “pledge to give the William J. Clinton Foundation an additional $100 million”

    At least that kind of money will be put to good use through the Bill Clinton Foundation.

    Enough said.

  • And there you have it.
    Lefty morals on full public display:
    If you kick some small time chump-change in to satisfy the leftywingnuts….
    They will be satisfied…

    Bruno:
    I saved the best quote for last.
    Figuring I’d get some flippant morally lax response like yours.
    Hope it makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside:

    Those two men have harnessed the former president’s clout to expand their businesses while making the Clintons rich through partnership and consulting arrangements.

    Lest you feel one small bit depressed about your hero…
    Here are some videos to cheer you up:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClfpG2-1Bv4&feature=related
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiIP_KDQmXs&feature=related

    Quite the moral man.
    Got to just love him to death.
    We need more of that in the White House.
    For sure. He is good for the party and good for the country.

  • Obama has a lot of young voters to thank.

    Duh. That’s kinda been obvious since the beginning. He’s done a good job of delivering on that whole “young people vote” thing.

    And that points at exactly what the GOP’s “counter-Obama” strategy will be – depress the youth vote as much as possible in the general election. If Obama is the nominee, expect a massive wave of mud specifically designed to turn those “youthful voters” who care more about a fresh face than experience off. It’ll be dirty and ugly. And that’s not even considering the racist attacks that’ll go out via direct mail and the Internet. (And gods help us if Obama actually has some real skeleton in his closet that hasn’t shown up yet. The GOP machine is able to do amazing work from nothing – I shudder to see what they’d do with something real)

    (And yes, if Clinton gets the nomination the target will be Independents – but the goal won’t be to depress the vote, it’ll be to sway them to the GOP. Obama threatens to bring new votes to the table for the Dems which should scare the crap out of the GOP – the last guy to bring new votes to the table for either side was Reagan pulling in the evangelicals for the GOP. And they’ve helped the GOP dominate our politics for the last couple of decades.)

  • CB says this all the time, of course, but it is nice to see Bill Schneider put this on CNN.com:

    The tone of this debate is far more sophisticated and grown up than the debate last night

  • Yet another al Qaeda #3 goes down: “Abu Laith al-Libi, a top al-Qaida commander in Afghanistan who was blamed for bombing a base while Vice President Cheney was visiting last year, has been killed in Pakistan,..”

    al Qaeda has more “#2s and 3s” than the USS Enterprise has red shirts.

    Also, it sounds like this information came from a “militant web site”. Why would they be posting about a death before you even have it mentioned by either the US or Pakistan? It’s been my impression that these sites are pretty tight-lipped about members of the al Qaeda and Taliban leadership getting knocked off. Weird.

    “….making it more likely that the next administration will inherit as many troops in Iraq as there were before President Bush announced a ’surge’ of forces a year ago.”

    Hey, all right. That way when it’s a Democrat in the White House, and they are forced to withdraw US troops and support from Iraq when it becomes logistically and economically impossible to stay there, the GOP and their wingnut supporters can call them the “cut-and-run President”.

    “How on earth does Michael Savage stay on the air?”

    I used to think Savage was just playing along with a schtick (right-wing windbag) just to get people to listen, but this is really over the top. He is a serious whacko nutjob.
    Michael, two words: “Therapy”.

  • I wonder whether Republican strategists have a clue about how they might make Obama look bad to young first-time voters. I suspect that the results will be instant classics along the lines of attempts circa 1970 to make Richard Nixon look hip.

  • Oh come on ROTFLMLiberalAO @#17. Anytime you play that silly deposition tape, you divert attention away from the tens of thousands of American casualties, the hundreds of thousands of dead, and millions of displaced Iraqis resulting from Bush lying us into war. Bush’s transgressions are many orders of magnitude worse than Clinton’s. Clinton’s transgressions are none of our business.

  • ROTFLMLiberalAO,

    I usually enjoy your posts. What has gotten into you? You usually come across as enlightened, informed, and intelligent. Yet lately you come across as bitter, petty, and off-base. Clinton was not all good nor all bad, but our economy prospered, peace prospered, and people felt hopeful again.
    Bush and Cheney have lied us into war, WAR for God’s sake. They have exposed an undercover CIA agent. They have protected the Saudi’s against law suits from 9/11 victims family’s. They have protected the Pakistani gov’t for their involvement in financing th 9/11 attacks. They are more willing to protect the Telecom industry from the law, than to protect us from terrorists. Where is your outrage in these cases? Remember when Bu$h/Cheney wanted to CUT combat pay for our fighting men and women? Is that how they support the troops? C`mon. Where is your sense of priority? Get back to fighting the good fight.

  • From the TIME article, “It’s hard to overstate the extent to which thick Washington résumés are out of vogue on U.S. campuses.”

    Oh, for goodness sake, when has experience in government ever counted for anything on campuses in post WWII America?

    I understand Obama’s appeal among young folks… but please. There’s nothing new here.

  • Of all that can and will be said about last night’s Democratic debate, what came across to me was how good these two candidates have become over the course of this campaign. In a game where nothing is certain, I think they both demonstrated they are capable of taking on either McCain or Romney, and that the party should be able to rally behind whomever is the eventual nominee.

    I’m sure folks will parse their various responses ad nauseam, but on most issues (other than invading Iraq), I suspect the differences had as much to do with who answered first and who got cut off by a CNN break. There were some “gotcha” moments and good one-liners, but overall, these two are remarkably close on the issues. Both present a clear and distinct alternative to Republican candidates and ideology, and are capable of articulating that. Differences are mostly matters of style, approach, personality and history — factors that are best evaluated outside of this debate and I’m sure will remain contentious.

    On the whole, I came away feeling that Democrats are in much better shape than I thought going in. Reassuring.

  • Savage stays on the air for several reasons:

    1) He’s passionate and animated. Rush did the blase cavalier thing and everyone copied him. Savage takes to it like a berserker warrior. It’s DIFFERENT. He’s not trying to be Rush and when I’m researching the enemy, Savage is one of my go-to’s because I can enjoy listening to him longer than 10 minutes.
    2) He’s not predictable. He doesn’t consistently agree with right wing talking points and he readily lets loose with venom for his own side. He viciously slammed Bush for the amnesty programs he backed for his illegal-hiring corporate buddies.
    3) He’s sincere. I’m constantly second guessing teh motive for what Hannity or Rush will Say. Less so with Glenn Beck. Savage, I suspect, says nothing that doesn’t come straight from his gut. It can be tiring to B.S. artists. Savage gives you the straight poop as he sees it.

    Is he racist? Maybe. I haven’t heard enough to make me feel he’s worse than average right wingers. (I’ve logged maybe 10 hours total in my entire life.) He just SAYS what he thinks. Howard Stern is a faux-racist. Is Savage using any of that in a less humorous way? His questionable remark could be seen as social commentary on the brutal behavior in some central African nations. To assume this behavior is TYPICAL is, naturally, racist; but given such poor world news coverage by the MSM, there may be substantial portions of the population unfamiliar with massacres and amputations in Rwanda and Sierra Leone, among others. Heck, they might even waterboard people there!

    Taken on the whole, I’d sooner dump Glenn Beck than Savage despite Savage being the more offensive of the two.

  • al Qaeda has more “#2s and 3s” than the USS Enterprise has red shirts.

    rofl…..

    no job security,

    “heck of a job, ibn Al Muhammad!”

  • Pingback: f44924fff1a7
  • Comments are closed.