Thursday’s political round-up

Today’s installment of campaign-related news items that wouldn’t generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers:

* Bill Shaheen, the co-chairman of Hillary Clinton campaign in New Hampshire, caused a quite stir by tackling Barack Obama’s teenaged drug use yesterday. In response, the Clinton campaign quickly distanced itself from Shaheen’s comments, saying “these comments were not authorized or condoned by the campaign in any way.” Shaheen himself released his own statement shortly thereafter: “I deeply regret the comments I made today and they were not authorized by the campaign in any way.”

* The flap was certainly noticed at Obama campaign headquarters. Obama campaign manager David Plouffe issued a statement that read in part: “Hillary Clinton said attacking other Democrats is the ‘fun part’ of this campaign, and now she’s moved from Barack Obama’s kindergarten years to his teenage years in an increasingly desperate effort to slow her slide in the polls. Senator Clinton’s campaign is recycling old news that Barack Obama has been candid about in a book he wrote years ago, and he’s talked about the lessons he’s learned from these mistakes with young people all across the country.” This morning, the Obama campaign began raising money on the controversy.

* Despite the setbacks, the New York senator remains very optimistic about her chances: “Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is anticipating that she will not have to wait long to become the Democratic presidential nominee, privately telling campaign donors in California that the race ‘is all going to be over by Feb. 5.'”

* And in still more Clinton-related news: “Bill Clinton has severed business ties with Los Angeles billionaire Ron Burkle, fearful that their deals could erupt into bad publicity damaging his wife’s presidential bid, according to sources who know both men. The break-up is a major development in the world of political fundraising, where Burkle has risen to the top ranks, credited with channeling $50 million or more into Democratic coffers over the past 15 years.”

* All four Democratic presidential candidates from the Senate will return to work this afternoon, briefly, in order to vote on an energy bill pending on the Hill. They will then quickly return to Iowa, for a debate set to begin at 2pm eastern.

* Speaking of today’s debate, the Des Moines Register decided that Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel will not be welcome on the stage today, because neither have opened campaign offices in the Hawkeye State. Why Alan Keyes can participate in the GOP debate, but Kucinich can’t participate in the Dems’ debate is unclear.

* And speaking of Iowa, there’s apparently quite a debate going on about whether students from out of state going to a college an Iowa should be able to participate in the caucuses. State law allows it (and kind of encourages it), but some, including David Yepsen, say it violates the “spirit” of the caucuses, whatever that means. I find the whole debate rather confusing, but Greg Sargent breaks it down nicely.

* Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is at least a little worried about his re-election fight next year, and now has his first serious Democratic challenger — Retired Lieutenant colonel Andrew Horne announced his Senate bid today. Horne has not held elected office, and lost in a Democratic House primary last year.

* And speaking of vulnerable Republican incumbents, there’s a real opportunity for some shake-up in Alaska next year: “A new round of Research 2000 polling, commissioned by Daily Kos, finds two longtime — and scandal-plagued — incumbents trailing in Alaska. Congressman Don Young (R) trails former state Rep. Ethan Berkowitz (D) by a 49%-42% margin, while Senator Ted Stevens (R) is behind Anchorage Mayor Mark Begich (D) 47%-41%.” Dems have not won a federal election in Alaska since 1974.

Why Alan Keyes can participate in the GOP debate, but Kucinich can’t participate in the Dems’ debate is unclear.

CB, Alan Keyes is black, and putting him on a stage with Republicans makes them look like they’re not racist, especially after they keep skipping Kistorically Black College and Hispanic-sponsored events.

  • I’m amazed at how Hillary’s campaign seems to just keep flailing around, throwing stupid bombs that only hurt Hillary. Obama needs to start highlighting the ineptitude that her campaign has shown. He (or his surrogates) should tell people to work her campaign’s inability to handle a crisis into electability calculations. So far, it’s Obama who’s come out ahead when tested, not Hillary.

    Also, Hillary’s “inevitability” strategy turns out to have been seriously flawed: She looks twice as bad when she goes negative. No “inevitable” candidate would need to do stoop so low. She’s painted herself into a corner.

  • “Why Alan Keyes can participate in the GOP debate, but Kucinich can’t participate in the Dems’ debate is unclear.”

    as someone who lived through the obama-keyes senate campaign a few years ago, i can vouch for alan keyes sheer entertainment value. he’s an absolute laff riot!

  • Whether the Obama smear was sanctioned or not by Hillary’s campaign, it’s despicable. Giuliani even praised Obama for being open about his teenage drug use, but the implication that desperate and frightened Hillary flacks want to create isn’t just that Obama used drugs but that he may have sold, because of course a black man using drugs as a teen has to also be a pusher. It’s racist and ridiculous and the surest sign yet of the Clinton campaign’s disarray. Dubya probably shoved more up his nose than Obama ever did and I don’t usually say nice things about Dubya, but at least he and Obama knew how to inhale.

  • I for one will be glad to send money to help get rid of Mitch McConnell. That guy has plagued us all for way too long, and the corrupt campaign finance system he supports is at the root of almost all of our problems. His recent comment that we shouldn’t worry so much about dead Americans in Iraq because they’re volunteers was utterly deplorable. He needs to go, so pony up, people!

    Go Andrew!

    http://www.andrewhorne.org/

  • Why Alan Keyes can participate in the GOP debate, but Kucinich can’t participate in the Dems’ debate is unclear.

    Unclear is the kindest way of phrasing it. This link at NRO just makes the whole thing seem even weirder.

    I’m okay with the Register having clear standards for candidates, and the five points they outline for those standards look fine to me on the face of it. But they need to apply those standards evenly. If Keyes is getting a pass on having an office and paid staff in the state that Kucinich and Gravel aren’t getting that’s not right – especially if it is just being done to make the Republican field look less pasty.

  • Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is anticipating that she will not have to wait long to become the Democratic presidential nominee, privately telling campaign donors in California that the race ‘is all going to be over by Feb. 5.’”

    Since her initials do not stand for Her Royal Highness (close, but no C-igar), I wonder how she can be so sure, especially on top of her campaign”s recent PR blunders.

  • Hillary cries wolf again as another supporter or employee puts their foot in their mouth on her behalf. Eventually the plausible deniability won’t be plausible any more.

  • Then they said Gravel couldn’t debate because he didn’t raise one million dollars like Kucinich, but I said nothing, because I didn’t support Gravel.
    Then they said Kucinich couldn’t debate, because he hadn’t set up an HQ in Iowa, but I said nothing because I didn’t support Kucinich.
    Then they said…

    It was only a matter of time, Kucinich fans.
    You had your chance to speak up.
    The sympathy meter is in the red-zone.

    Who’s next? And what will be the excuse next time? Dodd is probably the next most progressive of the rest of the also-rans. Does Dodd want to object to Dennis’ ouster before its too late?

  • …I wonder how she can be so sure…

    Because by that date more than half of the states and most of the population will have voted in the Primary.

    The winner will be pretty clear by that date, whether or not it’s Clinton.

  • The Obama-used-drugs thing is NO DIFFERENT that Hukabee’s making note of Romney’s Mormonism.

    It is a two-fer:

    1) Land a good hard low blow with the slander.
    2) Look good later by apologizing for it, and subtly reminding everyone the issue is still there.

    It wouldn’t surprise me if the Hillary and Huck camps didn’t plan out their media coups in detail.

  • Comments are closed.