Time for Fox News, Moonie publication to apologize to Obama

To date, the traditional media’s coverage of the Democratic presidential candidates has been discouraging, to put it mildly. CNN ran a segment comparing Obama to Ahmadinejad because the senator wasn’t wearing a tie in New Hampshire. The Washington Post ran a bizarre front-page story about John Edwards selling his house. Reports about Hillary Clinton have ranged from silly to bizarre.

But to follow up on news from last week, the reports about Obama and the Indonesian school he attended as a six year old have been uniquely, breathtakingly stupid. To briefly recap, some of the more hysterical elements of the conservative movement would have us believe that Obama has secret “Muslim heritage,” may have been taught radical Wahhabism, and may be disloyal to the United States. This obvious nonsense was picked up by Insight (a magazine produced by Sun Myung Moon’s Washington Times), Fox News, the New York Post, the Chicago Sun Times’ Mark Steyn, CNN’s Glenn Beck, and several of the less-responsible members of the far-right blogosphere.

In a pleasant surprise, real news outlets are not only treating this story with skepticism, they’re actually doing what the mainstream media is usually loath to do: they’re debunking the story and telling the public the truth.

The Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz took on the story yesterday in a fact-checking piece, and CNN did a lengthy segment yesterday setting the record straight.

:[R]eporting by CNN in Jakarta, Indonesia and Washington, D.C., shows the allegations that Obama attended a madrassa to be false. CNN dispatched Senior International Correspondent John Vause to Jakarta to investigate. He visited the Basuki school, which Obama attended from 1969 to 1971.

“This is a public school. We don’t focus on religion,” Hardi Priyono, deputy headmaster of the Basuki school, told Vause. “In our daily lives, we try to respect religion, but we don’t give preferential treatment.”

Vause reported he saw boys and girls dressed in neat school uniforms playing outside the school, while teachers were dressed in Western-style clothes.

“I came here to Barack Obama’s elementary school in Jakarta looking for what some are calling an Islamic madrassa … like the ones that teach hate and violence in Pakistan and Afghanistan,” Vause said on the “Situation Room” Monday. “I’ve been to those madrassas in Pakistan … this school is nothing like that.”

The good news is CNN and the WaPo have exposed a ridiculous right-wing smear job. The bad news is the misguided attack dogs aren’t done.

In a response that appears to have been written by a child, Insight magazine ran an item explaining that the “liberal media establishment is at it again. For years, they have been carrying water for liberal Democrats.” Those are literally the first two sentences in the piece, which lets the reader know about the tenor of the editorial.

It’s filled with cheap shots, factual errors, and logical fallacies — too many to list here, but read the piece and see for yourself — but here’s the real gem:

Prior to our story being published, we contacted the Obama camp for comment. They had none…and were petrified about the story. Only when FOX and several national radio talk show hosts jumped on the story, did they issue their denials. We stung the Obama people by doing what journalists should do: follow the truth, no matter where it leads.

As near as I can tell, Insight wasn’t trying to be funny; it just turned out that way.

For conservative blogs, there seems to be a delineation between the hinged and unhinged. Ed Morrissey wrote, “It seems more than a little irrelevant what kind of school in which his parents enrolled him when he counted his age in single digits. Obama has not lived his life as a Muslim but as a Christian, and received most of his education in American public schools. (Maybe we should be questioning that.) He isn’t a stealth Muslim regardless of his middle name or his two-year attendance in a school in Indonesia.”

And then there’s Dan Riehl, who argues “a few questions may still remain.” Like what?

No question Obama likes to push himself as a man of God now:

“Obama is especially proud of being a husband and father of two daughters, Malia, 8 and Sasha, 4. Obama and his wife, Michelle, married in 1992 and live on Chicago ’s South Side where they attend Trinity United Church of Christ.

“Barack Obama was born on August 4th, 1961, in Hawaii to Barack Obama, Sr. and Ann Dunham. Obama graduated from Columbia University in 1983, and moved to Chicago in 1985 to work for a church-based group seeking to improve living conditions in poor neighborhoods plagued with crime and high unemployment. In 1991, Obama graduated from Harvard Law School where he was the first African American president of the Harvard Law Review.”

But he tried to make himself appear as just the opposite in one of his recent books:

“In Indonesia, I’d spent 2 years at a Muslim school, 2 years at a Catholic school. In the Muslim school, the teacher wrote to tell mother I made faces during Koranic studies. In the Catholic school, when it came time to pray, I’d pretend to close my eyes, then peek around the room. Nothing happened. No angels descended.”

I don’t care so much about what he is or isn’t. But I detest people who want it both ways.

In other words, as Riehl sees it, if Obama wasn’t religious as a six-year-old child, but then became a church-going Christian as an adult, he’s trying to have it “both ways.” Wow.

In any case, kudos to CNN and Kurtz for actually following up on a hatchet job and telling the public the facts. At this point, there are a number of far-right media voices who owe Obama and their readers/viewers an apology.

[R]eporting by CNN in Jakarta, Indonesia and Washington, D.C., shows…

That’s how you know it’s a fact-checking piece. It doesn’t just state the facts, it backs it up! With reporting! (By which I mean, it’s strange how the story has to attribute statements to itself.)

  • Those who cast religoid nuttery shouldn’t get home schooled in glass houses.

    “In other words, as Riehl sees it, if Obama wasn’t religious as a six-year-old child, but then became a church-going Christian as an adult, he’s trying to have it “both ways.” Wow.”

    Wow indeed, CB.

    What about a 40 year old coke snorting, drinking, with daddy issues frat boy who suddenly finds religion?

  • “They had none…and were petrified about the story”…

    They probably didn’t even pick up the incoming call from caller id “1-800-WING-NUT”

  • It is next to impossible to instill any sense of the democratic creed upon people who act like rabid dogs when they begin to feel uncomfortable in a political debate. Yes, FOXNEWS 3-D (death, destruction and decay) reality has been trumping common American’s 3-D (decency, dignity, and democracy) reality for some time now. It’s time we take our nation back from these anti-democratic factions who have hijacked our collective common sense! -Kevo

  • typical smear job- this has all of the classic statements of “so when did you stop beating your wife?”… had Obama deigned to issue a denial at the outset, they probably would have run headlines like “Obama covering up his past”…

    Seems to me too many people are forgetting that First Amendment protections are NOT there to issue deliberately false information. Lock ’em up.

  • For some odd reason I do not think this campaign of doubt and smear will work this time. First Obama is not John Kerry and second this is not 2000. The wing-nut campaign methods are known and thanks to their effectivenetss at smearing opposing candidates we have spent the past 6 years living an example of how bad their policies are in practice.

    Kerry is a rich, back-east, blue-blood, Massachusettes liberal. You cannot run from what you are. Obama is not a Muslim fanatic. They will throw their mud but I have the feeling the voters will call it what is it, bullshit.

  • In other words, as Riehl sees it, if Obama wasn’t religious as a six-year-old child, but then became a church-going Christian as an adult, he’s trying to have it “both ways.” Wow.

    I’m waiting for Riehl to castigate George W. Bush as a 40-year-old drunk who suddenly got religion as a lying hypocrite wanting to have it both ways. Still waiting. . . Oh, I forgot, Bush still doesn’t go to church.

  • I’m hoping that *some* of the people who enabled these stories last time will realize that they helped put GWB in the White House and will push back this time….

    If Kurtz is printing this sort of debunking, and CNN is working it as well, there’s some hope…..

  • Steve, it’s time to stop calling for an apology in this situation and start doing what the right-wing does…attack. Instead of taking the gentlemanly approach, start hammering away at these news organizations. Every time they try to launch a smear on a democratic candidate, we need to remind everyone that these are the same news outlets that peddled this kind of tripe. They don’t need to apologize, they and their reputation need to suffer over and over again, so that anytime they try to launch another one of these attacks people immediately question its veracity merely because of the messenger. That’s what the right-wing has done to the mainstream media repeatedly over the years to great success. Anytime I talk to one of my right-wing friends about anything negative about a republican, the first comment out of their mouths is about how the left-wing MSM is to blame and can’t be trusted.

    Time we start fighting fire with fire, rather than politely slapping them in the face with our gloves after they’ve stuck a shiv in our gut.

  • The bad news is the misguided attack dogs aren’t done.

    With all due respect ,why give them the benefit of the doubt with “misguided”? A smear this obviously coordinated — and by “news organizations” that have shown a reckless disregard for the truth in pushing the Republican agenda — is loathsome and wrong, but hardly “misguided,” with the connotation of innocence that that implies.

  • Hmm. If Fox wants to appear “fair and balanced”, they should run this story about McCain.

    What? You didn’t know that while he was held as a POW in VietNam his captors brainwashed him into accepting communist doctrine?? That was the only reason that he was ultimately released and not killed. Yeah, turns out he has a secret communist agenda and that if elected he will turn this country over to the red Chinese.

  • They don’t care about facts, when there’s a smear to be done (as if the right wing noise machine cares about facts in the first place) They had one objective and they carried it out. The objective was to sew seeds of doubt with the vast majority who don’t follow politics outside of the last few months of a presidential campaign.
    GOPNews and the AM screech monkeys raise concern about a ‘Manchurian Candidate’ scenario and inject it into watercooler conversations across the country. To thinking people, the ‘Manchurian Candidate’ scenario a ridiculous notion. To the unthinking who get most of their information at the watercooler, it creates an undercurrent of doubt that will be vaguely remembered months later. It’s intended as a subliminal hit job.
    It’s despicable, no doubt. But it’s mild compared to what the wounded and cornered right wing machine come up with in the next 22 months.

  • “Nobody” (#9, above) is right. Fuck asking for an apology. You think these assholes come up with this bullshit because they think it’s true? You think they’re trying to convince people of the accuracy of what they’re saying? They’re trying to make us look like chumps, by any means necessary. If we don’t respond to the initial slander, then they’re happy because it worked, and people remember it. If we react by whining and asking for them to apologize, then they’re happy because they made us look like wimps. When someone punches you in the nose, do you ask them for an apology?

    I thought we were through bringing knives to this particular gunfight.

  • Now…if it were possible to put a large mob of anti-FOX demonstrators outside of the FOX H/Q building…I wonder if the rest of the national media would take notice? Maybe a lot of signs with the simple message, “FOX = Fake News” could be the beginning of the end for these hatemongers.

    Play “their” game. Play it by “their” rules. Play it on “their” field. Bury these pigs so deep in their own construct of excremental orations that they can never recover. Smear “their” journalistic image in front of a national audience, and publicize the rumours of their ever-shrinking commercial base. If advertisers believe that FOX is losing audience share; that FOX is fudging the numbers so as to get advertising revenue, then more clients will pull the plug.

    Attacking the Reich’s message does no good any more. Those who still believe it—will always believe it. But attacking their noise machine’s wallet? Well—that’s an entirely different tactic.

    And—it is a tactic that could work….

  • Of course, his parents are geniuses. After all, they named their son after the future President/dictator of Iraq in order to show the world that their newborn baby will destroy the United States.

    I wish I were smart enough to know the President of any country 10 years in advance. Then I would be smart enough to have my new born baby grow up to be President of France in 50 years and she could control the world and bring France back to the place it deserves.

    Unfortunately, I ain’t as smart as the Obama’s.

  • Steve #15 has a good aim. I believe his idea is equal to the Southern Poverty Law Center’s effort to put the KKK out of business. Just as the members of the KKK will never give up their perverse view of the world, so too will the FOX faithful continue unabated in their delusions. Yes, economic action is needed., and yes, kudos to whomever organizes massive demostrations against FOX headquarters. Signs that read “FOX is untruthful” “Who is supporting lies to the American public” “Why support falsehoods?” and the like shown on national TV will have an impact on FOX’s revenue stream. I say go for it! -Kevo

  • CB, you forgot to mention that CNN also debunked the theory that Hillary Clinton’s camp broke the story. They not only pointed out that there were not facts to back this claim but that the “it’s just what the Clinton Camp MIGHT DO!” lie is now a common Rovian tactic and a bunch of crap.

    My (to the right of Alan Keyes) wife is so disappointed that the story is not true.

  • The one aspect of the Insight story which I haven’t seen debunked is that the opposition research team working for Hillary is the one responsible for digging up the “dirt” on Obama. This is a twofer. It smears both Hillary and Obama. It also allows people to spread the Obama rumor while at the same time dismissing it and blaming Hillary. For an example of this “high-minded” nonsense take a look here.

  • Lance, you must have posted while I composed. The blogs I read haven’t talked about the fact that CNN debunked the Hillary part of the story. Thanks

  • “CB, you forgot to mention that CNN also debunked the theory that Hillary Clinton’s camp broke the story. They not only pointed out that there were not facts to back this claim but that the “it’s just what the Clinton Camp MIGHT DO!” lie is now a common Rovian tactic and a bunch of crap.”

    Now, you see, that’s just the point. That’s the old right-wing attack mode. Make up something, claim it COULD have happened, and then scream like heck until you convince people it DID happen. And then claim anyone who doesn’t buy in is not “fair and balanced.” Here’s the approach….

    Obama MIGHT have gone to a terrorist school. It could have happened, you know. We’ll never know the TRUTH until there is a FULL and IMPARTIAL investigation. We need an independent counsel and hearings to get to the bottom of this!

    I remember during the Lewinksy scandal being nauseated by a blousy blonde claiming that Clinton COULD have done something or other, and IF he did that it WOULD be an impeachable offense, therefore he should be impeached so the TRUTH could be determined. I wondered who this harridan was … I soon found it was someone named Ann Coulter.

  • What? You didn’t know that while he was held as a POW in VietNam his captors brainwashed him into accepting communist doctrine??

    [Gridlock]

    Love it. And McCainiac is irrational enough to make make it credible. “Senator McCain has changed his position on many important issues recently. Could it be he is trying to find a solution to difficult problems…or could it be the side-effect of brain washing at the hands of his Vietnatmese captors?”

    And of course there’s the Zeitgeist stand-by:

    “When will Bill O’Reilly tell the truth about his goat fetish?”

  • And of course there’s the Zeitgeist stand-by:
    “When will Bill O’Reilly tell the truth about his goat fetish?”

    Somewhere, there’s a loofah that is totally depressed because Bill never calls anymore.

  • Gah! Man, the projection that is going on over at WIngnut Central: “Our consultants (see Atwater, Lee; Rove, Karl, Swiftboat Veterans, etc.) would be only too happy to make up some utter bullshit to smear our political opponents, so the Antichrist, Hillary Clinton, would doubtless not scruple to do likewise. Let’s blame her for the crap being spouted about Barack Obama! After all, they’re mortal enemies.”

  • Think Progress or someone should oranize a letter writing campaign to Fauxnews to get them to apologize to Obama on air

  • Vause reported he saw boys and girls dressed in neat school uniforms playing outside the school, while teachers were dressed in Western-style clothes. — CNN report

    That’s *now*. Who knows what it had been on ’69? Probably a madrassa. My highschool hasn’t changed much in the nearly 40yrs since I’d left it but my primary school, once the model of communist lower education is now being run by the church, pretty much…

    Ducking-ly yours 🙂

  • Comments are closed.