Time for Fox News to apologize (again)

This week, Fox News’ E.D. Hill was forced to apologize for her on-air assessment that a fist-bump between Barack and Michelle Obama might have been a “terrorist fist jab.” A few weeks ago, Fox News’ Liz Trotta suggested on the air that someone should “knock off” the Democratic presidential candidate.

I’m thinking it might be time for yet another apology from the least-reliable name in television “news.” The estimable Alex Koppelman has the story:

During a segment discussing conservative attacks against Michelle Obama, the wife of presumptive Democratic nominee Barack Obama, the network described the former as “Obama’s baby mama.”

I checked, and sure enough, as you can see below, our e-mailer was right. In fact, that description was displayed on screen several times during the segment, which featured anchor Megyn Kelly and conservative blogger Michelle Malkin, an FNC contributor.

Sure enough, here it is. (I’d recommend watching with the sound turned down; the offensive part was on the chyron, which reads: “Outraged Liberals: Stop Picking on Obama’s Baby Mama!”)

Now, it seems to me there are two possibilities here. Either Fox News doesn’t know what a “baby mama” is, in which case this was unintentional racism driven by ignorance, or Fox News does know what a “baby mama” is, in which case this was deliberate racism driven by malice.

As Salon’s Joan Walsh noted:

Where do you even start when criticizing Fox’s slur? Do you try to explain that “baby mama” is slang for the unmarried mother of a man’s child, and not his wife, or even a girlfriend? Are they racist, or just clueless? Isn’t there racism even in their cluelessness, if somebody didn’t know what “baby mama” means, but used it anyway? Even at Fox, won’t somebody have to apologize? Am I wasting my time even thinking about that?

Even on a day when Maureen Dowd found time to “worry” about the coming attack on Michelle Obama, while at the same time passing along an ugly rumor about her (that would never have otherwise found its way into the New York Times), this was shocking.

Oliver Willis added:

So here’s the thing (because during this campaign I’m apparently learning that we black people have our own secret code and hand signals so this stuff has to be explained like you are speaking to a child at times), using the phrase “baby mama” to describe this woman implies that like too many people in the black community, she is a mother on her own with no man around doing his job.

Except, Barack and Michelle Obama are the exact opposite of this, and that is one of the reason America — especially black America — are so proud of them.

But Fox News is the network that tears down those who do not toe the line, and if that means they should resort to jive to describe a black woman as a “baby mama” despite the strength of her family and her own personal success, so be it.

Remember the Republicans’ game-plan: when it doubt, go after the candidate’s spouse. Fox News, as an extension of the GOP, is clearly just reading from the party’s script.

I think Faux News should pass on the apology, but from now on they should refer to Cindy McCain as John’s “Sugar Mama”.

  • Unintentional racism driven by ignorance? Or intentional racism driven by malice?

    I’m going for malice. And that’s my final answer.

  • Why does anyone expect faux news to be any LESS racist than shillary was during her campaign? Many were willing to give her a “free pass” on blatantly racist remarks and tactics and now some of the same folks want to cry FOUL at faux.

    If it is wrong to divide us by race for political purposes, then it is wrong whether you are a faux news network or a faux candidate.

  • Whether the people at Fox News know what a “baby mama” is or not, I would bet that virtually none of their audience does. So what purpose does it serve to use the term. I suspect that they, like Joe (3&4) merely want to revive the umbrage wars. Don’t let them do it.

  • As the Republican ship continues to sink the miasma of vulgarity emmitted will only increase. Unfortunatly all this vulagarity will only increase as the polls show the Republicans have failed miiserably.

  • I see Danp’s point in # 6, but I think that an objective observer would see this latest smear as pretty offensive. I think it makes Fox look pretty bad, and if played properly will make it a lot easier to ignore them and refuse to play their game (as Obama did for quite a while).

  • This should really help the McCain campaign woo those disaffected Hillary supporters.

  • Either Fox News doesn’t know what a “baby mama” is, in which case this was unintentional racism driven by ignorance, or Fox News does know what a “baby mama” is, in which case this was deliberate racism driven by malice

    Of course it is the latter, but when pressed they will say it was the former. Come on, this is Fox. Its the conservative political equivalent of porn, with racial slurs acting as a surrogate climax.

  • I thought “baby mama” was just an off-hand way of referring to girls who have become mothers very soon after puberty (i.e., 12 to 14 or so, probably while still in middle school or junior high school, mothers who are themselves still more child than adult). I’m no expert on this, but that’s just what I understood from the context the few times I’ve heard it.

  • 1. On June 12th, 2008 at 9:21 am, Capt Kirk said:

    I think Faux News should pass on the apology, but from now on they should refer to Cindy McCain as John’s “Sugar Mama”.

    Beam me up, Captain! There’s no intelligent life down here… But I immediately thought of doing the same thing as an experiment – to see how the reactions of the media to each of these spousal characterizations would differ.

    Now, it seems to me there are two possibilities here. Either Fox News doesn’t know what a “baby mama” is, in which case this was unintentional racism driven by ignorance, or Fox News does know what a “baby mama” is, in which case this was deliberate racism driven by malice.

    If Faux Snooze doesn’t know what a ‘baby mama’ is, then maybe they should do some research to find out before they spew it on the airwaves. If they actually were a news oganization…

    If Faux Snooze does know what a ‘baby mama’ is, and spews it on the airwaves anyway, then they are deliberately disseminating propaganda. Which they wouldn’t do if they actually were a news oganization…

    I can see only one clear conclusion: Faux Snooze is not a news organization.

    But it’s the same conclusion I cam to after watching five minutes of their ‘news’ programming a long/long time ago in a galaxy far, far away.

  • Wow. I wonder how the MSM will underplay this one. They did such a great job burying the Kucinich piece. It made page 6 in my city’s local newspaper. Page 6. I guess I shouldn’t complain too much. The car bomb that killed 5 Iraqi civilians and wounded a number more was reported just to the left of the article on the same page. The front page carried a story relating to the troubles Obama faced with having to fire one of his V.P. vetters because of a flap over some loans, Loans. Not preemptive wars, torture, loss of civil liberties, renditions,nope, friggin loans.

    Let’s see…Impeachment of a criminal administration weighed against reporting about some guys legal loans..hmmmmmmm. I can see why they’d go with the loan story. Everybody understands loans. Nauseating…

  • Another theory (which still doesn’t give Faux News a pass for this stuff) is the simple “They liked the way the words rhymed with Obama”. Yeah, that stupid. They apparently now have Britney Spears writing their copy.

  • Remember the Republicans’ game-plan: when it doubt, go after the candidate’s spouse.

    Sure, but this is just as much a swipe at the candidate himself, portraying him as a seed spreader who doesn’t stick around to be a father.

  • Hmmm…”ignorance” or “malice.” Tough choice when it comes to Faux News, CB. Think I’ll go with ignorance AND malice, with a great big dose of desperation thrown in just for fun. The ad hominem attack has long been the GOPers’ favorite weapon, as you point out, but now it’s their only weapon. They know perfectly well they’re on the wrong side of every issue that matters to voters. They’re just trying to keep things close enough–at least in appearance–that it won’t be so obvious when Diebold and Sequoia steal the election for them again.

  • “Whether the people at Fox News know what a “baby mama” is or not, I would bet that virtually none of their audience does.”

    But their audience knows its a “black thing,” and they see it as “ghetto black.” FOX News knew exactly what they were doing. By the time November comes around we’ll have seen a level of ugliness we’ve never seen before. All the Republicans really have to work with is racial scare tactics. They’re desperate, and they sink as low as possible to try and save themselves. If it works then it, unfortunately, speaks volumes about the american people…and we will truly have the government we deserve.

  • “Are they racist, or just clueless?”

    this isn’t necessarily an either/or kinda question.

  • FOX News is commenting on a well recorded phenomenon: the extremely low occurrence of marriage between the parents of black children. Of course this is going to be translated to the Obamas — they are now, thanks to their own arrogant choice of running for president, the top spokespeople for the black community. If Senator Pretend I’m Not Black is so concerned about racial stereotyping, he should be doing more as a black “leader” to ensure that fewer African American babies are born out of wedlock. Instead he’s mute on the subject…why?

  • #11 N.Wells- I’m certainly no expert either, but I’m 76% confident that it is short for “baby’s mama” (dropping the ‘s to be more ‘hip hop’, ya see?).

    It’s possibly that the elitists at Fox News don’t know this.

  • “Instead he’s mute on the subject…why?”

    Mary, your sarcasm is so strange, it almost sounds like ignorance!

    It is really a shock how McCain has ignored the soaring rates of white babies born out of wedlock! When will he do something about it?

    Also, looking at some video of Obama to see if I can spot the part where he “pretends he’s not black”. Oh my god, you’re right, he’s almost pulling it off, someone get make up on that quick.

  • And it’s wrong anyway. Michelle is not Obama’s “baby mama” – a phrase used to describe a biological mother who is not married to the father. She is his wife. And she has a name, too. Use it.

  • It’s possibly that the elitists at Fox News don’t know this. -Franklin

    They just saw the Tina Fey movie and ran with it.

  • Going after Michelle Obama is not going to work out well for the GOP.

    Michelle Obama is a woman who grew up in a lower class family, made it to Princeton and Harvard and is now a married mother of her children.

    Cindy McCain is a spoiled rich girl and a junkie, thief, and adulator who broke up the marriage of a war hero from his crippled wife.

    Which one has character?

  • Erik in Maine (25) – I’m guessing you don’t watch CNN. According to them Michelle Obama rose from poverty to Ivy league lawyer thanks to living in a great country, though she’s a bit ungrateful. Cindy McCain battled a debilitating stroke and prescription drug addiction, and wants to repay America by becoming an advocate against land mines.

  • I don’t think Fox is simply reading from the GOP script… I think they are some of the most prolific writers of that script.

  • Excuse me, ignorant Mary-mother of odd —

    get this through your head — Not all Black people are the same !! And one Black person does not represent a whole race. When ignorasses such as yourself lump all Blacks as a degenerate whole, the Blacks who share YOUR values cease to exist.

    Obama is not running to be a “black leader” he is running to be the American leader.

  • Is it out of bounds to speculate on whether Cindy was “McCain’s drug dealer?” She couldn’t possibly have stolen all those drugs purely for personal use, could she?

  • “Cindy McCain is a spoiled rich girl and a junkie, thief, and adulator who broke up the marriage of a war hero from his crippled wife.”

    Okay, I don’t like Cindy McCain particularly, but she did NOT break up John’s first marriage.

    John McCain “broke” up his own marriage by cheating with Cindy.

    This about plucks at my last nerve.

    It implies that a man can be “stolen” from his wife by another woman. Hey, women can’t “steal” another woman’s husband, the husband has to be a willing participant in adultery. (Or the opposite, if a woman leaves a marriage for another man).

    If it hadn’t been Cindy who McCain cheated with, it would have been someone else.

  • *psst. . . coral. . . MaryMOO is a satire character, a parody of a certain similarly named commenter who claims to be loyal to Clinton but now rejects everythng Clinton stands for out of blind Obama hatred*

  • Doesn’t this mean that all married women with children are “baby mamas”? Including Michelle Malkin herself, who is married and a mother of two children? Hillary Clinton and Queen Elizabeth also fit the profile.

    Or maybe one has to be a Black woman to qualify…

  • #32 – No. A married woman is never a ‘baby mama’. And yes. You most certainly do have to be black.

    I’m glad Fox keeps reminding us that the Obama family is (hush now!) blackedy black black black.

    Ugh.

  • Okay, I don’t like Cindy McCain particularly, but she did NOT break up John’s first marriage.

    I’m not saying it’s accurate (no one knows what goes on in another’s marriage).

    I’m saying if the GOP bloggers/527’s want to play in the ugly spin sewer then this is what they should expect from the dem bloggers/527’s.

    The fact is John and Cindy got married 6 weeks after John and Carol got divorced. So while “broke up the marriage” may be overstatement. The fact that she was “involved (sleeping) with another woman’s husband” is not overstatement. That alone speaks to her character.

  • “Or maybe one has to be a Black woman to qualify…”

    Judging from their context and track record, this is precisely the reasoning of Fox News and their audience. Otherwise why haven’t they referred to Laura Bush as the First Baby Mama for the last 7 plus years?

  • Linda in Oregon: “They liked the way the words rhymed with Obama”. Yeah, that stupid.

    I’m with you. As regrettably offensive as the label is to the future First Lady, it’s easy for me to imagine a bunch of clean-cut white guys, standin’ ’round the graphics monitor trying to think of something catchy and hip.

    “Wasn’t there a movie by that Tina Fey called ‘My Baby’s Mother?'”

    “No, I think it was ‘The Mother of All Babies.”

    “No, here it is at imdb.com! ‘Baby Mama!'”

    “It rhymes so conveniently!”

    “Of course! And Tina Fey is so white and lovely, there must not be anything wrong with it.”

    “Um…guys?…Never mind.”

    And I can’t imagine the one person in the newsroom who might grasp the implications of the phrase being willing to suggest an alternative. You know, like “Future First Lady.”

  • I thought they (Fox-GOP) were supposed to be the people of “family values”. Don’t they even recognize a good family when they see one?

  • “The fact is John and Cindy got married 6 weeks after John and Carol got divorced. So while “broke up the marriage” may be overstatement. The fact that she was “involved (sleeping) with another woman’s husband” is not overstatement. That alone speaks to her character.”

    Yes, Erik@34, but the onus of “breaking” up of the marriage should still completely be on McCain’s shoulders.

    And I am not excusing anyone here. It’s just that the concept that husbands (or wives) can be “stolen” just pisses me off. It completely lets the adulterous party off the hook for his (or her) actions.

  • An appology is not enough. This was strapline, decided in advance, with editorial input. Anyone who could have stopped this offensive racist and sexist statement from going out, or who set an environment where it is acceptable, from the control booth to Roger Ailes should be fired, now!

    Otherwise, it should be open season on Rupert Murdoch, Wendy Murdoch, his divorce, their families, all.

  • Referring to Michelle Obama as a “Baby Mama” was most certainly meant to be a racist slur. The Repugs can’t let there be any respect shown for these people because they represent a very scary future to them. A future where power must be shared with people of color. This is the nighmare of the country club racists.

  • This ‘baby mama’ thing is really sexist as well. They’re using up the rest of their supply of Hillary animus.

    I watch Fox News because it’s more racist.
    No more sexist.
    More racist.
    Ha ha ha, it’s rascist AND sexist.

  • the onus of “breaking” up of the marriage should still completely be on McCain’s shoulders

    And I am not excusing anyone here. It’s just that the concept that husbands (or wives) can be “stolen” just pisses me off. It completely lets the adulterous party off the hook for his (or her) actions.

    I don’t disagree. But you’re missing the point.

    If there’s going to be a mud fight, this is the mud the GOP should expect.

  • There’s no way that was unintentional. That’s something I’ve never had the misfortune to hear before, and it’s highly unusual thing to try and express on a ticker, so I have a hard time believing someone could PRINT that without knowing what they were saying.

  • Capt Kirk said:
    …they should refer to Cindy McCain as John’s “Sugar Mama”.

    Not bad but I prefer “Junkie Thief”. Of course, Faux Noise will never insult Cindy!

    FYI:
    Oct. 18, 1999 | PHOENIX — GOP presidential candidate John McCain’s wife Cindy took to the airwaves last week, recounting for Jane Pauley (on “Dateline”) and Diane Sawyer (on “Good Morning America”) the tale of her onetime addiction to Percocet and Vicodin, and the fact that she stole the drugs from her own nonprofit medical relief organization.

  • I first heard the term in 2005 when I was working on the MTV show “Yo Momma” as an editor. It’s obvious Fox thought they were being “hip” by using a slang term, and cleverly mocking by using one associated with blacks, the same way Imus used “nappy headed hoes”. (In much the same way did right-wingers used to call doves “comrade” in the Soviet era).

    Prepare for lots more of this. The Republicans are going to use race-baiting as often as they can, since it appears to be all they got. By late October, someone’s going to blurt out, Michael Richards-style, “He’s a nigger!”

  • Erik, agreed. Yes, it takes two to tango, but Cindy danced so the shoe fits.

    Moral expectations should be applied equally.

    McCain is a kept man, Cindy Stepford is indeed his Sugar Mama. But, then again, so are we. How many government incomes does he pull in?

  • Not bad but I prefer “Junkie Thief”. Of course, Faux Noise will never insult Cindy!

    I think it would be cool if Democrats stopped using someone’s addiction as a weapon against him or her.

    In the phrase “junkie thief,” “thief” is the pejorative.

  • Like I said previously; they’ll say any and everything up to n***. n***, n***. The way is going now, I predict by November that will be in play also.

    Mark my words, “All options are on the table.”

  • Fox is just trying to prove their street cred. After the FistDapFlap backfired on them, they probably figured anything goes. I mean, if a major party candidate and his wife can, on national tv, enact a bizarre, obscure ritual like dapping….

    Who is the arbiter of the official definition of a slang phrase? I’m going to save my outrage for a month or two. This is like being shocked that the kkk passes out racist propaganda. Don’t fall into a Fox laid PC trap! It is, after all, one of the right’s golden oldies.

  • Maria said:
    “I think it would be cool if Democrats stopped using someone’s addiction as a weapon against him or her. ”

    Why?

    I will stop demonizing Cindy McCain on November 8th or on the day after the rethug machine stops attacking Michelle Obama!

    Cindy McCain is a ‘junkie thief sugar momma’!

    At least my ‘slur’ is based upon fact!

  • Why?

    Because addiction in and of itself is morally neutral.

    Because it’s what addicts do about that addiction–and what they do while addicted–that is the behavior that should be judged.

    Because when you treat addiction itself, outside of any other actions or words, as shameful and worthy of insulting, you continue to encourage addicts to pretend they don’t have a problem, which benefits exactly nobody.

    Education about addiction has helped most people understand all this–most people get it by now. Unfortunately, there are still some (mostly older) people who believe that alcoholism or drug addiction should be classified as a moral failing. Most of them, fortunately, are Republicans. I’d like to see us get to the point where none of them are Democrats.

  • Live and learn… I had never before hard the term “baby mama” and would have never caught its “slurry” undertone (ie unmarried mother).

    I would have, probably, assumed it was meant to be a “black thing”, though. I well remember the weird looks we used to get around the shops here, when my son called me “Mama”. I taught him the Polish version rather than the English one because, at the time, I didn’t yet feel dessicated enough to be a “mummy” and “mommy” (US version) simply didn’t appeal. Eventually, someone explained that “mama” was a black version of the term. Didn’t bother me any and “mama” is what my son still calls me. Though I admit to passing on a “Another Mama For Obama” bumper sticker that a lady from Obama’s campaign was selling at our district Convention 🙂

  • #19 Mary MOO, funny again as usual. I hope you’re a writer in real life… whoever you are.

    As for FOX, I am hoping that this, along with everything else they have done and will do, will backfire on them big time. Yesterday I posted some excerpts from two columns about Michelle Obama and how impressed people are when they meet her (I don’t know how to link to that comment – help!?). Despite the occasional gaffe, she is an asset to the campaign and will make an excellent First Lady.

    Another thing that drives me crazy: When some say how privileged the Obamas were to have gone to such prestigious schools (insinuating that it was only due to affirmative action and that they attended for free), well, at our town’s Obama town hall, Obama revealed that he and Michelle had student loans of $100K to repay after law school and it took them 10 years to do so. Feel free to pass that along!

    Sheesh, it’s going to be a long fve months.

  • A senior FOXNEWS exec has now said the chyron was the result of “poor judgment” but I disagree! The chyron was the result of “racist judgment” and I think FOXNEWS needs to be called out for its racist response to the presumed Democratic presidential candidate, Barack Obama. FOXNEWS personalities are abominations to polite society. -Kevo

  • At what point does it become so blatantly obvious that FOX is an arm of the republican party that they come under some kind of investigation/regulation by the FEC or FCC?

    Aren’t they really an unregistered 527?

    I suppose that would require the Bush Administration to actually take an oversight role . . . well never mind.

  • This wasn’t just an act of “poor judgement.” I’m with CB–either the producer was tone deaf or s/he knew exactly what s/he was doing.

    Faux News needs to apologize on-air to Obama, and for good measure display an apology on its Website.

  • You all are entirely out of line this time.

    Normally I expect John McSame to put words in other people’s mouths and then condem them.

    Here my liberal brethren are doing teh same thing!

    The headline said:
    “Outraged Liberals: Stop Picking on Obama’s Baby Mama!”)

    Fox and its spokespeople have not demonstrated any ignorance or misuse of the potentially offensive term.

    They are merely reporting that 2 or more liberals used the term inappropriately.
    This is an unusual turn of events worthy of a moment’s notice by the Fox News network.

    Now, if we’ve all gotten our heads together…

    Which two were they quoting?

    They DID offer names, right?

  • Can anyone here honestly say they can imagine Edward R. Murrow, Walter Cronkite, or Ted Koppel ever referring to any candidate’s spouse (regardless of party affiliation) as a “Baby Mama”? [sigh]

  • Comments are closed.