Time for the Air Force to straighten up and fly right

Guest Post by Morbo

The Air Force just can’t seem to get this religious freedom thing down.

First comes word that the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs has become a hotbed of Christian fundamentalist proselytizers. To remedy that, the Air Force announced new guidelines governing religious activity by service members and chaplains. That in turn has the fundamentalists and certain members of Congress up in arms.

Now comes word that the Air Force may have discriminated against a Mormon — because of his underwear. Mormon airman Andrew Howells claims his commander threatened to kick him out of an entertainment unit unless he stopped wearing his sacred undergarments.

I’ll admit this gets a little strange. I don’t claim to be an expert on Mormon temple garments, but my understanding is that faithful Mormons wear them most of the time under their regular clothes. Usually it’s not a problem because people can’t see them.

Howells says his commander complained that the sacred underwear showed through his uniform. Howells feels strongly about it and has asked U.S. Rep. Jim Matheson of Utah to help out. Matheson has filed an inquiry on Howell’s behalf with the Air Force Congressional Liaison Office.

Can’t say I blame the guy. I’m totally opposed to senior officers in the Air Force or any other service branch using their superior positions to knock anyone else’s religion or pressure subordinates about personal religious matters. What church, temple, synagogue, mosque or wooded glade you go to — if you go to any at all — should your business and yours alone, and commanding officers should keep their noses out of it.

At the same time, I support individual religious freedom expression that does not infringe on anyone else’s rights. Howells’ underwear would seem to fit that definition. I can’t imagine his skivvies are creating problems for anyone else. It’s akin to a soldier wearing a cross or a Star of David under his shirt. The First Amendment protects these personal religious activities.

State-sponsored religion is another matter. It’s here that the Air Force seems to be falling down. Recently, some chaplains have been complaining because they have been told to stop proselytizing. The chaplains seem to think this is a violation of their religious freedom rights. It’s not.

A military chaplain’s job is to accommodate the religious needs to soldiers who may be stationed far from home away from the congregations they would normally attend. Chaplains either provide the needed religious service or find someone who will. Chaplains aren’t supposed to be “stealing sheep” — that is, luring members of the service into the chaplain’s denomination.

This shouldn’t be hard to figure out. State-sponsored and coercive forms of religions are not permitted. Private religious expression is. Airman Howells’ underwear clearly falls under the latter. The less time spent the higher-ups spend thinking about it the better.

To solve the problems of religious intolorance just become an atheist like me. 🙂

  • I’ve always considered underwear, religious or not, to be one of those don’t ask, don’t tell issues.

    With all of this examination of underwear and jousting over who gets to convert who, when are these folks finding time to learn how to fly planes?

  • Please note, the person that “ordered” A1C Howells to remove his undergarments or leave the team was not an AF Officer. This person was a civilian. Civilians are not empowered to give orders. Therefore, any “order” given by a civilian is not what the military calls a lawful order. Sure, A1C Howells has a complaint, but it is not against an Officer in the USAF!

  • The President, Secretary of Defense and other such officials are empowered to give orders. It is by his appointment that Mr. Edwards is authorized to do so. Believe me, I am not in any way defending A1C Howells, I know there could have been a better resolution to this without having to bring up a congressional investigation. I believe in religous freedom- freedom to worship, you don’t need a building to worship. Sacrifice is a major part of my belief, Tops In Blue is a ONE YEAR tour of duty, Airman Howells was almost halfway through, and for him to get so many in an uproar over his underwear because he wouldn’t be able to wear it for the remainder of the tour is madness.

  • well…madness huh? That just means that you do not understand what it means to people that are LDS, to wear garnments. That is what they are called, not underwear. To us, they are sacred. Not just desposable. They offer a certian amount of protection when faithfully worn. Granted it is our belief and not everyones, but not wearing them for 6 months would very literally be breaking a covenant with God. It is a really big issue for those who have made that promise to wear them at all times.

    It is a freedom of worship issue, he should not have been ordered to take them off. Even in the military uniform code hanbook it specifically states that garments can be worn under military uniforms, it is just like another servicemen wearing a undershirt. Would that same officer tell another servicemen not to wear that undershirt? Or is this an issue of not liking that it is a religous practise. It hurts no one.

  • Comments are closed.