Too nutty for McCain, just right for Lieberman

Max Blumenthal had a much-discussed report yesterday in which he noted that Joe Lieberman “is scheduled to headline Pastor John Hagee’s 2008 Christians United For Israel Washington-Israel Summit this July 22. In accepting Hagee’s invitation, Lieberman became the most senior elected representative confirmed to appear at the annual gala.”

I was actually curious to see how Lieberman would respond to this. After all, Lieberman probably accepted Hagee’s invitation to headline the event before the political controversy over Hagee’s radical worldview, and before John McCain decided Hagee is a little too nutty to be associated with.

With McCain backing away, Lieberman had an easy to excuse to get out of his speaking engagement. Would he, for a change, do the right thing? Apparently not.

Sen. Joe Lieberman says he’ll speak at a July conference hosted by Rev. John Hagee, whose endorsement was recently rejected by Republican John McCain because of Hagee’s controversial remarks about religion.

Lieberman, one of presumed GOP presidential nominee McCain’s strongest supporters, said Wednesday while Hagee’s comments were unacceptable and hurtful, he will judge him on his life work fighting anti-Semitism and building bridges between Christians and Jews.

Lieberman, I-Conn., will speak at Hagee’s “Christians United for Israel” summit in Washington.

McCain last week repudiated the months-old endorsement by the preacher after an audio recording surfaced in which Hagee said God sent Adolf Hitler to help Jews reach the promised land.

Yep, the radical right-wing evangelical preacher is a little too hot to handle for the Republican presidential nominee, but for Joe Lieberman, he’s just fine.

I argued yesterday that Lieberman either a) has no idea what Hagee believes, but stands by him anyway; or b) knows what Hagee believes, but doesn’t care. Given the response today, it’s the latter.

Keep in mind, Lieberman thinks liberal bloggers are foul-mouthed, and political leaders shouldn’t be associated with groups like MoveOn.org, but John Hagee is respectable because of his life work fighting anti-Semitism and building bridges between Christians and Jews.

I see. So, Lieberman is fine with the fact that Hagee’s support for Israel is “rooted in the belief that the Jewish state will — soon — be the site of Armageddon,” and his “brand of Christian Zionism closely links support for Israel to the end of the world and the conversion of the Jews to Christianity.”

Hagee’s predictions are very clear. Armageddon, the final battle, could begin, he wrote in his 2007 book “Jerusalem Countdown,” “before this book gets published.”

The Antichrist “will be the head of the European Union,” he writes.

Using geographical calculations based on the Book of Revelation, he writes that Israel will be covered in “a sea of human blood” in the final battle.

The Jews, however, will survive the battle, Hagee says, long enough to have “the opportunity to receive Messiah, who is a rabbi known to the world as Jesus of Nazareth.”

And Lieberman is fine with the fact that Hagee believes Jews have been persecuted over the centuries, but it’s their own fault.

“It was the disobedience and rebellion of the Jews, God’s chosen people, to their covenantal responsibility to serve only the one true God, Jehovah, that gave rise to the opposition and persecution that they experienced beginning in Canaan and continuing to this very day.”

And Lieberman is fine with the fact that Hagee’s “support” for Israel is rooted in the notion that Hagee welcomes Israel’s destruction.

[Hagee] argues that a strike against Iran will cause Arab nations to unite under Russia’s leadership, as outlined in chapters 38 and 39 of the Book of Ezekiel, leading to an “inferno [that] will explode across the Middle East, plunging the world toward Armageddon.” During his appearance on Hinn’s program at the end of last March, for example, the host enthused, “We are living in the last days. These are the most exciting days in church history,” but then went on to add, “We are facing now [the] most dangerous moment for America.” At one point, Hinn clapped his hands in delight and shouted, “Yes! Glory!” and then urged his viewers to donate money faster because he is running out of time to preach the gospel.

So, it’s not that Hagee loves Israel, so much as he foresees a blood-soaked war in the Middle East that leads to Jesus’ return, at which point the Jews who survive will become Christians.

The mind reels.

at this point, lieberman no longer knows what he thinks: he knows that if the “liberals” are agin’ it, he’s for it.

i’ve noted in the past that various senators have their specialties: biden is long-winded, mcconnell is sleazy, stevens is crazy.

joe lieberman’s specialty is to be the senator you most want to punch in the nose.

  • What century is this again? How could an atheist/agnostic not be contemptuous of such clowns? Hagee and his ilk are to dogmatic, scripture-based religion as the neocons are to conservatism: the inevitable result.

  • And later in the month Joe Lieberman is making an appearance with Carrie’s mother.

  • howard at #1 is right; Lieberman’s not pro-anything so much as he is reflexively anti-90 percent of the Democratic Party. But being powered by that much resentment and bitterness left over from the events of 2006 could be characterized as moving to give Stevens a run for his particular title.

  • Senator Droopy doesn’t care about Hagee’s motives for supporting Israel, as long as Hagee claims to do so. So what if he wants Israel there so it can be destroyed? So what if he thinks Hitler was God’s agent? So what if he thinks the Jews deserve destruction? He’s pro-Israel!

    No, Senator Droopy is an utter moron. Aligning yourself with a nut like Hagee is akin to not caring that the guy driving you home is shitfaced drunk and suicidal. You’re just glad to have a ride!

  • Lieberman’s behavior since 2006 is so bizarre that it defies explanation. I truly wonder if it isn’t some kind of health issue.

  • Maybe Joe Lie will move to Texas—then his constituents can fire him for not being a resident of the state he’s supposed to be representing….

  • At this point, all sarcasm and snark aside, I really don’t think Joe Lieberman is mentally unfit. I think he’s literally snapped. Not to the point where he’s going to be an immediate threat to himself or others. As sick as this sounds, I’d prefer that scenario. No, he’s just the sort of sociopath that will suggest leading the nation down awful dmanable paths, and because he’s not visibly foaming at the mouth, people will take him at least a little seriously. After all, the man is a Senator, so he can’t be having a breakdown, can he?

    Yes, he can and he is. He’s a Kurt Vonnegut character come to horrific life. A man without a country, too war-hungry to be a Democrat, too Jewish to be a Republican, can’t really 100% please anyone, so he spins like a top until he collapses under the weight of his own moral confusion. I said the same thing about Rudy 9/11 Giuliani when he was still in the Presidential race, and while I could be wrong, ti seems like his profile has gotten significantly lower in recent months. I’ve no idea if he’s seeking or receiving mental help, all I know is, for the time being, he’s out of the national spotlight, and thus is doing less harm to the nation.

    It’s time for Lieberman to step aside…you know…so he can spend more time with his family.

  • This always raises the question in my mind.

    Why is it considered anti-Semetic to ask the people of Isreal to share Palestine with the Palestinians fairly?

    But it is considered pro-Zionist to think Isreal should exist on all the Holy Lands so that the Jewish people can be destroyed completely?

  • Comments are closed.