Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.) sure is a fount of wisdom, isn’t he? Emailer K.K. mentioned yesterday that during the debate on torture, Lott told his colleagues, “Who hasn’t been attacked by a dog when they deliver laundry?”
Better yet, Lott spoke to reporters yesterday after the president stopped by the Senate, and explained a bit about their chat.
President Bush barely mentioned the war in Iraq when he met with Republican senators behind closed doors in the Capitol Thursday morning and was not asked about the course of the war, Sen. Trent Lott, R-Mississippi, said.
“No, none of that,” Lott told reporters after the session when asked if the Iraq war was discussed. “You’re the only ones who obsess on that. We don’t and the real people out in the real world don’t for the most part.”
It’s a little hard to believe Lott could say something this foolish. Lawmakers don’t “obsess” on a bloody, costly war, which is making us less safe, and which costs $2 billion a week? Shouldn’t they start obsessing a little more?
Indeed, the dismissive attitude reflects an almost Bush-like detachment from reality. “Real” people, Lott says, don’t bother worrying about the most serious foreign policy and national security crisis in a generation. As if concern for American troops and the future of the Middle East is somehow passe and unworthy of Lott’s time.
And then Lott managed to make matters slightly worse.
Lott went on to say he has difficulty understanding the motivations behind the violence in Iraq.
“It’s hard for Americans, all of us, including me, to understand what’s wrong with these people,” he said. “Why do they kill people of other religions because of religion? Why do they hate the Israeli’s and despise their right to exist? Why do they hate each other? Why do Sunnis kill Shiites? How do they tell the difference? They all look the same to me.”
First, for someone with a troubled racial background to say “they all look the same to me” shows remarkably bad judgment. Second, Lott is an experienced senator asking rather basic questions about the Middle East. Shouldn’t he have a better sense of history and international affairs? By his own admission, he seems completely bewildered by the factors that are driving hostilities in the region. After a quarter-century in Congress, why is that?
Remember, we’re supposed to trust Republicans on defense and national security because of their vast knowledge and expertise. Please.