Troops die after sneak attack, not during it

We learned this week of a horrific attack in Karbala, in which gunmen, impersonating U.S. troops, stormed a provincial governor’s office during a meeting between American and local officials, raising the nightmarish specter of American soldiers being vulnerable to attack from killers who appear to be colleagues. In this attack, the Pentagon said, five U.S. troops were killed.

As it turns out, that wasn’t true.

Contrary to public statements by the U.S. military, four U.S. soldiers did not die repelling a sneak attack at the governor’s office in the Shiite holy city of Karbala last week. New information obtained by The Associated Press shows they were abducted and found dead or dying as far as 25 miles away.

The brazen assault, 50 miles south of Baghdad on Jan. 20, was conducted by nine to 12 militants posing as an American security team. They traveled in black GMC Suburban vehicles — the type used by U.S. government convoys — had American weapons, wore new U.S. military combat fatigues, and spoke English.

In a written statement, the U.S. command reported at the time that five soldiers were killed while “repelling the attack.” Now, two senior U.S. military officials as well as Iraqi officials say four of the five were captured and taken from the governor’s compound alive. Three of them were found dead and one mortally wounded later that evening in locations as far as 25 miles east of the governor’s office.

As if this tragic attack weren’t sickening enough, this news adds insult to injury.

Indeed, it seems the past few days have been particularly discouraging.

There was also this story about the latest effort to retake Haifa Street in Baghdad.

As the sun rose, many of the Iraqi Army units who were supposed to do the actual searches of the buildings did not arrive on time, forcing the Americans to start the job on their own. When the Iraqi units finally did show up, it was with the air of a class outing, cheering and laughing as the Americans blew locks off doors with shotguns.

….Many of the Iraqi units that showed up late never seemed to take the task seriously, searching haphazardly, breaking dishes and rifling through personal CD collections in the apartments. Eventually the Americans realized that the Iraqis were searching no more than half of the apartments; at one point the Iraqis completely disappeared, leaving the American unit working with them flabbergasted.

“Where did they go?” yelled Sgt. Jeri A. Gillett. Another soldier suggested, “I say we just let them go and we do this ourselves.”

I understand the “they stand up, we stand down” approach, but news like this suggests we’re not likely to see any substantive results in this area for a very long time.

As for Iraqi politics, this story paints an equally discouraging picture.

Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki’s presentation of a new Baghdad security plan to the Iraqi Parliament on Thursday broke down in bitter sectarian recriminations, with Mr. Maliki threatening a Sunni Arab lawmaker with arrest and, in response, the Sunni speaker of Parliament threatening to quit.

Eventually, the tensions eased and lawmakers approved the security plan, which gives Mr. Maliki, a Shiite, more authority. But the episode provided the Iraqi public with a live televised view of the extent of raw anger dividing Shiite and Sunni politicians.

Outside of Parliament, bloody sectarian battles continued on the streets of Baghdad. Three hours after the confrontation between lawmakers, a huge car bomb killed at least 25 people in the Karrada district, less than a mile from Parliament in an area favored by leading Shiite politicians. Residents there reported a horrific scene, with two busloads of people trapped in their vehicles and burned alive.

Mr. Maliki made his threat to arrest the Sunni lawmaker shortly after promising once again that a crackdown on illegal activity and would be carried out with equal vigor in Shiite as well as Sunni communities.

The prime minister’s claim was challenged by Abdul Nasir al-Janabi, who represents a powerful Sunni Arab bloc. “We can not trust the office of the prime minister,” he said over jeers from the Shiite politicians before his microphone was cut off.

Mr. Maliki could barely contain his rage, waving his finger in the air and essentially accusing Mr. Nasir of being a criminal. “I will show you,” Mr. Maliki said. “I will turn over the documents on you” showing all your crimes, “then you can talk about trust,” Mr. Maliki said. Shiite politicians in the room erupted in applause. […]

As the prime minister continued, Shiites encouraged him on and Sunni Arabs tried to shout him down. Mr. Mashhadani yelled for everyone to “shut up.”

Freedom is on the march.

According to ABC yesterday, a military spokesman had denied in so many words that any AMericans had been kidnapped in the attack:

The U.S. military, which has said that five U.S. soldiers were killed and three were wounded while repelling the attack, denied that two U.S. troops were kidnapped.

Lt. Col. Christopher Garver, a military spokesman, said all American forces “were accounted for after the action.”

  • Being the military strategist that I am (I’ve watched Band of Brothers countless times), maybe the strategy should be that the Iraqis go in to do the job and the American troops stand back in reserve in case the Iraqis get into a fight.

    How in the world are they not ready? Isn’t basic training in the US Army like 6 weeks? I could see more training being required for your sargents and noncoms and lieutenants, etc., but after 4 years, hasn’t anyone risen up through the ranks?

  • I think all the top officials we give the task of executing presidential orders should be required to take a good Anthropology course dealing with what is known about tribal societies. Virtually every mistake we’ve made in Iraq has come from ignorance of how such societies work.

  • Sounds like Standard Operating Procedure for an administration that lives by the Friday afternoon news release. Shouldn’t there be a running list of these tragedies similar to this one?

  • Like I just said on Kos, it takes more skill and sophistication to engage, kidnap and transport live military hostages than it does to simply kill them in battle. We just didn’t want to give them any credibility by admitting that.

    In other news: The Enron signal is in the sky and The Decider Flies Again.

  • This is what I fear…that IraTq forces in the field won’t take any of their duties seriously, that they lack discipline since fear has been their only motivation for discipline in the past. They act like this is a joke working with American troops in the streets. If they are from Baghdad they shouldn’t be stationed in Baghdad. Sadam shot dissenters and and those who lacked discipline. How will anyone get these guys in line…to work seriously with American troops. They are gonna get us killed. They have already. Where is the surge…let’s use it to get us out of there. These people hate each other and now we’ve already empowered one side. Should we just get it in the open…attack Al-Sadr and replace Maliki then stake the oil and build up the green zone so we can leave…Oh God, is this what we are doing…..?

  • And this is how Bush’s plan is supposed to work, American forces holding areas that are supposed to be “cleared” of any threats. Who are then exposed to attacks like this.
    Usually the best laid-out operation will last at least the first 30 seconds of combat intact. What does it say when the operation fails before it even starts?

    Homer,
    That’s what I was wondering. After four years and nearly $400B of taxpayer money, you’d think they would have at least a sizable force to handle the fighting on their own. But a lot of it has to do with the Iraqis’ leaders, the officers and NCOs. If they’re not in the fight, then why the soldiers stick out their necks?
    In my opinion, they’re more worried about loyalty to the Maliki government among the Iraqi military leadership than they are about competency.

  • Another great Bush plan, going just as all his other plans went, straight to hell in a handbasket.

    So this is the “Clearing” phase. I’m sure the “Holding” and “Rebuilding” phases will be even more special.

  • Well, we’re officially back to the 5 O’Clock Follies, which was what the official press briefings in Saigon were called, for their fidelity to the truth.

    Jurassic Pork is exactly right that it takes a very sophisticated operation to go in looking (and apparently sounding) like Americans, take armed American soldiers and kidnap them, and then take them out of the compound and out of the city.

    Couple this with the two helicopters shot down recently (with the contractors who survived in the Blackwater helicopter being massacred – something I personally think mercenaries probably deserve), and things are “going to hell in a handbasket” all over.

    And if the Iraqi “government” isn’t a bad joke, I’d like to know what is.

    “Waist-deep in the big muddy
    The big fool said to push on…”

  • From Juan Cole:

    Guerillas fired rockets into the Green Zone in central Baghdad, site of the US embassy and Iraqi government offices. The attack seriously wounded one person and lightly injured 5 others. The Green Zone has often taken mortar fire, but seldom has suffered casualties. That nearly 4 years into the war, the US HQ in Iraq is subjected to rocket fire just underlines how helpless Gulliver is before the supposed Lilliputians.

    Guerrillas set off other bombs in Baghdad, some of which killed as many as 4 persons. There were also bombings in Tal Afar and Fallujah, and violence in several other cities.

    In Baghdad:

    Police found 40 bodies on Thursday, most of them showing signs of torture.

    …the Sadr Movement of Muqtada al-Sadr gave its unstinting support to al-Maliki’s security plan. It was speculated that this step is an attempt to avoid a confrontatation with US forces. The London daily also confirms that the Sadrists have appointed a negotiator to talk directly to the Americans on behalf of the commanders of the Mahdi Army militia. It says that some Mahdi Army commanders have scattered to Kut, Babil and Taji or even to neighboring countries, and that al-Maliki has avoided having to choose between his American partners and his Sadrist allies by convincing the Mahdi Army to fade away for the moment. It says US ambassador in Baghdad Zalmay Khalilzad expressed concern that gunmen in Iraq may go into hiding during the US “surge,” and then reappear when it is over.

    And the good news just keeps on coming.

  • There’s only one way to train the Iraqi forces. Get out of there and let them have their civil war. They’ll take that seriously or maybe they’ll find a relatively peaceful solution. Let them own it.

  • “…at one point the Iraqis completely disappeared, leaving the American unit working with them flabbergasted.”

    Would anyone be surprised if someone whispered to the Iraqis that something nasty was going to happen to them if they didn’t split, or that they just decided the joke was wearing thin and took off to have some fun elsewhere?

    No, me neither.

  • War is war. kill them all, let the All mighty sort them out. the only way I want to hear an american was hurt is because he triped over the brass on the ground. Nuff said. I am tired of a police action.. If we are at war , lets make war EC Sedgwick

  • Hmm. Maybe that would explain why the Army insisted that no questions regarding the nature of the tactics or injuries to the troops would be answered, during a briefing Thursday with the CO of the airborne brigade that lost four troops in the attack. Ostensibly, it was so the families would have that information first.

    FWIW, when given the opportunity to say that Congressional opposition to the Great Leader was damaging the morale of his troops, Col. Michael Garrett stuck to the professional line and simply said they remain committed to their mission.

  • It appears that who lacks stomach these days are the media and the military to tell the truth to the American public about what is going in Iraq, and that counts especially for Cheney (“Great success” my ass.)

    Maliki looks more and more like a Saddam in Shiite’s clothing. The Iraqi parliament sounds like a large scale version of Hannity or O’Reilly with messed-up accusations, shouting down opponents and cutting off mikes. They’ve learned well from the worst side of American culture. If this doesn’t prove that a massive US-led forced diplomacy between all sides of the Iraqi civil war is the way out of this, I don’t know what could.

    Maliki wants more weapons from the US. Like hell that will allow the nation to move anywhere closer to peace. These guys need an intervention not more invasion.

  • I wish more people were paying attention to Kurt Vonnegut when he appeared on TDS awhile back and most articulately, in his Vonnegut sort of way, laid out the stages needed to achieve representative democracy. I’m sure it’s archived over @ comedy central, and worth a visit as sad as it is. I have always seen Mr. Vonnegut an insightful soul. -Kevo

  • I think the administration is afraid of a hostage situation, because of the media attention it would attract. Therefore no MIAs, period. But I remember there were correct reports at the time.

    It reminds me of the time a few months ago where the US effectively ceded an area to the Mahdi army. Can’t remember the details, but there might have been a hostage involved.

  • Comments are closed.