True words were never spoken

The president spoke with new CBS News anchor Katie [tag]Couric[/tag] yesterday and acknowledged a point a lot of us have been talking about for years.

“One of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror.”

So true, so true.

And speaking of the Couric Q&A, it’s generally difficult for the president to conduct a lengthy [tag]interview[/tag] with a major TV network and not produce some noteworthy remarks, but this CBS interview was soundbite-city. Couric would ask a predictable question, [tag]Bush[/tag] responded with the same phrases we’ve heard countless times before. Dan Froomkin described the interview as “newsless.”

I’d go a step further and label it a missed opportunity. Salon’s Tim Grieve noted that Couric just seemed thrilled to get the interview.

[S]he started her interview by thanking the president for doing it — “We really, really appreciate it,” she gushed — and things went downhill from there.

Instead of pursuing lines of questions, Couric simply mentioned broad subject areas or random criticisms and then sat back while Bush offered a “response.” “You have said we can’t cut and run on more than one occasion. We have to stay until we win. Otherwise, we’ll be fighting the terrorists here at home on our own streets. So what do you mean exactly by that, Mr. President?” “Is this a civil war, Mr. President?” “What is the significance, Mr. President, of — of your announcement regarding — the masterminds [behind] 9/11? Can you explain that?”

At one point, Couric asked Bush why, if the war against terrorism is so important, he won’t “mobilize the country” by calling for sacrifices, raise taxes to finance the war, reduce U.S. dependency on foreign oil or send more troops to Iraq. It was a good question, but Couric didn’t follow up when Bush gave a rambling nonanswer. Indeed, it was Bush who said, “The question is: Why aren’t we winning?” Couric didn’t push for an answer to that one, either.

Couric went on to tell the president that “people admire so much your ability to adhere to your principles” and mentioned, “I know you care so much about the soldiers in Iraq.”

To borrow a line from Prof. DeLong, “Why oh why can’t we have a better press corps?”

“Why oh why can’t we have a better press corps?” – Prof DeLong

Because they would only get to ask the question once?

  • I suspect the Bush interview was a good preview of Couric’s tenure as anchor at CBS News. Her program will be upbeat, non-confrontational, and news-free. Paddy Chayefsky would be pleased.

  • I’ll always remember the way Bush got so infuriated when asked serious, probing questions by the Irish reporter. He simply couldn’t handle the heat.

  • The press will only ask Bush tough questions when they perceive he can’t hurt them if they piss him off. Obviously, we’re not at that point yet. Also, a few of them genuinely like and respect him. Which proves nothing except that all their taste is in their mouths, and that they would worship a glazed donut with equal fervor. Katie Couric appears to fall into the latter category.

  • I would think it would be a bigger coup for Couric to get Bush jumping up and down on the couch in anger on her show than a make-nice fluff piece.

    I remember when news headlines screamed. Now they whimper.

    From Froomkin: Legal blogger Marty Lederman offers much wonk fuel, writing for instance that “the draft Administration bill would (i) retroactively legalize all the unlawful acts that were approved and performed from 2001 to the present day (see section 9, page 86);

    They are already planning their war crimes defense strategy. They are so freaking worried.

  • Couric went on to tell the president that “people admire so much your ability to adhere to your principles” and mentioned, “I know you care so much about the soldiers in Iraq.”

    i imagine they edited out the segment when she fluffed him, before the interview began. and the segment after, when she actually blew him.

    ps, what did y’all expect? Katie Fuckin’ Couric, Intrepid Ace Journalist? c’mon!

  • Katie Couric (in “Fahrenheit 9/11”): “Navy Seals ROCK1

    People are surprised that the Bimbette of the Today would remain as intelligence-free as she has been there for all those years? You thought she would suddenly get a brain transplant?

    Please, go rent “Network.” She’s exactly what the corporations who own the media want.

  • Disgusting. Just disgusting. Makes you want to puke. But we have to remember that all the fat cats are doing just fine under Bush, better than they ever could have expected. And the fatter they are, the better they’ve done. Why would they bite the hand that feeds them? It’s a very simple explanation for why the establishment simply will not challenge this administration. They’d be crazy if they did. They’re loving it, every single minute of it, rolling around in the riches that this administration has bestowed upon them.

  • I think she should have just blown him on national TV. Then someone might pay attention…

    Seriously, I can’t think of anything that exemplifies the death of TV journalism than a gushing anchor licking the scrotum of a man 60% of American now realize is an incompetent liar.

    -jjf

  • Hark,

    But we have to remember that all the fat cats are doing just fine under Bush, better than they ever could have expected. And the fatter they are, the better they’ve done. Why would they bite the hand that feeds them? It’s a very simple explanation for why the establishment simply will not challenge this administration.

    But if this were true, then the establishment fat cats that had their marginal tax rates raised (2-3%) under President Clinton, would have been really upset with him and would have challenged him at every turn and we all know that they treated him just like W…oh. right. uh…just ignore this…

  • Fitz & Rimone – the metaphorical way is the only way Katie could get a rise out of W. I’m sure that he prefers Karl or Jeff G.

  • “I think she should have just blown him on national TV. Then someone might pay attention…”

    Yeah, but then we could have impeached him.

  • Dale: I guess Katie did a fluffer piece, eh rimone?

    yup but what i meant to end w/was ‘and the segment after, when they actually fucked.’

    BTW, your 1st link is hilarious; can’t access the 2nd.

    BuzzMon: Fitz & Rimone – the metaphorical way is the only way Katie could get a rise out of W. I’m sure that he prefers Karl or Jeff G.

    oh yes, IMO most definitely,

  • “Couric went on to tell the president that “people admire so much your ability to adhere to your principles”

    Jesus. I fucking hate that shit. Oh, he’s got such great principles! That’s why he’s staying the course, because he believes in his values! Fuck that stupid thinking. Principles and values have nothing to do with a shitty strategy and a useless “foreign policy”. Changing a strategy actually is sometimes required to stick to your principles, dumbass. It is really too bad for America that his goddamn principles include fighting a ridiculous, counter-productive war under false pretenses. I really admire that, Katie. Really. What a fantastic son of a bitch he is. Fuck him. Fuck Katie Couric.

  • Oh I’m sure the administration laid down some rules in order for CBS to secure the interview. I’m sure one of the rules was: “Please fawn and gush over the president.” Why do even call network news “news” anymore? Let’s just call it “bad entertainment.”

  • i totally agree with CJ’s comment no. 19.

    DKS: ‘Why do even call network news “news” anymore? Let’s just call it “bad entertainment.”

    that’s infotainment, bro’ and obviously what we the people want. i mean, think of the ratings.

    fuckers.

  • With so much fluffing, flucking and blowing Kawl (whose father was gay, btw) probably refers to it as the Owal Office.

    “Why oh why can’t we have a better press corps?”
    — because no one has taught them to ask one question at a time.

  • BuzzMon: Fitz & Rimone – the metaphorical way is the only way Katie could get a rise out of W. I’m sure that he prefers Karl or Jeff G.

    As a good Liberal I must point out that his preference isn’t a problem. It’s the HYPOCRISY.

    Long piece:
    Dick Cheney Plays Poker
    Steve Raker
     
    Transcript of The Editors’ regular Saturday-night poker game
    with Dick Cheney, 6/19/04.
     
    ********************

             The Editors: We’ll take three cards.

             Dick Cheney: Give me one.

    Sounds of cards being placed down, dealt, retrieved, and rearranged in hand. Non-committal noises, puffing of cigars.

             TE: Fifty bucks.

             DC: I’m in. Show ’em.

             TE: Two pair, sevens and fives.

             DC: Not good enough.

             TE: What do you have?

             DC: Better than that, that’s for sure. Pay up

             TE: Can you show us your cards?

             DC: Sure. One of them’s a six.

             TE: You need to show all your cards. That’s the way the game is played.

             Colin Powell: Ladies and gentlemen. We have accumulated
    overwhelming evidence that Mr. Cheney’s poker hand is far, far better than two pair. Note this satellite photo, taken three minutes ago when The Editors went to get more chips. In it we clearly see the back sides of five playing cards, arranged in a poker hand. Defector reports have assured us that Mr. Cheney’s hand was already well advanced at this stage. Later, Mr. Cheney drew only one card. Why only one card? Would a man without a strong hand choose only one card? We are absolutely convinced that Mr. Cheney has at least a full house.

             Tim Russert: Wow. Colin Powell really hit a homerun for the
    Administration right there. A very powerful performance. My dad played a lot of poker in World War 2, and he taught me many things about life. Read my book.

             TE: He’s extremely good at Power Point. But we would like to see the cards, or else we can’t really be sure he has anything to beat two pair. We don’t think he would lie to us, but … well, it is a very rich pot.

             Jonah Goldberg: Liberal critics of Mr. Cheney’s poker hand
    contend that “he doesn’t have anything”. Oh, really, liberal critics?
    Cheney has already showed them the six of clubs, and yet these liberals persist in saying he has “nothing”. Why do liberals consider the six of clubs to be “nothing”? Is it because the six of clubs is black?

             Matt Drudge: ****DRUDGE REPORT EXCLUSIVE****MUST CREDIT THE DRUDGE REPORT**** The Drudge Report has learned that Dick Cheney has a royal flush, hearts. Developing …

             TE: Perhaps if you could just show us a subset of your cards
    which beat 2 pair? Or tell us exactly what your hand is?

             DC: We will show you our cards after we have collected the pot. It is important that things be done in this order, otherwise the
    foundation of our entire poker game will be destroyed.

             TE: We aren’t sure …

             DC: Very good. And here are my cards. A straight flush.

             Judith Miller: Dick Cheney has revealed a straight flush,
    confirming his pre-collection claims about beating two pair

             TE: Those cards are of different suits. It’s not a flush.

             Mark Steyn: When will it end? Now liberal critics complain that Dick Cheney’s cards are not all the same suit. Naturally, these are the same liberals who are always whining about a lack of diversity in higher education. It seems like segregation is OK with these liberals, as long as it damages Republicans.

             MD: ****DRUDGE REPORT EXCLUSIVE****MUST CREDIT THE DRUDGE
    REPORT***          A witness has come forward claiming that The Editors engage in racial profiling in blog-linking. Developing …

             TE: Wait! It’s not even a straight! You’ve got a eight and ten
    of hearts, a six of clubs, and the seven and five of diamonds. You have a ten high. That’s nothing.

             Sean Hannity: Well, well, well. In another sign of liberal
    desperation, liberals now complain that a ten high is “nothing”. Does ten equal zero in liberal mathematics? That would explain a lot.

             Robert Novak: It’s a perfectly valid poker hand. Apparently,
    liberals have never heard of a “skip straight”. It’s a kind of straight,
    just with one card missing. But if you skip around the missing nine,
    it’s a straight.

             Alan Colmes: Mother says I mustn’t play poker.

             TE: There is no such thing as a “skip straight”.

             Brit Hume: It seems like some people are still playing poker
    like it’s September 10th. Back then, you needed to have all your cards in order to claim a straight. But, as we learned on that day, sometimes you won’t have perfect knowledge. Sometimes you have to learn to connect the dots, and see the patterns which are not visible to superficial analysis of the type favored by the CIA and the State Department. Dick Cheney’s skip straight is a winning poker hand for the post-9/11 world.

             Rush Limbaugh: Do The Editors have two pairs, or a pair of twos? First they say one thing, then another. What are they hiding?

             Andrew Sullivan: Dick Cheney never said he had a straight. He was very careful about this. His cards can form many different hands. None of these hands alone can beat a pair of twos; but, taken together, the combination of all possible hands presents a more compelling case for taking the pot than simply screaming “Pair of twos! Pair of twos!” as unprincipled liberal critics of the Vice President so often do.

             MD: ****DRUDGE REPORT EXCLUSIVE****MUST CREDIT THE DRUDGE REPORT****          Did The Editors claim to have “a pair of Jews”? Are they anti-Semites as well as racists?

             Developing … Zell Miller: As a lifelong liberal Democrat, I
    believe Dick Cheney, and I hate liberals and Democrats.

             William Safire: Why are liberals so obsessed by Dick Cheney’s poker hand? The pot has been taken, the deal is done. If liberals are upset that we are no longer playing by the Marquis of Queensbury patty-cake poker rules, they clearly lack the stomach to play poker in the post-September 11th environment. And why do they never complain about Saddam Hussein’s poker playing, which was a thousand times worse?

             Christopher Hitchens: The Left won’t be happy until the pot is divided up equally between Yassar Arafat, Osama bin Laden, and Hitler. Orwell would have seen this.

             Ann Coulter: Why do liberals object so strenuously to the idea of conservatives having a “straight”? Perhaps because it doesn’t fit in with the radical homosexual/Islamist agenda they hold so dear?

             Report of the Bipartisan Commission on Poker Hands: There is no such thing as a “skip straight”.

             DC: I have access to poker rules that the Commission doesn’t, and so I know for a fact that the cards in my hand are all intimately connected.

             George W. Bush: Dick Cheney is telling the truth. I’m a nice man who would drink a beer with you.

             Vladimir Putin: I dealt Dick Cheney three aces and two kings.

             DC: My deal.

  • It was amusing, watching my DH and his sort-of cousin (female) discussing politics and TV on Friday (I was “out of it” as much as I am when they discuss family). Both vote Democratic though, otherwise, they disagree on almost every point. But both of them swore not to watch Katie… They started to turn to me for referee statement and the both came down to earth: “oh, yeah, right. Would take too long to try and explain who Katie *was*…”

  • Dale, thanks for copying the link for me. yep, i can see it now. simultaneously funny and disgustingly true.

    As a good Liberal I must point out that his preference isn’t a problem. It’s the HYPOCRISY.

    definitely. however the thought of KC actually saying that shit, virtually blowing him on TV, removed most rational thought from my head.

    damn, i’m glad i don’t get US news here.

  • The Couric phenomenon fits the press model that got Bush elected. If the press would have been up to snuff, GW would still be in west Texas swindling some oil investors with dry holes and merely frustrating his wife instead of most Americans.

  • Comments are closed.