Tuesday’s campaign round-up

Today’s installment of campaign-related news items that wouldn’t generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers:

* Expecting to come up short, Hillary Clinton is apparently scaling back her efforts in South Carolina, campaigning outside the state over the next few days, and returning later this week. Instead, Bill Clinton will be campaigning on her behalf in South Carolina throughout the week.

* Speaking of the former president, Bill Clinton faced an awkward moment yesterday: “With former President Bill Clinton standing not 20 feet in front of her, Atlanta mayor Shirley Franklin took what appeared to be a political shot at the former president’s comments about Barack Obama’s candidacy. Speaking at the 40th annual MLK commemorative service at Ebenezer Baptist Church, Franklin said the country is on the ‘cusp of turning impossible into reality. Yes this is reality, not fantasy or fairy tales.’ … [A]fter Franklin’s remarks, the crowd of more than 2000 rose to its feet — except for Bill Clinton, who sat in his front pew seat and clapped politely.”

* Rudy Giuliani’s campaign troubles got a little worse yesterday, when an WNBC/Marist poll showed the former mayor losing badly in his own home state. John McCain now leads in New York with 33% of likely GOP primary voters, followed by Mitt Romney with 19%. Giuliani was third with 18%, just three points ahead of Mike Huckabee.

* In Florida, the Romney campaign has unveiled a Spanish-language TV ad, featuring a testimonial from Romney’s son, Craig, who learned Spanish during his missionary work in South America. It’s interesting, of course, that Romney would approve a Spanish-language ad, given his support for English-only measures. “English needs to be the language that is spoken in America. We cannot be a bilingual nation like Canada,” Romney said last year.

* The Obama campaign launched a national ad this week on cable TV, drawing complaints from the Clinton campaign that viewers in Florida might see it, and the candidates aren’t supposed to be campaigning in Florida at all. The Clinton team called the ad “a clear and blatant violation” of the candidates’ pledge, and has threatened to start campaigning in Florida as a result. The Obama campaign responded that it tried to buy a national ad that aired in 49 out of 50 states, but the networks said that was impossible.

* The Obama campaign told supporters in South Carolina that he’s encouraged by the polls, but his backers shouldn’t feel over-confident: You may decide, ‘Well you know what maybe Barack’s got it in the bag, because the polls look good.’ Remember the polls in New Hampshire? We cannot take anything for granted.”

* This morning, Hillary Clinton sounded a bit like she was taunting Obama this morning, following last night’s debate. “I think what we saw last night was that he’s very frustrated – Senator Obama is very frustrated,” Clinton said at a DC press conference.

* CNN is pushing this pretty hard, though I suspect it wasn’t a big deal: “Hillary Clinton and John Edwards met privately backstage following a very contentious Democratic presidential debate in this coastal city, sources with both campaigns confirm to CNN. The meeting took place in the Edwards campaign green room. One of the sources said the meeting happened by chance and the conversation consisted of light chatter. The source added that Clinton did jokingly take a jab at Edwards about his beating up on her during the debate.”

* And Ralph Nader said yesterday that he’s still considering a fourth presidential campaign. “I’ll decide in about a month,” he said in an interview broadcast on CBC Radio’s Daybreak show in Montreal. “What I’m deciding on right now is whether we can get enough volunteers, enough financial resources to overcome the huge ballot access obstacles, which you don’t experience here in Canada, but which are the worst in the Western world in the United States.”

Mitt Romney should get a job with the “DC Madame” when he finally drops out of the race. The man is so into role playing I keep expecting him to slip into a dress and pretend he’s a woman in order to get more female voters.

HRC needs to step back from comments about frustrated Senators. She sounded more than a tad heated a few times last night.

Also, and I know this is very wrong of me but I keep wanting to grab Ralph Vader by the throat and squeeze until his eyes pop out of his head and bounce around the room like super balls. Hasn’t this nation had enough of self-important little dickheads? I think it has.

  • Rudy Giuliani not getting much traction in NY shouldn’t be surprising… New Yorkers don’t really like Giuliani for the most part! They happen to actually KNOW Rudy and what he’s all about…

  • That sounds rather hypocritical of Clinton in Florida. After all, Obama (as well as Edwards and Richardson) had their names removed from the Michigan ballot while Clinton kept her name on the ballot. Both Michigan and Florida are in the same position as states which are being shunned due to moving up their primaries in violation of party rules.

  • Sounds to me like HRC’s campaign is looking for an excuse to break the pledge and campaign in Florida. They are using this Obama ad as such. Did Obama air ads specifically in florida? Or aimed at Floridians? No.

    He placed ads on cable networks that broadcast nationally, and cannot exclude certain states. There are primaries across the country in two weeks, all of the campaigns should be able to place national ads. Sticking to the pledge, means not stumping in Florida, or airing / buying Florida-specific ads, which is what Hillary wants to do.

    This is bogus.

  • Good point, Ron. I actually disagree with the decision by Obama, Edwards and others to remove themselves from the ballot. It was a bad tactical maneuver, especially if they weren’t ALL going to do it, but as a MI resident, it bothered me that ANY of them would choose to punish voters for decisions they had no say in, and effectively disenfranchise them.

    I believe in Florida, all names remain on the ballot.

  • Senator Clinton said, “I think what we saw last night was that he’s very frustrated – Senator Obama is very frustrated…

    She’s absolutely correct. Senator Obama is frustrated. Honest people always get frustrated when others benefit by telling lies.

  • You can help counter Clinton ccampaign lies right here on this site by adding a statement to your bit on the ad buy: Obama’s campaign sought and recieved permission for thhe ad buy from the head of thhe South Carolina Democratic party. The buy is legit annd the Clinton campaign is using the Republican technique of deliberately misconstruing non issues. Swampland has some more about this.

  • …Bill Clinton will be campaigning on her behalf in South Carolina throughout the week.

    He’s earned some spontaneous hectoring and jeering.
    Let’s hope it happens.

  • The implicit part of the cable TV buy vs. a network TV buy is it allows Obama to reach a younger, more affluent, more apolitical audience. It plays to his strengths. The demographic for network ads is entirely different — older, ossified, entrenched.

    Clinton’s media team knows they’ll get skunked on this one in terms of ad buy effectiveness, and they’re furiously trying to polish a turd. Obama is spending his ad dollars wisely, IMO.

    Though Mr. Furious @5 raises an intriguing scenario re: Hillary’s team looking for an excuse to campaign in FL.

  • Gee, why would Obama be frustrated? Because Bill Clinton’s been out there lying his ass off about him?

    I think Hillary is seeing her one shot at the presidency slipping away, and she’s getting desperate. I’ll bet she’d give her right arm for another shot at the AUMF vote.

  • LOOK! CLEAR AND BLATANT VIOLATION! WAH! BE AFRAID!

    Now gosh darn it, why do I have to tolerate the “Willy-and-Hilly Silly Show” sounding more and more like Ghouliani on a daily basis? I’m starting to think that some of those Kucinich “space aliens” kidnapped a couple of Democrats—and left ReThug “pod people” in their place….

  • [A]fter Franklin’s remarks, the crowd of more than 2000 rose to its feet — except for Bill Clinton, who sat in his front pew seat and clapped politely.”

    You can understand why he sat, since her criticism of him is based on an utter misundestanding or misrepresentation of what he said.

    Steve said:
    LOOK! CLEAR AND BLATANT VIOLATION! WAH! BE AFRAID!

    Steve Idiot is at it again… For any new readers who want a dose of what this creepazoid is like, checkout the sick gymnastics he goes through in comments on last night’s end-of-the-day post.

    Here’s apparently here just to mess with us, or something.

  • Wow, we spend so much time weaving elaborate conspiracies by Republicans that we fail to notice the strands created by fellow democrats. Does no one think it at all ominous that Clinton was the only major democratic candidate to keep her name on the ballot in Michigan? If the going gets tough for her, I expect some well-placed lawyers from the state will contest their absence from the convention in the courts. She’s looking for any excuse to do the same in Florida.

  • Ya’ll obviously missed the Clinton Campaign Narrative Memo.

    Hillary was supposed to run against Edwards, a Senator or two and a little known governor or two. She would defeat all of them handily in the first three or four contests and then be crowned Queen of the Democratic Party and go on to be The First Woman President. She was to be neither challenged nor questioned. Any misgivings about her husband’s administration would be swept away by nostalgia for the good’l days.

    C’mon people; co-operate.

  • Why can’t you be a bilingual nation like Canada? I haven’t noticed it’s hurt us much, in the way of development or otherwise, and we’d certainly be a poorer country without Quebec and its rich cultural heritage. Moreover, not everyone in the country is bilingual, or even close – Quebecers by far have a higher fluency in English than vice-versa.

    It costs a little more; the government invests a considerable amount annually in the promotion of official bilingualism – but if you had back the money your government has wasted in Iraq, every American could speak 10 languages. If it was simply a matter of money, of course.

    A lot of Americans fear accepting Spanish because they consider it a watering-down of the country, an acknowledgement that it is subject to otherwise than English influences. Maybe your situation is different, but we’re the better for our acknowledgement of our French roots.

  • Bill Clinton was one of the most effective presidents in U.S. history, but I’m getting concerned that he’s going a wee bit over the top in his campaigning these days, as are others. He’s actually starting to make it hard for Hillary because she’s now having to spend time either defending his comments or trying to distance herself from them even if she might not have had anything substantive to do with them.

    He might want to dial it back just a tad. The campaign should be focused on the candiate, not the spouse, no matter how famous he may be. Word to the wise…..

  • [A]fter Franklin’s remarks, the crowd of more than 2000 rose to its feet — except for Bill Clinton, who sat in his front pew seat and clapped politely.”

    Watching The Boy From Hot Springs shoot himself in the foot repeatedly is now becoming sad. He was lucky enough to be succeeded by a president even worse than he was, so much so that in comparison people were willing fo forget all his lies and betrayals and achievements not achieved, and turn him into a “statesman” with a well of popular support.

    The more petty, vindictive and small-minded he reveals himself to be, the more people are going to remember the sigh of relief we gave 7 years ago yesterday when we finally didn’t have to keep finding an explanation for “the definition of ‘is’,” or “I did not have sex with That Woman.”

    If I could insure a 62-vote Democratic Senate and a 279-vote Democratic House, I would be willing to put up with 4 years of McCain if meant the end of the Clintons and their destructive narcissism.

  • He was lucky enough to be succeeded by a president even worse than he was, so much so that in comparison people were willing fo forget all his lies and betrayals and achievements not achieved, and turn him into a “statesman” with a well of popular support.

    Um, Tom, how does that square with his 60+% approval rating at the end of his term before Bush had taken office?

    Blind hatred is a sad, credibility destroying thing.

  • Attention Walmart Shoppers: Hill and Bill: two Republican Presidential candidates for the price of one. Please go to Aisle 92.

  • Amazing that so many here have psychic powers to know the motivation behind the candidate’s actions. So many “assumptions” based on personal bias. Me too. Must stay focused on the issues as most of this campaign blather distracts from what needs to be accomplished.
    Linking Kucinich to “space aliens” is insulting and demeaning. He is the only true progressive running…right on everything. The other 3 candidates should be measured as either plus or minus Dennis Kucinich on the issues. Remember, his is the only “not for profit” healthcare plan, his is the only peace plan not less war. So many people made up their minds on Kucinich before ever listening to what he has said or plans to do. It’s offensive to belittle this great rep. by suggesting his connection with space aliens.
    Does Obama have any negatives or is he a political saint? This is from Slate website on article on Obama considering what he actually says and actually does: (last paragraph)

    “…The point is not that Obama has never taken a brave position. The issue is that as a candidate he talks about telling hard truths far more than he actually does so. To claim regularly that he’s going to tell audiences what they need to hear and not what they want to hear, and then to skirt delivering on that promise consistently is, to use a favorite Obama word, audacious.”

    I suspect that if Obama had been in the national eye for as long as Hillary we would have as many Obama bashers as Hillary bashers. How will he stand up to 20 yrs worth of hateful criticism and bashing. That’s actually a big part of being “experienced”.

    Here’s hoping Bill Clinton will take the hint and get on the positive side of campaigning and talk about the issues and the republicans and not the other dem candidates. There are many of us out here who have always considered him a great president and like all presidents he’s made mistakes but the country had a huge surplus and was in fairly good shape when he was president. I’ve always liked the guy but really wish he would stay out of campaigning for Hillary as he is an ex-president and needs to keep his legacy separate.

  • As is blind loyalty.

    I’m not at all blind to her faults. But they all have them, something many Obamaists can’t seem to grasp.

    And at least I don’t have to completely make shit up to make my points like Cleaver apparently does.

  • Curmeudgeon (#17) said: Bill Clinton was one of the most effective presidents in U.S. history

    Yeah, right. If screwing American workers, sending American jobs to Mexico and China, establishing trade agreements that drove Mexican farmers off their land and across the border as “illegal immigrants,” selling overnights in the Lincoln Bedroom to the highest Hollywood bidders, selling out environmental agreements, taking up Republican policies and calling them “good.” Yeah, I guess running as a Democrat and governing like a Republican is real effective.

  • And at least I don’t have to completely make shit up to make my points like Cleaver apparently does.

    Care to point out any of my “made up” points?

    I thought not. Have fun voting for Hubert Humphrey.

  • Am I the only one who feels the whole idea of extended primaries are getting to be truly painful? Apparently not – people are beginning to call for an end to the broken primary process

    New America Foundation comes out with a good first step:

    “A national plan would establish a total of four primary days, each held a month apart. The states would be grouped into four clusters, by population. The smallest 12 states, plus federal territories and the District of Columbia, would vote first, followed by the next smallest 13 states, then the 13 medium-size states, and finally the 12 largest states. These primaries would begin in March and end in June.”

    http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bal-op.primaries22jan22,0,5100652.story

  • You should know by now that you can’t bait me, Tom. And anyone on these boards who could find any Republican candidate as an acceptable president under any circumstances deserves whatever scorn they might justifiably receive.

  • Cleaver @ 18 – If I could insure a 62-vote Democratic Senate and a 279-vote Democratic House, I would be willing to put up with 4 years of McCain if meant the end of the Clintons and their destructive narcissism.

    Is 62 enough for impeachment? or do intend to accept the unitary executive?

  • Bush II
    Clinton
    Bush I
    Reagan
    Carter
    Ford
    Nixon
    Johnson

    These are the presidents that I was fully aware of. Pretty sad bunch, eh?

    Liberals that I know say that Bill Clinton was the best Republican president we ever had, and I tend to agree. Except that he had that damning (D) after his name, which apparently drove the real Republicans batshit crazy. Hence we have a “debate” on torture, fo instance.

    You got the MSM tipping the idiot voters out there just enough to Bush II for them to steal the presidency (admit it, until Farenheight 9/11 did you know about the ugly crowds at the Inaugural?).

    Who’s going to name the sucessor to Justice Stevens? A Republican? Not acceptable at all.

  • Considering how frustrated he is, I wonder if someone should ask Obama how he gets up every morning.. you know “How does he do it?”

    I’m happy with my candidates, but this campaign has taken a turn for the nauseating.

  • Buzzmom makes a point about President Clinton having ‘republican leanings’. I don’t agree that he was a ‘republican’ president, but he certainly took quite a few of the so called ‘republican ideas’ repackaged them and got them through congress, thanks to his ‘charisma’ and ‘gift of gab’.

    That’s why the Republicans went apeshit: someone beating them at their very own game. When Clinton indulged in his ‘republican habit’ of having ‘fun’ with other women out of wedlock; the Republicans pounced on it, because it was the ONLY thing they still had going for themselves: Family Values.

    Little did we know about Gingrich’s dalliances with his secretary during the impeachment process, or the still to come Vitter/DC madame, Craig’s bathroom antics, Foley’s page chasing, Haggard’s male prostitute encounters, and many more so called Republicans-running-on-Family-Values upstanding politicians.

    When they went after Hillary and Bill regarding the Whitewater dealings, little did we know how corrupt the Republicans really were, until the Bush Administration came to power. Tom Delay, Ney, Cunningham, Abramoff, Reed, etc…

    Really, if you come to think of it…. Instead of the candidates attacking each other, why don’t they start pointing out all the Republican Values from yesteryears and explain how the current crop of Republican politicians have done everything except for stand for their so called ideals.

    Fiscal responsibility – NOT
    Smaller government – NOT
    Family Values:
    Gay bashing – Yes but with hypocrisy (too may closeted gays)
    Marriage – Yes, again with hypocrisy (McCain – Guliani – etc)
    Abortion – Yes, again with hypocrisy (not providing for pregnancy prevention)
    Deficit reduction – NOT
    Strong Military – NOT (enriching a few Republican companies does not constitute ‘Supporting the Troops)
    Free Market – NOT (Enron, Housing/Mortgage collapse, etc)

    Did I forget anything? If so, it probably wouldn’t reflect very good on Republicans anyway. Since a lot of Republicans subscribe to the IOKIYAR , we can’t really educate them because they believe it doesn’t apply to them.

    I guess well need to concentrate our effort on the so called Independents, of which a lot of them are what I call “Ashamed-they-voted-for-Bush” recently converted Independents claiming they are ‘tired of political bickering’. At least they are willing to admit they are tired of something, and that is a good start.

    Personally a positive message from the candidates that questions the Republican’s ideas experienced over the last several years, should resonate with people willing to think for a change.

  • …and in other news, it’s nice to see that s’wanna-be is trolling the tubes with his newest alias, complaining about how “mean” I was in yesterday’s end-of-day thread.

    I just call ’em as they are, little one. You peddled a bunch of crap, got caught, and your little tirades didn’t scare your accuser away this time. Maybe you should ask everyone to go back and take a look at your comments—the ones posted under your real screen-name of “Swan.” Better still, let them go back through the CBR archives and see just what a petty, tin-pot tyrant you’ve been over the past several months.

    Be afraid, s’wanna-be—be very afraid.—and know that hiding behind other names will not protect you….

  • Comments are closed.