Tuesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* The Senate voted 94 to 2 today to undo the Patriot Act provision that allows the Bush administration to unilaterally fill U.S. attorney vacancies. As the AP explained, “The bill, which has yet to be considered in the House, would set a 120-day deadline for the administration to appoint an interim prosecutor. If the interim appointment is not confirmed by the Senate in that time, a permanent replacement would be named by a federal district judge.” The two who voted against the legislation, for reasons that escape me, were Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.) and Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.).

* Dr. Elias A. Zerhouni, the chief of the National Institutes of Health, told lawmakers Monday that lifting Bush’s ban on publicly-financed stem-cell research would better serve science and the nation. “It is clear today that American science will be better served — the nation will be better served — if we allow our scientists to have access to more cell lines,” Dr. Zerhouni told two members of the Senate health appropriations subcommittee during a hearing on the NIH’s proposed 2008 budget. Allowing the ban to remain in place, he said, leaves his agency fighting “with one hand tied behind our back.” How soon until Zerhouni is fired?

* Adjusted for inflation, defense spending is now higher than at any point since World War II. The “$630 billion provided for the military this year exceeds the highest annual amounts during the Reagan-era defense buildup, the Vietnam War and the Korean War.”

* Bush’s brief comments yesterday marking the fourth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq were so weak, I hardly found them worth mentioning. Slate’s Fred Kaplan, however, went into excellent detail, describing just how awful and dishonest the short speech really was.

* There’s a surprisingly lively debate underway between the White House and Ken Hutcherson, a furiously anti-gay pastor at Antioch Bible Church near Seattle. Hutcherson claims that Bush’s Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives named him Special Envoy for Adoptions, Family Values, Religious Freedom, and Medical Relief. The White House denies it. Hutcherson claims to have proof. It’s all very odd.

* According to the Justice Department’s inspector general, the “FBI engaged in widespread and serious misuse of its authority in illegally gathering telephone, e-mail and financial records of Americans and foreigners while hunting terrorists.” Glenn Fine, the internal watchdog who revealed the data-gathering abuses in a 130-page report last week, told lawmakers, “It really was unacceptable and inexcusable what happened here.”

* Suicide attacks, once uncommon in post-Taliban Afghanistan, sextupled since 2004, from 25 to 150.

* Cal Thomas complained today over the weekend that questions surrounding the Bush administration’s firing of eight U.S. attorneys “didn’t surface in October [2006]” because “the left in the media — but I repeat myself — had enough scandal going with Mark Foley and a bunch of other stuff, they didn’t need this.” Note to Cal: the purge didn’t happen until December, which comes after October.

* Bush at a White House ceremony yesterday honoring the University of Florida’s national championship football team: “Instead of, like, discouraging them that they got the bad deal when it came to the schedule, all that did was cause them to play harder. And it put them in pretty good stead going into the championship game [against Ohio State]. Like you might remember, all the pre-game polls said you couldn’t win. So much for polls.” As Jason Zengerle joked, “Bush went on to say that he was going to spend the rest of his presidency taking things one game at a time and proving the BCS voters wrong.”

* I appreciate and respect Michael Kinsley’s contrarian ways, but his piece on the purge scandal was widely off the mark. Kevin Drum described it as “beyond maddening, as if Kinsley is deliberately trying to misunderstand what’s going on here.”

* As the war enters its fifth year, fewer and fewer journalists at major news outlets are going to be in Iraq as our eyes and ears. Accurate and comprehensive coverage will no doubt suffer.

* And finally, Hillary Clinton responded to the “Big Sister” ad today, saying, “I haven’t seen it but I’m pleased that it seems to be taking attention away from what used to be on YouTube and getting a lot of hits, namely me singing “The Star Spangled Banner.” Everybody in the world now knows I can’t carry a tune.” Asked if the video should be removed, Clinton said she didn’t have an opinion, but added, “I might quibble a little bit about the content but if we get more people, especially young people, thinking about politics, I’m happy about that.”

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

Hillary hasn’t seen the ad, but she wishes to “quibble a little bit about the content”?

Maybe she should sit down and inhale before she tries spinning so fast.

  • “Bush went on to say that he was going to spend the rest of his presidency taking things one game at a time and proving the BCS voters wrong.”

    Yeah, politics, war and life are ALL like football. It would be true if they were all linear time limited games based on brute force. Pardon me while I roll my eyes 7200 degrees.

  • i sure hope Cal never tries to get a job as a campaign manager.

    Teaching moment: your opponents don’t sit on negative stories against you until after elections on purpose. The people that do that for you are your lackeys, also known as The Press.

    don’t kid yourself – if we’d had it, we’d have used it. anything to get that one more Senate seat so we could tell ol Joe to zip it.

  • Racerx – That’s a bit harsh. I had a pretty good idea what the video was about before I saw it. Clinton’s response was about as good as one could expect seeing that it was very critical of her (although it really gave no good arguments).

  • * The Senate voted 94 to 2 today to undo the Patriot Act provision that allows the Bush administration to unilaterally fill U.S. attorney vacancies. As the AP explained, “The bill, which has yet to be considered in the House, would set a 120-day deadline for the administration to appoint an interim prosecutor. If the interim appointment is not confirmed by the Senate in that time, a permanent replacement would be named by a federal district judge.” The two who voted against the legislation, for reasons that escape me, were Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.) and Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.).

    It is at least good to finally see a veto-proof majority opposing Bush.

    * Dr. Elias A. Zerhouni, the chief of the National Institutes of Health, told lawmakers Monday that lifting Bush’s ban on publicly-financed stem-cell research would better serve science and the nation. “It is clear today that American science will be better served — the nation will be better served — if we allow our scientists to have access to more cell lines,” Dr. Zerhouni told two members of the Senate health appropriations subcommittee during a hearing on the NIH’s proposed 2008 budget. Allowing the ban to remain in place, he said, leaves his agency fighting “with one hand tied behind our back.” How soon until Zerhouni is fired?

    A while back on Science Friday, a weekly segment on NPR’s Talk of the Nation, they discussed the issue of the stem-cell research ban. Several astute scientists pointed out that right now fertility clinics have a surplus of donated embryos. These embryos get destroyed because they only last for so long in the freezer and they cannot always be implanted in time. The current ban only applies to any lines not already created at the time of the ban. How about amending existing law to allow lines to be created from these surplus fertility clinic embryos that would otherwise be destroyed? This should appease even the most hard-core anti-abortionist and be more than enough to satisfy science. If Democrats supported it it would be a big win for them.

    * According to the Justice Department’s inspector general, the “FBI engaged in widespread and serious misuse of its authority in illegally gathering telephone, e-mail and financial records of Americans and foreigners while hunting terrorists.” Glenn Fine, the internal watchdog who revealed the data-gathering abuses in a 130-page report last week, told lawmakers, “It really was unacceptable and inexcusable what happened here.”

    It’s like they’re handing us the keys to the palace. Hurry up and and assign some special prosecutors, already, Congress!

    Re: #1: I disagree. I hardly saw that as spinning. Everyone knows the point of the ad was an attack on Hillary. You don’t need to eat crap to know it tastes bad. I thought she dodged the question honestly by admitting she didn’t appreciate its message but wasn’t going to make any demands, certainly not any that the right-wing would blow out of proportion (ie “Hillary hates freedom of speech!”)

  • CB, Surprised you didn’t post this one…

    The modest uptick in approval of the job being done by Congress has dissipated for the most part after only two months. Congress job approval had risen over the last two months after the Democrats took over control of Congress in early January — fueled in large part by a jump in approval among rank and file Democrats. This month, however, Congress job approval is back down to levels quite similar to where it was in 2006. Democrats have lost a good deal of the positivity exhibited in the first two months of the year after their party took over.

    According to Gallup’s monthly update on job approval of Congress — in a March 11-14, 2007, national poll — 28% of Americans approve of the job being done by Congress and 64% disapprove. This marks a substantial change from January and February, with approval down nine points and disapproval up nine points.

    I guess the public thinks they all suck, Dems and Reps alike… as there continues to be very little work done for the American people.

  • perhaps Leahy should respond that, speaking for Senate Democrats,
    “We will not go along with a partisan firing expedition aimed at honorable public servants.”

    and really, Bush must be using a lot of Botox to refer to AG-squared as honorable at this point.

  • (er, to refer to AG-squared as honorable with a straight face at this point. got distracted.)

  • “The two who voted against the legislation, for reasons that escape me, were Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.) and Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.).”

    Geezus, Chuck Hagel can’t vote against the White House on even the most transparently obvious issues, even when every other senator except one did the right thing.

    Just forget about running for president, Chuck. You’ve got less chance than every other Republican candidate, even the fringe ones.

  • Rian Mueller,

    This should appease even the most hard-core anti-abortionist and be more than enough to satisfy science.

    Athough I agree that what you suggest is a really solid first step that should be uncontroversial, the above statement is incorrect. The most hard-core anti-abortionists are also against fertility clinics precisely because of the “extra” “unwanted” embryos that are then destroyed.

  • Re: #13,

    Mea culpa. I should have said: “This should appease anyone who supported the original law because of the idea that research would promote the destruction of life.”

    Those guys you mention are beyond appeasement.

    Assuming JRS Jr’s post isn’t utter fiction, getting headlines with some consensus lawmaking would easily improve Congress’ approval rating.

  • Rian Mueller, @14,

    JRS Jr’s post isn’t fiction; them’s the Gallup results. See:
    http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/

    I guess everyone must have been reading Broder (WaPo) on Sunday. Broder complained that it was enough with the investigations and Dems should start legislating instead. The problem with that scenario is that you don’t lay a brand new carpet on the floor until you’ve moped up the vomit left there by the previous tenant.

    * Adjusted for inflation, defense spending is now higher than at any point since World War II. The “$630 billion provided for the military this year exceeds the highest annual amounts during the Reagan-era defense buildup, the Vietnam War and the Korean War.”

    And all of it is “on tick”, to the First National Bank of China. Add to that the article from today’s NYT:
    http://tinyurl.com/23g7zm
    about the un-readiness of the Army and you almost have to wonder what would happen if China decided to repossess US for bad debts?

  • Nice to see JRS Jr pull his head out of his ass, take a look around and prove he still can’t tell day from night, and that he believes he’s been breathing Chanel No. 5 up there.

    Memo to moron: with the Republicant’s doing the “Just say No” campaign in the Senate, it’s pretty much impossible to get “the people’s business” done. Particularly when the wholly-owned subsidiary of the Confederate Treason Corporation formerly known as the Republican Party is busy trying to save themselves from the hanging.

  • Comments are closed.