Tuesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Roll Call reported this afternoon that Sen. Larry Craig (R-Idaho) regrets his guilty plea, and may yet have an opportunity to reverse his decision: “Under Minnesota law, the Senator could file a motion requesting the withdrawal of the guilty plea. According to University of Minnesota Law School professor Steve Simon, Craig would have to allege ‘a manifest injustice’ in that motion, which he would have to file with the Hennepin County District Court judge who presided over his case. ‘He would have to allege some defect in the plea process,’ Simon said on Tuesday. ‘In other words that there was an inadequate factual basis or that his rights were not explained.'”

* A CBS affiliate in Sacramento re-enacted Craig’s bathroom encounter live, during an on-air broadcast. As frustrated as I get about national news outlets, local news outlets are too often even more cringe-worthy.

* E&P asks a good question: how is it that a senator can get arrested on sex charges, and no one noticed for a couple of months? Roll Call noted it found out based on a tip, but newspaper editors agreed that it was a combination of factors, most notably that Craig was arrested outside his home district in an area where few national outlets have a desk.

* The healthcare crisis is getting worse. The Census Bureau released its new figures for poverty and health insurance this morning: “The number of people without health insurance coverage rose from 44.8 million (15.3 percent) in 2005 to 47 million (15.8 percent) in 2006.” As Jonathan Cohn noted, “Note that the number of people without insurance is growing both as a raw number and as a percentage of the population. In other words, the problem is getting worse — making the case for universal health insurance even more urgent than before.”

* Rep. Brian Baird’s (D-Wash.) decision to go from war critic to surge supporter is costing him dearly among his constituents, who were outraged with their congressman at a townhall meeting last night.

* More and more, I’m starting to understand why conservatives seem less informed. Last night, for example, both Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity presented the news to their (misguided) viewers, and neglected to mention the Alberto Gonzales resignation and the Larry Craig sex scandal.

* AP: “The United States has 90 guns for every 100 citizens, making it the most heavily armed society in the world, a report released on Tuesday said.”

* On MSNBC last night, Newsweek chief political correspondent Howard Fineman asserted that “[t]he problem that the Democrats have got, indeed, that all America has got, is that having gone into Iraq the way we did, there is, in the opinion of many fair-minded observers, chaos and hell to pay if we get out overnight.” Note to Fineman: no one’s talking about an overnight withdrawal.

* TP: “On March 12, the Pentagon announced that Army Surgeon General Lt. Gen. Kevin Kiley, who oversaw neglect at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center, was resigning, effective immediately.” Guess what. He’s still there.

* Chertoff to senators that the Pentagon interrogation methods at Guantanamo were “plain vanilla.” Mark Benjamin explains that Chertoff might have lied.

* Speaking of Chertoff, who’s the leading replacement for Alberto Gonzales? I’ve decided not to mention every rumor I hear — and I heard quite a few today — but Emily Bazelon and Dahlia Lithwick run through some of the likely candidates.

* Media Bistro: “Last night on FNC, Hannity & Colmes spoke with Bill Keller, a Christian televangelist known for his harsh criticism of Islam. One problem: in the intro to the story, there was an image of Bill Keller, the executive editor of The New York Times.”

* AP: “A call by Puerto Rico’s governor for a U.S. withdrawal from Iraq earned a standing ovation from a conference of more than 4,000 National Guardsmen. Gov. Anibal Acevedo Vila said Saturday that the U.S. administration has ‘no new strategy and no signs of success’ and that prolonging the war would needlessly put guardsmen in harm’s way. ‘The war in Iraq has fractured the political will of the United States and the world,’ he said at the opening of the 129th National Guard Association general conference. ‘Clearly, a new war strategy is required and urgently.'” (thanks to LM for the tip)

* And finally, I suspect conservatives won’t want to hear this, but the AP reports that Europe accommodated gay civil unions — more than a half-millennium ago: “Civil unions between male couples existed around 600 years ago in medieval Europe, a historian now says. Historical evidence, including legal documents and gravesites, can be interpreted as supporting the prevalence of homosexual relationships hundreds of years ago, said Allan Tulchin of Shippensburg University in Pennsylvania. If accurate, the results indicate socially sanctioned same-sex unions are nothing new, nor were they taboo in the past.”

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

If Larry Craig wants to re-open his court proceedings, I say let him do it. Let all the seamy details come out on the record. I can hardly wait to hear.

  • CB: * Speaking of Chertoff, who’s the leading replacement for Alberto Gonzales?

    Last night Mark Shields let out some brain farts…

    GWEN IFILL: Who is the next attorney general going to be? And is there somebody out there who can win Senate confirmation?

    MARK SHIELDS: Well, you’re interested in someone who can win confirmation. […] I’d say what you’re looking for is someone who’s respected, independent and confirmable.

    GWEN IFILL: Like?

    MARK SHIELDS: I’d say — well, obviously, Orrin Hatch has been on everybody’s list, the senator from Utah. I don’t know if he’d be interested. Mike DeWine, the former senator from Ohio, a member of the Judiciary Committee, respected member. Patrick Fitzgerald would be a bold stroke.

    GWEN IFILL: Very bold.

    MARK SHIELDS: It really would. I mean, you know, he is — the model of Ed Levi, who was — Jerry Ford nominated him. He was dean of the University of Chicago Law School. He was independent; he had stature; he was respected. And he became a very respected attorney general…

    Shields was apparently being serious. As if BushCo would ever do something honest like nominate Fitzgerald, who they apparently thought about firing. And DeWine is respected? By WHO? Orrin Hatch is independent? WTF???

    Mark Shields really needs to retire and let a real progressive tear Bobo Brooks a new ass every week.

    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/july-dec07/sbgonzales_08-27.html

  • CB wrote: “A CBS affiliate in Sacramento re-enacted Craig’s bathroom encounter live, during an on-air broadcast. As frustrated as I get about national news outlets, local news outlets are too often even more cringe-worthy.”

    C’mon, CB! This is “News you can use”! Who knows when you might get the urge to solicit sex in an airport bathroom – you’ll be glad they told you how!

  • “Let me be clear: I am not gay and never have been,” said Craig

    Richard Nixon is intrigued and wants to subscribe to your newsletter.

  • “The United States has 90 guns for every 100 citizens, making it the most heavily armed society in the world, a report released on Tuesday said.”

    Looks like we’re more than ready to “fight them over here.”

    Chertoff to senators that the Pentagon interrogation methods at Guantanamo were “plain vanilla.”

    Must be the Craig/Gannon news but I read that and thought he was talking about sex.

    A call by Puerto Rico’s governor for a U.S. withdrawal from Iraq earned a standing ovation from a conference of more than 4,000 National Guardsmen.

    I bet BushBrat is pissed. Maybe someone can do a decible/duration comparison: Recent soldier response to Bush speeches v. AAV’s standing O.

  • ‘In other words that there was an inadequate factual basis or that his rights were not explained.’”

    Sounds like an extreme longshot.

  • “The United States has 90 guns for every 100 citizens, making it the most heavily armed society in the world, a report released on Tuesday said.”

    We’re still all waiting to hear the cavalcade of anecdotes about how all those guns are making people safer, though. The one anecdote of self-defense (besides all those specious claims in murder trials) that stands out as memorable in my mind, after all these years, is Brandon Lee’s (Bruce Lee’s son) kicking the crap out of some guy who broke into his apartment (that is, it was a karate, kung-fu-fighting type affair, not a dashing-somewhere-to-uncover-your-gun type scenario).

  • “* AP: “The United States has 90 guns for every 100 citizens, making it the most heavily armed society in the world, a report released on Tuesday said.”

    Well I’m glad the AP is reporting on the Small Arms Survey (Published by the Graduate Institute of International Studies and funded, in part, by the UN), and I’m even more glad to see it picked up here. I would encourage anyone concerned with the issue to actually pick up a copy. These are fascinating reports. However, in reading the AP article cited here I noticed what is typical of news reporting. These statistics are reported as fact and this fact is then lent a degree of credibility because of the news outlet. In truth, measuring the diffusion of small arms throughout the world is enormously complex and problematic. That said, I have no reason to doubt these numbers, but it misses the real question; a question which a number of my friends and colleagues are working on. That is, what is the meaning of these arms to the populace? True, the U.S. is heavily armed, but does that in and of itself matter? It used to be conventional wisdom to suggest a simplistic, “more arms equals more instability.” That was until these reports (the 2002 report is particularly compelling) showed that some of the more “stable” places in the world are relatively heavily armed (e.g., the U.S., Switzerland, even Yemen). I do not want to suggest that we need more guns. Precisely the opposite actually. I do want to support investigating what guns mean and how they are used. Only then can we start to figure out the impact of this industry.

  • E&P asks a good question: how is it that a senator can get arrested on sex charges, and no one noticed for a couple of months? Roll Call noted it found out based on a tip, but newspaper editors agreed that it was a combination of factors, most notably that Craig was arrested outside his home district in an area where few national outlets have a desk.

    Also, I’m surprised that Craig did not have to report his arrest/conviction to the Senate. Wouldn’t there be a rule requiring Senators to report such indiscretions? I know at the company that I work for, we are required to report criminal arrests/convictions.

    In unrelated news, Officer in Bush motorcade dies in crash

    I hope that “fundraiser” for Sen. Pete Domenici (R-N.M.) went well. The greedy bastards should give the funds that were raised to that cop’s family.

  • I don’t mean to be too puerile here….. but can someone explain to me the logistics of Craigs hand under the bathroom stall. My mother and I have been trying to figure this out all afternoon. Yes go ahead and laugh, she’s retired and over 65 and we get into some really silly discussions…….She thinks it was a signal, and had the man in the stall been interested in carrying it further, and not a cop, that some other signal would have occured and they would have gotten together in one or the other’s stalls. I think that since Senator Craig had blocked his stall door with his luggage, that whatever he was wanting to occur, would have occured seperately. And that’s where I get confused. I should not post this, but hey, you guys are smart and lnowledgable…sooooo…….(blush)

  • NMDem said:

    That was until these reports (the 2002 report is particularly compelling) showed that some of the more “stable” places in the world are relatively heavily armed (e.g., the U.S., Switzerland, even Yemen).

    Yeah, but we have the biggest prison population in the world, both in terms of absolute number and ratio of the total population. That’s great if a lot of dangerous people are locked up, but they all had to commit a crime to get there.

    The U.S. shouldn’t be competing on a stability scale w/ say, Angola, if what we’re measuring is the effect of small arms on stability. They’re apples and oranges. You’d have to compare the U.S. to similar, First World countries, like Britain, where people don’t have so many arms. In that comparison, you find out that the U.K. has a lot less crime.

    Conservatives would like to argue back, I’m sure (but can’t unless only other conservatives are listening) that the difference between crime in the U.S. and in countries like the U.K. and Canada is that we have more African Americans. But regardless of whether you accept that, it complicates the question of whether guns make our society safer when similar countries w/ no guns have a lot less crime. I’d tend to agree that we have more crime in part because of our African American population, but it’s not because they’re African Americans (as a conservative would argue)- it’s because African Americans in this country have social problems, that are the leftover effects of historical racism, and this results African Americans committing more crime and being investigated for commission of crime more than whites in the U.S.

    Anyway, if you actually interview a lot of incarcerated felons, I’m sure your study will quickly find that the worry that a victim will pull a gun on them isn’t a major deterrent to the commission of crime. Guns in the U.S. probably deter assaults on cops (but I wouldn’t argue tha cops shouldn’t have guns) and some violence between drug gangs, but I doubt there’s much effect beyond that.

  • Craig may indeed attempt to plead that his rights were not explained. The idea that a US Senator doesn’t understand the rights of the accused under the Constitution is easily explained by the fact that he’s a Republican.

  • Seems to me middle-class, white Americans mostly use their guns to kill themselves, when they go berserko-bonkers against their spouses / significant others and kids, and hunting, and never against the hordes of loud, African American teenagers that are always climbing over their backyard fence, about to rape their teenaged daughter, in the paranoid fantasies of NRA, pro-gun advocate types only, and that never seem to appear in reality.

  • Gen Kiley still ripping the taxpayer off by getting paid for doing nothing since he’s already resigned. Now he just shows up to collect his pay. Does Petraeus have plans to run for president…Bush will ruin it for him by parading him around to support his Iraq policies.. Petraeus already lacks credibility by changing the NIE report and he hasn’t eve began to speak yet.

  • Regarding your last item (gay unions in medieval europe), John Boswell covered this in great detail (with all sorts of documentation and photos of ancient manuscripts) in his book Same-Sex Unions in Premodern Europealmost 15 years ago. And it goes back a lot farther than medieval times. Try ancient Rome and Greece.

    It’s a fascinating, though at times very dry, read.

  • […] newspaper editors agreed that it was a combination of factors, most notably that Craig was arrested outside his home district in an area where few national outlets have a desk.

    It’s all the fault of the blogs, cutting into the newspapers’ profits. The newspapers had to let go so many of their reporters, they no longer have any in the airport mens’ rooms around the country.

  • So the Republicans in the Senate recognize that Sen. Craig (ID-G) could be the Mark Foley of the upcoming elections and decide to do to him what was not done to Mr. Foley. Get him out of the way and punish him in some way. Wow, that Senate cloakroom must be awful sweaty right now. All right…maybe I didn’t knead to put it in that way…..Argh!

  • I’ve heard of the ancient Roman civil unions before. I think it may have been looked down upon at least by some in Rome, though. But overall homosexuality was a lot less stigmatized in the ancient West. Far from the talking points our military uses to talk about its gays-in-the-military policy, at least some of the Greeks thought homosexuality in the military was a way to boost morale through boosting comraderie. I have no opinion on who, if anybody, is right on that, though.

  • Open thread post:

    I know one place I’m not going to be visiting any time soon.

    Chicago: Gays not protected by 14th Amendment

    A man who filed a lawsuit after being allegedly beaten by Chicago police because he is gay is contesting the city’s motion to dismiss his case—since the city is arguing that gays are not covered under the U.S. Constitution’s equal protection clause.

    The motion, filed by attorneys for the city, states that gays as a group are not included under the 14th Amendment, the Constitution’s equal protection clause.

    The amendment states: “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States: nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

    Disgust doesn’t even begin to describe what I feel. Since when are people born in the USA not considered citizens??

    Anyone?

    Buehler? Buehler?

  • Chertoff to senators that the Pentagon interrogation methods at Guantanamo were “plain vanilla.” Mark Benjamin explains that Chertoff might have lied.

    Well I’ve heard everything I need to know!

    Jherkoff is the next Attorney General of the USA.

    Anybody want a bet a vanilla shake on it?

  • Since when are people born in the USA not considered citizens??

    Since dickhead lawyers haven’t known when to StFu. Chicago? As in Illinois? As in, large g/l/b population? As in Human Rights Ordinance that specifically includes sexual orientation? As in, the city that hosted the Gay Games last fucking year?

    Man, that just melted my WTF-meter and I hope the CPD appreciates the seventeen additional flavours of well deserved hell their lawyers have unleashed upon them.

    What has gone from a routine arrest to an ugly incident of homophobia will now become a full-scale law suit of epic proportions and the only hope for those douche bags is that they can escape while the HRC/ACLU/LL etc sort out who gets to tear a strip off them first.

    Thanks Michael W. I’m going to keep track of that one. I might go to Chi-Town but only to see the look on the judge’s face when some turd in a suit rears up on its hind-legs and tries to argue that cops can beat the shit out of people. That should be a priceless moment in the history of US jurisprudence.

  • Some follow up (yeah I’m a nerd). If the facts in the plaintiff’s claim are true this is uber FUBAR.

    9. Wearing a pink shirt, Ruppert arrived at the lounge and ordered a drink. Shortly after Ruppert arrived, Defendants, Officers Torres and Pemberton, arrived at the lounge, and asked Ruppert to step outside with them and Ruppert complied with Defendants’ request.

    10. Defendants then escorted Ruppert from the premises for reasons unknown to Ruppert. Ruppert was not placed under arrest, but was placed in the back of Defendants’ squad car — un-cuffed and unrestrained. While in the back of the car, Ruppert received a phone call from his life-partner, who was at home, about five blocks away.

  • Gays aren’t protected by 14th? Who’s next? Gypsies? Jews? Blacks? Women? Micharel W and tAiO, I hope you will keep your eyes on that one and keep all of us informed.

    tAiO, are “Gay Games” the same as “Gay Olympics”? ’cause, when I was in Montreal last year (for a lacemaking convention), we shared the hotel with a lot of guys who said they were there for “Gay Olympics”. But, if they’re one and the same, they couldn’t have been held, simultaneously, in Chicago *and* Montreal…

  • Libra, the Gay Games was originally called the Gay Olympics, but the International Olympic Committee (I think) forced them to change their name back in the 80s–copyright or trademark infringement, or something like that. Note that the Special Olympics didn’t have that problem.

    There was some politics about venues and revenue in the lead-up to last year’s Gay Games, and the group essentially split in half, and a second event was born.

  • Comments are closed.