Tuesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Today’s House hearing on Blackwater produced all kinds of interesting information. Here’s the AP’s lede: “Blackwater chairman Erik Prince vigorously defended his private security company on Tuesday, rejecting charges that his staff acted like a bunch of cowboys immune to legal prosecution while protecting State Department personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan. ‘I believe we acted appropriately at all times,’ Prince, a 38-year-old former Navy seal, told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.”

* The folks at TPM Muckraker have been doing terrific work covering today’s hearing in great detail, so just start at the top and scroll down.

* The Gavel has also had some terrific coverage, with plenty of compelling YouTube clips and transcripts.

* Carpetbagger regular Sarabeth takes a closer look at the intersection of Blackwater’s over-billing and no-bid contracts.

* Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) had a banner day on the Hill today. Before embarrassing himself at the hearing, he was on C-SPAN, suggesting that House Oversight Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) may be in physical danger from Blackwater if he traveled to Iraq.

* Discouraging news out of Pakistan: As a widening political crisis distracts President Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan’s army appears to be folding in the face of a mushrooming Taliban insurgency sweeping down from the Afghan border, diplomats and Western military officials say. ‘I am very concerned that they are sort of throwing in the towel because it’s something the people don’t support and since Musharraf is also on the ropes,’ a Western military official told ABC News.”

* Rep. Mark Udall’s (D-Colo.) resolution condemning Rush Limbaugh for denigrating U.S. troops was officially introduced today. No word of when, or if, it’ll get a floor vote.

* Last week, Hillary Clinton disappointed many Dems when she endorsed the Kyl-Lieberman Amendment, which declared Iran’s military to be a terrorist organization. Yesterday, Clinton helped to redeem herself by joining with Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.) to mandate that Bush seek congressional approval before any confrontation with Iran.

* Any chance the president might come to his senses and support healthcare access for millions of uninsured children? Apparently not. “President Bush ‘will veto’ legislation expanding a children’s health insurance program by $35 billion over five years despite Democratic pressure lobbying him to change his mind, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino reiterated Tuesday.” It will be the fourth veto of Bush’s presidency, all of which dealt with bills that enjoyed broad, bipartisan support.

* Given how close the margin is, I’m glad the majority picked up another vote toady to override Bush’s S-CHIP veto.

* AP: “The National Archives gained a little power and presidents lost some in a federal judge’s ruling Monday about the fate of public records after presidents leave office. The ruling, by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of Federal District Court, involved a challenge to a 2001 executive order issued by President Bush.”

* Jack Goldsmith, the former head of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, explained the origins of his the administration’s definition of torture. “It came from a health care statute designed to define the circumstances under which there was an emergency situation warranting health care benefits,” he answered. He acknowledged today that was probably not a good idea.

* WaPo: “While waiting to be confirmed by the White House for a top civilian post at the Air Force last year, Charles D. Riechers was out of work and wanted a paycheck. So the Air Force helped arrange a job through an intelligence contractor that required him to do no work for the company, according to documents and interviews.” (thanks to S.W. for the reminder)

* AP: “A federal judge refused Friday to dismiss a defamation case against Rep. John P. Murtha and ordered the Pennsylvania Democrat to give a sworn deposition about his comments alleging ‘cold-blooded murder and war crimes’ by unnamed soldiers in connection with Iraqi civilian deaths. A Marine Corps sergeant is suing the 18-term congressman for making the charge, which the soldier claims is false. Murtha, who opposes the Iraq war, made the comment during a May, 2006 Capitol Hill news conference in which he predicted that a Pentagon war crimes investigation will show Marines killed dozens of innocent Iraqi civilians in Haditha in 2005.” (thanks to tAiO for the tip)

* Shortly after Rep. David Obey (D-Wis.) endorsed a “war tax” proposal, Speaker Pelosi nixed the idea.

* Where was Giuliani during the debate at Morgan State about the concerns of the African-American community? He was with Bo Derek in Santa Barbara. He’s a man of the people, you know.

* And finally, Stephen Colbert offered his take on the Lieberman-Kyl Amendment: “[N]ot everyone supports our troops enough to give them the job security a war with Iran would provide,” Colbert said. “People like Sen. Jim Webb, who voted against the amendment, calling it ‘Dick Cheney’s fondest pipe dream.’ Well, that is completely unfair. Everyone knows Dick Cheney’s fondest pipe dream is driving a bulldozer into the New York Times while drinking crude oil out of Keith Olbermann’s skull.”

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

Seems like Hils knows her CYA.

  • If Henry Waxman today wants to go to Iraq and do an investigation, Blackwater will be his support team. His protection team. Do you think he really wants to investigate directly? – Derelict Issa

    This is nothing but a veiled threat! I can’t believe that fascism has been enthroned in the United States of America. This is a living nightmare!

  • Last week, Hillary Clinton disappointed many Dems when she endorsed the Kyl-Lieberman Amendment, which declared Iran’s military to be a terrorist organization. Yesterday, Clinton helped to redeem herself by joining with Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.) to mandate that Bush seek congressional approval before any confrontation with Iran.

    That’s no redemption. Won’t the Usurper-In-Chief just veto the anti-dictator bill (if the ReThugs don’t filibuster)?

  • My Congressman is Dan Boren, a “blue dog” Democrat. He’s the one who announced today that he will be voting to override the Bush veto of children’s health insurance.

    “Blue dogs” allegedly won’t vote for any new spending unless revenue to pay for it has been identified. Therefore I assume that the “blue dogs” will be supporting David Obey’s “war tax” proposal.

    What? They won’t?

    Although there are many things about Bush’s adventure in Iraq that are infuriating and shameful, I think that the thing that makes me the most angry is that Bush expects the entire weight of this mess to be carried by the unfortunate souls in the military. Their tours in Iraq are repeated and extended. Their equipment has been inadequate. And Bush has not asked me or anyone else to sacrifice anything at all to further his foolish adventure – not even to help pay for it.

    If Republicans and “blue dogs” are going to continue to vote for funding for this war, they should at least have the political courage to vote for taxes to pay for it.

    Of course they won’t.

  • Go to youtube or democratic underground and watch the interview between Pelosi and Wolf Blitzer from the situation room and you will see why Pelosi should resign her post as speaker of the House.

    “We’ve done everything we can do.” So until we get another president nothing can be done. She’s thrown in the towel. She still claims impeachment is off the table and refuses to even discuss cutting the funding for anything but troop withdrawal. She’s infuriatingly stubborn and closed minded in her refusal to do what is necessary to stop Bush and this war. She single handedly has done more to encourage the continuation of this war and the destruction of our constitution by Bush and Cheney and is even willing to be a part of the mass murder of thousands of innocent Iranians if Bush attacks Iran by her stubborn refusal to even try to stop him. She has become comfortable with the war and watching soldiers die everyday she hesitates to do her job has no effect whatsoever on her. Just watching her talk in that video says it all. She won’t listen and she won’t change course…just like Bush. You can see and hear it in her condescending and authoritarian attitude when talking to Wolf. She acts like a beaten dog, whipped into submission. “It’s Bush’s fault…the republicans took control of this war…it’s their fault now…we’ve done all we can do”. Really, you could make a list of the dems in the house and senate who think this way. It’s over their heads and beyond their abilities to deal with it. They will do nothing. Go watch the video…and then watch Rahm Emanuelle on Bill Mahr saying the same thing and having the same look on his face. If we would have known then how they would act now we never would have voted for them and they won’t face us either. By their inaction they are condoning all of it…for they are in a position to do something and refuse to do it…nor will they listen to those who put them in that position.

  • I’m hearing a lot of defeatist excuses lately from Democrats along the line of, “Bush will just veto it, so what’s the point?” There’s a quote I love. I don’t know who said it, and I don’t want to because I find it profound and am afraid I’ll find out I got it from “Night Rider”, so I refrain from googling it: “The only causes worth fighting for are lost causes.”

    It’s not about whether we’ll win, but what’s right. Sometimes, if you fight for something you believe in, just because you believe in it, you know what happens? You actually achieve it! Amazing, huh?

    But let’s say you don’t. First of all, we define ourselves as much by the stands we take as the accomplishments we put under our belts. Hillary losing health care was not a loss, in my opinion. It was a priority, and the Clintons’ fought for it. They didn’t get it, but she’s back again for another go. Will she get it this time? Who cares. It’s a fight worth having, and it says something about us as a party that we keep fighting for something like that, no matter how many times we lose.

    In the latest New Yorker, Hertzberg says, “Every Democratic President since Truman has been elected on a platform of national health insurance, and, in spite of public support for the idea by majorities as big as those in Europe, every one of them has failed to get enacted.”

    Are you ashamed by that? For me, that makes Hillary all the more courageous. Every Democrat since Truman has tried and failed, and she’s going to try again. The balls on that woman.

    That might sound a bit optomistic coming from a guy who advocates political Roshambo, but it’s because the right is always able to derail these things with this stuff that we have to neutralize it before we can move on and fight the good fight again.

    You know what? We might lose. Again. That doesn’t make us pussies. Surrendering does.

  • To be fair, Jack Goldsmith was talking about the Bybee Memo, not his own work product:

    Much of Goldsmith’s difficulties, of course, centered around his efforts to revise earlier Department memos defining torture, such as the infamous 2002 “Bybee memo” (named after Goldsmith’s predecessor Jay Bybee) that defined torture as “equivalent in intensity to the pain accompanying serious physical injury, such as organ failure, impairment of bodily function, or even death.” Goldsmith called that reasoning “severely flawed.”

  • Yesterday, Clinton helped to redeem herself by joining with Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.) to mandate that Bush seek congressional approval before any confrontation with Iran.

    I’m sure Bush already feels like he got that when Kyl-Lieberman passed. How will she explain that she didn’t think he should attack a group she herself labeled as terrorists? Doesn’t she believe in the war on terror?

    Nope, no redemption here. Move along, these aren’t the Democrats you’re looking for.

  • Disgusting:

    Taliban insurgency sweeping down from the Afghan border…

    Even more disgusting:

    See… I’m not worried about Osama…. see.

    President Betrayus…
    General Betrayus…
    Congress Betrayus…

    Hold your ire folks.
    Things aren’t as totally FUBAR as they seem.
    Relax…
    Global warming is going to fix everthing in a few years…
    You’ll be able to work on your tan at Xmas time.

    Don’t worry.
    Be Happy.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjnvSQuv-H4

  • zeitgeist! You out there? I responded to your query at yesterday’s Political Round-up. Have a good evening.

    b

  • The Blackwater hearings: Making the case for the large presence of private security contractors, both Prince and the State Department resorted to explaining how terribly dangerous Iraq is, how many thousands of attacks occur every day – which pretty much undercuts the most recent meme of “the surge is working – see how much better things are?” that is being used to justify the continuing presence of US forces. Blackwater needs the war to continue – by Prince’s estimates, government contracts account for 90% of it revenues. Conflict much?

    Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid: Truly, madly, deeply disappointing, on so many fronts and on so many issues. “We’ve done all we can?” No, I don’t think you have, Nancy – and neither have you, Harry. I think you have a lot of options and strategic opportunities available to you, you have failed to use the rules of both houses of Congress to your advantage (hint: you’re in the majority – use the perks you get for being there). We are out here screaming and you pretend to be deaf. We are madly waving at you, and you pretend to be blind. “We’ve done all we can” is the mantra of the minority, the side with no power. Do more and you will be more. You’re the quarterback with open receivers in the end zone, but you’re so worried about the blitz that you don’t see it.

    S-CHIP: Muster up the votes to over-ride and it could be children’s health care that starts a collapse that could lead to more victories. Squander this opportunity and you might as well just go back to minority status. We will not forget that.

    Darrell Issa, Lynn Westmoreland and that hack from the State Department: This is the “A” team? How mentally defcient are the people in Westmoreland’s district that they could elect someone like that? He’s a person for whom the term “Congress-cretin” was invented. Issa? Not a whole lot smarter, but really in love with himself. I have no words for the State Department guy – he seemed to be talking in his sleep. Great work if you can get it.

  • I’m glad the majority picked up another vote toady
    CB, it’s so unlike you to call someone that has decided to vote with us a toady. Tsk, tsk, tsk……

  • This is almost comical. Bush hits a legitimate target—Afghanistan—and then drops the ball by going after a cripped, tinpot dictator in Iraq who had already been castrated by the no-fly zones and the constant aerial pounding on anything that lit up a pilot’s warning monitors.

    Now that we’ve made a total clusterf*ck out of Iraq, he wants to designate another target—Iran—because they might get a nuclear weapon in 8 to 10 years. Meanwhile, his Pakki-Pet is on the verge of collapse, which would certifiably hand the Taliban a nice, healthy quantity of nuclear weapons that are already built.

    One just has to wonder—should I go after the “maybe” threat—or the real deal? All it takes is just a moderate nuclear exchange between a Taliban-controlled Islamabad and a Hindu New Delhi to fully irradiate the entire Persian Gulf region and the central Indian Ocean—not too hard, given their proximity to the equatorial blending of prevailing winds found in the two hemispheres (west-to-east in the Northern; east-to-west in the Southern).

    Just something to think about….

  • It’s kind of disheartening that Pakistan can’t deal with a few insurgents. Don’t we give them enough military aid?

  • Comments are closed.