Tuesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Crisis continues to grip Pakistan: “Baton-wielding police fought with lawyers outside courthouses in Islamabad and Lahore again Tuesday, arresting dozens more as they enforced Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf’s crackdown on judicial activism. Three days after Musharraf suspended the constitution and declared a state of emergency, Pakistan’s judicial system is in lockdown, with thousands of lawyers jailed and many judges detained in their homes. Former prime minister Benazir Bhutto arrived in Islamabad from Karachi on Tuesday for meetings with other opposition leaders about how to respond to Musharraf’s declaration.”

* There’s been a lot of talk of late about the price of gas topping $90 per barrel. Now it’s nearly $100 per barrel.

* Michael Mukasey nomination as Attorney General, as expected, passed the Senate Judiciary Committee today, following an 11 to 8 vote. All the Republicans voted together (as they always do), while Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.) and Charles Schumer (N.Y.) broke party ranks to support Mukasey.

* Violence is on the rise in Afghanistan, where a bomb attack targeted a group of lawmakers killed at least 28 people this morning, including five parliamentarians. “The bomb exploded outside a Baghlan sugar factory as the lawmakers were about to enter. The blast struck children, elders and government officials gathered to greet the visiting delegation of 18 lawmakers from the lower house, officials said.” Reports indicated that 81 people were wounded, including 42 children.

* Speaking of Afghanistan, the Center for American Progress released an interesting report today called, “The Forgotten Front” by Larry Korb and Caroline Wadhams, which sets forth a new counterinsurgency strategy for Afghanistan. It outlines a set of recommendations for strengthening the Afghan government, increasing security, accelerating reconstruction, combating the narcotics trade, and removing the terrorist safe haven in Pakistan. (That last part seems particularly relevant in light of recent events.)

* Rep. Dennis Kucinich forced his Cheney impeachment measure onto the House floor today where it was about to be killed — before House Republicans decided to embrace it: “At one point there were 290 votes to table. After the [GOP] turnaround, the final vote was 251-162 against tabling, with 165 Republicans voting against it.” Republicans apparently wanted the measure to advance, but the House Dem leadership didn’t — they sent the bill to the Judiciary Committee, where it probably won’t be heard from again.

* You’ve all voted for The Carpetbagger Report today, right? (It only takes a second and I ask for so little…)

* Glenn Reynolds doesn’t understand why everyone is more concerned about the crisis in Pakistan than “Hugo Chavez’s emerging dicatatorship [sic].” Noah Shachtman explains why Reynolds doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

* The good news is, the latest CNN poll shows that 69% of Americans believe waterboarding is torture, and 58% believe the U.S. government should be barred from using the tactic against “suspected terrorists.” The bad news is, those numbers should be higher.

* Another painful milestone: “The U.S. military on Tuesday announced the deaths of five more soldiers, making 2007 the deadliest year of the war for U.S. troops, according to an Associated Press count… At least 852 American military personnel have died in Iraq so far this year — the highest annual toll since the war began in March 2003, according to AP figures. Some 850 troops died in 2004.”

* Congratulations to John Hinderaker for easily winning the Golden Wingnut Award for the worst blog post ever. It’s a well-deserved distinction.

* I sometimes wonder what the Bush administration would be like if it weren’t staffed with crazy people: “Julie Myers, head of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement division, has apologized for ‘awarding ‘most original costume’ to a Homeland Security Department employee who dressed in prison stripes, dreadlocks and dark makeup for a Halloween gathering at the agency.'”

* I thought media coverage of the presidential campaign couldn’t get much worse. I stand corrected.

* For those covering the Writers Guild strike, the writers continued to get additional support from Hollywood celebrities today, many of whom joined picket lines. Also, here’s a list of how some TV schedules will be affected, while the LAT has a good piece on how we got to where we are today.

* And the president reached a milestone today. A new Gallup poll showed Americans disapprove of Bush’s job performance, 64% to 31%, but here’s the kicker: 50% say they “strongly disapprove” of the president. The previous high was Richard Nixon at the height of the Watergate scandal, when 48% of Americans strongly disapproved of his performance. Congratulations, George, it couldn’t have happened to a more appropriate person.

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

Thanks Chuck! Thanks Diane! Here’s a coupon for a free waterboarding, courtesy of the Bush admin!

Cowards.

Republicans apparently wanted the measure to advance, but the House Dem leadership didn’t — they sent the bill to the Judiciary Committee, where it probably won’t be heard from again.

WTF? Thanks for trying Dennis. At least one candidate cares about this country.

  • Don’t be so optimistic about impeachment, CB. I’d love to see Hillary’s response to this development.

    FEAR H.R. 333 DICKTATOR!

  • Rep. Dennis Kucinich forced his Cheney impeachment measure onto the House floor today . . . Republicans apparently wanted the measure to advance,

    Hm. Funny guy, that Kucinich. Didn’t I have some theory about him I mentioned a couple times before?

  • I read that there was to be a protest at Schumer’s NY office today. Schumer and Feinstein need to be picketed and protested against over this until the day they leave office. I signed a petition over at Democrats.com that I will not contribute any further money to the DCCC and the DSCC because of this. And Democratic senators will not get any kudos from me for voting against Mukasey because it will be an empty token gesture. They know they are all safe to vote that way because of Feinstein and Schumer and that the Republicans will have enough votes to confirm him with the votes of Reid, Feinstein, Schumer, Lieberman, and a Nelson or two. There should have been intense pressure put on them before the committee vote. Especially by a certain presidential nominee.

  • Didn’t I have some theory about him I mentioned a couple times before? -Swan

    Oh, please, for ill-informed madmen like myself, please don’t hold back, Swan! What is your theory about regarding Kucinich?

  • Congratulations to John Hinderaker for easily winning the Golden Wingnut Award for the worst blog post ever. It’s a well-deserved distinction.

    Unfortunately it wasn’t the Derbyshire school-shooting one, or the Ann Althouse penises-n-vaginas pseudo-psychobabble one. People who aren’t politicized may look at the Hinderaker one and think, ‘What, they’re complaining because he likes Bush?” How many Americans are really informed/educated/whatever enough to judge whether or not claims that Bush is a genius are justified? The Derbyshire and Althouse ones more clearly make the righties look bad, when you explain what we think are wrong with those posts.

  • Especially by a certain presidential nominee. -naschkatze

    You can’t lead when you’re triangulating.

  • * The good news is, the latest CNN poll shows that 69% of Americans believe waterboarding is torture, and 58% believe the U.S. government should be barred from using the tactic against “suspected terrorists.” The bad news is, those numbers should be higher.

    The 11% who agree it is torture but think the government should use it are a scary bunch.

    * And the president reached a milestone today. A new Gallup poll showed Americans disapprove of Bush’s job performance, 64% to 31%, but here’s the kicker: 50% say they “strongly disapprove” of the president. The previous high was Richard Nixon at the height of the Watergate scandal, when 48% of Americans strongly disapproved of his performance. Congratulations, George, it couldn’t have happened to a more appropriate person.

    And Clinton was at 60% approval when he was impeached. I still do not understand quite how that happened.

    * You’ve all voted for The Carpetbagger Report today, right? (It only takes a second and I ask for so little…)

    Of course – and you are closing fast on 2nd place!

  • Kucinich is bad news. He’s a spoiler and not trust-worthy. We liberals aren’t that organized to be practical and accomplish a lot in politics- at least since the continuity of our best leadership was disrupted by conservative tactics in the 1960s. So what do you do if you think an area is ripe to elect a real progressive? You make sure they elect your ace-in-the-hole. Do you want the most liberal voice in the House/the Senate to be a real liberal, or a guy you can count on when the chips are down?

    I had other specific stuff that makes me wonder about Kucinich, and I’ll have to try to remember it and post it in a comment. Republicans seem to think that either an impeachment vote would lead to a backlash against us, or that it would bring up a lot of division in our own party. In any event, addressing Bush or Cheney with attempts at impeachment is an impractical measure and a questionable stunt. With more evidence against them and a more favorable congress, it could be a go, but now it’s not at all.

  • I sometimes wonder what the Bush administration would be like if it weren’t staffed with crazy people: “Julie Myers, head of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement division, has apologized for ‘awarding ‘most original costume’ to a Homeland Security Department employee who dressed in prison stripes, dreadlocks and dark makeup for a Halloween gathering at the agency.’”

    No, no, the Republicans aren’t racists . . .

  • Odd, Kucinich sure isn’t in the news showing he’s a spoiler and untrustworthy. The Democrats fill that bill quite nicely.

  • Sorry, leon @ 12, but I would be more easily convinced that December 21, 2012 could be the last day based on the Mayan calendar. At least on that day, the Earth will be aligned with other planets and there is a possibility that the Earth’s magnetic poles could shift. You might want to cut back on the kool-aid between now and then.

    On our lame-ass dem Congrass, I remember Schumer was also campaigning for Lieberphlegm in Connectican’t. Not much of a judge of character.

    Hey, Leon, any predictions if the next prez will be the Triangulator-In-Chief?

  • Bush set the “strongly disapprove” record, but not really, when you consider many who so disapprove of him are right wing extremists who think he’s neocon-lite, and old fashioned conservatives who think he’s fiscally reckless. The number who truly understand what a monster this man and his administration are is frighteningly modest. And the members of the establishment who get it is trifling. Maybe Keith Olbermann and Dennis Kucinich. Who else? Paul Krugman. A few more. Pathetic and baffling. How did this guy and his gang of fellow sociopaths get away with it? It’s not just the worst, the most corrupt, the most inept and incompetent administration in history, it’s evil. Positively evil, and I never use that word, but there’s no other that fits.

  • “What’s not to like”, you said.

    Accountability, investigations, subpoenas. It all sounds fine.

    Now what? Impeachment is being treated as a distraction from the important business of government.

    Are you embarrassed yet?

  • Odd, Kucinich sure isn’t in the news showing he’s a spoiler and untrustworthy. The Democrats fill that bill quite nicely.

    He could be supporting one of the stronger candidates instead of advocating a lot of stuff that idealists of the party would like to see, but that is at the same time stuff that isn’t practical (for example, impeach Cheney)- and thereby playing the exact role as Nader played in 2000, by being an attractive-to-some-yet-unviable candidate.

    That’s just where you have to start out to understand him, though.

    The Democrats do not “fit the bill quite nicely” of being untrustworthy. They can’t just do what comic-book characters do and solve everything in a second’s worth of effort. Thay have at least one deck stacked against them.

  • The Democrats do not “fit the bill quite nicely” of being untrustworthy.

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A divided Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday backed Michael Mukasey as attorney general despite concerns about the retired judge’s refusal to denounce “waterboarding” — simulated drowning — as unlawful torture.

    I trust the Democrats; I trust them to cringe, to cave and to be outmaneuvered.

  • They can’t just do what comic-book characters do and solve everything in a second’s worth of effort.

    Hell, they can’t even vote against the Bush agenda, much less fight it with everything at their disposal. First time in my life I’ve ever seen the minority win on every single constitutional matter that comes before them because the majority votes with them.

    That sure wasn’t why I voted for the Democrats in 2006. Fool me once…

  • The Democrats do not “fit the bill quite nicely” of being untrustworthy. They can’t just do what comic-book characters do and solve everything in a second’s worth of effort. Thay have at least one deck stacked against them.

    Forgive me, Swan, but you seem to be channeling Harry Reid. Or maybe his chief of staff?

  • Today’s vote on H.R. 333 goes to show that “there aren’t enough votes to impeach” is largely a myth.

    I’m not saying the votes are there (yet) but the point is we’ve been assuming all along that members of Congress already have their minds made up on this issue. Today’s vote to kill the resolution put that myth to rest today.

    Nuff said!

  • Ok, so what is the evidence for impeaching and kicking Cheney and Bush out of office?

    We all think, “where there’s smoke there’s fire,” but to do things legally, you need evidence. Impeachment is a legal process, not a bill of attainder.

  • That’s why impeachment is a bad idea and why Dems don’t want to do it. People who want them to do it want them to, metaphorically speaking, charge into battle with no weapons in their hands.

  • In my favorite “bwahahahahahaha” moment of the day, Regnery Publishing’s parent company, Eagle Publishing, Inc., is being sued by a coterie of conservative douchebag authors that claim the wingnut publishing enterprise is screwing them out of their due rewards. It appears Regnery is selling screwball books like “Swiftboating John Kerry: The Book” (I won’t dig to find the real title of the book, sorry) at bargain basement prices to it’s parent firm that then turns around and gives the books away or uses them for promos. And the authors think Regnery is making “jillions” (yeah, they really said jillions) of dollars off of this arrangement, while depriving the authors of royalties by not selling the books at full price.

    Wingnut conservatives who are all about “tort reform” suing wingnut conservatives for practicing the same hardball capitalism they claim to advocate. Swiftboaters swiftboating their fellow swiftboaters. Schadenfreude just doesn’t taste much sweeter than this.

    Check this out in the NYT – http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/07/books/07cons.html?bl&ex=1194498000&en=c613ca4348835776&ei=5087

  • ***Swan you are full of it just like Hoyer*** You and those like you are the spoilers. “Let’s not do what’s right or just because it just distracts from reality”. Never believing in creating another reality. There is no down side to impeachment. Hell even Nixon was forced by congress to give them a ’special” prosecutor just to get his AG approved. That prosecutor ended up prosecuting Nixon.
    “Evidence”?…we have video tapes and testimony out the yin-yang and that is just what we know so far. With a special prosecutor the amount of evidence he could gather would be overwhelming (can’t hide behind executive privilege with impeachment. You

    know all those emails and documents the WH refuses to turn over)

    What pray tell is the downside to making the republicans discuss WMD, torture, wire tapping, executive privilege, secret energy policies…even if the dems planned not to vote to impeach they could have had a field day bashing Cheney and this administration and only shortly before an election.

    Hoyer was so stupid here…the republicans wanted to make it look like they were willing to debate Cheney’s positions (“He’s done nothing wrong or improper”) when in fact they weren’t. But that is how they will play it now…(“It was the democrats who didn’t want to discuss it…they were afraid…proving that even they know Bush/Cheney are men of honor and have done nothing wrong”) Could Hoyer have been more easily manipulated…the dem leadership were changing positions back and forth today, that’s why the 15min. vote went on for over 55min.

    Swan you are like the person who when facing a person who has all the answers to all the problems of the world standing before him would argue ..”maybe it’s not a good idea to have all the answers to all the problems…maybe we’re not supposed to.”
    Kucinich has been right on every issue and always way ahead of the other candidates.

    He is more like Gore than Nader. We let Gore get by us and now we are making the same mistake with Kucinich. All you are doing is looking for how wrong he is instead of paying attention to how right he is. He is a democratic candidate for president and before the primaries have even begun and without paying the slightest attention to his policies you are saying he should throw his support behind one of the “stronger” candidates.

    Let me remind you that Kucinich is stronger than all the other candidates…starting a coalition to prevent invading Iraq instead of signing the AUMF, voted against the MCA, the Patriot act, the FISA protect America act, re-authorizing the Patriot act, Only candidate saying he would end NAFTA and withdraw us from the WTA, introduced not for profit single payer national Health care for all Americans, withdraw our troops from Iraq with none left behind and no permanent military bases within 3mos, create a department of Peace, was the first one to call out Cheney and Bush for their Iran rhetoric and threats. and is the only candidate who said on his first day of office WOULD HAVE BUSH AND CHENEY ARRESTED. He is the strong candidate and the one who has been there when “the chips are down”, unlike Hoyer, Fienstein, Rockefeller, Clinton, and many more I could name.

    Look at the country…how divisive and full of fear…how politicized…debating torture and wiretapping and preemptive war…and finally someone has the guts to stand up and attempt to make this regime accountable…and you call them a spoiler…Hoyer says we are just too busy with other things to bother with accountability…Pelosi says we are too busy “policy making”…yet the regime blocks them at every turn. It is no longer the issues that must be attacked…but the regime…the cou appointed illegally in 2000.

    Here are a few paragraphs from a post at Glenn Greenwald’s site over at Salon from guest blogger Chris Floyd, Oct. 26 showing why impeachment is not a distraction (suggest you go to the archives on that site and read the whole article):
    “…For above all, impeachment should be moved to the top of the congressional agenda. It should be the overriding, all-consuming priority of the people’s representatives. For this is the inescapable, stone-cold truth: nothing, absolutely nothing but impeachment, will stop the Bush-Cheney regime from carrying out its criminal agenda…
    (snip)

    Congress passes laws forbidding torture; Bush and Cheney ignore them. Congress issues subpoenas and demands documents for its corruption probes; Bush and Cheney ignore them. Bush’s “signing statements” explicitly state that he will follow only those parts of the law that suit him. Congress could vote tomorrow that Iran cannot be attacked without a formal declaration of war, and Bush would attack whenever he chooses anyway, calling it an extension of the congressionally authorized action in Iraq, a “defensive” action to protect the troops. Congress can pass any law it wants, but if you have an executive branch that considers itself above the law – as this one demonstrably does – then it doesn’t matter. As long as Bush and Cheney remain in power, their criminal enterprise will go on.

    Thus impeachment is not a “distraction” from efforts to end the war in Iraq, or stop a new war with Iran, or quell the vast and sickening corruption of the regime. It is their prerequisite. And even if impeachment is “politically impossible in the present circumstances,” as Bush enablers like the pusillanimous Nancy Pelosi likes to tell us, it should be shoved to the forefront of national debate nonetheless. Let us have a “constitutional crisis;” let us bring our festering sickness to a boil. Let’s lay it all out, and let people declare once and for all where they stand. Are you for the republic, or do you hold with tyranny, torture and mass murder? Let’s draw the line at last, and be done with all pretense.

    But we know that what should be done will not be done. We see that the Democrats have taken impeachment “off the table.” We see that far from stopping or curtailing the war in Iraq, Pelosi and the Democratic leadership punish those among their number who dare speak the truth: that Bush has indeed sent American soldiers to have their heads blown off for his amusement, for his aggrandizement, for his radical agenda of loot and dominion. We see that far from stopping the rush toward a new war with Iran they are instead abetting it, declaring their overwhelming assent to the deceitful casus belli Bush has offered. We see, with despair, that the national Democrats share the regime’s radical agenda of endless militarism and hegemonic sway, differing only on a few points of style and decorum, and a desire to see more “competence” in Iraq and “future wars.” …”

    This is the leadership that you can count on when the chips are down? Kucinich should be applauded for his courage and strength…to go against the mis guided leadership of his own party who should have had his back but are too spineless to step out of line against this regime. Read the article Swan…I dare ya’.

  • Bjobotts, in your comments, you usually have put stuff you are quoting between asterisks, but in this comment you seem to have used them for emphasis since I can’t find where anyone else wrote what you put between asterisks. This is confusing, especially since I tend to use the asterisks to emphasize things (quicker than using the italics or bold html tags) or to denote “virtual” body language (for example, * rolls eyes*, *sighs*, *dramatically covers face with crook of arm*, etc.) while others seem to have adopted them stylistically to surround quoted material, and to make sure the quote gets noticed at the same time. If you would stick to one usage, either as quotes or as emphasis, it would help us to understand your comments a lot.

    As far as the substance of your comment, I think it is just stupid.

  • bjobotts –

    if we selected presidents by having everyone submit a “blind graded” essay, Kucinich would probably have a great chance.

    but since 1960, at least, it has been clear that other, more superficial things matter (and, in that election, thank god they did).

    Dukakis was, in my opinion, significantly brighter than Kucinich, and had a well established record of accomplishment as an executive. He lost for a lot of reasons, but one certainly was that his short stature and squinting, elfin grin made him look “wimpy” riding on a tank in a helmet. He got mocked in Iowa for suggesting farmers could diversify for economic safety by planting Belgian Endive (which, given all the novel stuff at ever expanding farmers markets here, turned out to be prescient). Dukakis won, what – about 3 states?

    Kucinich can be spot on 100% of the time on issues, but as long as he talks in a nasal, whiny voice, stands about 5′ 4″, is parodied on late night shows as an elf, sees UFOs, hangs with Shirley MacLaine and is a vegan he’d be lucky to get a dozen votes between Philadelphia and Fresno, and those would be a handful of university professors in Madison and Iowa City. There may be a way for Dems to win ignoring the Old South, but we can’t win relying only on the 13 colonies and the pacific coast. If people think Hillary is a down-ballot threat to other Dems, Kucinich would turn upper midwestern and interior western states from in play to deep red faster than anyone. Right or wrong on the merits, and it may not say much about this country’s political maturity level (which shouldn’t surprise anyone here), but it would be the Dukakis electoral map all over again if Kucinich ever got the nomination.

  • Comments are closed.