Tuesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Good news: “A federal magistrate ordered the White House on Tuesday to reveal whether copies of possibly millions of missing e-mails are stored on computer backup tapes. The order by U.S. Magistrate Judge John Facciola comes amid an effort by the White House to scuttle two lawsuits that could force the Executive Office of the President to recover any e-mail that has disappeared from computer servers where electronic documents are automatically archived. Two federal laws require the White House to preserve all records including e-mail. Facciola gave the White House five business days to report whether computer backup tapes contain e-mails written between 2003 and 2005. The time period covers the Valerie Plame affair in which at least three presidential aides were found to have leaked Plame’s CIA identity to the news media.”

* As much as we’d hope the Iraqi insurgency is gone, it’s not: “Militants assassinated two key leaders of American-backed neighborhood militias in northern Baghdad over the past two days, highlighting the militants’ strategy of eliminating militia commanders who have embraced partnerships with American forces but who themselves remain vulnerable to attack. On Monday morning, a suicide bomber on foot killed Col. Riyadh al-Samarrai, a founder of the Sunni Awakening Council in Adhamiya, a Sunni stronghold that until recently was a haven for insurgents…. The bomber struck at the offices of the Sunni Endowment, one of the most powerful Sunni institutions in Iraq and an influential backer of the new Sunni alliances with American forces. The suicide blast and a nearly simultaneous car bombing just yards away killed 14 people and wounded 18 others.”

* Fox News reported today that James Carville and Paul Begala would leave their CNN jobs to help turn around Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. Shortly thereafter, Carville flatly denied the report, “Fox was, is and will continue to be an asinine and ignorant network. I have not spoken to anyone in the Clinton campaign about this. I have not done domestic political consulting since President Clinton was elected. I’m not getting back into domestic political consulting.” Not long after, Begala was equally emphatic: “As I say to the boys: N.H.D. Not Happenin’ Dude.”

* Krugman: “When the economy was (sorta, kinda) strong, it showed that tax cuts work, and so we needed to make the Bush tax cuts permanent. Now the economy is falling off a cliff — although according to the White House, nobody is predicting a recession (I seem to know an awful lot of nobodies) — and you know what that means: we’d better make the Bush tax cuts permanent.” Dan Froomkin has more.

* I hate to see Dems get caught up in the culture of corruption, but this story about a fishy earmark pushed by Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) looks discouraging. Let’s hope there’s an innocent explanation.

* Over the weekend, Bill O’Reilly got physical with an Obama staffer he didn’t like. Last night, the Fox News blowhard said his temper tantrum, which drew Secret Service intervention, was necessary to protect the Constitution. He didn’t appear to be kidding.

* Good point from Matt Yglesias, Part I: “My roommate Kriston Capps is having some difficulty explaining to his parents why the Fair Tax is not, in fact, fair. I think the talking point you want to hit here has to do with the effects of excluding savings and investment from taxation. Under the fair tax, Paris Hilton’s maid winds up paying a bigger proportion of her income in taxes than does Paris Hilton. People who can afford giant mansions aren’t going to pay 30 percent on that, people who can afford full-tuition for their kids at fancy private universities aren’t going to pay 30 percent on that, people aren’t going to pay 30 percent on their European vacations, they’re not paying 30 percent on what they pay their maid or their gardner. But ordinary people are going to see the price of everything they buy at the grocery store go up. ”

* Good point from Matt Yglesias, Part II: “Reading Bill Clinton’s slams on Barack Obama you have to wonder if the ex-president and other close associates might be so clouded by bitterness if Hillary Clinton loses that they’ll try to sabotage Obama’s general election campaign. As Hillary’s husband, you expect Bill to vigorously support her campaign. But as a former president and high-profile Democratic Party leader, you also expect Bill to not actually get down and dirty attacking other Democrats as unfit for office. After all, if Obama does become the nominee and John McCain or Mitt Romney starts attacking him as insufficiently experienced to do the job, one surrogate you’d definitely want to have out there in Obama’s camp would be former President Bill Clinton.”

* Very disappointing: “The Defense Department’s top watchdog has declined to investigate allegations that an American woman working under an Army contract in Iraq was raped by her co-workers. The case of former Halliburton/KBR employee Jamie Leigh Jones gained national attention last month. An ABC News investigation revealed how an earlier investigation into Jones’ alleged gang-rape in 2005 had not resulted in any prosecution, and that neither Jones nor Democratic and Republican lawmakers have been able to get answers from the Bush administration on the state of her case. In letters to lawmakers, DoD Inspector General Claude Kicklighter said that because the Justice Department still considers the investigation into Jones’ case open, there is no need for him to look into the matter.”

* Best healthcare in the world? “France, Japan and Australia rated best and the United States worst in new rankings focusing on preventable deaths due to treatable conditions in 19 leading industrialized nations, researchers said on Tuesday. If the U.S. health care system performed as well as those of those top three countries, there would be 101,000 fewer deaths in the United States per year, according to researchers writing in the journal Health Affairs.” (thanks to LM and RK for the tip)

* Fox News Attacks: Obama edition.

* Sam Seder reports live from New Hampshire at a Rudy Giuliani “rally.” Hilarious.

And finally, a quick programming note. Tonight, I probably won’t be blogging too much, if at all, about the New Hampshire primary results, but I will set up a special overnight New Hampshire Open Thread for folks who want to talk about the results, brag, complain, speculate, whatever strikes your fancy. I’ll have full coverage in the morning.

That’ll be up in a few hours. Until then, feel free to talk, brag, complain, and speculate about everything else.

Seems that Yglecias saw my comment #19 from two posts ago. Just glad that idea is out and spreading…

  • Democratic pundits seem really worried that the Clintons, if Hillary doesn’t win, will pick up their marbles and go home. She will quit the senate; he won’t campaign for the nominee. Are y’all out of your freaking minds? These people have devoted their lives to progressive issues. And if Obama or Edwards lose, I don’t think they are going to drop out and take up drinking either.

    Rumors and innuendos – let the Republicans do those. They are better at it.

  • jen,
    Don’t you agree it would be hard for the Clintons to support Obama as the Democratic nominee they Swift-boat him?

  • Another argument against the misnamed “Fair Tax” that is particularly applicable to the Baby Boomer generation:

    All your lives you accumulated savings after you paid income tax. Now, as you approach retirement and will be spending down your savings, they want to eliminate the income tax and tax you on your consumption instead. It’s a double whammy for baby boomers.

    Another point: every example I’ve seen of the “fair tax” calculation shows the hypothetical taxpayer paying less. If everyone pays less, how can it be revenue-neutral? Or is it more work by the Tax Fairy?

  • Speaking of O’Reilly’s run-in with the Secret Service, billoreilly.com has a poll question:

    “Was Bill right to remove the guy who was blocking the Factor’s shot of Senator Obama?”

    Perhaps readers of The Carpetbagger Report might like to go there and express your opinions. 🙂

  • So it sounds like Bush is going to leave office symmetrically with repsect to taxes. When he ran for office, he argued that tax cuts were merited because the economy was so good. As it started to falter after he won, he tried to talk it down so that he could claim that the recession began before he took office. Then when it tanked he sold us the same tax cuts on the basis that they were needed because the economy was so bad. He’ll argue any BS to get his way, and we as a nation are fool enough to buy it. Apparently we get the leaders we deserve.

    “All your lives you accumulated savings after you paid income tax. Now, as you approach retirement and will be spending down your savings, they want to eliminate the income tax and tax you on your consumption instead. It’s a double whammy for baby boomers.”

    Given that we baby boomers have overseen massive deficit spending / increase in the public debt that will be shoved off onto our kids and that we haven’t properly dealt with the future of social security, that could actually be an argument for a consumption tax that would target boomers. Nonetheless, yes, it is hugely regressive and a huge boon for the very wealthy, so it’s a terrible idea.

  • Re: Mary Landrieu. Gee, what a surprise. Look at her vote on the energy bill. A Louisiana politician in a ethicly questionable situation? Who would have thought. For the Democrat or Republican officeholder, dirty, corrupt politics is a way of life in Louisiana.

  • Sam Seder reports live from New Hampshire at a Rudy Giuliani “rally.”

    That really is quite funny. Seder’s deadpan delivery is perfect.

  • Stephen, None of the groups who were supposed to be plotting this Swift Boat attack against Obama say that’s their intention. It’s another exaggeration become rumour become news.

    And if you remember the campaign against Clinton by W’s father – it wasn’t nice at all. Yet Clinton has worked with George Ist on several issues. It’s politics. You do what you need to do and then you work with the winner. And if Obama withers under any criticisms Bill may make of him, what will the Republicans do to him? My suspicion is that Obama will show his mettle. Otherwise he shouldn’t be our candidate. And regardless of who wins the nomination, they will all work together. It’s how politics works.

  • ***jen flowers***”… She will quit the senate; he won’t campaign for the nominee. Are y’all out of your freaking minds? These people have devoted their lives to progressive issues. And if Obama or Edwards lose, I don’t think they are going to drop out and take up drinking either.

    Rumors and innuendos – let the Republicans do those. They are better at it.”

    Exactly right. I guess they ran out of things to smear Hillary with so they went on to her husband. What is with these people and the Clintons?

    Does anyone really believe that the WH, court ordered or not, will turn over any incriminating emails…that anything will be done about making these people accountable for any of their criminal activity?

    Sen Landrieu explanation is clear…”…I need to make money” for my campaign. Public finance of campaigns will stop this earmark profiteering.

    Gripes the hell out of me to see that we have the potential to have the greatest health care system in the world but have it held back by the greed of private ins co and big pharm. and a bribed congress.

    Why isn’t Barack and Hillary screaming bloody murder and rape about the refusal of the DoD IG to investigate and arrest the perpetrators of raping and enslaving an American citizen in their employ by contractors? It’s shameful and should fill them with fury and rage that nothing is being done about it. If it were their daughter hell would be raised.

    Bush’s tax cuts would pay for our nation’s health care, for SCHIP, and still have money left over. Fair tax is not fair by any means. Poor people should not be expected to pay the same tax as the wealthy. You would think this would be self evident. The rich can never be expected to regulate their own greed. They live under the premise that you can never have too much money…which is untrue if you are making everyone else poor. Then too much money will get you killed out of necessity by those starving.

  • Spoke Rich Man down to Poor Man:
    “Fair taxes we have not!
    You get your milk and eggs tax-free;
    And then you tax my yacht!

    All men created equal
    Means each one an equal bill,
    The same upon your Thirty Grand
    As on my Thirty Mill!”

    Hey—it’s a work in progress. Anyone care to add on? C’mon people—think “Bastille Day” here.

    Up the Revolution!

  • Okie,

    Check this out:

    http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110010523

    This is only the beginning of the deceptions in the FairTax. Under the Linder-Chambliss bill, the federal government would have to pay taxes to itself on all of its purchases of goods and services.

    This legerdemain is done solely to make revenues under the FairTax seem larger than they really are, so that its supporters can claim that it is revenue-neutral. But for the government to afford to purchase the same goods and services, it would have to raise spending by the amount of the tax it pays to itself.

    After reading that article, I’m of the opinion that all supporters of the FairTax should be hanged for treason.

  • Here’s a tidbit in regards to Fox News and how they spread misinformation… Today, NPR’s show “Talk of the Nation”, dealt with the ‘evolution of Al-Jazeera’ and how they are perceived throughout the world and here in America.

    Hugh Miles, author of “Al-Jazeera: The Inside Story of the Arab News Channel that Is Challenging the West” was on the show and explained that in the UK, Fox Broadcasting would not be issued a license to have a newscast because it is too biased. He said Al-Jazeera has a broadcasting license for the UK, which means that Al-Jazeera is less biased than Fox news!

    He said that Fox news is not balanced and deliberately spreads wrong information without correcting it afterwards. Of course none of this is any news to the ‘reality based community’, but I wonder how Fox News would react if someone was to mention in the major Media conglomerate that they wouldn’t be able to broadcast in the UK because of their extreme bias.

    The transcript on the NPR website won’t be available until tomorrow, but below is the link if you’d like to listen to it yourself

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=17932912

    IF there are any readers here who regularly watch Fox news and believe their talking points as if it is the gospel… Listen and learn. It might open your mind.

    🙂

  • I was looking through the NH exit polls, and setting aside the unreliability of exit polling, and the fact that there seems to be some internal inconsistency and all-over-the-map-ness about them, there is nothing in there to suggest an Obama landslide, and indeed some pretty strong suggestion to the contrary.

    Obviously if Clinton wins, she wins. If Obama wins by double digits, he wins.

    But the question for my fellow political junkies is this: has the media slammed on Hillary’s “crash” so hard and so thoroughly hyped Obama that if Clinton loses by, lets say, 4%, that it ends up being a “win” for her by beating the expectations game? Does that get her a headline of “Not Over Yet!”

  • Bill Clinton: This whole thing is the biggest fairy tale…

    And you turned the White House into a whore house.

    My oh my…
    Old pervs don’t fade away do they?
    They just chew on bigger cigars….

  • Zeitgeist, I don’t see a landslide either. I think that Hillary has gotten all the press this weekend. Obama hasn’t been heard from much in the MSM.

    Hey where’s that open thread?

  • I’m really geeky about this stuff, so the exit polling on when people made their decision is fascinating to me.

    If you made your decision a long time ago, you are for Hillary.
    If you made your decision in the last week, you are for Obama – a very strong post-Iowa bounce.
    If you made your decision in the last day or so, it is close to even – it appears showing some emotion helped HRC more than it hurt.

  • i think the huge turnout in new hampshire, plus the local interviews i have seen, indicate a great win for obama. the energy is there

  • Huh, history repeating itself:

    “Report reveals Vietnam War hoaxes, faked attacks”

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080108/pl_afp/usvietnamintelligence512

    “But he said that probably the ‘most historically significant feature; of the declassified report was the retelling of the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident.

    “That was a reported North Vietnamese attack on American destroyers that helped lead to president Lyndon Johnson’s sharp escalation of American forces in Vietnam.

    “The author of the report ‘demonstrates that not only is it not true, as (then US) secretary of defense Robert McNamara told Congress, that the evidence of an attack was ‘unimpeachable,’ but that to the contrary, a review of the classified signals intelligence proves that ‘no attack happened that night,’ FAS said in a statement.

    “‘What this study demonstrated is that the available intelligence shows that there was no attack. It’s a dramatic reversal of the historical record,’ Aftergood said.”

    But then again, 9/11 changed everything…….

  • Democratic pundits seem really worried that the Clintons, if Hillary doesn’t win, will pick up their marbles and go home. She will quit the senate; he won’t campaign for the nominee. Are y’all out of your freaking minds? These people have devoted their lives to progressive issues. — jen flowers, @2

    Well, no; I don’t think either of the Clintons would, suddenly, renounce years of progressive (or semi-progressive) thought and become a Cheney. Nevertheless… If the two of them dig the Obama-negative pit deep enough, they’ll make it that much harder on themselves to do a 180deg pivot and start supporting him should he win the Dem nomination.

    Steve, @11,

    I’m thinkin’. I’m thinkin’… 🙂 But English is not my first language and your rhythm is a bit wobbly, so it ain’t easy…

  • Comments are closed.