Tuesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Since you’re probably curious, polls close in Vermont at 7 p.m. ET, Ohio at 7:30 p.m. ET (though some parts of the state were experiencing flooding, and may get some extra time), Rhode Island at 9 p.m. ET, and Texas at 9 p.m. ET (though the far-western tip of Texas is in the Mountain time zone, and will close an hour later). Of course, in Texas, the caucuses begin after the primary ends.

* This could get ugly in a hurry: “Hundreds of Venezuelan troops moved Tuesday toward the border with Colombia, where trade was slowing amid heightening tension over Colombia’s cross-border strike on a rebel base in Ecuador. The Organization of American States scheduled an emergency afternoon meeting in Washington to try to calm one of the region’s worst political showdowns in years, pitting U.S.-backed Colombia against Venezuela’s leftist President Hugo Chavez and his allies. Colombian and Ecuadorean officials, meanwhile, traded accusations in the United Nations and the International Criminal Court.”

* I sure hope this investigation happens: “A Federal Communications Commission official has asked for an agency inquiry into the blackout of CBS News’s ’60 Minutes’ by an Alabama television station. FCC Commissioner Michael J. Copps said he had asked Chairman Kevin J. Martin to open an inquiry into the Feb. 24 incident at WHNT, a CBS affiliate in Huntsville, Ala. Martin said he would look into the matter but has not indicated yet whether he would issue a letter of inquiry to the station, a source close to the commission said.”

* Something to look forward to: “As expected, Attorney General Michael Mukasey gave the House the legal finger on Friday in response to a criminal referral for White House aides’ contempt of Congress. Think of that what you will, the House has been forced on to Plan B, a civil suit against the White House. Roll Call reports it should be coming soon: ‘House Democrats said a civil lawsuit could be filed as early as this month that challenges the Bush administration’s claims of executive privilege in curtailing aides from testifying on Capitol Hill.'”

* Disappointing, but not surprising: “In the six and a half years since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, federal law-enforcement agencies have secretly established profiling techniques to screen immigrants based on their nationalities, protocols that critics charge encourage the unjustified targeting of Muslims.”

* Rush Limbaugh rationalizes on-air racism by saying he’s never heard of “Curious George.” Riiiiight.

* There such a thing as bad publicity: “Barack Obama received more campaign coverage than any other candidate during the past week, with 69% of campaign stories focusing on him, according to a survey by the Project for Excellence in Journalism, which noted that to be the highest percentage for any candidate this year. But does that mean that Hillary Clinton’s charge that he is the media darling is correct?” No, most of the Obama coverage was negative.

* On a related note, Obama chatted with reporters in Texas today, “chiding them for buying Clinton claims that the media has been soft on him.” Obama said, “I am a little surprised that all the complaining about the refs has actually worked as well as it has for them This whole spin that the press is being so tough of them and not tough on us. I just didn’t expect you guys would bite on that.”

* Republicans are voting in Texas’ Dem primary: “Thanks in part to the lack of a competitive GOP contest, a lot of Republican voters are crossing over to vote in the Democratic primary — so much so that Democratic ballot requests are out-numbering the Republicans in even a lot of GOP strongholds. Just who is benefitting, though, it not yet clear. In the heavily-GOP Cleveland suburb of Chagrin Falls, an estimated 70% of today’s ballots are being cast in the Dem race. And judging by the folks who talked to the Plain Dealer and indicated who they’d voted for, they were breaking mostly for Hillary Clinton. We’ll find out tonight just how widespread that pattern was.”

* Jonathan Turley on Michael Mukasey: “In his twisting of legal principles, the attorney general has succeeded in creating a perfect paradox. Under Mukasey’s Paradox, lawyers cannot commit crimes when they act under the orders of a president — and a president cannot commit a crime when he acts under advice of lawyers.”

* The Republicans’ culture of corruption in Alaska is truly unique.

* Has the Bush gang successfully politicized the CDC, too? Apparently so.

* It’s hard to overstate how encouraging it is to see Melanie Morgan lose her radio show. She is a uniquely hateful person.

* And finally, a classic Bushism: “I appreciate the fact that you really snatched defeat out of the jaws of those who were trying to defeat us in Iraq.”– George W. Bush to Lt. General Ray Odierno in the White House yesterday.

Anything to add? Consider this a temporary open thread. I’ll be back later with some Election Night coverage.

And judging by the folks who talked to the Plain Dealer and indicated who they’d voted for, they were breaking mostly for Hillary Clinton.

You’ve got to be fucking kidding me. What a bunch of feckless children following Rush around like puppies.

Obviously they want this contest to continue and Clinton to win. A fact which should not escape the trolls who’ve been crying about crossover manipulation favoring Obama.

  • On item 9, given the reference to Cleveland, I assume you mean the Ohio primary, not the one in Texas.

  • Texas Republicans are are following their oracle Limbaugh’s suggestion and crossing over to vote for Hillary. In fact, I heard a woman who described herself as a Republican (i.e. Plutocrat) call into Sean Hannity a few minutes ago giddy about her good deed voting for Hillary in an attempt to help Hillary get nominated so McCain can beat her in the fall.

  • * Jonathan Turley on Michael Mukasey: “In his twisting of legal principles, the attorney general has succeeded in creating a perfect paradox. Under Mukasey’s Paradox, lawyers cannot commit crimes when they act under the orders of a president — and a president cannot commit a crime when he acts under advice of lawyers.”

    Catch. Meet 22. Throw in a 1984 and we have the classics of FUCK YOUism.

  • If Hillary gets the nod, do you think McCain has a chance against her? Dirty politics will have no scorn like this woman who will be president.

    McCain couldn’t dream up dirty politics that will be flung at him…with good cause.

    And I, for one, will be in the cheerleading section for that one.

  • A Federal Communications Commission official has asked for an agency inquiry into the blackout of CBS News’s ‘60 Minutes’ by an Alabama television station.

    I’m glad to hear this although I don’t why the FCC Chairman would hesitate for a second. It’s a no-brainer.

    We need to remember that the airwaves belong to us…not the networks. In theory, they can’t decide which stories they’ll air and which they’ll blackout. However, with the Plutocrats (i.e. Republicans) in the White House, there’s not much we can do about it…for now.

  • There can be only one presidential chimp and that’s the Chimperor George Bush.

    I wouldn’t snatch George Bush out of the jaws of anything.

    How stupid that the Republicans think they know which of our candidates they can defeat. Probably neither.

    I predicted a year ago that South America was going to go bad fast under the Bush Administration. i’ve got crystal balls!

    Let’s not help Limbaugh maintain the fiction that he actually has standards to apologize for breaking.

    Sorry I can’t get too worked up about security targeting Muslims. The odds are that the next terrorist attack will be perpetuated by Muslims. It’s like a clue!

  • “… Under Mukasey’s Paradox, lawyers cannot commit crimes when they act under the orders of a president — and a president cannot commit a crime when he acts under advice of lawyers.”

    Beautiful, isn’t it? Mukasey turned out to be quite a piece of work. Who could have imagined?

    “Consider this a temporary open thread”

    Is that like a worm hole?

  • McCain couldn’t dream up dirty politics that will be flung at him…with good cause. And I, for one, will be in the cheerleading section for that one.

    MsJoanne, a Hillary supporter, doesn’t seem to mind dirty politics…whether its against a Republican or a fellow Democrat. I’m afraid that doesn’t bode well for the long-term health of our party.

    The key is to innoculate Democratic candidates against dirty politics by educating voters on the issues. For example, if enough people support universal health care, Republicans can call us Socialists all day long, and it won’t matter. We’ll have a nation of progressives that will dismiss their nonsense as easily as most of us who visit this blog do today.

  • Just fyi: the Texas polls close at 7:00 (6:00 ET), and the caucuses begin at 7:15. I don’t know how long they last since I’ve never been to one before and don’t recall there ever being one before. But I’ll go tonight and find out.

  • i’m with msjoanne 5 I’ve been persuaded by Obama to try the high road, but if hillary gets the nod then I’m ready to go back into revenge mode.

  • Honey, MsJoanne is anything but a Hillary supporter. Either you’re not reading my posts or you’re not paying attention.

    What I am saying is IF she gets the nod, you damned well better believe I would love dirty politics. Sometimes you have to fight fire with fire. And we are at a point in our country where we live or die. This economy will affect us for generations. War for life?

    NO! NO! NO!

    And if it takes dirty politics to get the dirty politicians out of office, COUNT ME IN!

  • CJ said:
    MsJoanne, a Hillary supporter, doesn’t seem to mind dirty politics…whether its against a Republican or a fellow Democrat. I’m afraid that doesn’t bode well for the long-term health of our party.

    I hope it’s not raining where you are. Because with that turned up nose you could drown.

  • In my area, a lot of people voted early. The ones I know (quite a few) went mostly for Obama. That’s going to skew the exit polls.

    Myself? I did it the old-fashioned way—walked up to the school in the freezing drizzle about 6:30 this morning. There was already a line, and the demographics were pretty much across-the-board.

  • To MsJoanne…From Michael Seitzman:

    “Scorched Earth” is a military term, a strategic, tactical and/or punitive act against an enemy whereby you completely destroy anything and everything in the pursuit of your goal.

    This week Senator Clinton made an astonishing statement. She said, “I think you’ll be able to imagine many things Senator McCain will be able to say. He’s never been the president, but he will put forth his lifetime of experience. I will put forth my lifetime of experience. Senator Obama will put forth a speech he made in 2002.”

    You have to go back to Hillary’s crying moment in New Hampshire for context. What she told us that day was that she’s running for president because she has “so many opportunities from this country. I just don’t want to see us fall backwards.” Okay, let’s take her at her word. She’s running for president because she doesn’t want us to fall backward. “Backward,” in Clinton-speak presumably means “more George Bush.” So then you have to ask yourself how she could make a statement like the one she made today. She has to know — even if she thinks she could win — that Obama could very well be the nominee. If we accept that she is a smart woman then we have to realize that she knows this. And then we have to also realize that she knows what she just did. She just handed the Republican nominee a soundbite he can play over and over and over again throughout the general election. And this is someone who has professed as her goal to beat the Republicans at all costs.

    I wrote a piece yesterday about the Clinton campaign being a crystal ball through which we can see a Clinton presidency. Today’s statement is yet another such view into the future and a reminder of the past, a past full of the kind of partisan bickering that splits the nation down the middle, pitting American against American in a time when it benefits all of us to find common ground. It’s breathtaking to me how juvenile the Clinton campaign is. There is a “take-my-ball-and-go-home” attitude in almost all of the rhetoric. Anger, sarcasm, chest pounding and foot stomping — this is a president? No, this is a toddler having a temper tantrum. This is someone in desperate need of a time-out.

    And the more I hear the “Vote for me because I will beat the Republicans” refrain that climaxes every Clinton stump speech, the more I find it creepy and disturbing. Sorry, but the “Republicans” are half of the country. How often have we been told in the last several elections that the country is painfully divided politically.

    I don’t want to sound too Kumbaya about this, but we shouldn’t be voting for someone because they will “beat” half our country into submission. We need a leader who will enlist the other half, who will invite them, who will welcome them and who will lead a nation into an uncertain future.

    What we don’t need is a tone deaf, angry, sarcastic, brow-beating divider who would rather scorch the ground she lives on rather than imagine any possibility that she might not be the landlord. That kind of behavior represents a past we would all like to step away from, not a future any of us should embrace or even accept.”

  • If you haven’t watched the “Soldier in Iraq Throws Puppy Off A Cliff” video yet, then you are probably not aware that this is a really big story today on the intertubes. The soldier’s name is David Motari and a lot of people are really, really angry at him.

    Try googling his name. Motari’s home address has been blasted far and wide and a fair number of people are keeping their fingers crossed that he steps on an IED. Other more kindly souls only advocate court martial.

    Motari must have realized he unleashed a shitstorm of criticism because he deleted his My Space and Facebook entries but not before someone got a hold of a clear photo of him.

  • Dale doesn’t seem to mind dirty politics either. In that case, he should have no trouble voting for Hillary if given the opportunity. Me…I’d be voting for the lesser of two evils…yet again.

  • People, read what I said.

    I don’t need anti-HIllary rhetoric thrown at me. I agree. I am not a Hillary supporter BUT I WILL SUPPORT ANY DEM WHO WINS THE NOD!

    And I strongly suggest you all do, too. Period.

    I don’t like Hillary but I like McCain less. DO YOU?

  • Maven, I saw the story but couldn’t watch the vid.

    This story is equally disturbing. Hal Turner, dickhead extrodinaire, is calling for someone “acting alone” to off the presidential candidates.

    http://patriotboy.blogspot.com/2008/02/bond-had-q-jethro-has-hal-turner.html

    Screen cap of his asking someone to assassinate Obama. http://patriotboy.blogspot.com/2008/03/turner-threat-screen-cap.htmlhttp://patriotboy.blogspot.com/2008/03/turner-threat-screen-cap.html

  • At least Melanie Morgan is gone from the air. May she never reappear; she was a most terrible hate monger who encouraged violence from her minions.

  • MsJoanne@18

    Personally, the longer the campaign drags on and the uglier Hillary gets, the more I like McCain. I don’t like McCain’s policies, but as a person and politician I am starting to favor him to Hillary. A few months ago I would have voted for Hillary in November without a second thought… now she is becoming someone I may not morally be able to support.

  • John, But you will morally support someone blatantly owned by lobbyists? Someone who jokes about bombing Iran? Someone who wants us in Iraq for 10,000 years? Someone who welcomes the end of the world crowd as mirroring his? Someone who wants to continue lowering taxes for the rich? Someone who panders shamelessly EVERY TIME HE SPEAKS?

    More power to ya, bruddah. That’s some fucked up values. You go for it, though.

    I’ll stick with the better of THOSE two evils. And MY moral fortitude will STILL be intact. I may not like her but she is 10,000,000x better than McCain could ever be. Straight Talking moderate my ass.

    For shame.

  • MsJoanne@25

    I didn’t say I would vote for or support McCain… the only thing I said is that I am not sure that I can morally support Hillary.

    This isn’t Kerry v.s. Bush and there is a line past which a candidate loses my support regardless of who they are running against.

  • Sorry I can’t get too worked up about security targeting Muslims. The odds are that the next terrorist attack will be perpetuated by Muslims. It’s like a clue!

    Yeah, like that well known Grand Ayatollah, Timothy McVeigh.

    Stereotyping sucks dude. Get a clue.

  • Oh and even though I am not going to support McCain because I disagree with his policies, you are going a bit overboard in demonizing him. Yes, his policies are basically Bush 2.0, but as a politician he is one of the better guys, straight talk express being bs or not. But again, this is about Hillary losing my support, not McCain gaining it.

    Wants us in Iraq for 10,000 years? Republicans aren’t the only ones that swallow talking points…

  • “This isn’t Kerry v.s. Bush and there is a line past which a candidate loses my support regardless of who they are running against.”

    John@26

    You read this blog and you still can’t tell the difference between Republican and Democratic values?? Sorry, I don’t buy that BS.

  • The problem, as i see it, with the idea of a Clinton nomination and “revenge”, dirty politics, etc. is that she’ll lose that fight against the Republicans. For one, she’s not all that good at it, unless she’s really been pulling her punches against Obama. Sure, her attacks will make Democrats feel warm and fuzzy, but they aren’t going to affect the Republican base. Remember that the right already “knows” that the Clintons are severely truth challenged.

    For two (and its the bigger problem), she is much more vulnerable to attack than she likes to admit. All the things that Obama hasn’t brought up will be running wild. Sure, the old scandals won’t affect the Democratic base, but its a general election and she’ll have to spend time defending against those charges. A secondary problem with the old stories is that a good many voters under 27 – and older in some cases – don’t know those stories.

    How will she defend her recent talk about ending the Iraq occupation against John McCain? Get ready to hear the word “flip-flop” a few hundred thousand times. Her health care plan? They’ll just point to the last time she had a health care plan. And don’t think that they won’t attack Bill too; do any of us really know what he’s been doing for the last 7 years? Do we really want to find out?

    Not to mention that we already know she’s planning a solid 10 state strategy to the White House, which means that McCain won’t have to worry about defending his territory…he’ll be free to attack her on hers. Nor should we forget that 40+% of the population already dislikes (or even hates) her. And she’ll have to work very hard to bring back significant portions of the population that she’s managed to alienate during the primaries.

    She might be able to win, given the general dissatisfaction with the Republican Party, but it won’t be easy and it won’t be pretty…and i’d bet a paycheck that she won’t get a Democratic Congress if she does win, which would pretty well negate the victory beyond stroking her ego.

  • Why do people feel that you can only vote for the Republican or the Democrat?

    From personal experience, i can tell you that there are times when nothing feels better than “throwing away” your vote. (and no, i didn’t vote for Nader in 2000)

  • Oh and even though I am not going to support McCain because I disagree with his policies, you are going a bit overboard in demonizing him. Yes, his policies are basically Bush 2.0, but as a politician he is one of the better guys, straight talk express being bs or not. But again, this is about Hillary losing my support, not McCain gaining it.

    Did you really just type that? He’s Bush 2.0 but a good guy? Uh huh.

    Wants us in Iraq for 10,000 years? Republicans aren’t the only ones that swallow talking points…

    Talking point? “I don’t think American’s are concerned if we’re there for 100 years or 1000 years or 10,000 years.” Hyperbole, perhaps. But he said it, no?

    You can vote however you would like, but I am aware of the consequences of having Bush 2.0. I just hope others are, too.

  • uptown@29

    I think that both sides have their good and bad politicians even if the numbers are not even.

    Many Republicans aren’t going to vote for McCain because they feel that he betrayed their party. If pushed far enough, some Democrats aren’t going to vote for Hillary because we feel that she is betraying her party and our values by her campaign. If it is a battle of lesser evils then we are back at square one and frankly, I’m sick of playing that game. Hillary didn’t start this way.

  • Lex@31

    Why do people feel that you can only vote for the Republican or the Democrat?

    From personal experience, i can tell you that there are times when nothing feels better than “throwing away” your vote. (and no, i didn’t vote for Nader in 2000)

    Exactly. That’s where Hillary is pushing me if her campaign keeps getting uglier and uglier as it has been and she wins the nomination by it. I don’t want a nation run by Karl Rove wannabes.

  • From Dale at #7: “Sorry I can’t get too worked up about security targeting Muslims. The odds are that the next terrorist attack will be perpetuated by Muslims. It’s like a clue!”

    Actually, the odds are probably excellent that the next terrorist attack in the U.S., like the last several, will be perpetrated by fundamentalist Christians – against Planned Parenthood and other pregnancy counseling centers.

  • I agree with Stephen in # 35, that the probability of the next terrorist attack on American soil being perpetrated by a Caucasian fundamentalist nut is very high. Since the majority of fundamentalist nuts are Christians, that would make it all the more necessary to start looking at some of those snake handler churches where some of those nuts seem to be spawned.

    Having said that, I’m glad that the government has been profiling immigrants. I have no problem with that, and for all those ‘civil libertarians’… get over it. It’s about time that, when it comes to the ones who want to harm America, they seem to be more likely to come from the middle east. Why not pay some extra attention to them.

    Disclaimer. I’m a foreign born – legally naturalized US Citizen (born and raised in Europe. I’m red flagged and get picked out of the line pretty much every single time. It sure is annoying, and they can’ t tell me ‘why’ I’m red flagged because it is ‘secret’. It’s as if I have ‘terrorist’ stamped on my forehead instead of ‘tourist’. I’ve come to accept that, and even though I don’t like it, I put up with it, because I rather know that they’re picking on other immigrants coming into the country, and give them the same scrutiny I had to go through in order to be legally admitted into this country.
    I enjoy the freedom here in America very much, but freedom should not extend to just anybody wanting to come into the country, without having a back ground check.

  • * On a related note, Obama chatted with reporters in Texas today, “chiding them for buying Clinton claims that the media has been soft on him.” Obama said, “I am a little surprised that all the complaining about the refs has actually worked as well as it has for them This whole spin that the press is being so tough of them and not tough on us. I just didn’t expect you guys would bite on that.” Now that he’s actually getting real questions asked of him, he’s whining like Hillary. What’s next, crying? “There’s no crying on the campaign trail.” Illinois has one cry-baby Senator already: Durbin.

  • How did Schumer get Mukassey as completely wrong as McCain on Iraq.
    Can we trust him about anything again?

    What was the thought process?
    Not that Dubya would have sent us anyone good… but Schumer VOUCHED for him.
    I had hope! I accept blame for groundless optimism.

  • Comments are closed.