Tuesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Spitzer-Watch 2008 will continue, at least until tomorrow: “Gov. Eliot Spitzer, who has spent much of the day considering his options following allegations that he was linked to a high-priced prostitution ring, will not resign his office on Tuesday, according to a person involved in discussions with the governor.”

* There’s at least some indication that Spitzer is wondering if he can wait to see if the storm blows over: “‘He has not made up his mind,’ a senior adviser to Mr. Spitzer, Lloyd Constantine, said. ‘It is more correct to say that he is not resigning.'”

* For his part, Lieutenant Governor David Paterson hasn’t talked to Spitzer since yesterday and has no idea what’s going to happen: “Asked whether preparations for a transition were underway, the lieutenant governor said: ‘No one has talked to me about his resignation and no one has talked to me about a transition.'”

* Bloodshed in Baghdad: “A roadside bomb hit a bus traveling in southern Iraq on Tuesday, killing at least 16 civilians, while other violence killed at least 26 people around Iraq, police said. The U.S. military reported three American soldiers killed Monday by a roadside bomb north of Baghdad, bringing to eight the number of troops who died that day. It was the deadliest day for American forces in Iraq since Sept. 10, when 10 troops died. At least 22 other people were wounded in the attack on the bus traveling from Najaf to Basra, a policeman said on condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to release the information.”

* Bloodshed in Pakistan: “The spread of terrorism across Pakistan from its wild tribal regions to the cultural capital of Lahore on Tuesday adds to the pressure for a reconsideration of its U.S.-allied president’s approach to countering al-Qaida and the Taliban as its new government prepares to take office…. At least 24 people died Tuesday and more than 200 were injured when bombers in explosives-laden vehicles devastated a police headquarters and a business near a house belonging to Asif Ali Zardari, the widower of slain opposition leader Benazir Bhutto.”

* Waxman is still all over the EPA. Good.

* Dick Cheney will leave Sunday for a diplomatic trip to the Middle East. Bush said yesterday that Cheney would “reassure people that the United States is committed to a vision of peace in the Middle East.” Cheney the diplomat? Why does this seem like a bad idea?

* I had a hunch this might happen: “The Kansas Supreme Court today declared the state’s funeral picketing ban invalid, citing legislative legal maneuvering as the reason. The decision nullifies the law passed by the Legislature last year – and not yet implemented – designed to rein in a Topeka church that protests the funerals of fallen soldiers and others across the country. Fearing the church could win a legal challenge against the law, lawmakers inserted a so-called ‘trigger’ provision designed to test the law’s validity before it could be implemented.”

* Murdoch visits his newsroom: “In his first visit to the Wall Street Journal’s D.C. bureau, Rupert Murdoch told staffers Friday that he would put more resources into Washington coverage and take on the New York Times, while reassuring them that he is not a ‘conservative’ pushing an agenda in the news pages.” No, of course not. Why would anyone ever think that?

* Hoping to prevent the next Ashcroft-based controversy: “The Justice Department announced guidelines Monday to prevent the sort of conflict-of-interest accusations that followed its decision to steer a private contract worth tens of millions of dollars to former Attorney General John Ashcroft to monitor a large out-of-court settlement… Until now, the Justice Department has allowed individual federal prosecutors who do not work in Washington to select outside lawyers to monitor out-of-court settlements involving large companies, with the companies paying the monitors’ fees. Under the new guidelines, the monitors must now be chosen by a committee and approved in Washington by the office of the deputy attorney general, the department’s No. 2 official.”

* Cheney may not be quite as popular with the troops as he thinks he is.

* Reuters: “Only 22 percent of people responding to the poll said they read blogs regularly, meaning several times a month or more, according to the survey conducted by Harris Interactive.” Only? I have some serious doubts about the reliability of the poll, but if more than one in five Americans are reading blogs, isn’t that a lot?

* And finally, John McCain’s website lists high-profile supporters of the campaign, including “Former President George W. Bush.” It’s an amusing gaffe — and a pleasant thought.

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

The question is what percentage of Americans reads a newspaper that subscribed to Reuters wire service. . . less the percentage that only reads said newspapers for the comics, sports, want ads, or obits.

I’m bettin’ its well below 22%.

  • Well, well, well, the Emperor continues to do his thing. Not unexpected, little surprises me anymore.

    I wonder if the people will ever rise up against the evil that is our empire.

    But, to rise, you need communications. Hmmm, let’s review shall we.

    Our land and cell lines are being monitored by AT&T, Verizon and possibly others. No telephone communications. We all know enough about that, links are not needed.

    A couple of months ago, we had a rash of underline cables being cut – I had heard up to seven instances, but this link shows the fourth. I am lazy today so if you want to look for the others, feel free. This shut down internet communications in several countries. Ok, no more internet communications.

    Oh, but what about the satellite internet? Well, something about a rogue satellite being shot down comes to mind. Lots of discussion about why this was done when it was never needed before – ever. No satellite internet as well as land based internet? Maybe.

    Mail! Ah, we still have our handy dandy US Postal Service, right? Well, has anyone read H.R. 6407? Let’s take a peek at this gem, shall we? I happened on it as I was blog hopping. Thanks to Elvis for this one.

    This little signing statement has a two-fer going on. First, searches:

    The executive branch shall construe subsection 404(c) of title 39, as enacted by subsection 1010(e) of the Act, which provides for opening of an item of a class of mail otherwise sealed against inspection, in a manner consistent, to the maximum extent permissible, with the need to conduct searches in exigent circumstances, such as to protect human life and safety against hazardous materials, and the need for physical searches specifically authorized by law for foreign intelligence collection.

    No 4th Amendment. No warrant. Just the Okie dokie to search our mail whenever, wherever.

    Well, seeing that we no longer have any reasonable expectation to privacy in phone, internet or mail communications. Uhm, am I missing one that’s not been subverted? Anyone?.

    Let’s now look at that two-fer I was referring to in this little signing statement:

    The executive branch shall construe sections 3662 and 3663 of title 39, United States Code, as enacted by section 205 of the Act, not to authorize an officer or agency within the executive branch to institute proceedings in Federal court against the Postal Regulatory Commission, which is another part of the executive branch, as is consistent with the constitutional authority of the President to supervise the unitary executive branch and the constitutional limitation of Federal courts to deciding cases or controversies.

    (emphasis mine)

    What this does say here? Only he can determine whom anyone can talk to AND no one from an agency can say anything (whistle blower?), AND this is a Unitary Executive Branch AND no court shall determine cases or controversies. Think retroactive immunity? Might that count as a controversy?

    How did this executive order slip by with no fanfare? Have we become so immune to this type of shenanigans that no one pays attention to them any longer?

    Repeat after me…We. Are. Screwed.

    Oh, yeah…bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran! WOO HOO!

  • Cheney the diplomat? Why does this seem like a bad idea?

    I hope no one yells, “pull!”

    Also Jack Cafferty says he is going over there to do something about oil prices. So buy now.

  • Since we’re at the end of day thread, I’ll bring up the Ferraro issue again.

    Ferraro is another example of how we in the Democratic party are slowly but surely defeating ourselves…again. We have an historic opportunity to take back the White House, and instead of taking advantage of it, we get more of this shit.

    Stephanie Powers and Geraldine Ferraro are excellent people who have made excellent contributions to the cause in different ways. But our unnecessarily long primary fight has us shooting at each other.

    It’s virtually impossible for Hillary Clinton to get the nomination without beating Obama to a bloody pulp and damaging what little respect the Clinton’s might yet retain. The supers need to stand up and end the blood bath before we lose any more bright and respected Dems, the party and the White House.

    Obama is our nominee. Nothing will change that between now and August. It’s time for the superdelegates to stop the madness.

  • I think a lot of folks may have missed the point of Patterson’s argument about the Red Phone ad, which is entirely his fault because it was poorly made. You don’t have to show a scary arab for certain arguments about fear and security to evoke that image, and when made in this manner they certainly do.

    Not that I think the Clintons did it on purpose, I just think its something ever-present in our cinematic language.

    My further take is here.

    http://halfricanrevolution.blogspot.com/2008/03/academics-politics-and-birth-of-nation.html

  • Cheney the diplomat? Japan did the same thing—while moving their carrier forces to attack Pearl Harbor. Nothing new here—moving on.

    Spitzer watch 2007? Yeah—I bet he’d LOVE to take 2008 back right now. Sorry—no do-overs, Eliot. ET says “go home.”

  • The only reason Cheney could be going over to the Middle East is to put the fear of a Christian God into them…can’t wait for the announcement of his accomplishments. I heard he was going to be involved in the Israel/Palestinian peace process. W needs a victory there before the end of the year, unnerstand????

  • CB – Your pull quote about the eight soldiers killed the other day being the highest killed in day since last September is in error. Atrios had a post this morning that nine soldiers willed on January 9. God rest their souls every one.

    So we have a Democratic majority in Congress and a looming Democratic president and Rupert Murdoch wants the Wall Street Journal to focus more on Washington. Why does that move appear to have an ulterior motive to it? Shouldn’t the Wall Street Journal focus on, um, Wall Street?

    “Former President George W. Bush.” I like the ring to that, but not as much as “George W. Bush, Federal Inmate no. 196665418.”

  • With Fallon gone, he’s going to brief the Israelis on the Iran attack plans or give the the go ahead. Coincidence?

  • FYI: “There is some good news for Clinton in this [Insider Advantage Poll]..we have heard rumors that Republicans voters might engage in the primary in higher than normal numbers, so that they can vote for Clinton, and thus keep the Democratic battle going. There is some evidence that this trend might be developing.

    Following up on CJ’s post above, keeping this thing going into Pennsylvania and beyond is good for Republicans and bad for Dems. I agree…the superdelegates need to commit…NOW!

  • * Waxman is still all over the EPA. Good.

    There isn’t a company in the world whose managers would tolerate such outrageous behavior by its employees or bureaucrats without punishing them. Johnson, and/or Bush, should fire the lot of them; or if that isn’t allowed, lock them out without pay and order a renegotiation of the contract with the stupid union to disallow such behavior.

    And then tell Waxman to shut up.

  • Piggybacking on earlier posts, the polls show Hillary leading by 20 in PA. They show her tied with Obama in Michigan, and up on Obama in Florida by about 10 points. Everywhere else? Obama is leading or within the margin of error.

    On the other hand, Hillary must win 70 percent of the vote in every remaining state to catch up in elected delegates.

    They’re right. It’s over. Despite the media’s obsession with Hillary, she’s the Dem’s version of Mike Huckabee. Why the super delegates allow this insanity to continue at the expense of the party and the country, when we already know what the outcome is going to be, is beyond me. In theory, they were given SD status because they’re supposed to look out for the best interests of the party. But it’s clear to me that, by maintaining their silence, they’re not doing their jobs.

  • Spitzer Watch 2007? What happened last year?

    Wait, I’m supposed to know what year it is, too? Picky, picky…

  • dnA: That was a bit disturbing, seeing John Boehners name, and then a link to a sight called halfricanrevolution. But the message had your dnA all over it. 🙂

  • Dick Cheney will leave Sunday for a diplomatic trip to the Middle East. Bush said yesterday that Cheney would “reassure people that the United States is committed to a vision of peace in the Middle East.” Cheney the diplomat? Why does this seem like a bad idea?

    It makes perfect sense if you understand that they believe that “War is Peace” and “Freedom is Slavery” – now that Admiral Fallon’s gone, Big Dick is back on track to bring on the Apocalypse as the Anti-Christ he is.

  • dnA is John Boehner? That’s got to be big news.

    Does anybody remember how annoying political ads are? Nobody pays much attention to them on tv, they’re just an annoyance. The whole subliminal thing is ineffective. Political ads aren’t French cinema.

  • The split between the two Americas keeps widening: As the mother of all meltdowns looms, Fed bails out banks, while homeowners cash out 401k accounts. Nothing better illustrates the brutal economic asymmetry of the Bush years than today’s headlines: Homeowners who can’t make their payments either walk away from their homes or throw good money after bad in an attempt to hold on, mortgaging their futures to save their mortgages. In contrast, banks that can’t raise capital can now borrow $200 million from the Fed, unloading their bad debt on the Fed as collateral.

  • Latest on the Ferraro front:

    Ferraro said. “Racism works in two different directions. I really think they’re attacking me because I’m white. How’s that?”

    I never thought I see the day when a leading democratic presidential nominee would tolerate such vile spit from a campaign surrogate.

    But then….
    Along came Billary.

    Once upon a time, not too long ago, the democratic party was much better than this.

  • On Fox News, Ferraro also said something to the effect that Obama should stop antagonizing her because she’s a major fund raiser for Democrats.

    This is a perfect example of why we need to elect Obama. So the bigshots from either party aren’t driving the agenda. Obama has demonstrated that Dems can win, not by relying on the bigshots, but with small donations from tens of thousands of voters.

  • Cheney does not emerge from his cave unless he is up to something bad for the country. In this case, it will be either to further enrich himself and his corporate buddies, or to lay the groundwork for an attack on Iran. (Or both, as is often the case these days.)
    In other, healthier times, something so outrageous as an attack on Iran would raise a fearsome hue and cry in the American people. But we are in very sick, sick times, and such a move will be met with a whimper, especially in our totally ineffective Congress. And King Cheney will have his lap monkey do an address on what used to be our media, justifying the attack as part of “keeping America safe”. Whimper, whimper.
    I am so sick of this shit.

  • On the Ferraro front, she has a reasonable defense and that is that she was not acting as a Clinton surrogate when she made her comments. She was working as a paid commentator and was speaking for herself. Therefore, she says, Obama should not “antagonize” her.

    The problem is that Stephanie Powers was not acting as an Obama surrogate. She was touring for the book she recently completed about the Balkans. She too was speaking for herself, not on behalf of the campaign.

    Does Ferraro truly fail to see the irony, or is it that she doesn’t care. Powers should not have been fired. In fact, her comments should have been ignored entirely by the press, Clinton and the electorate. But if Hillary wants to cry foul over the slightest slight, then she (and her surrogates or “fund raisers”) should not be surprised when she’s held to the same ridiculous standards.

  • Fed Plans to Lend $200 Billion to Banks

    Scrambling to ease the strain on the credit market, the Federal Reserve announced a $200 billion program on Tuesday that would allow financial institutions, including the nation’s major investment banks, to borrow ultra-safe Treasury money by using some of their riskiest investments as collateral. Wall Street responded with a rally, with the Dow Jones industrials surging more than 400 points.

    […]

    That cartel of “quasi-private” central banks (the Federal Reserve System) sure knows how to print money out of thin air and multiply money magically through “Fractional Reserve Banking” to the tune of $200,000,000,000 this time alone. Too bad that inflating the money supply deflates the value of our fiat currency, leaving us with less buying power.

    Some kind of “free market.”

    It’s a lucrative time to be at the top of the ponzi scheme known as the Federal Reserve, along with the government sector and other supranational corporations.

  • With effectively zero percent of the vote in, NBC has called Mississippi for Obama. No big surprise but I hope Geraldine Ferraro chokes on it.

  • Keith Olbermann just said the Ferraro first made the comment about how Obama wouldn’t be successful if he were white, on Feb 28. It merely wasn’t printed until today. And she is on Clinton’s finance committee. She even said so in the same article. So I would argue she cannot say she wasn’t acting on Clinton’s behalf when she made the comment.

  • Here’s to holding out hope that Cheney is going to smack down Israel for their plan to build new housing complexes in east Jerusalem… Bush is staking a lot of his cred on this Israel Palestine peace deal, and for Israel to pull something like this really diminishes any possibility of it happening.

    Really, I’m cynical about this whole thing, and suspect he’ll settle for a deal that appears to satisfy both parties only to degenerate a few years after he leaves office so that the Repubs can blame the collapse of Bush’s “greatest success” on the Dems. Cheney’s going to make sure that this deal happens, if only for his own selfish ends…

  • Olbermann is going to have a Special Comment tomorrow night regarding Hillary. How interesting is that going to be?

  • * Dick Cheney will leave Sunday for a diplomatic trip to the Middle East. Bush said yesterday that Cheney would “reassure people […]

    Really? They’re gonna make him leave his beer *and* his hunting rifle behind? Do they really think that Cheney yelling “go f*** yourself!” at everyone is going to be sufficiently strong diplomacy?

  • MaryL,

    Thanks for that link. Ferraro is obviously a lifelong racist who seems to have problems engaging her brain before talking.

  • Cheney is going to “reassure people that the United States is committed to a vision of peace in the Middle East.”

    Of course he is. He’s committed to the ‘vision of peace’, but not to peace itself. Don’t forget how these twats parse words and splice meaning. Unless he’s talking about a ‘vision of pieces’, as in all the gold and silver pieces of money he can make while he and his energy and military junta buddies blow the M.E. to pieces.

  • JKap, you can add “these” to that $200 billion the Fed’s giving away:

    Short-term cash auctions: $100 billion.
    and—
    Debt repurchase programs: $100 billion.

    That’s $400 billion to bail out the credit markets that no one wants to buy into any more—and I’ll guarantee the ‘credit institutions” never pay these “28-day loans” back.

  • 8 U.S. soldiers dead in Iraq? Bringing the yearly total to near 80? I thought the “tide had turned” and that the “surge was a huge success?” Don’t the Democrats and American people have it all wrong when it comes to the success story that is Iraq? Perhaps Mr. Cheney should go shopping in Baghdad to prove us all wrong (yet again). Bring this senseless war to a close!

  • Re the Spitzer story, can we please drop the construction, “linked to a high-priced prostitution ring”. He bought a hooker. And expensive one, but he bought a hooker.

  • With 89% of the Mississippi vote in at 11:04 PM, the New York Times has Obama with 59.1% and Clinton with 38.7%, so it’s another lopsided victory for Obama. I’m thinking that superdelegates in states with lopsided victories may end up magnifying the already lopsided decisions of their states: in places with split votes, the superdelegates may feel relatively free to vote their conscience or their connections, but ones from states with lopsided victories (in either direction) may all feel much more pressure to go with the clear choice of their voters, given that they are politicians and are therefore likely to be sensitive to popular opinion. Comments? Does anyone have a good link to how superdelegates typically arrive at their decisions?

  • I know that I’m beginning to sound like a well-paid shill, but, truly, I do it for love 🙂

    The Votemaster at
    http://www.electoral-vote.com/
    sets another interesting mental exercise for us today:

    Supposing we were Repubs, not Dems… Supposing we alloted delegates not proportionally, but according to the “winner takes all” rule… Where would our candidates be today?

    Well… It seems that neither of them would have been where McSame is — the sole, undisputed, anointed heir — but, certainly, Clinton would have been closer to that exalted spot (making Greg, Comeback Bill, Mary and Nell very happy)…

    Disclaimer: the above report of the contents of a posting on a website in no way suggests that Clinton would have been happier running for the Republican party.

  • ROTFLMLiberalAO said:
    Yeah… Big doggy went on Rusty Limburger’s show on the day of the Texas Primary.

    Good get, Retc. That boggles my mind.Disgusting.

  • N.Wells, @41,

    Many thanks for the link; fascinating. I have an impression that it’s not fully updated but what’s there is thought-provoking. My mis-shapen funny bone was tickled by Eric Kleinfeld’s (of TPM’s Election Central) name on the list. I don’t read the comments there with any regularity but all TPM bloggers have — often — been accused of a pro-Clinton bias. I’ve always thought that the charges were valid but also that Kleinfeld managed to remain more balanced than, say, Greg Sargent. Yet… here is Eric, in the Clinton superdelegate column 🙂

  • Comments are closed.