Tuesday’s political round-up

Today’s installment of campaign-related news items that wouldn’t generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers:

* Politico: “The Obama campaign has scheduled a conference call with campaign manager David Plouffe and other top aides to re-assure gay donors and other backers who are angry at the inclusion of a gospel singer hostile to homosexuality, Donnie McClurken, in Obama’s South Carolina gospel tour, one supporter advised of the call said. ‘They’re trying to put out the fire,’ said the gay Obama supporter of the call planned for this evening. He said he hoped heads would roll. ‘Somebody made the decision [to include McClurken] and somebody approved the decision,’ the supporter said. ‘The question is, Will he hold someone accountable?'”

* Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are trading fire over Iran policy, but mainly through the mail. Over the weekend, Clinton, apparently concerned about the issue, did a major mailing in Iowa about her position, saying her vote on Kyl-Lieberman was not an endorsement for military action. Obama sent out his own mailing on the issue today, which read in part, “Why is this amendment so dangerous? Because George Bush and Dick Cheney could use this language to justify keeping our troops in Iraq as long as they can point to a threat from Iran. And because they could use this language to justify an attack on Iran as a part of the ongoing war in Iraq.”

* It will probably be wrapping up shortly, but FireDogLake is hosting an online chat with Chris Dodd this morning, and he’ll be fielding questions live from bloggers and blog commenters.

* Rep. Tom Davis (R), up until recently a top contender in Virginia’s open U.S. Senate race, apparently doesn’t want to lose to former Gov. Mark Warner (D). Davis will reportedly announce later this week that he will not run for the seat, but will instead seek re-election to the House. With Davis out, former Gov. James Gilmore (R) is expected to be the Republican candidate next fall.

* Speaking of Senate withdrawals, Texan Mikal Watts, a leading candidate to take on Sen. John Cornyn (R) next year, bowed out this morning. Watts, who has three young children, said in a statement, “After spending the last several months putting everything into this campaign, I have seen the toll this effort has taken on my young children. For these reasons, my wife and I have made the decision that I will not be seeking the Democratic nomination for the United States Senate in 2008.” With Watts out, state Rep. Rick Noriega is the likely Democratic candidate for the statewide race.

* All of a sudden, Giuliani is opposed to gay marriage, but in August 2001, after the mayor’s infidelity got him thrown out of Gracie Mansion, Giuliani moved in with a gay couple, Howard Koeppel and his partner, Mark Hsiao. Giuliani reportedly told Koeppel that “if they ever legalized gay marriages, we would be the first one he would do.”

* Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), an unheralded hero on many progressive issues, has drawn a challenger for next year’s re-election fight: businesswoman Anne Evans Estabrook.

* Bill Richardson is facing renewed criticism for his ongoing support of Don Imus. “Despite Imus’ history of on-air racial blunders, Democratic Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico and Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona said they would return to Imus’ show, saying the talker deserves a second chance.” Markos isn’t going for it.

* I can’t vouch for her veracity, so I’m just passing this along: “In Shirley MacLaine’s new book, the actress and longtime friend of Dennis Kucinich makes an interesting claim: During a visit to her home in Washington state, Kucinich said he saw a UFO and heard messages from it. ‘Dennis found his encounter extremely moving,’ MacLaine writes…. ‘It hovered, soundless, for 10 minutes or so, and sped away with a speed he couldn’t comprehend. He said he felt a connection in his heart and heard directions in his mind.'”

* Former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist endorsed Fred Thompson’s presidential campaign yesterday. Chances are, no one cares.

* And Mike Huckabee has won the coveted Chuck Norris endorsement. “Like our Founding Fathers, he’s not afraid to stand up for a Creator and against secularist beliefs,” the martial-arts actor said. Huckabee’s campaign did not have a public comment on the endorsement.

HEADLINE: Giuliani “would do” a gay couple

  • And Mike Huckabee has won the coveted Chuck Norris endorsement.

    Obviously, the Huckle-buck would “kick ass” in the current “theological war.”

  • Poor upChuck hasn’t been the same since the props department accidentally swapped a real chair with a break-away chair.

  • Note to Richardson: the offensive comment that got Imus fired was not only his second, but more like his 100th chance.

  • I think Davis was smart. He is definitley going to get re-elected, but if he left to run for a Senate seat he would be likely to loose, his seat in the House would more than likely go Dem.

  • Here’s an item, via Political Wire:

    “Nearly one year after recapturing control of Congress, House Democratic leaders will embark on a publicity blitz starting in November to combat a dismal 25 percent approval rating,” The Hill reports.

    Good! …ummm, however:

    Interestingly, House Democrats “have not coordinated the two-month public relations push with their Senate counterparts.”

    Head… exploding… must… remain… CALM!

  • Hillary may or may not have intended her vote on Kyl-Lieberman to be “an endorsement for military action,” but how in the hell does she think Bush and Cheney are going to interpret it? Can’t she hear the war drums beating again? Is she really that naive?

  • I think it’s great that Obama is calling that Kyl-Leiberman vote for what it is, permission to start a war with Iran. And he is rightfully pointing that out to voters. Hillary had no idea her AUMF vote would be used to go to war with Iraq, she seriously can’t say that this time, and she was a complete and utter tool for voting in favor of it. Unless she really beleives we need to bomb Iran, which I think she does.

    But as an aside, wasn’t this one of those votes Obama ducked?

  • But as an aside, wasn’t this one of those votes Obama ducked? -Dee Loralei

    Yeah, he skipped it, which is nearly as unforgivable as voting for it.

  • After how he covered Hillary’s back on the Kyl-Lieberman vote in the mailing she did, I assume Gen. Wes Clark will be HRC’s running mate.

    Curious how the Clinton/Clark plays with the many former Clark supporters here who, if memory serves me correct, by and large are not big HRC supporters.

  • #11: I’ve polled many of my friends who were Clark supporters (15 total): all of the Independents and Republicans are disgusted and feel somewhat betrayed (6). About half of the Democrats are happy (4), and the other half have already thrown their support behind someone else (5).

    Personally, I’ve been unable to get excited about any of the Democratic candidates.

  • A Chuck Norris quote:
    “I was wondering the other day, if I ran for president, what would be my campaign promises.
    If I’m elected president, I will…
    …tatoo an American flag with the words, “In God we trust,” on the forehead of every atheist.” (Worldnetdaily column, 6/11/2007)

    What a sweettalker. And he shows such a fine grasp of history and the Constitution. Sounds like VP material to me.

  • Zeitgeist,

    Curious how the Clinton/Clark plays with the many former Clark supporters here who, if memory serves me correct, by and large are not big HRC supporters.

    I think I fit that description. While Clintonis still not my preferred Dem nominee, I think Clark would be a great VP or Sec State. Thus if Clinton wins the nomination and announces that Clark is her running mate, I’d be quite happy about that announcement (although still not so happy about her winning the nomination).

    Does that make sense?

  • Note To Chuck Norris: The founding father WERE secular in thier political beliefs. (people, after all, can be secular in thier politics and still believe in God) And the Constitution is not in Bible. Democracy itself is based on Humanism, not theology.

    If the Founding Fathers had been anti-secular, we would not be a democracy.

  • Comments are closed.