Undead Religious Right boosts Huckabee in Iowa

Guest Post by Morbo

In the wake of the 2006 Democratic sweep of the congressional elections, self-appointed media pundits started telling us that the Religious Right is dead. They’ve kept up that drumbeat for more than a year.

I wonder how this dead movement has managed to resurrect Mike Huckabee’s presidential campaign? As columnist Ruth Marcus noted recently, Huckabee’s surge in Iowa can be pretty much attributed to socially conservative evangelicals, some of whom abandoned Mitt Romney for him:

With evangelicals expected to comprise four in 10 Republican caucusgoers, voters such as [Pastor Jeff] Williams hold the key to a Huckabee victory — and they could deliver it. In the latest Post-ABC News poll of likely GOP caucusgoers, the former Arkansas governor led Romney 44 percent to 22 percent among evangelical Protestants.

It’s amazing how this dead movement managed to propel Huckabee, whose candidacy was on life support three months ago, to the top tier. And isn’t it incredible that Romney is in such a state of panic trying to win over this dead movement that he gave a major speech this week on how much he loves Jesus and hates those mean, old courts that uphold secular government?

How did it happen? I can’t prove this, but I suspect Huckabee’s appearance before the “Values Voter Summit” in October helped him quite a bit. I was there and heard Huckabee’s speech. While the content appalled me, I have to admit it was expertly delivered and chockfull of the red meat Religious Right activists love. Word started getting around that this guy was worth a second look.

Huckabee has also been trooping around to fundamentalist churches nationwide, speaking in pulpits on Sunday mornings. It hasn’t captured much media attention, but it generates a lot of buzz in the fundamentalist community.

At the same time, lingering doubts over Romney and the Mormon issue intensified. Fred Thompson’s candidacy started to wilt once everyone realized he’s lazy and near incoherent on the stump. Sam Brownback dropped out. McCain is still disliked for mean things he said about the Religious Right in 2000. Giuliani is perceived as too liberal. That leaves Huckabee.

Even as this dynamic unfolds, some in the punditocracy refuse to admit what is happening. They keep pointing to polls that supposedly show that today’s evangelicals are less partisan and more moderate on issues like the environment, health care and education.

Those polls are flawed because they rely too heavily on self identification. For some reason, people in this country love to glom on to the term “evangelical.” People who attend a church that is in no way evangelical will claim to be evangelical. People who rarely go to church will tell pollsters they are evangelical. Thus, the pollsters are misled and in turn mislead.

What’s really going on is that a core faction of ultra-right religious conservatives continues to mobilize for political action through fundamentalist churches. Obviously they are stronger in some parts of the country than others, but the Religious Right hasn’t gone anywhere. It remains a fixture on the political scene and has enough power to shift the balance in Iowa. It may even have enough to give Huckabee the nomination.

The Religious Right supposedly died during the TV preacher scandals of the 1980s. Then it died again when Pat Robertson’s presidential campaign went up in flames in 1988 and Jerry Falwell shut down the Moral Majority in 1989. It died once more when Bill Clinton was elected in 1992 and croaked anew when he was reelected in 1996.

What’s sad is that some reporters and analysts who ought to know better have fallen for the “Religious-Right-is-dead” line. They’re simply wrong; the Religious Right, unfortunately, remains alive and kicking.

Spot on, CB. My sense is that the extremists of the religious right have overstepped the influence their numbers should bring to the republican party. They’ve theologically cleansed the party of moderates and tolerance. Otherwise rational republicans live under the threat of their wrath. The coalition repubs built in the 80s and 90s is quickly getting pared down to exclude all but the most extreme of the bible thumpers.

Huckabee is probably the only candidate the RR will come out in force for, but are they enough in 2008 general election, given the enormous mess Bush plans to leave behind? In the face of this mess, how will average voters react to a platform limited to no abortion, no gay marriage, intelligent design and even more debt?

The RR’s support of Huckabee might be enough for him to win the nomination, but what will be left of the the rest of the party? They run a serious risk of limiting their party brand to religious extremism. How does that serve them in the longer arc?

The repubs made a deal with the devil in their pandering to the religious right. It will be interesting to watch how things play out in the next decade, now that it’s time to pay the devil his due.

  • Good post, Morbo.

    I’ve taken to calling glad-handing, back-slapping Huckabee — HICK-a-Bee.

  • Religion is never dead. Like any other disease, it’s always around and, when conditions are ripe, the susceptible become infected for a while. The realization that they can’t bring Heaven to Earth usually results in a kind of innoculative learning, which the still-infected call “back sliding” and the rest of us call sanity.

  • Bush’s low approval ratings are a symptom that many Republicans are questioning their allegiance to the Party of Grant. It looks like Republicans will be deserting their party in droves during the next election cycle. The ones most likely to remain faithful are those for whom right-wing red-meat social and religious issues are of overriding importance – the Christian Right.

    Loyalty oaths proposed in Virginia. Registered Republicans only in the California Republican presidential primary. Alienating Hispanics, perceived as one of their growth markets a short time ago. Republicans seem to be determined to win with a “small tent” strategy. They are making the mistake of putting ideological purity ahead of incremental victory, something that we lefties have been guilty of so often.

    I hope that the GOP truly becomes God’s Own Party in the next decade, driving out all but the holier-than-thou crowd. And who better to lead that movement than Mike Huckabee?

  • I hope that the GOP truly becomes God’s Own Party…

    I prefer to call them the God On Parade Party-dressed up and marched around to incite religious fervor for the sole purpose of getting elected. Apparently the RR is still capable of falling for this nonsense.

  • Widespread support for the religious right’s agenda is a luxury that America can indulge in when times are good and dinner party conversation can center on these fringe ideas because other more pressing issues are held at bay. But these days there is plenty more to worry about other than what gays are up to and pondering the fate of some knocked-up woman’s embryo.

    Yes the fundies are still around and kicking. This nation will be stuck with that case of rabies for some time. This election cycle the rest of America will be hard-pressed to go along with them and cast votes purely on socially conservative issues when other issues have superceded the religious right’s petty obsessions.

  • While the Retard Right is frothing over abortion, gay rights, and evolution, the rest of the world is progressing. While America devolves into the Dark Ages, other countries have awakened from their respective religious stupors and are moving on. Look at world-wide demographics and you’ll find that the countries with the worst literacy, infant mortality, life expectancy, and poverty rates are those that have the highest rates of religiosity. Fairy tales just aren’t compatible with reality or prosperity (except for the hucksters and con-artists posing as evangelical pastors that are profiting from their ignorant flocks). Huckabee for president? Might as well have an ayatollah.

  • The writer of this article is correct to say that followers of Jesus Christ have not changed in political outlook within the last 25 years… we still believe in the principles spoken and exemplied by a man 2000 years ago. I doubt that in the next 25 years the situation will change much.

    As evidenced by the comments so far, I think that it is hard for persons who are not followers of Christ to “get inside the head” of believers. Because they don’t understand (though they may earnestly try), they resort to characterizations and simplifications. Speaking as one who was was already 26 years old before I acknowledged the grace and forgiveness God freely extended to me, I can relate.

    To understand Huckabee’s rise, you must realize that overt religiosity has nothing to do with walking with Christ, and that a person who walks with Christ can immediately recognize another one. If this is a mystery to you, I suggest you read the New Testament, then over again. Then read the Old Testament, then the New Testament again.

    I did this when even before I became a believer. Why? Because I prided myself on being open-minded, and I knew that being truly open-minded meant being open-minded even towards those ideas which cut across the grain of my cultural and educational bias. It is a circular argument to call ourselves open-minded towards the ideas we are already in agreement with…

  • Harris Huckabee:

    Are you related to… you know?

    In my entire life I have known fewer than five people who are both devout Christian believers and moral, kind people. The rest of the many “believers” that I encounter convince me that Huckabee-style Christianity is much more about overt religiosity than about “walking with Christ.” It’s too bad that so many Christians give Christianity a bad name like that, but it’s a fact.

    I didn’t know that believers were able to recognize each other in some mystical, magical manner. Yours is the first description of that phenomenon that I’ve ever heard. Can you distinguish the good ones from the ones for whom it’s all about overt religiosity using the same aura?

    I’ll be the first to admit that I don’t understand how the Mike Huckabees of this world think. I also don’t understand how most Republicans think. Why would they oppose expanding health insurance for uninsured children? Why do they seem to put tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans ahead of almost every other priority. And why do they do these things in the name of their Christian faith? It surpasseth all understanding, if you ask me.

  • God save America, we do not need another candidate who wears religion on his sleeves and has poor judgment on every other issue.

  • Comments are closed.